Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

Usher Proteins: Lifting the lid on pilus assembly

Oct 28, 2014

Open access
Copyright information

Download
Cite
CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).
Share

VIB Structural Biology Research Center, Belgium
Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Pathogenic bacteria are coated with adhesive structures that enable them to seek out and colonize their host organisms and tissues of choice. In gram-negative bacteria, these adhesive structures are often long linear protein fibers called pili. Pilus assembly is a marvelous molecular process that requires the orchestrated passage and polymerization of hundreds of subunits across the two lipid bilayers that make up the cell envelope.

In principle, the ability to polymerize and form fibers of a specific ordering is intrinsic to the pilus subunits (Vetsch et al., 2004; Rose et al., 2008). In bacterial cells, however, two proteins facilitate and catalyze this process: one is a chaperone protein that resides in the periplasm (the space between the two lipid bilayers); the other is an usher protein that is embedded in the outer membrane. The role of the chaperone protein is to maintain pilus subunits in a higher energy conformation that is suitable for polymerization (Sauer et al., 1999, 2002).The role of the usher protein is to catalyze the polymerization and to form a barrel-shaped channel for the passage of the growing pilus to the cell surface (Nishiyama et al., 2008; Phan et al., 2011).

An unresolved question is how the assembly process at the usher protein is switched on. Both in vitro and in cells, the usher protein is a highly efficient catalyst, but only after it has been activated—that is, only after a plug domain that blocks the usher channel has been moved out of the way (Figure 1). This plug is important because, without it, the usher channel would form a 4 nm puncture in the outer membrane that would compromise its insulating function (Remaut et al., 2008). When the usher protein has been activated, the growing pilus takes its place in the usher channel.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Many bacteria are covered with long protein fibers called pili that contain hundreds of pilus subunits.

These pili are assembled at usher proteins (above) that are embedded in the cell walls of bacteria; chaperone proteins are also involved in the assembly process. The usher protein recruits chaperone-subunit complexes, catalyzes the polymerization of the subunits, and allows passage of the pili to the cell surface. The usher protein must be activated in order to act as a catalyst; activation involves moving a ‘plug’ (purple) that blocks the channel in the protein (left) through an angle of ∼150° to open the channel (right). The movement of the plug also orients the domains (NTD, CTD1 and CTD2) that recruit the chaperone-subunit complexes (not shown). These models are based on X-ray structures of the PapC usher protein (PDB:2vqi; Remaut et al., 2008) and the FimD usher protein bound to a chaperone-subunit complex (PDB:3rfz; Phan et al., 2011; Geibel et al., 2013). Farabella et al. explored the roles of the alpha-helix (yellow) and the beta-hairpin (blue/grey) in the activation process.

Triggering activation of the usher protein involves the binding of the first chaperone-subunit complex. X-ray structures of an activated FimD usher protein engaged with growing pilus intermediates showed that the plug domain had swung into the periplasm to vacate the usher channel and to help position the domains that recruit the chaperone-subunit complexes (Figure 1; Phan et al., 2011; Geibel et al., 2013). However, the details of the processes that control how the plug swings through an angle of ∼150° are not fully understood.

Now, in eLife, Maya Topf and co-workers—including Irene Farabella as first author, and co-workers at Birkbeck College, University College London, the University of Houston and Stony Brook University—use a unique computational approach to model the pathway that leads to usher activation (Farabella et al., 2014). This approach involves detecting the key amino acids that are involved in controlling the position of the plug in the channel.

To allow the plug to move, the binding interactions of the plug in the channel need to be only marginally stable: such situations are difficult to compute. Furthermore, this metastability is the result of a large number of weak interactions, rather than being the result of a few strong interactions, which is typical for proteins (Kessel and Ben-Tal, 2011). Topf and co-workers designed unique computational approach to circumvent these modeling difficulties. Previous studies suggested that this process is controlled by two regions: an alpha-helix and a beta-hairpin (Figure 1). Therefore, Farabella et al. started by performing molecular dynamics simulations of the native protein and of mutant proteins in which the alpha-helix and/or the beta-hairpin are deleted. They recorded the polar interactions (that is, hydrogen bonds and salt bridges) that were frequently observed in the simulations, and compared the frequencies of these interactions in the native protein and in the mutants.

Farabella et al. used evolutionary data to highlight particularly important interactions, assuming that the interacting amino acids should be conserved (Ashkenazy et al., 2010). Evolutionary data were also used to detect couplings (co-evolution) where both amino acids change in tandem to retain the interaction (Marks et al., 2012; de Juan et al., 2013). To give an example, the importance of a salt bridge could be detected if the two oppositely charged amino acids involved in the interaction, say arginine and glutamate, are strictly conserved. However, even if the interacting amino acids evolve, the interaction would persist if every arginine-to-glutamate substitution was balanced by a glutamate-to-arginine substitution. Thus, both evolutionary conservation and coupling could be indicative of importance.

