Introduction

Aneuploidy is common in human preimplantation embryos from both natural (Munné et al., 2020a) and medically assisted reproduction cycles (Voullaire et al., 2000; Wells and Delhanty, 2000; Vanneste et al., 2009; Johnson et al., 2010; Chavez et al., 2012; Mertzanidou et al., 2013b, 2013a; Chow et al., 2014; Fragouli et al., 2019; Popovic et al., 2020; Starostik et al., 2020; Capalbo et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021). Depending on the study, up to 80% of human cleavage stage embryos are found to be aneuploid, of which 70% show chromosomal mosaicism, i.e. the presence of at least two cell lineages with different genomic content (Regin et al., 2022). The reasons behind this high rate of chromosomal abnormalities of mitotic origin is still largely unknown (McCoy, 2017) but could be a combination of a weak spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) that is uncoupled of apoptosis until the blastocyst stage (Jacobs et al., 2017; Vázquez-Diez et al., 2019), in combination with an abundancy of transcripts of anti-apoptotic genes in cleavage-stage embryos (Yan et al., 2013). After embryonic genome activation, the rapidly increasing expression of pro-apoptotic genes along with the full functionality of the SAC establishes the control of mitotic errors.

It is by now well established that chromosomally mosaic embryos can result in healthy new-borns with normal karyotypes, implying a progressive and selective loss of aneuploid cells during development (Greco et al., 2015; Fragouli et al., 2017, 2019; Munné et al., 2017, 2020b; Capalbo et al., 2021; Viotti et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021). In the preimplantation embryo, several studies have shown that the proportion of aneuploid cells within the embryo decreases three days post fertilization (3dpf) (van Echten-Arends et al., 2011; Fragouli et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2021) with no apparent preferential allocation of aneuploid cells during the first lineage segregation event to either trophectoderm (TE) or inner cell mass (ICM) (Capalbo et al., 2013; Popovic et al., 2018; Starostik et al., 2020; Ren et al., 2022). However, aneuploid cells can be excluded as cell debris (Orvieto et al., 2020) or allocated to the blastocoel cavity and to peripheral cells that do not participate in the formation of the embryo (Griffin et al., 2022). In some studies, (Starostik et al., 2020; Griffin et al., 2022) the TE contained a slightly higher number of aneuploid cells than the ICM, without reaching statistical significance. In their landmark paper, (Bolton et al., 2016) found a quite similar but statistically significant 6% TE enrichment in mouse embryos treated with the SAC inhibitor reversine to induce mosaic aneuploidy. This small enrichment fell in the same confidence interval as the Starostik study, therefore TE enrichment cannot be ruled out in the human embryo. After implantation, aneuploid cells become progressively more frequent in the trophoblast lineage which is derived from TE cells as compared to the epiblast (EPI) and primitive endoderm (PrE) lineages which are derived from the ICM cells during the second lineage segregation (Starostik et al., 2020). This suggests that the trophoblast cells are more tolerant to aneuploidy, in line with the rate of 1-2% of confined placental mosaicism observed in ongoing pregnancies in the general population (Kalousek and Vekemans, 1996) and with the presence of aneuploid cells in the placental lineages only (Zamani Esteki et al., 2019). This is further supported by a recent study showing that genetic mosaicism is a normal feature of the placenta and is due to genetic bottlenecks that occur early in development (Coorens et al., 2021). Taken together, strong evidence supports the selective elimination of aneuploid cells from the embryonic lineage in the pre- and post-implantation development, while the placenta appears to be more tolerant to genetic imbalances.

From a cellular point of view, aneuploidy has two types of consequences. Imbalances of a specific chromosome, such as trisomy 21 or trisomy 18, can result in different phenotypes, as evidenced by the human Down and Edwards syndromes. These imbalances can manifest early on during early embryo development (Licciardi et al., 2018; Fuchs Weizman et al., 2019; Sanchez-Ribas et al., 2019; Shahbazi et al., 2020). Moreover, aneuploidy as such also elicits two highly conserved intracellular stress responses, that have been found from yeast and plants to mouse and human cells (reviewed in: Santaguida and Amon, 2015; Zhu et al., 2018; Chunduri and Storchová, 2019; Chunduri et al., 2022; Krivega et al., 2022), and which are likely at the basis of the selective clearance of aneuploid cells during development. First, aneuploidy results in gene-dosage defects, leading to an unbalanced protein pool and proteotoxic stress (Torres et al., 2007; Huettel et al., 2008; Williams et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2011; Oromendia et al., 2012; Stingele et al., 2012; Donnelly et al., 2014; Ohashi et al., 2015). If this remains unresolved by activation of autophagy (Stingele et al., 2012; Dürrbaum et al., 2014; Santaguida et al., 2015; Ariyoshi et al., 2016), CASP8/LC3B/p62 may interact to activate the apoptosis cascade (Pan et al., 2011). Second, aneuploidy results in replication stress that can lead to DNA-damage, resulting in p53 activation (Li et al., 2010; Thompson and Compton, 2010; Santaguida et al., 2017) and ultimately to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (reviewed in: Santaguida and Amon, 2015; Zhu et al., 2018; Regin et al., 2022).

During early embryo development of the mouse, Bolton et al. (Bolton et al., 2016) showed that aneuploid cells are selectively cleared from chimeric embryos generated from control blastomeres mixed with aneuploid blastomeres obtained using a treatment with the SAC inhibitor reversine. Later work by the same group showed that apoptosis of these aneuploid cells requires autophagy and p53 activation and that euploid cells in the mouse embryo compensate this cell loss by increased proliferation (Singla et al., 2020). The authors proposed that the proteotoxic stress in these aneuploid chimeric mouse embryos activated the p53 pathway, which in turn activated autophagy and apoptosis. In a recent study using human 2D gastruloids with reversine-induced aneuploidy, apoptosis was only induced in differentiating but not in pluripotent cells, although aneuploidy induced an increase in total nuclear p53 proteins (Yang et al., 2021). The apoptotic response to aneuploidy also seems to be lineage-specific. In the mouse, aneuploid cells in the ICM are eliminated by apoptosis while they are rather tolerated in the TE (Bolton et al., 2016). Furthermore, in a follow-up study, (Singla et al., 2020) demonstrated that during the peri-implantation period, aneuploid cells were eliminated from the EPI and the PrE at similar rates, and that the EPI-specific elimination of aneuploid cells by apoptosis is coupled to increased proliferation rates of euploid cells. Similarly, in human gastruloids, aneuploid cells are eliminated by apoptosis from the embryonic germ layers but are tolerated in the TE-like cells (Yang et al., 2021).

