1. Plant Biology

Dormancy-specific imprinting underlies maternal inheritance of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana

  1. Urszula Piskurewicz
  2. Mayumi Iwasaki
  3. Daichi Susaki
  4. Christian Megies
  5. Tetsu Kinoshita
  6. Luis Lopez-Molina  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Geneva, Switzerland
  2. Yokohama City University, Japan
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Urszula Piskurewicz
  2. Mayumi Iwasaki
  3. Daichi Susaki
  4. Christian Megies
  5. Tetsu Kinoshita
  6. Luis Lopez-Molina
(2016)
Dormancy-specific imprinting underlies maternal inheritance of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana
eLife 5:e19573.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Mature seed dormancy is a vital plant trait that prevents germination out of season. In Arabidopsis, the trait can be maternally regulated but the underlying mechanisms sustaining this regulation, its general occurrence and its biological significance among accessions are poorly understood. Upon seed imbibition, the endosperm is essential to repress the germination of dormant seeds. Investigation of genomic imprinting in the mature seed endosperm led us to identify a novel set of imprinted genes that are expressed upon seed imbibition. Remarkably, programs of imprinted gene expression are adapted according to the dormancy status of the seed. We provide direct evidence that imprinted genes play a role in regulating germination processes and that preferential maternal allelic expression can implement maternal inheritance of seed dormancy levels.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.001

Introduction

Mature seeds are the endpoint of embryogenesis and highly resistant structures. In angiosperms, seed development is initiated after a double-fertilization event, which produces the endosperm and the zygote. Arabidopsis mature seeds consist of a desiccated and highly resistant embryo surrounded by a single cell layer of endosperm and an external layer, the testa, consisting of dead integumentary maternal tissues. The endosperm nourishes the developing embryo as both tissues develop. The endosperm is triploid, bearing two maternal genomes and one paternal genome, whereas the zygote is diploid, bearing one maternal and one paternal genome.

Seed germination is a developmental transition that transforms the embryo into a fragile seedling. Unsurprisingly, this process is tightly controlled (Nonogaki, 2014; Yan et al., 2014). Primary seed dormancy, hereafter referred to as ‘dormancy’, is a property of freshly produced seeds whereby seed germination does not occur even under otherwise favorable germination conditions (Chahtane et al., 2016). Dormancy is a vital trait that prevents germination out of season while maintaining the embryo in a protected state within the dry seed. As they age, dry seeds lose dormancy, a process known as dry after-ripening, i.e. they acquire the capacity to germinate under favorable germination conditions. The time period of dry after-ripening required before the seed acquires the capacity to germinate can be used to define the dormancy levels stored in seeds (Chahtane et al., 2016). Unsurprisingly, the trait of dormancy varies markedly among plant species, including among Arabidopsis accessions, with important consequences in plant ecology, phenology and agriculture (Baskin and Baskin, 1998; Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger, 2006; Schmuths et al., 2006; Meng et al., 2008; Springthorpe and Penfield, 2015). Indeed, different Arabidopsis accessions produce seeds with low or high dormancy levels. Low dormancy accessions need only a short dry after-ripening time to acquire the capacity to germinate upon imbibition, unlike highly dormant accessions.

Final seed dormancy levels are strongly influenced by the climatic conditions experienced by the mother plant. In particular, cold temperatures lead to higher final dormancy levels in Arabidopsis mature seeds (Kendall et al., 2011). Interestingly, this response is maternally controlled, and involves the genes FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) (Chiang et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2014).

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a growth-repressive hormone that is essential to repress the germination of dormant seeds (Debeaujon and Koornneef, 2000; Ali-Rachedi et al., 2004). Furthermore, upon imbibition, ABA stimulates the expression of LATE EMBRYONIC ABUNDANT (LEA) genes, whose products promote osmotolerance, and inhibits embryonic lipid catabolism (Lopez-Molina and Chua, 2000; Lopez-Molina et al., 2002; Penfield et al., 2006; Dekkers et al., 2015).

In Arabidopsis, the endosperm is essential to repress the germination of dormant seeds. Indeed, removing the testa and endosperm upon dormant seed imbibition triggers growth and greening of the embryo (Bethke et al., 2007; Lee and Lopez-Molina, 2013). Furthermore, removing the testa while leaving the endosperm layer surrounding the embryo does not trigger embryonic growth (Bethke et al., 2007). A ‘seed coat bedding assay’, monitoring the growth of dissected embryos cultured on a layer of dissected endosperms with the testa still attached, showed that the endosperm of dormant seeds is able to block embryonic growth by continuously synthesizing and releasing ABA towards the embryo (Lee et al., 2010). In fully after-ripened seeds, the endosperm ceases to release sufficient ABA upon imbibition, thus allowing germination to take place (Lee et al., 2010).

In summary, dormancy is a multi-faceted process in which, upon seed imbibition, (1) embryonic growth is repressed, (2) utilization of at least part of the seed’s food reserves is repressed and (3) osmotolerance gene expression programs are stimulated.

Imprinted gene expression, also called genomic imprinting, is the preferential expression of a given parental allele over the other. Such parent-of-origin gene expression is observed in both mammals and flowering plants, which share the habit of nourishing the embryo through a sexually derived tissue (Pires and Grossniklaus, 2014). In Arabidopsis, genomic imprinting was found and studied in the endosperm during seed development (Gehring, 2013). Given the endosperm’s nourishing role, it is often regarded as a plant equivalent of the mammalian placenta. The kinship or ‘parental conflict’ theory is often proposed to account for the evolutionary origin of imprinting (Haig and Westoby, 1989). Nevertheless, the evolutionary forces that led to imprinting remain obscure (Rodrigues and Zilberman, 2015).

Dormancy levels can be maternally regulated (Chiang et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2014). However, the general nature and extent of the maternal control of seed dormancy remain poorly characterized. The occurrence and biological role of endospermic imprinting in Arabidopsis mature seeds has not been investigated previously. Given the central role played by the mature endosperm in preventing the germination of dormant seeds, we investigated whether genomic imprinting could be implicated in maternal inheritance of primary seed dormancy. Here, we provide direct evidence that the maternal inheritance of seed dormancy does indeed involve dormancy-specific genomic imprinting programs that take place in the mature endosperm.

Results

Maternal inheritance of seed dormancy levels

When cultivated under standard laboratory conditions, Arabidopsis accessions Cape Verde Islands-0 (Cvi) and C24 (C24) produce seeds with high and low dormancy levels, respectively. Cvi seeds require a longer dry after-ripening time than C24 seeds to acquire the capacity to germinate. To assess whether seed dormancy levels are determined by parental inheritance in these accessions, we measured the dormancy levels of F1 hybrid seeds generated after reciprocally crossing Cvi and C24 plants. F1 hybrid seeds produced by C24 mother plants (with a Cvi pollen donor) are referred to as C24xCvi F1 seeds and those from Cvi mother plants (with a C24 pollen donor) as CvixC24 F1 seeds (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

Following a short after-ripening period (five days), C24, Cvi, and F1 seeds were unable to germinate 72 hr after seed imbibition (Figure 1A). As expected, a long dry after-ripening period (6 months) led to full germination of all seed groups (Figure 1A). An intermediate after-ripening time (25 days) led to full germination of C24 seeds but not of Cvi seeds, consistent with their different natural seed dormancy levels (Figure 1A). Interestingly, C24xCvi F1 seeds almost fully germinated, unlike CvixC24 F1 seeds, indicating that C24xCvi F1 seeds are less dormant than CvixC24 F1 seeds (Figure 1A). In all cases where seeds were dormant, removal of the testa and endosperm triggered embryonic growth, consistent with previous results (Figure 1A) (Bethke et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2010).

