Smed-pou4-2 regulates mechanosensory neuron regeneration and function in planarians

  1. Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States
  2. Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla United States

Peer review process

Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, public reviews, and a provisional response from the authors.

Read more about eLife’s peer review process.

Editors

  • Reviewing Editor
    Labib Rouhana
    University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, United States of America
  • Senior Editor
    Didier Stainier
    Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Summary:

In this manuscript, the authors explore the role of the conserved transcription factor POU4-2 in planarian maintenance and regeneration of mechanosensory neurons. The authors explore the role of this transcription factor and identify potential targets of this transcription factor. Importantly, many genes discovered in this work are deeply conserved, with roles in mechanosensation and hearing, indicating that planarians may be a useful model with which to study the roles of these key molecules. This work is important within the field of regenerative neurobiology, but also impactful for those studying the evolution of the machinery that is important for human hearing.

Strengths:

The paper is rigorous and thorough, with convincing support for the conclusions of the work.

Weaknesses:

Weaknesses are relatively minor and could be addressed with additional experiments or changes in writing.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Summary:

In this manuscript, the authors investigate the role of the transcription factor Smed-pou4-2 in the maintenance, regeneration, and function of mechanosensory neurons in the freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. First, they characterize the expression of pou4-2 in mechanosensory neurons during both homeostasis and regeneration, and examine how its expression is affected by the knockdown of soxB1, 2, a previously identified transcription factor essential for the maintenance and regeneration of these neurons. Second, the authors assess whether pou4-2 is functionally required for the maintenance and regeneration of mechanosensory neurons.

Strengths:

The study provides some new insights into the regulatory role of pou4-2 in the differentiation, maintenance, and regeneration of ciliated mechanosensory neurons in planarians.

Weaknesses:

The overall scope is relatively limited. The manuscript lacks clear organization, and many of the conclusions would benefit from additional experiments and more rigorous quantification to enhance their strength and impact.

Author response:

(1) We will clarify statements comparing regeneration and developmental processes. Additionally, we will include a new supplemental figure with published data showing that the pou4-2 clone dd_Smed_v6_30562_0_1 (cross-referenced as SMED30002016) is expressed during stages corresponding to organ development in Schmidtea mediterranea (https://planosphere.stowers.org/feature/Schmidtea/mediterranea-sexual/transcript/SMED30002016).

(2) We will reorganize the figures by combining Figures 3 and 4 for improved clarity.

(3) We will address experimental and interpretive concerns regarding the role of atonal in the pou4-2 gene regulatory network.

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation