Genetic interactions affecting human gene expression identified by variance association mapping

  1. Andrew A Brown
  2. Alfonso Buil
  3. Ana Viñuela
  4. Tuuli Lappalainen
  5. Hou-Feng Zheng
  6. John B Richards
  7. Kerrin S Small
  8. Timothy D Spector
  9. Emmanouil T Dermitzakis
  10. Richard Durbin  Is a corresponding author
  1. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, United Kingdom
  2. University of Geneva, Switzerland
  3. King's College London, United Kingdom
  4. McGill University, Canada
  5. The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, United Kingdom

Abstract

Non-additive interaction between genetic variants, or epistasis, is a possible explanation for the gap between heritability of complex traits and the variation explained by identified genetic loci. Interactions give rise to genotype dependent variance, and therefore the identification of variance quantitative trait loci can be an intermediate step to discover both epistasis and gene by environment effects (GxE). Using RNA-sequence data from lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from the TwinsUK cohort, we identify a candidate set of 508 variance associated SNPs. Exploiting the twin design we show that GxE plays a role in ~70% of these associations. Further investigation of these loci reveals 57 epistatic interactions that replicated in a smaller dataset, explaining on average 4.3% of phenotypic variance. In 24 cases, more variance is explained by the interaction than their additive contributions. Using molecular phenotypes in this way may provide a route to uncovering genetic interactions underlying more complex traits.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrew A Brown

    Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Alfonso Buil

    University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Ana Viñuela

    King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Tuuli Lappalainen

    University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Hou-Feng Zheng

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. John B Richards

    King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Kerrin S Small

    King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Timothy D Spector

    King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Emmanouil T Dermitzakis

    University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Emmanouil T Dermitzakis, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  10. Richard Durbin

    The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    rd@sanger.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Ethics

Human subjects: This project was approved by the ethics committee at St Thomas' Hospital London, where all the biopsies were carried out. Volunteers gave informed consent and signed an approved consent form prior to the biopsy procedure. Volunteers were supplied with an appropriate detailed information sheet regarding the research project and biopsy procedure by post prior to attending for the biopsy. The St. Thomas' Research Ethics Committee (REC) approved on 20th September 2007 the protocol for dissemination of data, including DNA, with the REC reference number RE04/015. On 12th of March of 2008, the St Thomas' REC confirmed this approval extends to expression data.

Copyright

© 2014, Brown et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrew A Brown
  2. Alfonso Buil
  3. Ana Viñuela
  4. Tuuli Lappalainen
  5. Hou-Feng Zheng
  6. John B Richards
  7. Kerrin S Small
  8. Timothy D Spector
  9. Emmanouil T Dermitzakis
  10. Richard Durbin
(2014)
Genetic interactions affecting human gene expression identified by variance association mapping
eLife 3:e01381.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01381

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01381

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Carmina Lichauco, Eric J Foss ... Antonio Bedalov
    Research Article

    The association between late replication timing and low transcription rates in eukaryotic heterochromatin is well known, yet the specific mechanisms underlying this link remain uncertain. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone deacetylase Sir2 is required for both transcriptional silencing and late replication at the repetitive ribosomal DNA (rDNA) arrays. We have previously reported that in the absence of SIR2, a de-repressed RNA PolII repositions MCM replicative helicases from their loading site at the ribosomal origin, where they abut well-positioned, high-occupancy nucleosomes, to an adjacent region with lower nucleosome occupancy. By developing a method that can distinguish activation of closely spaced MCM complexes, here we show that the displaced MCMs at rDNA origins have increased firing propensity compared to the nondisplaced MCMs. Furthermore, we found that both activation of the repositioned MCMs and low occupancy of the adjacent nucleosomes critically depend on the chromatin remodeling activity of FUN30. Our study elucidates the mechanism by which Sir2 delays replication timing, and it demonstrates, for the first time, that activation of a specific replication origin in vivo relies on the nucleosome context shaped by a single chromatin remodeler.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Carlos Moreno-Yruela, Beat Fierz
    Insight

    Specialized magnetic beads that bind target proteins to a cryogenic electron microscopy grid make it possible to study the structure of protein complexes from dilute samples.