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Maternal inheritance of seed dormancy.

(A) Histograms depicting percent germination of C24, Cvi, C24xCvi F1 and CvixC24 F1 seed populations after-ripened for short (five days), intermediate (25 days) or long (six months) time periods. Germination was scored after 72 hr of seed imbibition (4 replicates, n = 150–200, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, Student’s t test). Pictures show intermediately after-ripened C24, Cvi, C24xCvi F1 and CvixC24 F1 seeds 72 hr after imbibition (upper panel) and the respective embryos (lower panel) following testa and endosperm removal 4 hr after seed imbibition. (B) Same as (A) using C24tet, Cvitet, C24xCvitet F1 and CvixC24tet F1 seeds. (C) Same as (A) with Col, Cvi, ColxCvi F1 and CvixCol F1 seeds that were not after-ripened (No aft.-rip) or after-ripened for short (10 days), intermediate (20 days) and long (six months) time periods.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.002

Similar observations were made with CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds generated after reciprocally crossing Cvi plants with the low dormancy accession Columbia-0 (Col) (Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 3).

At least for the particular ecotypes studied here, these observations indicate that hybrid F1 seeds tend to inherit dormancy levels more akin to their maternal genotype, which necessitates the endosperm’s germination repressive activity. Maternal inheritance of dormancy levels could be due to several factors including: (1) a purely maternal effect whereby the Cvi maternal plant tissues impose higher dormancy to the seed progeny; (2) an endospermic gene-imprinting effect; (3) a gene expression dosage effect resulting from the endosperm’s parental genome imbalance, which favors the maternal genome (2 maternal vs. 1 paternal genome, Figure 1—figure supplement 1). In the last case, duplication of maternal dormancy genes would impose a pattern in their expression more akin to the maternal genotype. These three possibilities are not mutually exclusive and could therefore all be valid.

To assess the contribution of endospermic gene dosage effects, we used tetraploid Cvi-0 (Cvitet) and C24 (C24tet) plants as pollen donors in crosses with normal diploid C24 and Cvi female accessions, respectively. These crosses produce hybrid C24xCvitet and CvixC24tet F1 seeds containing a 2:2 Cvi to C24 genome ratio in endosperm cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Unsurprisingly, Cvitet seeds were more dormant than C24tet seeds (Figure 1B). Furthermore, CvixC24tet F1 seeds were more dormant than C24xCvitet F1 seeds (Figure 1B). As expected, presence of the endosperm was required to repress seed germination (Figure 1B). These data therefore indicate that the endosperm’s natural maternal genome imbalance does not readily account for the observed inheritance in F1 seeds of dormancy levels akin to those of their maternal genotype (Figure 1A). This prompted us to explore whether F1 seed dormancy is associated with genomic imprinting in the endosperm of F1 seeds.

The mature testa contains insignificant amounts of mRNA relative to the endosperm

Partial dissection of the endosperm, i.e. the isolation of the endosperm with the testa still attached to it, is a rapid and easy procedure. By contrast, full dissection of the endosperm, i.e. the isolation of the endosperm without the surrounding testa, is a challenging task because it requires peeling the testa, a delicate and lengthy procedure that more often than not wounds the endosperm. The testa originates from ovular integuments that undergo progressive degeneration and collapse during seed development. Electron microscopy studies reveal that the mature testa does not contain obvious traces of organelles, cytoplasm or nuclei (Yadav et al., 2014). Accordingly, researchers assume that the testa is not a significant source of maternal RNA contamination and thus that the partially dissected endosperm can be used as a source of RNA for endosperm transcriptomic studies (Dekkers et al., 2013; Lee and Lopez-Molina, 2013).

We sought to verify that the testa is not a significant source of maternal mRNA contamination. Using WT seed material, total RNA was isolated from 40 partially dissected endosperms, 40 testas and 40 fully dissected endosperms in two independent experiments. To ensure maximal RNA recovery, a nucleic acid carrier was used for final RNA precipitation (Table 1, Materials and methods). The concentration levels of RNA extracted from testas were below detection levels, unlike those from partially and fully dissected endosperm (Table 1). 200 ng of RNA was used to construct partially and fully dissected endosperm cDNA libraries. Although testa RNA could not be detected in our RNA testa sample, we sought to construct testa cDNA libraries using avolume of RNA testa sample equal to that of the largest one used for the construction of the partially and fully dissected endosperm cDNA libraries (Table 1, Materials and methods). Unsurprisingly, the resulting testa libraries contained concentrations of cDNA that were smaller than 25 fold than those in the partially and fully dissected endosperm (Table 1). All cDNA libraries were subject to high-throughput sequencing and sequencing reads were mapped to the Arabidopsis genome. The total number of reads obtained with the testa sample was only about 1% of the read numbers obtained for the partially and fully dissected endosperm (Table 1). By contrast, the read numbers of the partially and fully dissected endosperm samples were similar (Table 1). We compared the gene expression profiles between partially and fully dissected endosperm samples. Only 14 genes among 33,557 annotated genes were differentially expressed between the partially and fully dissected endosperm samples (p < 0.05) (Figure 2—source data 1) (Material and methods). Among these 14 genes, seven are osmotic stress-induced genes whose expression was higher in the fully dissected endosperm relative to the partially dissected endosperm (Figure 2—source data 2) (Kilian et al., 2007; Winter et al., 2007). The differential expression of these genes could be due to the lengthy testa peeling procedure, prior to endosperm isolation, which likely deprives the endosperm tissue of moisture. Similarly, among the 14 genes, two genes (AT4G35100 and AT1G62510) were reported to be downregulated in response to osmotic stress and had higher expression in the partially dissected endosperm relative to the fully dissected endosperm (Figure 2—source data 1) (Kilian et al., 2007; Winter et al., 2007). Only AT1G62510, predicted to encode a seed-storage 2S albumin-like protein, had a substantial number of reads in the testa sample (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). This gene is expressed during seed maturation, suggesting that a maternal contamination could also account for its higher expression in the partially dissected endosperm relative to that in the fully dissected endosperm (Winter et al., 2007).

Table 1

RNA concentrations and read number after RNA-seq using RNA isolated from partially dissected endosperm (with testa still attached to the endosperm), fully dissected endosperm, and testa.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.006
SampleRNA concentration ng/µl in 50 µl volumeTotal amount of RNA (ng)Volume of RNA sample used for library preparation (µl)cDNA library (ng/µl)Volume of library used for sequencingTotal mapped sequencing reads
Partially dissected endosperm_A52504037.41.1639,097,682
Partially dissected endosperm_B6.432031.2515.22.531,930,392
Fully dissected endosperm_A735028.5716.42.539,862,912
Fully dissected endosperm_B4.422045.4515.82.535,254,459
Testa_A0045.450.372.5264,057
Testa_B0045.450.592.5595,710

Altogether, these results confirm the notion that low amounts of mRNA are present in the testa relative to the endosperm and that the partially dissected endosperm of mature seeds can be used as a source of endospermic mRNA without a major concern of maternal mRNA contamination (see also below). Furthermore, the contamination of partially dissected endosperm samples with embryonic tissue is not a major concern (Lee et al., 2012).

Dormancy-specific genomic imprinting in the endosperm

Hereafter, for simplification purposes and unless otherwise specified, we use the term ‘endosperm’ for ‘partially dissected endosperm’.

