Allosteric signalling in the outer membrane translocation domain of PapC usher

  1. Irene Farabella
  2. Thieng Pham
  3. Nadine S Henderson
  4. Sebastian Geibel
  5. Gilles Phan
  6. David G Thanassi
  7. Anne H Delcour
  8. Gabriel Waksman
  9. Maya Topf  Is a corresponding author
  1. Birkbeck College, United Kingdom
  2. University of Houston, United States
  3. Stony Brook University, United States
  4. University of Würzburg, Germany
  5. Université Paris Descartes, France

Abstract

PapC ushers are outer-membrane proteins enabling assembly and secretion of P pili in uropathogenic E. coli. Their translocation domain is a large β-barrel occluded by a plug domain, which is displaced to allow the translocation of pilus subunits across the membrane. Previous studies suggested that this gating mechanism is controlled by a β-hairpin and an α-helix. To investigate the role of these elements in allosteric signal communication we developed a method combining evolutionary and molecular dynamics studies of the native translocation domain and mutants lacking the β-hairpin and/or α-helix. Analysis of a hybrid residue interaction network suggests distinct regions (residue 'communities') within the translocation domain (especially around β12-β14) linking these elements, thereby modulating PapC gating. Antibiotic sensitivity and electrophysiology experiments on a set of alanine-substitution mutants confirmed functional roles for four of these communities. This study illuminates the gating mechanism of PapC ushers and its importance in maintaining outer-membrane permeability.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Irene Farabella

    Birkbeck College, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Thieng Pham

    University of Houston, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nadine S Henderson

    Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sebastian Geibel

    University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gilles Phan

    Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. David G Thanassi

    Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Anne H Delcour

    University of Houston, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gabriel Waksman

    Birkbeck College, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Maya Topf

    Birkbeck College, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    m.topf@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Volker Dötsch, Goethe University, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: May 30, 2014
  2. Accepted: September 29, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 1, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 28, 2014 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: September 27, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2014, Farabella et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,744
    views
  • 123
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Irene Farabella
  2. Thieng Pham
  3. Nadine S Henderson
  4. Sebastian Geibel
  5. Gilles Phan
  6. David G Thanassi
  7. Anne H Delcour
  8. Gabriel Waksman
  9. Maya Topf
(2014)
Allosteric signalling in the outer membrane translocation domain of PapC usher
eLife 3:e03532.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03532

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03532

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Hitendra Negi, Aravind Ravichandran ... Ranabir Das
    Research Article

    The proteasome controls levels of most cellular proteins, and its activity is regulated under stress, quiescence, and inflammation. However, factors determining the proteasomal degradation rate remain poorly understood. Proteasome substrates are conjugated with small proteins (tags) like ubiquitin and Fat10 to target them to the proteasome. It is unclear if the structural plasticity of proteasome-targeting tags can influence substrate degradation. Fat10 is upregulated during inflammation, and its substrates undergo rapid proteasomal degradation. We report that the degradation rate of Fat10 substrates critically depends on the structural plasticity of Fat10. While the ubiquitin tag is recycled at the proteasome, Fat10 is degraded with the substrate. Our results suggest significantly lower thermodynamic stability and faster mechanical unfolding in Fat10 compared to ubiquitin. Long-range salt bridges are absent in the Fat10 structure, creating a plastic protein with partially unstructured regions suitable for proteasome engagement. Fat10 plasticity destabilizes substrates significantly and creates partially unstructured regions in the substrate to enhance degradation. NMR-relaxation-derived order parameters and temperature dependence of chemical shifts identify the Fat10-induced partially unstructured regions in the substrate, which correlated excellently to Fat10-substrate contacts, suggesting that the tag-substrate collision destabilizes the substrate. These results highlight a strong dependence of proteasomal degradation on the structural plasticity and thermodynamic properties of the proteasome-targeting tags.