The type of aneuploidy and the percentage of aneuploid cells within a euploid/aneuploid mosaic embryo determine its developmental capacity. The viability of mouse embryos inversely correlates to the proportion of aneuploid cells, with 50% of euploid cells being sufficient to sustain normal development (Bolton et al., 2016). This same threshold appears to apply to human embryos, where embryos with less than 50% of aneuploid cells have higher developmental potential than those containing more than 50%, albeit both performing worse than fully euploid embryos (Viotti et al., 2021, Capalbo et al., 2021). Conversely, whole chromosome gains and losses that are present in every cell of the human embryo are usually linked to lethality with the notable exception of trisomies 13 (Patau syndrome), 18 (Edwards syndrome) and 21 (Down syndrome), and sex chromosome abnormalities. Shahbazi et al. recently described the consequences of carrying specific meiotic aneuploidies on human embryo development using an in vitro implantation model (Shahbazi et al., 2020). They showed that human embryos with trisomy 15, 16 and 21 and monosomy 21 readily all reached the blastocyst stage, and that monosomy 21 embryos arrested after implantation while trisomy 15 and 21 embryos developed further. Interestingly, trisomy 16 embryos showed a hypoproliferative trophoblast due to excessive CDH1 expression, a gene located on chromosome 16.

In this study, we investigated the cellular responses to complex aneuploidy during human preimplantation development, with a focus on stress response and lineage segregation events.

Methods

Ethical approval

All experiments have been approved by the local Commission of Medical Ethics of the UZ Brussel (B.U.N. 143201628722) and the Federal Committee for Medical and Scientific Research on Human Embryos in vitro (AdV069 and AdV091). Patients from Brussels IVF (UZ Brussel) donated their embryos for research after written informed consent.

Culture of human pre-implantation embryos

We warmed vitrified human blastocysts (5-6dpf) after PGT or at 3dpf using the Vitrification Thaw Kit (Vit Kit-Thaw; Irvine Scientific, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Embryos were graded before vitrification by experienced clinical embryologists according to Gardner and Schoolcraft criteria (Gardner and Schoolcraft, 1999). Post PGT-embryos were left to recover for 2h in 25 µL droplets of Origio Sequential BlastTM medium (Origio) at 37°C with 5% O2, 6% CO2 and 89% N2, after which they underwent a second TE biopsy (Fig. 1a). For the reversine experiment, we cultured the 3dpf embryos for 24h in the same medium supplemented with 0.5 µM reversine (Stem Cell Technologies) and after wash-out we let them develop until 5dpf and subsequently took a biopsy (Fig. 1b). The PGT embryos (5dpf or 6dpf) used for the second experiment series (Fig. 4a) were cultured for 16h after warming to ensure sufficient time to progress to the second lineage differentiation. Prior to fixation we live-stained all the embryos with either Caspase-3/7 or Caspase-8 (Supplementary Table 30) for 30 min and subsequently removed the zona pellucida using Acidic Tyrode’s Solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 sec – 2 min and subsequently washed in PBS/2%BSA.

RNA-sequencing of trophectoderm cells reveals deregulation of DNA damage, p53, cell-cycle, autophagy and apoptosis pathways in chromosomally abnormal human embryos.

a. Human blastocysts 5 or 6 days post-fertilization (dpf) underwent Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) for monogenic diseases and/or aneuploidy screening, followed by cryopreservation. Embryos that were not transferred were donated for research after written informed content. After warming and 2hrs recuperation, euploid and fully aneuploid research embryos underwent a second TE biopsy for RNA-sequencing. The remainder of the embryos was live-stained with either CASP3/7 or CASP8 for 30min and fixed for immunostaining for proteins of interest (see figure 3). b. 3dpf human embryos were warmed and treated with 0.5µM reversine for 24hrs then transferred to normal culture medium until 5dpf to undergo TE biopsy for RNA-sequencing. After 2hrs recuperation the embryos were live-stained with CASP8 for 30min and fixed for immunostaining for proteins of interest (see figure 3). c. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of all coding genes. Color coding: beige = euploid, red = aneuploid and blue = reversine-treated. d. Comparison between the diagnosis of aneuploid embryos obtained after PGT (list on the left) and the results obtained after using InferCNV after RNA-sequencing (plot on the right). e,f. Volcano plots after differential gene expression analysis with a cutoff value of |log2 fold change| > 1 and −log10(p-value) < 0.05 for aneuploid versus euploid (e) and reversine versus euploid (f). g,h. Venn diagrams comparing the upregulated (g) and downregulated (h) genes in aneuploid versus reversine treated embryos. i,j. Supervised plot of pathway analysis using the Molecular Signatures Database (FDR < 0.05) based on the list of all differentially expressed genes between aneuploid or reversine versus euploid embryos. Pathways are ranked based on the total number of genes in overlap of both test sets, ranked from sets with the highest number of genes in overlap to sets with the lowest. Outputs of the Hallmark library and C5 ontology gene sets are shown in (i) and (j), respectively. k,l. Supervised plots after Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of upstream regulators with an activation z-score ≤ −2 and ≥ 2 and a p-value < 0.05 in the aneuploid (k) or reversine (l) versus euploid embryos. m,n. Supervised plots after Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of canonical pathways in aneuploid (m) or reversine (n) versus euploid embryos. Pathways are ranked by p-value from the most to the least significant, those with a p-value < 0.05 and with an activation z-score ≤ −1.5 and ≥ 1.5 were considered as inhibited or activated, respectively. Significant pathways with an activation z-score between −1.5 and 1.5 were considered as deregulated.

Biopsy procedure

The zona pellucida was opened (15-25µm) on 4dpf using a Saturn Laser (Cooper Surgical). For PGT cycles, expanded good quality embryos were biopsied on 5dpf; early blastocysts were evaluated again for expansion on 6dpf. Briefly, embryos were transferred to HEPES buffered medium and biopsied on a Nikon inversed microscope equipped with a Saturn Laser. The herniated TE cells were then aspirated and cut using manual laser shoots. In case of sticking cells this was supported by mechanical cutting. After successful tubing, the blastocysts were vitrified using CBS-VIT High-Security straws (CryoBioSystem, L’Aigle, France) with dimethylsulphoxide-ethylene glycol-sucrose as the cryoprotectants (Irvine Scientific Freeze Kit, Newtownmountkennedy, County Wicklow, Ireland) (Van Landuyt et al., 2011). The TE biopsy for RNA-sequencing (Fig. 1a,b) was performed with the same procedure, cells were biopsied form the same opening in the zona pellucida.

PGT

During PGT we analyzed a TE sample with multiple cells for each embryo. Next Generation Sequencing: The chromosomal analysis was performed by WGA (Sureplex, Illumina) followed by library preparation (KAPA HyperPlus, Roche), sequencing on a NovaSeq (Illumina) and an in-house developed interpretation pipeline. The analysis has an effective resolution of 5 Mb.

SNP-array: We relied on whole genome amplification (MDA, Repli-G) followed by genome wide SNP array using Karyomapping (Vitrolife) with Bluefuse software (Vitrolife). In addition, SNP array data were analyzed with an in-house developed interpretation pipeline for aneuploidy detection.

RNA-sequencing

Multiple (5-10) TE cells were used as input to generate full length cDNA with the SMART-SeqTM v4 UltraTM Low Input RNA Kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of cDNA was checked using the AATI Fragment Analyzer (Advances Analytical). Library preparation was performed using the KAPA HyperPlus Library Preparation Kit (KAPA Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. During cDNA synthesis and library preparation we used 17 and 11 PCR cycles, respectively. Sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina) with 25 million reads per sample.