ColxCvi and CvixCol F1 seeds were harvested the same day and after-ripened for 10 days (dormant seeds) or for two months (non-dormant seeds). Total RNA samples were extracted from the endosperms (n = 200) of dormant and non-dormant CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds 36 hr after seed imbibition (Figure 2A). At this time, CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds have not yet germinated, even though ColxCvi F1 seeds are less dormant that CvixCol F1 seeds (Figure 1C). Thus, 36 hr after imbibition is a time when the endosperm of ColxCvi and CvixCol F1 seeds ought to express the genetic dormancy programs controlling seed germination that are akin to their maternal genotype. The resulting cDNA libraries were subject to high-throughput sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used to quantify the expression arising from Col and Cvi gene alleles (Materials and methods). The large majority of genes had a 2:1 ratio of maternal to paternal allele expression (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Hundreds of genes had a high expression bias when present as either Cvi or Col alleles, consistent with the results of previous studies analyzing endosperm and embryo gene expression during early embryogenesis (Figure 2—figure supplement 2) (Nodine and Bartel, 2012; Pignatta et al., 2014).

Figure 2 with 6 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Dynamic changes in imprinted gene expression.

(A) Seed treatment procedure used to isolate endosperm from seeds. CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds were after-ripened for short (10 days) or long (two months) time periods. RNA that was extracted from endosperm dissected 36 hr after imbibition was processed for RNA-seq and RT-PCR for Sanger sequencing analysis. (B) Overlap among maternally expressed imprinted genes (MEGs) and paternally expressed imprinted genes (PEGs) in the endosperm of dormant and non-dormant seeds and of developing seeds according to Pignatta et al. (2014). (C) Sanger sequencing chromatograms at SNPs of selected genes. RNA from shortly after-ripened (Dormant) and fully after-ripened (Non-Dormant) CvixCol and ColxCvi endosperms were analyzed. Three Dormant-specific MEGs and two Non-dormant-specific MEGs and one MEG found in all data sets (Dormant, Non-dormant, and Early embryogenesis) are shown. Nucleotides at SNP sites are highlighted in red. (D) K-means clusters of dormant-specific MEGs expression levels. RNA samples extracted from endosperms of shortly after-ripened Col, ColxCvi, CvixCol, and Cvi seeds were analyzed. For each gene, expression levels relative to those found in ColxCvi endosperms are shown. (E) Gene expression profiles in response to cold treatment of the mother plants during seed development. Left panel: Mother plants exposed to cold temperature produce highly dormant seeds. Right panel: The pie charts group MEGs according to how their expression responds upon seed imbibition after the mother plant was exposed to cold temperatures. 'Down' means that expression was downregulated more than two fold (p < 0.05), 'Up' means that expression was upregulated more than two fold (p < 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.007
Figure 2—source data 1

Genes that are differentially expressed between the endosperm+testa and endosperm samples.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.008
Figure 2—source data 2

mRNA expression of MEGs in the testa+endosperm and endosperm samples.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.009
Figure 2—source data 3

Imprinted genes in the endosperm of mature seed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.010
Figure 2—source data 4

mRNA expression of dormancy-specific MEGs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.011
Figure 2—source data 5

Expression of MEGs in response to cold treatment during seed development.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.012
Figure 2—source data 6

RNA-seq data for all genes for imprinting in the endosperm of mature seed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.013
Figure 2—source data 7

Resequencing of amplicons containing SNPs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.014

In the endosperm from dormant CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds, we identified 71 maternally expressed genes (MEGs) and 5 paternally expressed genes (PEGs) (Figure 2B, Figure 2—source data 3). In the endosperm from non-dormant CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds, we identified 50 MEGs and 8 PEGs (Figure 2B, Figure 2—source data 3). Only 14 MEGs and 2 PEGs were present in both dormant and non-dormant data sets (Figure 2B). To further address potential maternal testa RNA contamination, we counted the read numbers of the identified MEGs in the testa cDNA library discussed above (Table 1). Among the 107 MEGs, only two (AT4G00220 and AT4G04955) had at least one read (Table 2). However, their total read number was less than 1-2% of that found in the partially or fully dissected endosperm cDNA libraries (Table 2). Furthermore, as indicated above, none of the MEGs had expression levels that were significantly different between partially and fully dissected endosperm samples (Figure 2—source data 2). These data further strengthen the notion that maternal mRNA contamination from the testa is unlikely.

Table 2

Read numbers of the identified MEGs in testa, partially dissected endosperm (endosperm + testa), and fully dissected endosperm samples.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.021
TestaPartially dissected endospermFully dissected endosperm
AT4G002209603597
AT4G0495532,1541,859

To validate the occurrence of imprinting, we performed RT-PCR on 17 MEGs and 2 PEGs in independent CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 endosperm material. Amplicons were sequenced by Sanger and MiSeq sequencing (see Materials and methods). The results confirmed the RNA-seq analysis (Figure 2—figure supplement 3, Figure 2—source data 2). In the particular case of FWA, a previous report identified FWA genomic sequences as sufficient to confer maternal allele expression during embryogenesis in transgenic experiments (Kinoshita et al., 2004). The pFWA::dFWA-GFP line was reciprocally crossed with Col and a pDD65::mtKaede transgenic line in which GFP is localized in mitochondria (Materials and methods) (Arimura et al. 2004). Analysis of the F1 transgenic seed material confirmed the maternal expression of the pFWA::dFWA-GFP transgene in mature endosperm (Figure 2—figure supplement 4).

We compared the identified endospermic MEGs and PEGs with those reported during early embryogenesis using the same F1 seed material (Pignatta et al., 2014). Only 6 MEGs and 3 PEGs found here were previously reported, including the MEG FWA (Figure 2B) (Pignatta et al., 2014).

These results strongly suggest the occurrence of specific programs of endospermic genomic imprinting that take place upon seed imbibition. Furthermore, these imprinted gene expression programs appear to change according to seed dormancy levels. Given that dormancy is maternally inherited and given the small number of identified PEGs, we focused on studying dormancy-specific MEGs. Indeed, among the 57 dormancy-specific MEGs, seven were shown to regulate dormancy or germination, whereas another nine could potentially perform the same role based on current knowledge (Supplementary file 1 and see below). By contrast, only three genes that directly (two genes) or indirectly (one gene) regulate germination were among the 36 non-dormant-specific MEGs (Supplementary file 1).

Dormancy-specific MEG expression can correlate with seed dormancy levels

We evaluated whether dormancy-specific MEG expression correlates with dormancy levels. Clustering analysis of gene expression levels revealed that among the 57 identified dormancy-specific MEGs, about half (26 out of 57) had expression levels that were negatively correlated with seed dormancy levels: Cvi seeds being the most dormant, followed by CvixCol F1, ColxCvi F1 and finally Col seeds, which are the least dormant (cluster 1 in Figure 2D, Figure 2—source data 4). Strikingly, the majority of MEGs (12 out of 16) that are involved or potentially involved in regulating seed germination belonged to cluster 1 (Supplementary file 1). Other gene expression clusters did not show any apparent correlation between mRNA and seed dormancy levels (cluster 2 and 3, Figure 2D). Furthermore, among all Arabidopsis genes only a minority (about 7%) had expression levels that negatively correlated with seed dormancy levels (Figure 2—figure supplement 5). These data therefore indicate that genes belonging to the dormancy-specific MEG group tend to have expression levels that correlate negatively with seed dormancy levels.

Cultivating Arabidopsis plants under low temperatures (10°C) increases final seed dormancy levels (Figure 2E). Using seed nicking experiments, a previous report indicated that the presence of an intact endosperm is necessary to repress the germination of highly dormant seeds produced under low temperatures (Kendall et al., 2011). Indeed, we observed that removal of the endosperm and testa, but not removal of the testa alone, triggered embryonic growth and greening (Figure 2—figure supplement 6). This demonstrates that the endosperm is also necessary to repress the germination of highly dormant seeds that developed under low temperatures.

