Apoptosis: Keeping inflammation at bay
-
Download
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Apoptosis: Keeping inflammation at bayeLife 3:e02583.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02583 - Cite
- CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).
- The Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
The cells in our bodies are genetically programmed to undergo a natural process of self-destruction called apoptosis, after which the dying cell is removed by cells that have the ability to engulf them (‘phagocytes’). The membrane of the dying cell is still intact as it is engulfed by the phagocyte, so its contents do not come into contact with other nearby cells. Apoptosis does not trigger inflammation, whereas another form of cell death called necrosis—in which the cell membrane is ruptured—is often associated with inflammation (Kerr et al., 1972).
Necrosis causes inflammation because some components of the dying cell that are capable of triggering inflammation come into contact with healthy cells nearby (Rock and Kono, 2008). At first it was assumed that the only reason why apoptosis did not cause inflammation was that all the contents of the dying cell remained inside the membrane and the phagocyte. However, it was later discovered that apoptosis can actually block inflammation (Voll et al., 1997; Fadok et al., 1998). Initial observations suggested that this anti-inflammatory effect is triggered when the phagocytes are exposed to phosphatidylserine—a molecule on the surface of apoptotic cells that has a central role in phagocytosis (Huynh et al., 2002). It seemed, therefore, that these anti-inflammatory changes could be induced only in cells intimately associated with the dying cell (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
How do apoptotic cells trigger an anti-inflammatory response in phagocytes?
(A) Phosphatidylserine molecules on the surface of an apoptotic cell can bind to phosphatidylserine receptors on the surface of a phagocyte and previously it was suggested that this triggered an …
Now, in eLife, Shigekazu Nagata and co-workers at Kyoto University and the Osaka Bioscience Institute—including Hiroshi Yamaguchi as first author—report that apoptotic cells release a molecule called adenosine that can activate an anti-inflammatory gene response in phagocytes (Yamaguchi et al., 2014). They have also shown that adenosine activates this response by stimulating the A2a adenosine receptor in phagocytes.
Similar results have been reported before (Sitkovsky and Ohta, 2005; Köröskényi et al., 2011), but it had been thought that the adenosine was generated by the phagocytes as a consequence of their uptake of the apoptotic cells (Figure 1B). Yamaguchi et al. now show that the adenosine comes from the apoptotic cells themselves, with the phagocytes having only a secondary role in its production. The first step involves enzymes called caspases—which have a central role in apoptosis—cleaving a membrane channel protein called pannexin-1 in the dying cells, and thereby activating it. This results in the release of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) from the dying cells. A 5′-nucleotidase expressed by the phagocytes then removes a phosphate group from the AMP to yield adenosine. The adenosine then binds to the A2a receptor on the phagocytes to trigger an anti-inflammatory gene response (Figure 1C).
Adenosine is not the only soluble molecule released by apoptotic cells to perform a specific role. For example, various other molecules—including lysophosphatidylcholine and the nucleotides ATP and UTP—act as ‘find me’ signals that attract phagocytes towards apoptotic cells (Hochreiter-Hufford and Ravichandran, 2013). Another example is an iron-binding glycoprotein called lactoferrin that inhibits the translocation of certain white blood cells, thereby apparently contributing to the anti-inflammatory effect of apoptosis (Bournazou et al., 2009).
To what extent do the soluble molecules released by apoptotic cells have an effect on cells remote from the site of death? And how does the contribution of these molecules to the anti-inflammatory consequences of apoptosis compare with the contribution that results from direct contact between the dying cell and the cell engulfing it? Nagata and co-workers report that in a mouse model of inflammation (zymosan-induced peritonitis), deletion of either the Pannexin-1 gene or the A2a gene prolongs the inflammation. These findings support the notion that (in this experimental model) adenosine derived from apoptotic cells contributes significantly to the restriction of inflammation. More precise cell-type-specific targeting of these molecules (and other molecules that have anti-inflammatory effects) should lead to an improved understanding of their relative contributions to immune regulation in specific pathological situations.
References
-
Apoptotic human cells inhibit migration of granulocytes via release of lactoferrinJournal of Clinical Investigation 119:20–32.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI36226
-
Clearing the dead: apoptotic cell sensing, recognition, engulfment, and digestionCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5:a008748.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008748
-
Phosphatidylserine-dependent ingestion of apoptotic cells promotes TGF-beta1 secretion and the resolution of inflammationJournal of Clinical Investigation 109:41–50.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI11638
-
Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kineticsBritish Journal of Cancer 26:239–257.https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1972.33
-
The inflammatory response to cell deathAnnual Reviews of Pathology 3:99–126.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151456
-
The ‘danger’ sensors that STOP the immune response: the A2 adenosine receptors?Trends in Immunology 26:299–304.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2005.04.004
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2014, Wallach and Kovalenko
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,244
- views
-
- 217
- downloads
-
- 20
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
Niemann–Pick disease type C (NPC) is a devastating lysosomal storage disease characterized by abnormal cholesterol accumulation in lysosomes. Currently, there is no treatment for NPC. Transcription factor EB (TFEB), a member of the microphthalmia transcription factors (MiTF), has emerged as a master regulator of lysosomal function and promoted the clearance of substrates stored in cells. However, it is not known whether TFEB plays a role in cholesterol clearance in NPC disease. Here, we show that transgenic overexpression of TFEB, but not TFE3 (another member of MiTF family) facilitates cholesterol clearance in various NPC1 cell models. Pharmacological activation of TFEB by sulforaphane (SFN), a previously identified natural small-molecule TFEB agonist by us, can dramatically ameliorate cholesterol accumulation in human and mouse NPC1 cell models. In NPC1 cells, SFN induces TFEB nuclear translocation via a ROS-Ca2+-calcineurin-dependent but MTOR-independent pathway and upregulates the expression of TFEB-downstream genes, promoting lysosomal exocytosis and biogenesis. While genetic inhibition of TFEB abolishes the cholesterol clearance and exocytosis effect by SFN. In the NPC1 mouse model, SFN dephosphorylates/activates TFEB in the brain and exhibits potent efficacy of rescuing the loss of Purkinje cells and body weight. Hence, pharmacological upregulating lysosome machinery via targeting TFEB represents a promising approach to treat NPC and related lysosomal storage diseases, and provides the possibility of TFEB agonists, that is, SFN as potential NPC therapeutic candidates.
-
- Cell Biology
Dynamic interactions between gut mucosal cells and the external environment are essential to maintain gut homeostasis. Enterochromaffin (EC) cells transduce both chemical and mechanical signals and produce 5-hydroxytryptamine to mediate disparate physiological responses. However, the molecular and cellular basis for functional diversity of ECs remains to be adequately defined. Here, we integrated single-cell transcriptomics with spatial image analysis to identify 14 EC clusters that are topographically organized along the gut. Subtypes predicted to be sensitive to the chemical environment and mechanical forces were identified that express distinct transcription factors and hormones. A Piezo2+ population in the distal colon was endowed with a distinctive neuronal signature. Using a combination of genetic, chemogenetic, and pharmacological approaches, we demonstrated Piezo2+ ECs are required for normal colon motility. Our study constructs a molecular map for ECs and offers a framework for deconvoluting EC cells with pleiotropic functions.
