Global distribution maps of the leishmaniases
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4f93/e4f93a9bb0c88790b05bbfbb004ed3bdf6a64d81" alt=""
Reported and predicted distribution of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the New World.
(A) Evidence consensus for presence of the disease ranging from green (complete consensus on the absence: −100%) to purple (complete consensus on the presence of disease: +100%). The blue spots indicate occurrence points or centroids of occurrences within small polygons. (B) Predicted risk of cutaneous leishmaniasis from green (low probability of presence) to purple (high probability of presence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55624/556244410162cd94dc9df4a503f0e51d4f9a50b9" alt=""
Uncertainty associated with predictions in Figure 1B.
Uncertainty was calculated as the range of the 95% confidence interval in predicted probability of occurrence for each pixel. Regions of highest uncertainty are in dark brown, with blue representing low uncertainty.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36eef/36eefc6a0138b223291139b768f62a9a2823573e" alt=""
Reported and predicted distribution of visceral leishmaniasis in the New World.
(A) Evidence consensus for presence of the disease ranging from green (complete consensus on the absence: −100%) to purple (complete consensus on the presence of disease: +100%). The blue spots indicate occurrence points or centroids of occurrences within small polygons. (B) Predicted risk of visceral leishmaniasis from green (low probability of presence) to purple (high probability of presence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bd79/8bd79d698e07c5fee429117f7a4a78fbce28875b" alt=""
Uncertainty associated with predictions in Figure 2B.
Uncertainty was calculated as the range of the 95% confidence interval in predicted probability of occurrence for each pixel. Regions of highest uncertainty are in dark brown, with blue representing low uncertainty.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac5a/0ac5aec53a9e176d3d570b8443f82609f4727195" alt=""
Reported and predicted distribution of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Old World.
(A) Evidence consensus for presence of the disease ranging from green (complete consensus on the absence: −100%) to purple (complete consensus on the presence of disease: +100%). The blue spots indicate occurrence points or centroids of occurrences within small polygons. (B) Predicted risk of cutaneous leishmaniasis from green (low probability of presence) to purple (high probability of presence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e428/2e4288ca04574f021537d3b9d20e8abcec82a796" alt=""
Uncertainty associated with predictions in Figure 3B.
Uncertainty was calculated as the range of the 95% confidence interval in predicted probability of occurrence for each pixel. Regions of highest uncertainty are in dark brown, with blue representing low uncertainty.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89513/89513276ebe9766fb5662d7c59081fea41b9d456" alt=""
Reported and predicted distribution of cutaneous leishmaniasis in northeast Africa.
(A) Evidence consensus for presence of the disease ranging from green (complete consensus on the absence: −100%) to purple (complete consensus on the presence of disease: +100%). The blue spots indicate occurrence points or centroids of occurrences within small polygons. (B) Predicted risk of cutaneous leishmaniasis from green (low probability of presence) to purple (high probability of presence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92a1c/92a1cf476b514f1235501cd1a1980ef83b19597a" alt=""
Reported and predicted distribution of cutaneous leishmaniasis across the Near East, including Syria, Iran and Afghanistan.
(A) Evidence consensus for presence of the disease ranging from green (complete consensus on the absence: −100%) to purple (complete consensus on the presence of disease: +100%). The blue spots indicate occurrence points or centroids of occurrences within small polygons. (B) Predicted risk of cutaneous leishmaniasis from green (low probability of presence) to purple (high probability of presence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b6db/3b6dbc21359832950daac602ed78e919649e6b35" alt=""
Reported and predicted distribution of visceral leishmaniasis in the Old World.
(A) Evidence consensus for presence of the disease ranging from green (complete consensus on the absence: −100%) to purple (complete consensus on the presence of disease: +100%). The blue spots indicate occurrence points or centroids of occurrences within small polygons. (B) Predicted risk of visceral leishmaniasis from green (low probability of presence) to purple (high probability of presence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29538/295387a6dbd8463d33ac8ba65b0ac3409247834a" alt=""
Uncertainty associated with predictions in Figure 4B.