Strikingly, among the 57 dormant-specific MEGs, about half (33) had their expression lowered when seeds developed under cold temperatures (Figure 2E, Figure 2—source data 5). By contrast, among the 36 MEGs identified in non-dormant seeds, only one had its expression lowered while the expression of the vast majority of genes was unchanged. Furthermore, the majority (23 out of 33) of the genes that were downregulated in response to cold belonged to the cluster 1 of genes whose expression negatively correlates with dormancy levels (Figure 2E, Figure 2—source data 5).

In summary, at least a third of dormancy-specific MEGs are involved or potentially involved in regulating seed germination. Moreover, about half of dormancy-specific MEGs have their expression correlated negatively with seed dormancy levels. Among the latter, most have their expression downregulated by cold during seed development, which increases mature seed dormancy levels.

We focused our attention on two MEGs, CYSTEINE PROTEASE1 (CP1) and ALLANTOINASE (ALN). First, we investigated whether these genes play a role in regulating seed germination processes, which has not been investigated previously. Second, we asked whether their maternal allele expression in dormant seeds plays a role in implementing maternal inheritance in seed dormancy.

CP1 encodes a predicted ortholog of radish DRCP26, which is involved in protein storage decay during the early phase of seed germination (Tsuji et al., 2013). We found that CP1 expression is stringently regulated upon seed imbibition according to seed dormancy levels and cold temperatures during seed development (Figure 3 and Figure 2—source data 5). Furthermore, since food utilization and the imprinting phenomenon were proposed to be closely connected, we reasoned that CP1 could be a candidate MEG governing seed food store utilization according to maternally inherited dormancy levels.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Low and preferential maternal CP1 allele expression is prolonged in dormant seeds but not in non-dormant seeds.

CvixCol F1 and ColxCvi F1 seeds were either not after-ripened (No aft.-rip.) or after-ripened for short (10 days), intermediate (20 days), and long (two months) time periods. Percent germination 2 and 5 days after seed imbibition is shown. RNA extracted from endosperm 36 hr after seed imbibition, i.e. prior to germination, was used for qPCR and RT-PCR for Sanger sequencing analysis. CP1 expression levels relative to those found in the endosperm from CvixCol F1 seeds that had been after-ripened for an indicated time period are shown. CP1 expression levels were normalized to those of PP2A. ND: no detection.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.022

Low and preferential maternal CP1 allele expression is prolonged in dormant seeds

We studied in more detail the dynamics of CP1 expression according to seed dormancy levels in CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds.

In absence of dry after-ripening, CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds were unable to germinate up to five days after seed imbibition. CP1 mRNA could not be detected 36 hr after seed imbibition (Figure 3).

After a short dry after-ripening period of 10 days, CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds did not germinate two days after imbibition but 60% of ColxCvi F1 seeds germinated five days thereafter while CvixCol F1 seeds did not. CP1 mRNA expression could be detected 36 hr after imbibition in the endosperm of both CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds, and Sanger sequencing confirmed that it was preferentially maternal (Figure 3). Furthermore, CP1 maternal allele expression was higher in the endosperm of ColxCvi F1 seeds than in that of CvixCol F1 seeds (Figure 3).

We next considered an intermediate after-ripening time of 20 days, after which CvixCol F1 seeds were still unable to germinate 2 and 5 days after imbibition, unlike ColxCvi F1 seeds whose populations germinated at about 40% and 100%, respectively (Figure 3). In CvixCol F1 seeds, CP1 expression was higher than that in shortly after-ripened CvixCol F1 seeds (Figure 3). However, this expression remained preferentially maternal and lower than that in ColxCvi F1 seeds (Figure 3). Furthermore, CP1 expression was no longer preferentially maternal in ColxCvi F1 seeds.

Finally, after a long after-ripening period of two months, CP1 expression was similarly high and biallelic in both CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds (Figure 3).

These results confirm that CP1 preferential maternal allele expression is only found in dormant seeds (Figure 2C). Furthermore, the expression levels of maternal CP1 alleles correlate negatively with dormancy levels. As seeds lose dormancy, CP1 preferential maternal allele expression is lost and CP1 expression increases. Similar observations were made with CvixC24 and C24xCvi F1 seeds (Figure 3—figure supplement 1).

Relationship between seed dormancy levels and cruciferin proteins decay upon seed imbibition

CP1 is predicted to regulate protein storage decay in Arabidopsis seeds (Tsuji et al., 2013). Cruciferins (CRUs) are highly abundant storage proteins present in endosperm and embryos that can be detected by coomassie dye staining in SDS-PAGE gels (Barthole et al., 2014).

We first studied how seed dormancy levels affect protein storage decay using antibodies raised against CRUs and coomassie dye staining (Figure 4—figure supplement 1) (Jolivet et al., 2011; Barthole et al., 2014). In the absence of dry after-ripening, WT CRU levels in the endosperm remained constant over time upon seed imbibition, consistent with the dormant state of the seeds (Figure 4A and Figure 4—figure supplement 2). By contrast, in fully after-ripened seeds, endospermic CRUs levels rapidly decayed prior to germination (Figure 4A and Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Following a short after-ripening period that does not fully eliminate seed dormancy, endospermic decay of CRU proteins and germination took place upon imbibition, but both processes were delayed relative to fully after-ripened seeds (Figure 4A and Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Altogether, these results show that endospermic abundance of CRU proteins upon imbibition reflects seed dormancy levels.

Figure 4 with 8 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
CP1 promotes the decay of CRU proteins.

CRU protein decay is controlled through CP1 maternal gametophytic alleles. (A) Endosperms from non-after-ripened (No aft.-rip.) WT and cp1 seeds or from WT and cp1 seeds after-ripened for short (three days) or long (two months) time periods were dissected at the indicated times after seed imbibition. Proteins isolated from the same number of WT (Col) or cp1 endosperms were separated on SDS PAGE gels and probed with 12S antibody serum. The specificity of the antibody was confirmed using protein extracts isolated from the endosperm and embryo of the cruabc mutant (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). For a given after-ripening time, WT and cp1 endosperm proteins were separated on the same SDS PAGE gel. An aspecific band is used as a loading control. Percent germination at each time-point after seed imbibition is indicated. Arrows indicate highly abundant cruciferin (CRU) proteins. (B) WTxcp1 F1 and cp1xWT F1 seeds (obtained by reciprocally crossing WT (Col) and cp1 plants) were subject to dry after-ripening treatments as in (A). For each after-ripening treatment, endosperms and embryos were dissected 36 hr after seed imbibition. Proteins isolated from the same number of endosperms or embryos were processed as in (A). Seeds obtained after crossing cp1/+ heterozygous mother plants with Col WT (+/+) pollen were after-ripened for a short time period (three days). Endosperms were dissected 36 hr after imbibition, whereas embryos were further cultured for later genotyping in order to distinguish endosperms according to their (i) +/+/+ or (ii) cp1/cp1/+ genotype. Endosperms with the same genotype were pooled. Proteins extracted from the two endosperm pools were processed as in (A).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.024

CP1 promotes CRU protein decay upon seed imbibition

We next used a genetic approach to ask whether CP1 is necessary to regulate the decay of CRU proteins using cp1-1, cp1-2 and cp1-3 mutant seeds bearing a T-DNA insertion in CP1’s second exon, second intron and promoter, respectively (Materials and methods). In all of these lines, the decay of CRU proteins was delayed relative to WT in non-dormant seeds (Figure 4 and Figure 4—figure supplement 3). We chose the cp1-1 mutant line (hereafter referred to as cp1) for detailed characterization of CRU protein decay in dormant vs non-dormant seeds.