The results were presented as a network with edges between amino acids that interact with each other. The network was inhomogeneous with some regions containing more interactions than others. Further analysis, using techniques based on graph theory, showed that the network contained ‘communities’ of amino acids: five of these communities were particularly large and also included interactions between amino acids that were separated by relatively large distances. Farabella et al. then performed experiments to check if these communities were involved in “gating” the channel in the usher protein. Amino acid residues from four of the five communities were involved. Moreover, some of these amino acids were from regions of the protein that, based on the X-ray structures alone, did not stand out as important. Also of note, amino acids close to each other in a community can have opposing effects on gating, resulting either in the stabilization of closed pores, or in pores remaining open for longer, which makes the bacteria more sensitive to antibiotics.

The activation and inactivation of many more transmembrane channels and signaling complexes is based on switching between conformations of very similar energy. The similarity is required by design in order to allow a response to relatively small external signals; if one conformation were significantly more stable than the other, the system would get stuck. The methodology developed by Farabella et al. provides a powerful tool for the identification of the intramolecular components that control these equilibria. For pilus assembly, the incoming chaperone-subunit complex also contains intermolecular cues that help to trigger the activation of the usher protein (Munera et al., 2008). It is not clear if these intramolecular and intermolecular elements interact with each other: answering this question will require further structural insights, ideally of an usher-chaperone-subunit complex before activation.

References

1. Ashk enazy H
2. Erez E
3. Martz E
4. Pupko T
5. Ben-Tal N
(2010) ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids
Nucleic Acids Research 38:W529–W533.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq399
- Google Scholar
(2013) Emerging methods in protein co-evolution
Nature Reviews Genetics 14:249–261.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3414
- Google Scholar
1. Farabella I
2. Pham T
3. Henderson NS
4. Geibel S
5. Phan G
6. Thanassi DG
7. Delcour AH
8. Waksman G
9. Topf M
(2014) Allosteric signalling in the outer membrane translocation domain of PapC usher
eLife 3:e03532.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03532
- Google Scholar
1. Geibel S
2. Procko E
3. Hultgren SJ
4. Baker D
5. Waksman G
(2013) Structural and energetic basis of folded-protein transport by the FimD usher
Nature 496:243–246.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12007
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Kessel A
2. Ben-Tal N
(2011)
Introduction to Protein: Structure, Function, and Motion

Boca Raton: CRC Press.
- Google Scholar
(2012) Protein structure prediction from sequence variation
Nature Biotechnology 30:1072–1080.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2419
- Google Scholar
(2008) Specific residues in the N-terminal domain of FimH stimulate type 1 fimbriae assembly in Escherichia coli following the initial binding of the adhesin to FimD usher
Molecular Microbiology 69:911–925.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06325.x
- Google Scholar
(2008) Reconstitution of pilus assembly reveals a bacterial outer membrane catalyst
Science 320:376–379.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154994
- Google Scholar
1. Phan G
2. Remaut H
3. Wang T
4. Allen WJ
5. Pirker KF
6. Lebedev A
7. Henderson NS
8. Geibel S
9. Volkan E
10. Yan J
11. Kunze MB
12. Pinkner JS
13. Ford B
14. Kay CW
15. Li H
16. Hultgren SJ
17. Thanassi DG
18. Waksman G
(2011) Crystal structure of the FimD usher bound to its cognate FimC-FimH substrate
Nature 474:49–53.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10109
- Google Scholar
1. Remaut H
2. Tang C
3. Henderson NS
4. Pinkner JS
5. Wang T
6. Hultgren SJ
7. Thanassi DG
8. Waksman G
9. Li H
(2008) Fiber formation across the bacterial outer membrane by the chaperone/usher pathway
Cell 133:640–652.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.033
- Google Scholar
1. Rose RJ
2. Verger D
3. Daviter T
4. Remaut H
5. Paci E
6. Waksman G
7. Ashcroft AE
8. Radford SE
(2008) Unraveling the molecular basis of subunit specificity in P pilus assembly by mass spectrometry
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 105:12873–12878.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802177105
- Google Scholar
(1999) Structural basis of chaperone function and pilus biogenesis
Science 285:1058–1061.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5430.1058
- Google Scholar
(2002) Chaperone priming of pilus subunits facilitates a topological transition that drives fiber formation
Cell 111:543–551.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01050-4
- Google Scholar
(2004) Pilus chaperones represent a new type of protein-folding catalyst
Nature 431:329–333.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02891
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

Han Remaut

Structural Biology Brussels Lab, VIB Structural Biology Research Center, Brussels, Belgium

For correspondence
han.remaut@vib-vub.be

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Nir Ben-Tal

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

For correspondence
bental@tauex.tau.ac.il

Competing interests
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Publication history

Version of Record published: October 28, 2014

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.