Peer review process
Revised: This Reviewed Preprint has been revised by the authors in response to the previous round of peer review; the eLife assessment and the public reviews have been updated where necessary by the editors and peer reviewers.
Read more about eLife’s peer review process.Editors
- Reviewing EditorRosana CollepardoUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Senior EditorQiang CuiBoston University, Boston, United States of America
Reviewer #1 (Public Review):
This is an interesting, informative, and well-designed study that combines theoretical and experimental methodologies to tackle the phenomenon of higher-resolution structures/substructures in model biomolecular condensates.
The authors have adequately addressed my previous concerns.
Reviewer #2 (Public Review):
Summary:
Latham A.P. et al. apply simulations and FLIM to analyse several di-block elastin-like polypetides and connect their sequence to the micro-structure of coacervates resulting from their phase-separation.
Strengths:
Understanding the molecular grammar of phase separating proteins and the connection with mesoscale properties of the coacervates is highly relevant. This work provides insights into micro-structures of coacervates resulting from di-block polypetides.
Weaknesses:
The results apply to a very specific architecture (di-block polypetides) with specific sequences.