The abundance of CRUs was similar in WT and cp1 mutant dry seeds. In absence of WT and cp1 seed after-ripening, CRUs levels in the endosperm remained constant over time after imbibition (Figure 4A and Figure 4—figure supplement 2). By contrast, in fully after-ripened seeds, WT endosperm CRU levels rapidly decayed upon imbibition whereas in cp1 mutants, the decay of CRUs levels was delayed by at least 12 hr (Figure 4A and Figure 4—figure supplement 2). This delay was not due to slower cp1 mutant germination as both testa rupture and endosperm rupture events proceeded at the same pace in WT and cp1 seeds, indicating that CP1 is not required to regulate germination sensu stricto (Weitbrecht et al., 2011) (Figure 4—figure supplement 4). Similarly, in shortly after-ripened seeds, CRU protein decay was delayed in cp1 mutant seeds relative to WT seeds even though cp1 and WT seed germination proceeded at the same pace (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 2 and Figure 4—figure supplement 4). During the early stages of germination examined above, no differences in the accumulation of CRUs proteins could be detected between WT and cp1 embryos (Figure 4—figure supplement 5).

Taken together, these data show that CP1 is necessary to promote the decay of endosperm CRU proteins prior to the germination of shortly and fully after-ripened seeds.

The decay of CRU proteins is maternally controlled through CP1

We next explored whether CRU protein decay is maternally controlled through CP1 by analyzing CRUs accumulation in hybrid seeds arising from reciprocal crosses between WT and cp1 plants (Figure 4—figure supplement 6).

Only conditions in which CP1 expression is preferentially maternal upon seed imbibition, as in shortly after-ripened seeds, are expected to be associated with detectable differences in the abundance of CRU proteins in the endosperm of WTxcp1 and cp1xWT F1 seeds upon seed imbibition (Figure 4—figure supplement 6). On the other hand, conditions in which CP1 expression is undetectable, such as the absence of dry after-ripening, or very high and biallelic, as in fully after-ripened seeds, should not be associated with marked differences in CRU abundance between WTxcp1 and cp1xWT F1 endosperm upon seed imbibition (Figure 4—figure supplement 6). Consistent with this prediction, in the absence of dry after-ripening or in fully after-ripened seeds, CRU protein levels were similar between WTxcp1 and cp1xWT F1 endosperm 36 hr after seed imbibition (Figure 4B and Figure 4—figure supplement 2B). By contrast, in shortly after-ripened WTxcp1 and cp1xWT F1 seeds, CRU protein levels were higher in the cp1xWT F1 endosperm than in the WTxcp1 F1 endosperm 36 hr after imbibition (Figure 4B and Figure 4—figure supplement 2B). Similar observations were made with WTxcp1-3 and cp1-3xWT F1 seeds (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B).

Therefore, the cp1 mutant maternal allele imposes a delay in CRU decay only in intermediately dormant seeds in which CP1 preferential maternal allele expression could be detected in F1 seeds (Figure 3).

Decay in CRU proteins is controlled through CP1 maternal gametophytic alleles

Delayed CRU decay in cp1xWT F1 endosperm could reflect the cp1 mutant genotype of the mother plant (a sporophytic maternal effect). To address this possibility, we used a cp1/CP1 heterozygous mother plant in a cross with a WT pollen donor (Figure 4—figure supplement 7). This cross generates seeds whose endosperm is CP1/CP1/CP1 or cp1/cp1/CP1, in which the cp1 alleles originate from a cp1 mutant female gametophyte (Figure 4—figure supplement 7). On the other hand, given that the sporophytic mother is cp1/CP1 heterozygous, the maternal tissues bearing the seeds, including the seed testa, are genetically identical (Figure 4—figure supplement 7). Figure 4B and Figure 4—figure supplement 2B show that among seeds produced in the same cp1/CP1 silique, the decay of CRUs was delayed in cp1/cp1/CP1 endosperms relative to CP1/CP1/CP1 endosperms 36 hr after seed imbibition.

These results therefore show that the maternally imposed delay in the decay of CRU proteins results, at least in part, from cp1 mutant alleles present in the maternal gamete cells rather than in maternal sporophyte cells.

ALN negatively regulates dormancy through maternal sporophytic and gametophytic alleles

The ALN gene encodes allantoin amidohydrolase (allantoinase). Allantoinase participates in the plant purine catabolism pathway by converting allantoin to allantoate, which is subsequently used for nitrogen remobilization. Besides its housekeeping function, there is increasing evidence that the purine degradation pathway participates in the plant’s responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. In this context, Watanabe et al. showed that increased allantoin levels in response to drought stress protects the plant by enhancing ABA synthesis (Watanabe et al., 2014). Indeed, Watanabe et al. showed that aln seedlings accumulate high ABA levels (Watanabe et al., 2014). Given the importance of ABA in promoting seed dormancy, these results suggest that ALN could regulate seed dormancy. Indeed, we found that aln mutant seeds displayed high dormancy relative to WT seeds (Figure 5A). Thus, ALN is a negative regulator of seed dormancy. As expected, implementation of seed dormancy in aln mutants required the presence of the endosperm (Figure 5A).

Figure 5
Download asset Open asset
ALN affects seed dormancy level through maternal alleles.

(A) WT and aln mutant seeds were after-ripened for 10 days. Pictures show seeds (upper panel) and embryos (lower panel) 72 hr after imbibition. Embryos were dissected 4 hr after imbibition. (B) WT, aln, WTx aln F1, aln x WT F1 and aln/ALN x WT F1 seeds were after-ripened for 3 days, 14 days, and 30 days (only for WT and aln seeds). Germination was scored 72 hr after seed imbibition (4 replicates, n = 50, **p<0.01, Student’s t test). After germination, aln/ALN x WT individuals were genotyped to distinguish endosperms bearing aln/aln/ALN and ALN/ALN/ALN alleles. (C) Sanger sequencing chromatograms covering SNPs present in ALN. CvixCol and ColxCvi F1 seeds were dry after-ripened for 3 days, 14 days, and 30 days. RNA extracted from endosperm dissected 36 hr after imbibition was processed for RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. Nucleotides at SNP sites are highlighted with red.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.033

As above, we next explored whether seed dormancy is maternally regulated by ALN. We generated alnxWT and WTxaln F1 seeds, developed in aln and WT mother plants, respectively. After a short after-ripening period of three days, the germination percentage of alnxWT F1 seeds was low and comparable to that of aln mutants (Figure 5B). By contrast, the germination percentage of WTxaln F1 seeds was markedly higher and similar to that of WT seeds (Figure 5B). The germination differences between alnxWT and WTxaln F1 seeds were no longer observed when the after-ripening time was prolonged to 14 days whereas aln mutant seed germination remained significantly lower than that of WT (Figure 5B). These results indicated the occurrence of maternal inheritance in seed dormancy levels.

Consistent with our results with CP1, preferential maternal allele expression of ALN in ColxCvi F1 seeds was detected in seeds after-ripened for three days but no longer detected after 14 days of after-ripening (Figure 5C). This suggested that maternal inheritance of seed dormancy levels could result from imprinted ALN gene expression. However, unlike CP1, ALN is expressed not only upon seed imbibition but also during embryogenesis (Penfield et al., 2006; Winter et al., 2007; Bassel et al., 2008; Le et al., 2010). To assess the relative contribution of sporophytic and gametophytic maternal allele effects on seed dormancy levels, we pollinated aln/ALN heterozygous plants with WT pollen. Figure 5B shows the average germination percentage of seeds bearing ALN/ALN/ALN or aln/aln/ALN endosperm. Although the differences in germination percentage were not as pronounced as those found with alnxWT and WTxaln F1 seeds, seeds bearing aln/aln/ALN endosperm were significantly more dormant than those bearing ALN/ALN/ALN endosperm. These results therefore strongly indicate that ALN negatively regulates dormancy at least in part by maternal gametophytic alleles.