Bioinformatics analysis

Reads were trimmed using cutadapt version 1.11 to remove the “QuantSEQ FWD” adaptor sequence. We checked the quality of the reads using the FastQC algorithm (Love et al., 2014). Count tables were generated using STAR (Dobin et al., 2013) (version 2.5.3) through mapping against the Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 38 patch release 10 (GRCh38.p10) combined with a general transfer format (GTF) file, both downloaded from the Ensembl database. The RNA-sequencing by Expectation Maximization (RSEM) (Li and Dewey, 2011) software (version 1.3.0) was used to produce the count tables.

Differential gene expression analysis was performed using R-studio (Version 1.1.456) with the edgeR (Robinson et al., 2009) and limma (Ritchie et al., 2015) packages. We included genes with a count per million greater than 1 in at least two samples. The trimmed mean of M values (Robinson and Oshlack, 2010) algorithm was used for normalization. The normalized counts were then transformed in a log2 fold-change (log2FC) table with their associated statistics. In each comparison, genes with a | log2FC | > 1 and an p-value < 0.05 were considered as significantly differentially expressed.

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using the ‘investigate gene sets’ function on the website of the Molecular Signature Database (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/annotate.jsp). We used all differentially expressed genes (Supplementary Tables 2, 3) as input and investigated Hallmark, C2 and C5 gene sets with FDR-q values < 0.05. For the analysis of gene dosage effects, we could only use the TOP500 differentially expressed genes by p-value since the Molecular Signature Database changed the cut-off during the period of our data analysis (raw data, Supplementary Tables 26, 27). In the figures 1f and g we used a supervised approach and sorted the significantly deregulated gene sets by the total amount of genes in overlap. Figure 2f was also supervised but the gene sets were sorted by FDR-q value.

Human embryos with the highest number of genes with abnormal copy number show stronger p53 pathway and apoptosis response.

a. Supervised hierarchical clustering of the TOP 500 deregulated genes sorted by p-value. Color coding: blue = euploid, green = Low dosage and red = High dosage. b,c. Volcano plots after differential gene expression analysis with a cutoff value of |log2 fold change| > 1 and −log10(p-value) < 0.05 for low dosage versus euploid embryos (b) and high dosage versus euploid embryos (c). d,e, Venn diagrams comparing the upregulated (d) and downregulated (e) genes in low dosage versus high dosage embryos. f. Supervised plot of pathway analysis using the Hallmark library of the Molecular Signatures Database (FDR < 0.05) based on the list of the TOP 500 expressed genes by p-value between low or high dosage versus euploid embryos. Pathways are ranked based on FDR-q-values of both test sets, the most significant deregulated pathway ranked from top to least significant pathway. g,h. Dot plots of the genes in overlap with the Hallmark p53 pathway (g) and Hallmark apoptosis pathway (h) of both low and high dosage embryos sorted by log2 Fold Change from the highest to the lowest. Dots with an increased size and a darker blue represent a higher value of log2 Fold Change and lower p-value, respectively. i, Violin plots with box and whisker plots of the counts per million mapped reads of a supervised set of 10 genes (from Supplementary Table 2) that are part of apoptosis (BAD, BCL2L1, TNFRSF10B), p53 pathway (DRAM1, MDM2, CDKN1A/B, PURPL), growth arrest (GADD45A), and DNA-damage (DDB2). *p = 0.027, **p = 0.010, ***p = 0.004, ****p < 0.001 using the Jonkheere-Terpstra test. Box and whisker plots show median and minimum to maximum values.

Ingenuity Pathway analysis (IPA, Qiagen Inc.) was used to investigate activated, deregulated and inhibited upstream regulators and canonical pathways. As for the GSEA we used all differentially expressed genes of our two test sets with their respective log2FC and p-value. For the upstream regulators IPA computes z-scores with associated p-values that are considered significant when p < 0.05. If significant, a z-score > 2 means activated, a z-score < 2 means inhibited and in between means deregulated. For the canonical pathways IPA computes z-scores with associated p-values that are considered significant when p < 0.05. If significant, we considered a z-score > 1.5 as activated, a z-score < 1.5 as inhibited and in between as deregulated. We generated all figures in a supervised approach.

Transcription factor analysis of all differentially expressed genes was performed using Enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/). We selected the outputs from ChEA 2016 and ENCODE ChEA consensus and considered those transcription factors as significant with a p-value < 0.05.

The copy number variation (CNV) analysis was inferred from our RNA-sequencing data set using inferCNV R package (version 1.7.1) (Inferring copy number alterations from tumor single cell RNA-Seq data (https://github.com/broadinstitute/inferCNV/wiki”). Our count table was used as input and compared to the reference set which in our case was the expression data of the euploid embryos. The analysis followed the standard workflow in inferCNV with the following parameters: “denoise” mode, value of 1 was used for the “cutoff”, prediction of CNV states using default Hidden Markov Models (HMM) method, “cluster_by_groups” was set to TRUE, and other values were set by default.

All figures were generated using R-studio (Version 1.1.456).

Gene dosage analysis

We calculated the total number of loci with imbalanced gene expression based on the genetic abnormalities identified during the PGT. For this, we used the number of coding loci per chromosomal region as listed in the ENSMBL database (ensemble.org) and included both gains and losses, either mosaic or homogeneously present, and both full chromosomal aneuploidy as well as segmental abnormalities. The embryos were ranked based on the total number of imbalanced loci and separated into a low- and a high-imbalanced gene dosage group. The low-dosage group contained the embryos with the lowest 50th percentile in number of unbalanced loci, the high-dosage group the embryos with 50th percentile or higher (Supplementary Table 25, 29).

Immunocytochemistry

Embryos were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min, washed three times in PBS/2%BSA for 5 min and then permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min followed by another washing cycle. We used 10% FBS supplemented with 2% BSA for 1h to block non-specific protein binding. The embryos were then incubated overnight with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 30) diluted in blocking buffer at 4°C. The next day, they underwent another washing cycle using PBS/2%BSA and were then incubated with secondary antibodies (1:200, Supplementary Table 26) for 1h at room temperature. After washing, nuclei were stained using Hoechst 33342 (5µg/mL, Life Technologies) diluted in PBS/2%BSA for 15 min. For imaging we mounted the embryos on poly-L-lysine coated glass slides (Sigma-Aldrich) in 3µL of PBS. To avoid flattening of the embryos we used Secure-SealTM Spacers (9mm diameter, 0.12mm deep, Thermofisher) before putting the coverslips in place. For the experiments that required re-staining (Fig. 4a) we imaged the embryos in 3µL PBS/2%BSA in 18 well µ-Slides (Ibidi) and subsequently recuperated them. After recuperation we photobleached the embryos stained for CASP3/7 by using maximum laser power of the 488 nm channel and maximum size of the pinhole for 10 min. The embryos were then re-stained using rat-anti-GATA4 primary antibody and the matching Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody (Supplementary Table 30) (to replace the CASP3/7 staining).

Imaging and image analysis

Confocal imaging was performed using the LSM800 (Zeiss). Z-stacks were taken with a LD C-Apochromat 40x/1.1 NA water immersion objective in optical sections of 1µm. Nuclei were counted using Arivis Vision 4D (3.4.0). All other measurements were performed using the Zen 2 (blue edition) software based on the optical sections and/or orthogonal projections.