Uncertainty was calculated as the range of the 95% confidence interval in predicted probability of occurrence for each pixel. Regions of highest uncertainty are in dark brown, with blue representing low uncertainty.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4122f/4122f821a4ec64eb1d747fe7b51a642cf4677c00" alt=""
Reported and predicted distribution of visceral leishmaniasis in northeast Africa.
(A) Evidence consensus for presence of the disease ranging from green (complete consensus on the absence: −100%) to purple (complete consensus on the presence of disease: +100%). The blue spots indicate occurrence points or centroids of occurrences within small polygons. (B) Predicted risk of visceral leishmaniasis from green (low probability of presence) to purple (high probability of presence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39673/396731744366de24aaf0f253b30049756def38f6" alt=""
Reported and predicted distribution of visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent.
(A) Evidence consensus for presence of the disease ranging from green (complete consensus on the absence: −100%) to purple (complete consensus on the presence of disease: +100%). The blue spots indicate occurrence points or centroids of occurrences within small polygons. (B) Predicted risk of visceral leishmaniasis from green (low probability of presence) to purple (high probability of presence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/939a6/939a66044736e78d53972cb82e34d63c33120d34" alt=""
Population at risk estimates for leishmaniasis.
Four scatterplots showing the relationship between non-zero estimated mean annual incidence (Alvar et al., 2012) and estimated population at risk derived from the cartographic approach for (A) New World cutaneous leishmaniasis, (B) New World visceral leishmaniasis, (C) Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis, and (D) Old World visceral leishmaniasis. For each country the bars represent the annual incidence estimate range.
Tables
Origin and spatial resolution of leishmaniasis occurrence data
Origin and resolution of occurrence data | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Point data | Province level data | District level data | Total | |
Cutaneous leishmaniasis | ||||
Literature | 3680 | 879 | 1220 | 5779 |
CNR-L | 531 | 47 | 31 | 609 |
HealthMap | 31 | – | – | 31 |
GenBank | 6 | – | 1 | 7 |
Total | 4248 | 926 | 1252 | 6426 |
Visceral leishmaniasis | ||||
Literature | 3050 | 1500 | 1068 | 5618 |
CNR-L | 429 | 24 | 29 | 482 |
HealthMap | 32 | 1 | – | 33 |
GenBank | 3 | – | 1 | 4 |
Total | 3514 | 1525 | 1098 | 6137 |
-
Each cell gives the number of occurrence records added to the data set by considering each additional datasource after removing duplicate records. Occurrence records are separated by spatial resolution—whether they are recorded as points (typically representing settlements) or as province level (admin 1) or district level (admin 2) data.
Mean relative contribution of predictor variables to the ensemble BRT models of CL and VL in both the Old and New World
Top predictors of CL | Relative contribution | Top predictors of VL | Relative contribution |
---|---|---|---|
Old world | |||
Peri-urban extents | 47.34 | Peri-urban extents | 51.50 |
Minimum LST | 18.36 | Urban extents | 17.38 |
Urban extents | 9.01 | Maximum NDVI | 7.87 |
G-Econ | 7.33 | Minimum LST | 5.87 |
Minimum Precipitation | 4.95 | Maximum Precipitation | 4.00 |
New World | |||
Maximum LST | 36.91 | Peri-urban extents | 25.90 |
Peri-urban extents | 18.61 | Urban extents | 21.24 |
Maximum precipitation | 12.06 | Mean LST | 9.18 |
Minimum precipitation | 6.21 | Mean NDVI | 7.83 |
Minimum LST | 4.39 | Maximum LST | 6.40 |
-
LST = Land Surface Temperature, G-Econ = Geographically based Economic data, NDVI = Normalised Difference Vegetation Index.