Peer review process
Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, public reviews, and a provisional response from the authors.
Read more about eLife’s peer review process.Editors
- Reviewing EditorLabib RouhanaUniversity of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, United States of America
- Senior EditorDidier StainierMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany
Reviewer #1 (Public review):
Summary:
In this manuscript, the authors explore the role of the conserved transcription factor POU4-2 in planarian maintenance and regeneration of mechanosensory neurons. The authors explore the role of this transcription factor and identify potential targets of this transcription factor. Importantly, many genes discovered in this work are deeply conserved, with roles in mechanosensation and hearing, indicating that planarians may be a useful model with which to study the roles of these key molecules. This work is important within the field of regenerative neurobiology, but also impactful for those studying the evolution of the machinery that is important for human hearing.
Strengths:
The paper is rigorous and thorough, with convincing support for the conclusions of the work.
Weaknesses:
Weaknesses are relatively minor and could be addressed with additional experiments or changes in writing.
Reviewer #2 (Public review):
Summary:
In this manuscript, the authors investigate the role of the transcription factor Smed-pou4-2 in the maintenance, regeneration, and function of mechanosensory neurons in the freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. First, they characterize the expression of pou4-2 in mechanosensory neurons during both homeostasis and regeneration, and examine how its expression is affected by the knockdown of soxB1, 2, a previously identified transcription factor essential for the maintenance and regeneration of these neurons. Second, the authors assess whether pou4-2 is functionally required for the maintenance and regeneration of mechanosensory neurons.
Strengths:
The study provides some new insights into the regulatory role of pou4-2 in the differentiation, maintenance, and regeneration of ciliated mechanosensory neurons in planarians.
Weaknesses:
The overall scope is relatively limited. The manuscript lacks clear organization, and many of the conclusions would benefit from additional experiments and more rigorous quantification to enhance their strength and impact.