Statistics

The type of statistical test and p-values are mentioned in the figure legends. For experiments that contained groups with small sample sizes we used non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test). Fisher-exact test was used to determine the dependency of the ploidy status on the presence or absence of primitive endoderm and to test for differences in the quality of the ICM of euploid and aneuploid embryos. Otherwise we used Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction when we assumed normal distribution and unequal standard deviations. We used GraphPad Prism 9.0.0 or R-studio for statistical testing. The trend analysis regarding gene dosage effects was performed with SPSS using the Jonkheere-Terpstra test.

Results

Human embryos with meiotic complex aneuploidy show transcriptional signatures of a deregulated p53 pathway and apoptosis

We first tested the hypothesis that chromosomally unbalanced cells are cleared during human preimplantation development by apoptosis, mediated by both sustained p62-LC3B accumulation as a marker for autophagy and DNA-damage-mediated p53 activation. Fifty cryopreserved human blastocysts (5 or 6dpf) that had been previously diagnosed by Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) as either euploid (n=28) or containing non-mosaic complex aneuploidy of at least two whole chromosomes and assumed of meiotic origin (except for one) (n=22, further referred to as aneuploid, Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 1) underwent a second TE biopsy to collect cells for RNA sequencing. Eleven warmed human cleavage stage embryos that were treated with 0.5 µM reversine from 3dpf to 4dpf and further developed to the blastocyst stage (referred to as reversine-treated embryos, Fig. 1b) were also biopsied on 5dpf to serve as a comparison with the results obtained in the mouse. The concentration of 0.5 µM reversine was chosen based on previous experiments in mouse embryos (Bolton et al., 2016; Singla et al., 2020). Of these, 14 euploid, 20 aneuploid and 11 reversine-treated embryos (total=45) yielded good quality RNA-sequencing results.

Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis using all expressed genes revealed no clustering of the euploid, aneuploid or reversine-treated embryos in distinct groups (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1a). We used InferCNV (https://github.com/broadinstitute/inferCNV/wiki”) to bioinformatically infer unbalanced chromosomal copy numbers from gene expression data, based on higher or lower expression of genes located on chromosomes with gains or losses respectively (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 1). We compared the outcomes to the results obtained during PGT and found a match for 45/48 of the full chromosome aneuploidies, while euploidy was correctly predicted in all cases (Supplementary Fig. 1b). These results show that aneuploidy in human blastocysts results in significant abnormal gene dosage effects. The exact karyotypes of the reversine-treated embryos could not be determined since reversine induces different aneuploidies in each cell, leading to mosaic TE biopsies. However, InferCNV allowed us to determine a trisomy 12 meiotic chromosomal abnormality in one reversine-treated embryo (Supplementary Figure 1c), confirming that the reversine treatment causes random aneuploidy while naturally occurring meiotic aneuploidies are readily determined.

Despite the abnormal gene dosage, and in line with the lack of clear clustering in the PCA, the differential gene expression analysis yielded very few genes with a false discovery rate (FDR-q-value) under 0.05. These findings are similar to those of other studies on the transcriptome of aneuploid human embryos (Groff et al., 2019; Maxwell et al., 2022). Therefore, we used the differential gene expression with a cut-off value of |log2 fold change|>1 and −log10(p-value)<0.05, and primarily focused on pathway analysis. We found 547 upregulated and 463 downregulated genes in aneuploid versus euploid embryos (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Table 2). Amongst the top upregulated genes was Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15), a gene that has been found to be upregulated in human aneuploid cells (Dürrbaum et al., 2014) including aneuploid human embryos (Starostik et al., 2020). When comparing reversine-treated versus euploid embryos we observed 539 upregulated and 355 downregulated genes (Fig. 1f, Supplementary Table 3). While only 9.6% of the differentially expressed genes are in common between the aneuploid and reversine-treated embryos (Fig. 1g, h, Supplementary Table 4), pathway analysis revealed several commonly deregulated pathways. We identified deregulation of the p53 pathway and apoptosis (FDR q-value < 0.05, Fig. 1i, Supplementary Tables 5, 6) and deregulation of cell population proliferation, apoptotic process, regulation of cell death, and cell cycle (Fig. 1j, Supplementary Tables 7, 8). The prediction of p53 activation is also supported by differential expression of several p53 target genes (Jaiswal et al., 2021), such as MDM2 and PPM1D (feedback); CDKN1A, BTG2, GADD45A (cell-cycle arrest); TNFRSF10B (apoptosis), DDB2 and RRM2B (DNA-repair); FDXR (metabolism) and SESN1 (translation control) (Supplementary Table 2). Other pathways of interest related to DNA damage and p53, such as cellular response to DNA damage stimulus and DNA damage response signal transduction by p53 class mediator were specific to the aneuploid group. Cellular senescence signatures in the aneuploid embryos and selective autophagy in the reversine-treated group were also deregulated (Supplementary Tables 9, 10). Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) showed that upstream regulators CDK19 and AURK (cell cycle) and GAS2L3 and ANLN (cell growth) were inhibited in the aneuploid group (Fig. 1k, Supplementary Table 11). In line with the GSEA analysis, p53 was the most activated upstream regulator. Reversine-treated embryos activated ATM which is a well-known sensor of DNA-damage that mediates target genes such as p53 (Banin et al., 1998) (Fig. 1l, Supplementary Table 12). Canonical pathway analysis by IPA confirmed that p53 signalling, autophagy, cell-cycle pathways and senescence are deregulated in aneuploid embryos (Fig. 1m, Supplementary Table 13). The TE of reversine-treated embryos showed activated senescence, similar to the mouse reversine-treated embryos (Bolton et al., 2016) (Fig. 1n, Supplementary Table 14). Transcription factor analysis identified significant p53 expression in both aneuploid and reversine-treated groups (Supplementary Tables 15, 16).

We next compared our set of differentially expressed genes to those identified by other studies investigating the gene expression of euploid and aneuploid embryos, namely: mosaic monosomies 4, 7, 10, 15, 19 and mosaic trisomies 15 and 19 (Maxwell et al., 2022), trisomy 16 and monosomy 16 (Fuchs Weizman et al., 2019), monosomy 21 (Sanchez-Ribas et al., 2019) and embryos that contained various types of chromosomal abnormalities (Vera-Rodriguez et al., 2015; Licciardi et al., 2018; Starostik et al., 2020; Martin et al., 2023) (detailed overview in Supplementary Table 17). Overall, we found modest overlaps (Supplementary Figure 1d,e, Supplementary Tables 18-20). Most commonalities were with the data of Starostik et al, where we found an overlap in 87 genes (2.3%) (Starostik et al., 2020). These included target genes of the p53 pathway such as MDM2 and CDKN1A (Supplementary Fig. 1d, Supplementary Table 20). Interestingly, GSEA of these 87 genes identified an enrichment of intrinsic apoptotic signalling pathway by p53 class mediator and the apoptotic signalling pathway, in line with the findings of our dataset (Supplementary Table 19).