Discussion

Here we showed that hybrid seeds produced by Cvi and C24 reciprocal crosses or Cvi and Col reciprocal crosses tend to inherit dormancy levels more akin to those of the maternal ecotype (Figure 1). We also showed that the endosperm’s germination-repressive activity is essential to implement maternally imposed and cold-induced dormancy levels (Figure 2—figure supplement 6). These observations further emphasize the key role played by the mature endosperm in implementing dormancy in Arabidopsis.

We identified a developmentally dynamic genomic imprinting expression program in the endosperm of mature seeds. Indeed, different sets of MEGs and PEGs were identified according to the dormant state of the seed. Concerning the inheritance of maternal dormancy levels observed in hybrid seeds, a substantial number of identified MEGs in dormant seeds are directly or plausibly involved in controlling seed germination and, furthermore, their expression correlates with seed dormancy levels (Figure 2D and Figure 2—source data 3).

More specifically, in shortly after-ripened seeds, CP1 expression is low relative to fully after-ripened seeds and preferentially maternal. However, CP1 expression is higher in ColxCvi seeds relative to that in CvixCol seeds, reflecting the lower dormancy of ColxCvi seeds, i.e. reflecting the lower dormancy of the maternal Col ecotype (Figure 3 and Figure 6B). As dry seed after-ripening time proceeds, seeds progressively lose the capacity to sustain low CP1 maternal allele expression. This marks the beginning of acquisition of the capacity of seeds to trigger the decay of CRU protein stores. This occurs faster in ColxCvi seeds than in CvixCol seeds (Figure 6B). How loss of preferential maternal allele expression is regulated remains unknown.

Figure 6
Download asset Open asset
A model for maternal dormancy inheritance in seed hybrids.

(A) General mechanism accounting for maternal inheritance of seed dormancy in hybrid seeds. Upon imbibition, a group of genes that regulate seed germination processes are preferentially maternally expressed during the seed-dormant period. As a result, dormancy levels in hybrid seeds reflect the maternal genotype. (B) The case of CP1. In the absence of after-ripening (No aft.-rip), preferential maternal allele expression is very low. As seeds begin to after-ripen (Short), preferential maternal allele expression rises according to the maternal genotype, i.e. there is higher maternal allelic expression in ColxCvi F1 relative to CvixCol F1 seeds (see also Figure 3). After an intermediate after-ripening period, low and maternal allelic CP1 expression is lost in ColxCvi F1 seeds but not in CvixCol F1 seeds. As a result, seed CRUs decay is initiated earlier in ColxCvi F1 seeds relative to CvixCol F1 seeds. Further after-ripening abolishes preferential maternal allelic expression in CvixCol F1 seeds upon imbibition, which leads to undelayed decay of CRU proteins and seed germination.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573.034

Furthermore, we identified ALN as a negative regulator of seed dormancy (Figure 5). ALN is a dormancy-specific MEG whose expression, like that of CP1, negatively correlates with dormancy levels. We provide direct evidence that it regulates dormancy, at least partially through maternal gametophytic alleles (Figure 5).

Together, these observations suggest a model in which maternal dormancy inheritance involves the preferential maternal allele expression of regulators of seed dormancy upon seed imbibition. Therefore, dormancy levels in hybrid seeds reflect the maternal genotype, reflected in the maternal expression levels or product activities of genes regulating dormancy (Figure 6).

The occurrence of genomic imprinting upon seed imbibition raises the question of which developmental stage, i.e. prior or after mature seed formation, is the one in which maternal allelic transcription takes place. It appears unlikely that this transcription takes place only during seed development, with resulting mRNAs being stored in mature seeds. Indeed, we found that CP1 maternal allelic mRNA accumulation increased over time after imbibition, indicating de novo and dormancy-specific maternal allele transcription (Figure 4—figure supplement 8). Furthermore, the MEGs and PEGs identified in non-dormant seeds probably involve maternal allelic transcription upon seed imbibition as they were not detected in dormant seeds. These observations support the notion of a dedicated parental-specific allele transcription program operating upon mature seed imbibition.

The biological significance of maternally inherited dormancy remains to be understood. Presumably, the mother plant adjusts the dormancy of its seed progeny to optimize future germination according to seasonal cues. Interestingly, the majority of dormancy-specific MEGs whose expression correlates with dormancy levels also have their expression further regulated by cold during seed development. This suggests that imprinted gene expression levels upon imbibition are further adapted to the environmental cues perceived by the mother plant or by the developing seed tissues or both.

The evolutionary driving force leading to imprinting in the context of seed dormancy is unclear. Although the following scenario might seem unlikely for Arabidopsis, which is mainly a self-fertilizing species, it might reflect an evolutionary trend present in related cross-pollinating species. Indeed, in the case of a seed fathered by a pollen grain coming from a distant plant, which could be either a different accession or have experienced different climatic conditions than the mother plant, the paternal allele expression may interfere with maternal control of seed dormancy. It would seem advantageous therefore to silence paternal genes that regulate germination to prevent such paternal interference. Consistent with this speculation, the number of PEGs identified in dormant seeds is markedly lower than that reported previously during early embryogenesis (Figure 2) (Pignatta et al., 2014).

In plants, genomic imprinting during early embryogenesis is mainly proposed to arise from a ‘parental conflict’ over food allocation to the offspring (Jiang and Köhler, 2012; Köhler et al., 2012; Gehring, 2013; Rodrigues and Zilberman, 2015). The occurrence of dormancy-specific genes would rather seem to reflect a ‘mutual interest’ between progenitors rather than a ‘conflict’ (Haig, 2014).

Material and methods

Plant material

Request a detailed protocol

The Arabidopsis thaliana cp1 and aln mutants were obtained from The European Arabidopsis Stock Centre (RRID:SCR_004576). Salk_067293 (cp1-3 allele) bears a T-DNA insertion in the promoter region of CP1. salk_146500 (cp1-1 allele) bears a T-DNA insertion in the second exon of CP1 and salk_020878 (cp1-2 allele) in the second intron of CP1. Salk_109258 (aln) bears a T-DNA insertion in the promoter region of ALN. Cvi tetraploid and C24 tetraploid seeds were kindly provided by Dr. Luca Comai and cruabc triple mutant was kindly provided by Dr. Leonie Bentsink and described by Withana-Gamage et al. (2013).

Plant growth conditions and germination assays

Request a detailed protocol

When comparing hybrid seed germination or gene expression, hybrid seed material was obtained after crossing parents on the same day. Dry siliques were obtained about three weeks after pollination. Seeds from dry siliques were harvested on the same day from plants grown side by side under identical environmental conditions (22–24°C, 100 μE/m2/s, 16 hr/8 hr day/night photoperiod, 70% relative humidity). Seeds were dry after-ripened at room temperature (22–24°C, 50–60% relative humidity) for indicated time periods. For each individual experiment, seeds were produced from plants grown under the exact same environmental conditions. Nevertheless, different seed batches may contain variations in dormancy levels because the amount of after-ripening time needed to break dormancy can vary. For the Col ecotype, variation is in the order of 1–5 days, whereas for the Cvi ecotype, variations can be up to several weeks.

For each genotype, germination assays were performed with seeds from at least four independent siliques (30–50 seeds in each silique). For germination tests, seeds were sterilized (1/3 bleach, 2/3 water, 0.05% Tween) and plated on a Murashige and Skoog medium containing 0.8% (w/v) Bacto-Agar (Applichem).

