Oxidation of cellular amino acid pools leads to cytotoxic mistranslation of the genetic code

  1. Tammy Bullwinkle
  2. Noah M Reynolds
  3. Medha Raina
  4. Adil B Moghal
  5. Eleftheria Matsa
  6. Andrei Rajkovic
  7. Huseyin Kayadibi
  8. Farbod Fazlollahi
  9. Christopher Ryan
  10. Nathaniel Howitz
  11. Kym F Faull
  12. Beth Lazazzera
  13. Michael Ibba  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ohio State University, United States
  2. Adana Military Hospital, Turkey
  3. Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  4. California Department of Toxic Substances Control, United States
  5. University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Abstract

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases use a variety of mechanisms to ensure fidelity of the genetic code and ultimately select the correct amino acids to be used in protein synthesis. The physiological necessity of these quality control mechanisms in different environments remains unclear, as the cost versus benefit of accurate protein synthesis is difficult to predict. We show that in Escherichia coli, a non-coded amino acid produced through oxidative damage is a significant threat to the accuracy of protein synthesis and must be cleared by phenylalanine-tRNA synthetase in order to prevent cellular toxicity caused by mis-synthesized proteins. These findings demonstrate how stress can lead to the accumulation of non-canonical amino acids that must be excluded from the proteome in order to maintain cellular viability.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tammy Bullwinkle

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Noah M Reynolds

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Medha Raina

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Adil B Moghal

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Eleftheria Matsa

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrei Rajkovic

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Huseyin Kayadibi

    Adana Military Hospital, Adana, Turkey
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Farbod Fazlollahi

    Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Christopher Ryan

    California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Nathaniel Howitz

    University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Kym F Faull

    Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Beth Lazazzera

    University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Michael Ibba

    Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    For correspondence
    ibba.1@att.net
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gisela Storz, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, United States

Version history

  1. Received: February 10, 2014
  2. Accepted: May 29, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 2, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 24, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2014, Bullwinkle et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,792
    views
  • 286
    downloads
  • 68
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tammy Bullwinkle
  2. Noah M Reynolds
  3. Medha Raina
  4. Adil B Moghal
  5. Eleftheria Matsa
  6. Andrei Rajkovic
  7. Huseyin Kayadibi
  8. Farbod Fazlollahi
  9. Christopher Ryan
  10. Nathaniel Howitz
  11. Kym F Faull
  12. Beth Lazazzera
  13. Michael Ibba
(2014)
Oxidation of cellular amino acid pools leads to cytotoxic mistranslation of the genetic code
eLife 3:e02501.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02501

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02501

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.