High gene-dosage imbalances result in stronger cellular stress signatures in human embryos

To test if there was a relationship between the level of stress signatures and the size of chromosomal imbalances in embryos as previously described in cancer (Dürrbaum and Storchová, 2016), we separated the aneuploid group into a low- and a high-imbalanced gene dosage group, based on the total number of coding loci that were affected by the chromosomal abnormalities. The low-dosage group contained the embryos under the 50th percentile when ranking the embryos from the lowest to the highest number of unbalanced loci, the high-dosage group the embryos with 50th percentile or higher (Supplementary Table 21). Hierarchical clustering using the top 500 deregulated genes showed that all high-dosage embryos clustered together and separated from the euploid embryos, while the low-dosage embryos clustered with either group (Fig. 2a). Differential gene expression with |log2 fold change|>1 and −log10(p-value)<0.05 resulted in 404 upregulated and 340 downregulated genes in low-dosage versus euploid embryos and in 716 upregulated and 627 downregulated genes in high-dosage versus euploid embryos with an overlap of 104 (10%) between both aneuploid groups (Fig. 2b-e, Supplementary Tables 22,23). We identified deregulation of TNFA signalling via NFkB, p53 pathway and apoptosis for both groups (FDR q-value < 0.05, Fig. 2f, Supplementary Tables 24,25). High-dosage embryos additionally showed an unfolded protein response, suggesting that this signature may only be present in the embryos with more and/or larger abnormal chromosomes. In the high-dosage group more of the genes of the p53 and apoptosis pathways were deregulated, and with higher significance (Fig. 2g,h, Supplementary Tables 26,27). The gene expression levels in the p53 and apoptosis pathways show a stepwise distribution between the gene dosage groups (Fig. 2i).

Aneuploidy triggers proteotoxic stress, autophagy and apoptosis in human embryos

To further investigate the cellular stress responses identified by the transcriptomic analysis, we immunostained the same embryos that underwent TE biopsy for transcriptome analysis. Thirty-seven (18 euploid, 19 aneuploid) of the 50 PGT embryos and 8 of the 11 reversine-treated embryos were successfully stained for markers of apoptosis, proteotoxic stress and autophagy (Fig. 3a,b). Aneuploid embryos showed increased intensity levels of active CASP3/7 (13 euploid and 8 aneuploid embryos stained) and CASP8 (6 euploid, 9 aneuploid and 8 reversine-treated embryos stained) (Fig. 3c-f). Both aneuploid and reversine-treated embryos had lower cell numbers than euploid embryos (Fig. 3g). We investigated whether proteotoxic stress and autophagy (Oromendia et al., 2012; Stingele et al., 2012; Dürrbaum et al., 2014; Ohashi et al., 2015; Singla et al., 2020) were also present in aneuploid human embryos. The number of puncta per cell of autophagy markers LC3B (19 euploid, 22 aneuploid and 8 reversine-treated embryos stained) and p62 (6 euploid and 9 aneuploid embryos stained) and the intensity levels of proteotoxic stress marker HSP70 (13 euploid, 8 aneuploid and 8 reversine-treated embryos stained) were significantly increased in both aneuploid and reversine-treated embryos (Fig. 3h-k). The gene expression profiles suggest that the accumulation of autophagic proteins in aneuploid embryos is caused by increased autophagic flux due to differential expression of the p53 target gene DNA Damage Regulated Autophagy Modulator-1 (DRAM1), rather than by inhibition of autophagy (Supplementary Table 2). DRAM1 is located in the lysosomal membrane and it increases autophagic flux and apoptosis after stress-induced p53 activation in cancer cells (Crighton et al., 2006; Guan et al., 2015).

Immunostaining reveals increased apoptosis, autophagy, proteotoxic stress and DNA-damage in chromosomally abnormal human embryos.

a,b. Same experimental set-up as described in Fig. 1 a,b, but focused on immunostaining analysis. c, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid and aneuploid embryos for DNA (white) and CASP3/7 (green). d, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid, aneuploid and reversine-treated embryos for DNA (white) and CASP8 (green). e, CASP3/7 mean intensity per cell. Euploid n=13, Aneuploid n=8 embryos. Mann-Whitney test, *p = 0.0199. f, CASP8 mean intensity per cell. Euploid n=6, Aneuploid n=9, Reversine-treated n=8 embryos. Kruskal-Wallis test, *p = 0.0394, **p = 0.0085. g, Number of nuclei per embryo. Euploid n=19, Aneuploid n=18, Reversine-treated n=8 embryos. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p < 0.0001, *p = 0.0305. h, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid, aneuploid and reversine-treated embryos for DNA (white), LC3B (turquoise) and HSP70 (magenta). i, LC3B puncta per cell. Euploid n=19, Aneuploid n=22 embryos, Reversine-treated n=8 embryos. Kruskal-Wallis test, *p = 0.0189, **p = 0.0074. j, HSP70 mean intensity per cell. Euploid n=13, Aneuploid n=8, Reversine-treated n=8 embryos. Kruskal-Wallis test, **p = 0.0077, ***p = 0.0008. k, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid, aneuploid for DNA (white) and p62 (turquoise). l, p62 puncta per cell. Euploid n=6, Aneuploid n=9 embryos. Mann-Whitney test, **p = 0.0076.

Brightfield pictures were obtained during confocal imaging. All scale bars are 20 µm. Box and whisker plots show median and whiskers show minimum to maximum values. Bar plots show mean ± s.d. For all plots each dot represents a single embryo and ns = not significant.

Aneuploidy increases apoptosis in the trophectoderm and impairs the second lineage segregation in the inner cell mass

We further investigated if these effects are cell-type specific, as shown in the mouse (Bolton et al., 2016; Singla et al., 2020) and human 2D gastruloids (Yang et al., 2021), and how they affect the first lineage segregation event to TE and ICM, and the second lineage segregation event to EPI and PrE.

We co-stained a new batch of expanded blastocysts for OCT4 (10 euploid, 14 aneuploid, ICM/EPI) and CASP3/7 (10 euploid, 14 aneuploid), LC3B (4 euploid, 5 aneuploid) or Serine 15 p53 (3 euploid, 5 aneuploid) (Fig. 4a). To ensure that there was sufficient time for differentiation to EPI and PrE, we thawed blastocysts at 5dpf or 6dpf and cultured them for 16 hours. All information on embryo score and developmental day and stage at time of cryopreservation can be found in Supplementary Table 28. The latter marker was chosen to demonstrate that the transcriptomic signature of p53 signalling is caused by DNA-damage-induced phosphorylation of Serine-15 on p53 (Loughery et al., 2014). Aneuploid embryos showed a higher percentage of cells with activated p53 (Fig. 4b,c), as suggested by our transcriptomic data (Figure 1), although these differences did not reach significance when considering the ICM/EPI (OCT4-positive) cells or TE (OCT4-negative) separately (Supplementary Fig. 2a-c). We then investigated cell type specificity of proliferative defects and apoptosis. Both the aneuploid TE and OCT4-positive cells showed decreased cell numbers (Fig. 4d-f) that led to an overall decrease of cell numbers in whole aneuploid embryos (Fig. 4g), confirming our previous experiment (Fig. 3g). The observed increased percentage of nuclear CASP3/7 positive cells in the TE of aneuploid embryos (Fig. 4h,i) and increased CASP3/7 mean intensity per cell in whole aneuploid embryos (Fig. 4h,j) points to apoptosis as the cause of this decrease in cell numbers. However, no OCT4-positive cells of either euploid or aneuploid group showed nuclear CASP3/7 signal (Fig. 4h). We also found CASP3/7-positive micronuclei which were increased in number in aneuploid embryos (Fig. 4h, Supplementary Fig. 2d,e).