Plates were incubated at 21–23°C, 16 hr/8 hr day/night photoperiod, light intensity of 80 μE/m2/s, humidity of 70%. Between 100 and 200 seeds were examined with a Stemi 2000 (Zeiss) stereomicroscope and photographed with a high-resolution digital camera (Axiocam Zeiss) at different times after seed imbibition. Photographs were enlarged electronically for measurement of germination events (i.e. endosperm rupture events). Percent of germination of C24xCvi, CvixC24, C24xCvitet and CvixC24tet F1 seed populations was scored in three independent experiments giving similar results.

For dissected embryo growth analysis, seeds of each genotype were sterilized and plated under standard germination conditions. Four hours after seed imbibition, dissected embryos were cultivated for four days under standard germination conditions. Pictures were taken four days after embryos dissection.

Statistics

Errors bars in histograms correspond to SD values. We used Student's t-test (two-tailed assuming unequal variance) to compare average mean values in order to determine whether their differences were statistically significant (** p<0.01, ***p<0.001).

RNA extraction and RT-PCR/ RT-qPCR

Request a detailed protocol

Total RNA was extracted as described by Vicient and Delseny (1999). When extracting RNA from 40 partially dissected endosperm, 40 fully dissected endosperms and 40 dissected testas, the Pellet Paint Co-precipitant (Merck, Switzerland) was used for final RNA precipitation. Total RNAs were treated with RQ1 RNase-Free DNase (Promega, Switzerland) and reverse-transcribed using ImpromII reverse transcriptase (Promega) and oligo(dT)15 primer (Promega) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Quantitative RT–PCR was performed using the ABI 7900HT fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Switzerland) and Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). Relative transcript levels were calculated using the comparative ΔCt method and normalized to the PP2A (AT1G69960) gene transcript levels. Primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary file 2.

RNAseq

Request a detailed protocol

Seeds were sterilized and plated under standard germination conditions (Piskurewicz and Lopez-Molina, 2016). Dissection procedures were performed on WT seeds (Col-0) 36 hr after imbibition. Total RNA was extracted as described before (Piskurewicz and Lopez-Molina, 2011) and RNA concentrations were measured by Qubit Fluorometric quantification system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Switzerland). For partially dissected endosperm and fully dissected endosperm samples, the cDNA libraries were prepared from 200 ng total RNA using a TruSeq mRNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, Switzerland). Although testa RNA could not be detected, we prepared the cDNA library with the same volumes of RNA testa as those used for the construction of the endosperm cDNA libraries. cDNA libraries were normalized and pooled then sequenced using HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) with single-end 100 bp reads. For sequencing testa cDNA, we used the same volume of cDNA as that used for sequencing endosperm cDNA. cDNA library preparation and sequencing, as well as read mapping and counting, were performed in the same manner for all seed materials (testa, partially and fully dissected endosperm). The resulting RNA concentrations, library concentrations, and read numbers are shown in Table 1.

Identification of Cvi SNPs

Request a detailed protocol

We sequenced cDNA libraries prepared from endospermic RNA (partially dissected endosperm from short- and long-period after-ripened seeds). Low-quality reads were filtered out by the fastqc program (RRID:SCR_005539) with the option –q 20 and –p 90. The remaining reads were mapped to the Col-0 genome (TAIR10) with the TopHat program (RRID:SCR_013035), allowing up to five mismatches per alignment. The resulting two alignment files (BAM files) were merged into one file. Variant calling was performed using the FreeBayes program (RRID:SCR_010761) using the input filters option (-F --min-alternate-fraction 0.9 and -C --min-alternate-count 3) and the resulting SNPs were compared to the publicly available Cvi SNPs (http://www.arabidopsis.org/download_files/Polymorphisms_and_Phenotypes/Ecker_Cvi_snps.txt). This led us to identify 107,977 common exonic SNPs covering 15,814 genes, which in turn were used to distinguish Cvi and Col reads in ColxCvi and CvixCol F1 RNA sequencing data. The SNPs used in this study are listed in Supplementary file 3.

Identification of imprinted genes

Request a detailed protocol

We sequenced cDNA libraries prepared from ColxCvi and CvixCol endospermic F1 RNA. Low-quality reads were filtered out and the remaining reads were treated as described above for the Cvi reads.

We called variants at each SNP position using the SAMtools Mpileup (RRID:SCR_002105) supplied with a reference bed file of SNP positions to generate a pileup file. The resulting file was used with the SAMtools Filter pileup program, which generated read counts for the reference (Col) and variant (Cvi) genome for every SNP position. Next, reads specific to Col and Cvi alleles were summed across all the SNPs present in each gene. The resulting numbers for each gene are provided in Figure 2—source data 6. A list of potential maternally expressed genes (MEGs) and paternally expressed genes (PEGs) was established after applying the following criteria: (1) potential MEGs are those genes whose ratio of maternal allele to paternal allele read number is more than 0.8 in both ColxCvi and CvixCol endosperm F1 material; similarly potential PEGs are those whose ratio of paternal to maternal allele read number is more than 0.6; (2) potential MEGs or PEGs with read numbers lower than five were discarded; (3) the probabilities of deviation from expected ratio (maternal:paternal = 2:1) in a Fisher's two-tailed exact test were calculated and only potential MEGs or PEGs with a p < 0.05 were retained.

Validation of imprinting

Request a detailed protocol

RNA was extracted from other sets of reciprocal crosses between Col and Cvi (after ripening for five days and two months), treated with DNase, and cDNA was synthesized using ImpromII reverse transcriptase (Promega) and oligo dT primers. We selected 17 MEGs and two PEGs and designed primers to amplify cDNA fragments containing SNPs. PCR amplicons were purified using Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega), then sequenced by Sanger sequencing. The same PCR amplicons were pooled and libraries were constructed using the Illumina NexteraXT kit (Illumina). Libraries were sequenced using the MiSeq system (Illumina) with paired-end 150 bp reads. The resulting reads were mapped to the Col-0 genome (TAIR10) using the TopHat software (RRID:SCR_013035). Col and Cvi reads at the SNP position of each gene were counted as described above for RNA-seq.

Gene expression profile

Request a detailed protocol

Transcripts assembly and normalization was performed with the Cufflinks program (RRID:SCR_013307), and gene expression levels were calculated in FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of exon per Million mapped fragments) units. Differential gene expression analysis was performed by Cuffdiff (RRID:SCR_001647), a part of the Cufflinks package. For clustering analysis, we used relative expression data compared with the ColxCvi sample. The rest of the genes were clustered using K-means clustering in R statistical computing. Mapping reads, SNP calling, and gene expression analysis were performed using Galaxy (RRID:SCR_006281) (Giardine et al., 2005; Blankenberg et al., 2010; Goecks et al., 2010).

Confocal microscopy

Request a detailed protocol

The marker lines of pFWA::dFWA-GFP (Kinoshita et al., 2004) and pDD65::mtKaede (mtKaede: mitochondria localized Kaede-GFP protein) (Arimura et al., 2004) were crossed reciprocally. The F1 seeds were surface-sterilized and plated on the 1/2 MS-Agar media, incubated under 16 hr/8 hr of light and dark photoperiod at 22°C for 36 hr. The endosperm was dissected under a binocular microscope. The fluorescent signals from the endosperm cell layer were captured using the confocal laser microscope (Olympus FV-1000) equipped with 488 nm laser, a x40 objective lens (UPLSAPO 40X, WD = 0.18, NA = 0.95; Olympus) and band-pass filter cube of 520/35 nm for GFP. The images were were adjusted for brightness and contrast using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe systems, Inc).

Protein gel staining and western blot analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Proteins were extracted from 30 endosperms or three embryos using Laemmli buffer (100 mM Tris pH 6.8, 200 mM DTT, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol blue). Proteins extracted from 30 endosperms or from three embryos (i.e. 3 µg of total protein) were resolved under reducing conditions using 10% SDS/polyacrylamide gels. Gels were stained with a solution of 0.25% coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (Sigma) in 40% methanol +10% acetic acid. For western blot analysis, proteins were extracted as described above. The amount of protein loaded in each line of the gels is an equivalent of two endosperms (i.e. 0.2 µg of total protein) or 0.5 embryos (0.5 µg of total protein). Proteins were resolved under reducing conditions using 12% SDS/polyacrylamide gels, transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane and probed with 12S antibody serum as described by Barthole et al. (2014). Specificity of the antibody was confirmed using protein extracts isolated from the endosperm and embryo of cruabc mutants (Figure 4—figure supplement 1).

Gametophytic effect of maternal cp1 inheritance

Request a detailed protocol

A heterozygous cp1/CP1 mother plant was pollinated with wildtype (CP1/CP1) Col-0 pollen (Figure 4—figure supplement 5). The resulting mature siliques were harvested on the same day and seeds were after-ripened for 2 days. Seeds were sterilized and plated under standard germination conditions. 36 hr after imbibition, individual seeds were dissected and partially dissected endosperm material was suspended in 1 µl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer and frozen. The embryos were further cultured for two weeks prior to genotyping to identify and distinguish embryos carrying a cp1-1 allele from those carrying a CP1 allele. Thirty cp1/cp1/CP1 partially dissected endosperms (coming from seeds with cp1/CP1 embryos) and 30 CP1/CP1/CP1 partially dissected endosperms (coming from seeds with CP1/CP1 embryos) were separately pooled. 20 µl of partially dissected endosperm protein extracts from each pool were run side-by-side on an SDS PAGE gel and probed with the 12S antibody serum or stained with coomassie blue solution.

References

    1. Baskin CC
    2. Baskin JM
    (1998)
    Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination
    Seeds, Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination, San Diego, Academic Press.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Urszula Piskurewicz

    1. Department of Plant Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    2. Institute for Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Contribution
    UP, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Contributed equally with
    Mayumi Iwasaki
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9523-9123

  2. Mayumi Iwasaki

    1. Department of Plant Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    2. Institute for Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Contribution
    MI, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Contributed equally with
    Urszula Piskurewicz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Daichi Susaki

    Kihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
    Contribution
    DS, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Christian Megies

    1. Department of Plant Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    2. Institute for Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Contribution
    CM, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Tetsu Kinoshita

    Kihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
    Contribution
    TK, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Luis Lopez-Molina

    1. Department of Plant Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    2. Institute for Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Contribution
    LL-M, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    For correspondence
    Luis.LopezMolina@unige.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0463-1187

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A_152660)

  • Urszula Piskurewicz
  • Mayumi Iwasaki
  • Christian Megies
  • Luis Lopez-Molina

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant in Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area 16H06465)

  • Daichi Susaki
  • Tetsu Kinoshita

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant in Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area 16H06464)

  • Daichi Susaki
  • Tetsu Kinoshita

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant in Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area 16K21727)

  • Daichi Susaki
  • Tetsu Kinoshita

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Luca Comai for kindly providing Cvi and C24 tetraploid seeds. We thank Leónie Bentsink for providing crua/crub/cruc mutant seeds. We thank Colette Larre for providing antibodies against CRUs. We thank Mylène Docquier and members of the Genomics Platform of the Institute of Genetics and Genomics (iGE3) at the University of Geneva for their invaluable help in conducting sequencing experiments. Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas Nos. 16 H06465, 16 H06464, and 16 K21727 to TK. Work in LLM’s laboratory was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation and by the State of Geneva.

Copyright

© 2016, Piskurewicz et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,431
    views
  • 822
    downloads
  • 48
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Urszula Piskurewicz
  2. Mayumi Iwasaki
  3. Daichi Susaki
  4. Christian Megies
  5. Tetsu Kinoshita
  6. Luis Lopez-Molina
(2016)
Dormancy-specific imprinting underlies maternal inheritance of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana
eLife 5:e19573.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19573

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology

    Non-canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation participates in maternal and environmental control of seed dormancy

    Mayumi Iwasaki, Lena Hyvärinen ... Luis Lopez-Molina
    Research Advance

    Seed dormancy is an adaptive trait preventing premature germination out of season. In a previous report (Piskurewicz et al., 2016) we showed that dormancy levels are maternally inherited through the preferential maternal allele expression in the seed endosperm of ALLANTOINASE (ALN), a negative regulator of dormancy. Here we show that suppression of ALN paternal allele expression is imposed by non-canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) of the paternal ALN allele promoter. Dormancy levels are further enhanced by cold during seed development. We show that DNA methylation of the ALN promoter is stimulated by cold in a tissue-specific manner through non-canonical RdDM, involving RDR6 and AGO6. This leads to suppression of ALN expression and further promotion of seed dormancy. Our results suggest that tissue-specific and cold-induced RdDM is superimposed to parental allele imprints to deposit in the seed progeny a transient memory of environmental conditions experienced by the mother plant.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Plant Biology

    Root cap cell corpse clearance limits microbial colonization in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Nyasha Charura, Ernesto Llamas ... Alga Zuccaro
    Research Article

    Programmed cell death occurring during plant development (dPCD) is a fundamental process integral for plant growth and reproduction. Here, we investigate the connection between developmentally controlled PCD and fungal accommodation in Arabidopsis thaliana roots, focusing on the root cap-specific transcription factor ANAC033/SOMBRERO (SMB) and the senescence-associated nuclease BFN1. Mutations of both dPCD regulators increase colonization by the beneficial fungus Serendipita indica, primarily in the differentiation zone. smb-3 mutants additionally exhibit hypercolonization around the meristematic zone and a delay of S. indica-induced root-growth promotion. This demonstrates that root cap dPCD and rapid post-mortem clearance of cellular corpses represent a physical defense mechanism restricting microbial invasion of the root. Additionally, reporter lines and transcriptional analysis revealed that BFN1 expression is downregulated during S. indica colonization in mature root epidermal cells, suggesting a transcriptional control mechanism that facilitates the accommodation of beneficial microbes in the roots.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Plant Biology

    Autophagosome development and chloroplast segmentation occur synchronously for piecemeal degradation of chloroplasts

    Masanori Izumi, Sakuya Nakamura ... Shinya Hagihara
    Research Article

    Plants distribute many nutrients to chloroplasts during leaf development and maturation. When leaves senesce or experience sugar starvation, the autophagy machinery degrades chloroplast proteins to facilitate efficient nutrient reuse. Here, we report on the intracellular dynamics of an autophagy pathway responsible for piecemeal degradation of chloroplast components. Through live-cell monitoring of chloroplast morphology, we observed the formation of chloroplast budding structures in sugar-starved leaves. These buds were then released and incorporated into the vacuolar lumen as an autophagic cargo termed a Rubisco-containing body. The budding structures did not accumulate in mutants of core autophagy machinery, suggesting that autophagosome creation is required for forming chloroplast buds. Simultaneous tracking of chloroplast morphology and autophagosome development revealed that the isolation membranes of autophagosomes interact closely with part of the chloroplast surface before forming chloroplast buds. Chloroplasts then protrude at the site associated with the isolation membranes, which divide synchronously with autophagosome maturation. This autophagy-related division does not require DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN 5B, which constitutes the division ring for chloroplast proliferation in growing leaves. An unidentified division machinery may thus fragment chloroplasts for degradation in coordination with the development of the chloroplast-associated isolation membrane.