Aneuploid human embryos show less cells in trophectoderm and OCT4-positive cells and impaired second lineage segregation

a, 5 or 6dpf post-PGT-A euploid and fully aneuploid human blastocysts were warmed and kept for 16hrs in culture to allow for the second lineage segregation. The blastocysts were live-stained with CASP3/7 for 30min and fixed for immunostaining proteins of interest. In a first scan we analyzed OCT4 (ICM), CASP3/7 (apoptosis), LC3B (autophagy) and S15p53 (DNA damage) in both lineages. Embryos were then re-stained with GATA4 as a marker for PrE. b, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid, aneuploid for DNA (white) and Serine (S) 15 p53 (turquoise). c, Percentage (%) of Serine 15 p53 positive cells per embryo. Euploid n = 3, Aneuploid n = 5. Mann-Whitney test, *p = 0.0357. d, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid and aneuploid embryos for DNA (white) and OCT4 (magenta). The first aneuploid panel (Trisomy 14 and 16) shows a similar number of ICM cells compared to the euploid embryo. The second aneuploid panel (Trisomy 14 and 22) shows an embryo without an ICM. e,f,g, Differences in number of nuclei per embryo between euploid and aneuploid embryos in the OCT4-negative cells (trophectoderm) (e) **p = 0.0092, OCT4-positive cells (ICM/EPI), *p = 0.0412 (f) and whole embryo **p = 0.0067 (g). Euploid n = 10, Aneuploid n = 14. Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. h, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid and aneuploid embryos for DNA (white), CASP3/7 (green) and OCT4 (magenta). i, Percentage (%) of CASP3/7 positive (+) cells in the trophectoderm lineage (OCT4-negative cells). Euploid n = 9, Aneuploid n = 14. Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction, *p = 0.0453. j, CASP3/7 mean intensity per cell of whole embryos. Euploid n = 9, Aneuploid n = 14. Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction, *p = 0.0332. k, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid and aneuploid embryos for DNA (white), OCT4 (magenta) and GATA4 (green). The first aneuploid panel (trisomy 13 and 15) shows an embryo with presence of a GATA4 positive cell (PrE). The second aneuploid panel (Trisomy 7 and monosomies 5, 12 and 21) shows an embryo that did not contain GATA4 positive cells. l, Differences in the number of cells per embryo that were OCT4 positive and either GATA4 negative (red) or positive (green) between euploid and aneuploid embryos. In case GATA4-positive cells (PrE) were present we considered the GATA4-negative cells to be epiblast (EPI). All euploid embryos contained GATA4-positive cells, 7/14 aneuploid embryos had an ICM completely lacking GATA4-positive cells (Fisher-exact test, p = 0.0188). m, Differences in the PrE/EPI ratio between euploid and aneuploid embryos that had an ICM containing GATA4-positive cells. Euploid n = 9, Aneuploid n = 7. Note here that one euploid embryo (#6, l) was lost during re-staining for GATA4. Mann-Whitney test, **p = 0.0089. n, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid and aneuploid embryos for DNA (white), LC3B (turquoise) and OCT4 (magenta). Yellow circle indicates the ICM. The first aneuploid panel (Trisomy 1 and 20 and monosomy 18) shows OCT4-positive cells (ICM/EPI) with low levels of autophagy and, after re-staining for GATA4, without PrE (right panel, ICM zoom). The second aneuploid panel (Monosomy 14) shows an embryo with high levels of autophagy in the ICM that contains PrE cells (right panel, ICM zoom). o,p,q. Differences in LC3B puncta per cell between euploid and aneuploid embryos in the whole embryo,*p = 0.0317 (o),(OCT4-negative cells (trophectoderm),*p = 0.0317 (p) and OCT4-positive cells (ICM/EPI) (q). Euploid n = 4, Aneuploid n = 5. Mann-Whitney test. r, Violin plots with box plots of OCT4-positive-cells (ICM/EPI) per embryo (left, ns), OCT4-negative cells (trophectoderm) per embryo (center, *p = 0.043) and GATA4-positive-cells (PrE) per embryo (right, ****p < 0.001, Jonkheere-Terpstra test) depending on gene dosage. Euploid (light blue), Low dosage (middle blue) and High dosage (darkest blue).

Yellow arrows indicate presence of the signal and yellow arrow heads indicate absence of signal. Brightfield pictures were obtained during confocal imaging. All scale bars are 20 µm. Box and whisker plots show median and minimum to maximum values. Bar plots show mean ± s.d. For all plots each dot represents a single embryo; ns = not significant. T = Trisomy, M = Monosomy

The observation (figure 4f) that the ICM/EPI cell numbers of aneuploid embryos fell into two groups with either low or high cell counts led us to further investigate the impact of aneuploidies on the second lineage segregation event. All blastocysts were re-stained for GATA4 (PrE marker) and imaged together with OCT4 (ICM/EPI marker). We found that while all euploid embryos contained GATA4-positive cells, 7/14 aneuploid embryos had no GATA4-positive cells (Fig. 4k,l) and that in those with GATA4-positive PrE cells, there was a significantly lower ratio of GATA4-positive to OCT4-positive/GATA4-negative cells (Fig. 4m). In line with their decreased ICM cell numbers and absence of PrE, the aneuploid embryos had received a significantly lower ICM score by the clinical embryologists at time of cryopreservation (1xA/13xB) when compared to euploid embryos (6xA/4xB, p=0.0088, Fisher-exact test).

We then investigated whether there are different levels of LC3B as marker of autophagy between the aneuploid TE and ICM in an additional 5 aneuploid and 4 euploid embryos. Aneuploid embryos displayed increased levels of autophagy mainly attributable to the TE (Fig. 4n-q), while their ICM/EPI cells showed a small increase in autophagy which did not reach significance (Fig. 4q). The aneuploid embryos could be separated in two groups: a first group with low levels of autophagy lacking GATA4-positive cells in 2 out of 3 embryos (Fig. 4n, left and right panels, 2nd row) and a high-level autophagy group in which both embryos contained GATA4-positive cells (Fig. 4n, left and right panels 3rd row).

Lastly, we separated the aneuploid embryos into a low- and a high-dosage group as done for the gene-expression analysis (Supplementary Table 29). Trend analysis showed that the higher the number of imbalanced loci, the lower the cell numbers in the TE and PrE but not in the EPI (Fig. 4r).

Discussion

In this work, we studied the consequences of aneuploidy in human preimplantation embryos that carried a uniformly present, presumed meiotic, complex aneuploidy. In our study we find that, while aneuploid embryos had lower cell numbers in both TE and ICM/EPI, the effect of aneuploidy was cell-type dependent. Aneuploid TE presented transcriptomic signatures of p53 signalling and apoptosis, and immunostaining of whole embryos showed that aneuploidy results in increased proteotoxic stress, autophagy, DNA damage-mediated activated p53 and subsequent apoptosis in the TE. In contrast, aneuploidy impairs the second lineage differentiation and affects PrE formation in particular.

Overall, our gene-expression results are in line with previously published RNA-sequencing studies on aneuploid human embryonic cells that identified transcriptional signatures consistent with DNA damage (Vera-Rodriguez et al., 2015; Licciardi et al., 2018; Fuchs Weizman et al., 2019), alteration of cell proliferation (Starostik et al., 2020; Maxwell et al., 2022; Martin et al., 2023), the cell cycle (Vera-Rodriguez et al., 2015; Licciardi et al., 2018; Fuchs Weizman et al., 2019; Starostik et al., 2020; Martin et al., 2023), deregulation of autophagy (Licciardi et al., 2018; Sanchez-Ribas et al., 2019), p53 signalling (Licciardi et al., 2018) and apoptosis (Licciardi et al., 2018; Groff et al., 2019; Sanchez-Ribas et al., 2019; Maxwell et al., 2022; Martin et al., 2023). However, when comparing our dataset of differentially expressed genes to these studies, we only found modest overlaps at the level of individual genes. This is probably because embryos of different developmental stages were included in the studies, containing specific aneuploidies, and of different sample types (overview in Supplementary Table 17). Naturally acquired and induced aneuploidies only share a few differentially expressed genes but show overall equal signatures after pathway analysis, suggesting that reversine-based models of aneuploidy are very close but may not fully mimic endogenous aneuploidy. We also observed aneuploidy-mediated gene dosage effects in the TE cells, as extensively reported in human and mouse aneuploid cancer cell lines (Dürrbaum and Storchová, 2016), and found that a higher dosage leads to stronger p53 signalling and apoptosis responses.

We next tested the predictions made based on the gene-expression profiles with immunostaining. First, we found evidence of proteotoxic stress and increased expression of autophagy proteins, as well as activation of apoptosis. The most likely series of events is that p62/LC3B/CASP8 interaction results in autophagy-mediated apoptosis in aneuploid human embryos. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out indirect activation of apoptosis mediated by autophagy due to the degradation of cell organelles (Gump and Thorburn, 2011). This is supported by the observation in the aneuploid mouse embryo model that autophagy is independent of the mTOR pathway (Singla et al., 2020). Other upstream regulators of autophagy could be involved, such as the cGAS-STING pathway (Krivega et al., 2021) or, as also observed in our dataset, p53-mediated activation of DRAM1 (Crighton et al., 2006) that can induce apoptosis by increasing BAX protein levels (Guan et al., 2015). Second, we confirmed the presence of activated p53 in aneuploid human embryos. We specifically stained for p53 with phosphorylation on Serine 15, mediated by kinases such as ATM and ATR as a direct result of DNA-damage (Loughery et al., 2014). This indicates that aneuploidy also induces the DNA-damage response in the embryo, as found in the mouse and 2D gastruloids (Singla et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2021). An interesting observation is that aneuploid embryos contained increased numbers of CASP3/7 positive micronuclei. This is similar to findings in a non-human primate model showing that abnormal chromosomes can be encapsulated in micronuclei, which can subsequently be selectively eliminated from the embryo (Daughtry et al., 2019). In human cleavage stage embryos these micronuclei have been shown to contain genetic material that originates from chromosome breakages due to replication fork stalling and DNA-damage (Palmerola et al., 2022), further highlighting how aneuploidy is leading to DNA-damage in the human embryo. In sum, our results in this part are in line with previous findings on mouse and 2D gastruloid models (Singla et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2021), and suggest that these conserved stress responses to aneuploidy are also activated in fully aneuploid embryos with complex karyotypes, both converging on apoptosis if not resolved. First, proteotoxic stress resulting from gene-dosage imbalances mediates the unfolded protein response and autophagy, and second, replication stress that can lead to DNA-damage, resulting in p53 activation and ultimately to apoptosis (Li et al., 2010; Thompson and Compton, 2010; Santaguida et al., 2015, 2017; Zhu et al., 2018; Chunduri and Storchová, 2019; Krivega et al., 2022; Regin et al., 2022).

In the second part of our work, we focused on studying the lineage-specific response to complex aneuploidy, as the studies on reversine-treated mouse embryos (Bolton et al., 2016; Singla et al., 2020) and human 2D gastruloids (Yang et al., 2021) also identified a cell-type specific effect of aneuploidy. In the mouse, aneuploid cells are eliminated by apoptosis in the EPI, while tolerated in the TE, and in human 2D gastruloids, aneuploid cells are eliminated in the post-gastrulation embryonic germ layers but tolerated in the TE. We found lower cell numbers and increased apoptosis in aneuploid TE cells. While we also detected lower cell numbers in aneuploid OCT4-positive ICM/EPI, we did not find any of them to be CASP3/7 positive, i.e. undergoing apoptosis. These results are in line with the findings of Victor et al. (Victor et al., 2019), where the TE of mosaic and aneuploid embryos showed increased levels of apoptosis, and the recent RNA-sequencing of TE and ICM samples of mosaic human embryos (Martin et al., 2023). Mosaic TE cells showed disrupted regulation of apoptosis while the ICM showed primarily deregulated mitochondrial function. However, in contrast to our findings, some of the embryos in the study of Victor et al. showed CASP3/7 positive signals in the ICM; further research will be needed to understand if these differences with our findings and those of Martin et al. are related to technical or to biological factors. Finally, the differences with the mouse results are possibly due to species-specific properties of the ICM/EPI cells. For instance, the lack of apoptosis in the human ICM/EPI could be due to an uncoupling between aneuploidy-induced stress signals and apoptosis, as observed in human embryonic stem cells (Mantel et al., 2007). In this context, the lower cell numbers in aneuploid embryos could be explained by two other known effects of p53 activation which are not apoptosis. First, p53 activation could decrease cell proliferation, leading to lower cell numbers. Secondly, p53 activation may downregulate OCT4 and NANOG expression, as seen in mouse embryonic stem cells (Lin et al., 2005), leading to loss of pluripotency and driving the cells to differentiation and out of the ICM/EPI.

Another difference is that we found that the human aneuploid TE had increased levels of autophagy markers, which did not reach statistical significance in the ICM/EPI, while the mouse EPI does show increased autophagy (Singla et al., 2020). Interestingly, the aneuploid OCT4-positive cells separated into a high and a low-level autophagy group, where the low-level group seemed to lack GATA4-positive PrE cells. Although based on a few samples, this data suggests that an ICM in a transcriptionally earlier state of pluripotency, i.e. GATA4-negative and prior to the second lineage segregation event, might be less sensitive to the consequences of aneuploidy, i.e. show less autophagy. We thus propose that aneuploid human embryonic cells in the ICM become more sensitive from the second lineage segregation onwards. We hypothesize that this effect may even become stronger and more specific to the embryonic lineage after onset of gastrulation, as elegantly shown in human 2D gastruloids (Yang et al., 2021).

Finally, we found that in those embryos that had already undergone the second lineage segregation event, the aneuploid embryos had a significantly lower ratio of PrE (GATA4-positive) to EPI (OCT4-positive/GATA4-negative) cells than euploid embryos. Our findings are in line with the upregulation of the PrE marker SOX17 that has been recently found by gene-expression analysis of euploid and low- and high level mosaic human embryos (Martin et al., 2023). Further, we observed that this effect was dosage-dependent, with embryos with larger gene-dosage imbalances showing significantly lower cell numbers in the TE and PrE than euploid embryos or embryos with lower gene-dosage imbalances. This suggests that complex aneuploidy both affects TE and ICM proliferation and PrE formation or that the PrE is more sensitive to aneuploidy-mediated apoptosis than the less differentiated EPI. An alternative explanation is that in aneuploid human embryos the PrE forms at a later time point due to their delayed development. In our study, to minimize the risk of missing the second lineage segregation, we purposefully used 5-6dpf expanded blastocysts that were kept in culture for an additional 16 hours after warming, to allow the embryos sufficient time to recover and develop.

When interpreting the results of this study, it is important to bear in mind that we identified the ICM/EPI as staining positive for OCT4 and the PrE as positive for GATA4. We confirmed that the embryos analysed were expanded blastocysts which had undergone the first lineage segregations, as OCT4 was restricted to the inner cells and absent in TE cells (Niakan and Eggan, 2013). The identity of human ICM and EPI cells is currently under vigorous debate (Meistermann et al., 2021; Radley et al., 2022) and exclusive markers of either cell type are untested. Therefore we cannot assign ICM or EPI identity to OCT4-positive cells. However, in blastocysts with GATA4-positive cells the second lineage segregation had occurred and PrE was established, and consequently we confidently assigned the EPI identity to OCT4-positive cells in these blastocysts. In GATA4-negative embryos OCT4-positive cells could be either ICM or EPI cells. Interestingly, we never found GATA4-positive cells in the absence of OCT4-positive cells, supporting the hypothesis that PrE cells differentiate from EPI cells (Meistermann et al., 2021). Limitations of our study are that we did not analyse the transcriptome of the ICM of our embryos, because after the biopsy they were used for immunostainings instead, and we can therefore not draw any conclusions on their transcriptome. We did not study embryos with the same type of aneuploidy and can thus not provide insight on chromosome-specific effects. Although some of our embryos carried genetic abnormalities in mosaic form as part of their complex karyotype (aneuploid/aneuploid mosaics), we did not study diploid/aneuploid mosaic embryos and can therefore not assert that these also activate the same cellular stress pathways in their aneuploid cells. Since these pathways are common to most cell types, our guess would however be that they are activated in mosaic embryos too. Lastly, the possibilities for functional studies and lineage tracing experiments in human embryos are very limited, which is why we can only present an observational study.

Taken together, our results suggest that while the same pathways appear to be activated in human and mouse embryos with complex aneuploidy, human embryos have a different response when it comes to the downstream effect of these pathways in the different cell lineages. While the mouse readily depletes aneuploid cells by apoptosis specifically from the embryonic lineage before implantation (Bolton et al., 2016; Singla et al., 2020), in the preimplantation human embryo, apoptosis appears to be more active in the TE, as also seen by others (Victor et al., 2019; Martin et al., 2023). The results suggest that in the human embryo, undifferentiated pluripotent cells have a different response to aneuploidy-induced cellular stress than the neighbouring differentiated cells.

Our results on human embryos with complex meiotic aneuploidy provide further insight into the mechanisms by which human embryos respond to gene-dosage imbalances, and may contribute to understanding how aneuploid cells are selectively eliminated in mosaic embryos. Further research, especially by using human embryos with endogenous chromosomal mosaicism, will be needed to shed light on the interactions between proteotoxic stress, the p53 pathway and differentiation during early development, for which the most novel models of human embryo implantation (Deglincerti et al., 2016; Shahbazi et al., 2016, 2020; Kagawa et al., 2021) will prove to be of incalculable value.

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data files are provided for figures 3 and 4. Raw files are not provided due to GDPR guidelines concerning human embryo research. Count tables generated from the raw data files are included in the source data files.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Marleen Carlé from the Center for Medical Genetics (UZ Brussel) for assisting during the tubing of trophectoderm samples. We thank Wilfried Cools from the Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Group (VUB) for the statistical advice and the members of the BRIGHTcore facility (UZ Brussel) for performing the RNA sequencing. We thank Prof. Rajiv McCoy for the scientific input and data exchange. This study was funded by the Fonds for Scientific Research in Flanders-G017218N-(Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek – Vlaanderen [FWO]). M.R. and E.C.D.D. are doctoral fellows at the FWO.

Author contributions

M.R. carried out all the experiments unless stated otherwise, interpreted and analyzed the results and co-wrote the manuscript. Y.L. and E.C.D.D. performed the bioinformatics analysis. Y.G. performed the trophectoderm biopsies. P.V. provided and supervised the diagnoses of the PGT embryos. G.V. and H.V.D.V. provided the embryos for this study. K.S. interpreted and supervised the experimental work and co-wrote the manuscript. C.S. designed, interpreted and supervised the experimental work and co-wrote the manuscript. All co-authors proofread the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Expanded RNA-sequencing analysis

a, Principal component analysis after RNA-sequencing of euploid (green) versus aneuploid (red) and reversine (blue) embryos. b, InferCNV analysis of individual euploid samples compared to the reference set. c, InferCNV analysis of individual reversine samples compared to the reference set. d, Venn Diagram of overlap between differentially expressed genes of this study with three studies that analyzed human embryos that contain euploid and diverse types of aneuploidy from cleavage stage embryos (Vera-Rodriguez et al. 2015), single cells from 4 and 7 dpf human embryos from TE, ICM, EPI and PrE lineages (Starostik et al. 2020) and ICM and TE samples of 5 or 6 dpf embryos containing low- and high levels of mosaicism (Martin et al., 2023). e, Venn Diagram of overlap between differentially expressed genes of this study with four studies that analyzed specific aneuploidies (Licciardi et al. 2018, Fuchs-Weizman et al. 2019, Sánchez-Ribas et al. 2019 and Maxwell et al. 2022).

S15-p53 expression in TE vs OCT4-positive cells (ICM/EPI) and increased micronuclei in aneuploid embryos

a, Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid and aneuploid embryos for DNA (white), S15p53 (turquoise) and OCT4 (magenta). b, Percentages of nuclei positive for S15p53 per embryo in euploid (n = 3) and aneuploid (n = 4) embryos in the ICM. c, Percentages of nuclei positive for S15p53 per embryo in euploid (n = 3) and aneuploid (n = 5) embryos in the TE. d, Left panel: Orthogonal projections after immunostaining of euploid and aneuploid embryos for DNA (white) and CASP3/7 (green) showing micronuclei. Yellow box indicates zoomed-in region in the right panel. Yellow arrows indicate presence of micronuclei and overlap between DNA and CASP3/7. e, Number of micronuclei per cell in euploid and aneuploid whole embryos. Euploid n = 9, Aneuploid n = 14. Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction, *p = 0.0115.

Brightfield pictures were obtained during confocal imaging. All scale bars are 20 µm. Box and plots show median and minimum to maximum values. Bar plots show mean ± s.d. For all plots each dot represents a single embryo; ns = not significant. ROI = Region of interest.