In the heart, reliable activation of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum during the plateau of the ventricular action potential requires synchronous opening of multiple CaV1.2 channels. Yet the mechanisms that coordinate this simultaneous opening during every heartbeat are unclear. Here, we demonstrate that CaV1.2 channels form clusters that undergo dynamic, reciprocal, allosteric interactions. This ‘functional coupling’ facilitates Ca2+ influx by increasing activation of adjoined channels and occurs through C-terminal-to-C-terminal interactions. These interactions are initiated by binding of incoming Ca2+ to calmodulin (CaM) and proceed through Ca2+/CaM binding to the CaV1.2 pre-IQ domain. Coupling fades as [Ca2+]i decreases, but persists longer than the current that evoked it, providing evidence for ‘molecular memory’. Our findings suggest a model for CaV1.2 channel gating and Ca2+-influx amplification that unifies diverse observations about Ca2+ signaling in the heart, and challenges the long-held view that voltage-gated channels open and close independently.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05608.001
To pump blood around the body, the muscle cells within the heart must contract and relax together with a regular rhythm. A contraction begins when proteins called CaV1.2 channels embedded in the cell membranes of heart cells open to allow calcium ions to enter the cells. The calcium ions that enter through these CaV1.2 channels trigger the release of calcium ions from storage compartments within the cells, which leads to the heart contracting. However, to trigger this release of calcium ions, many CaV1.2 channels have to open at the same time and we do not yet know how this is co-ordinated.
Dixon et al. studied CaV1.2 channels in heart muscle cells from mice. The experiments show that these proteins are arranged in clusters of eight, on average, in the cell membrane. When calcium ions enter the cell they bind to a protein called calmodulin, which in turn binds to a CaV1.2 channel. This allows the CaV1.2 channels within a cluster to interact with each other. The physical association between CaV1.2 channels within clusters enables them to work cooperatively; they open at the same time to allow more calcium ions to enter and then close together to allow the cell to relax.
Dixon et al. found that even when levels of calcium ions in the cells declined, the CaV1.2 channels within clusters remained open for a little while longer before they closed. This suggests that the interactions between the CaV1.2 channels act as a type of ‘molecular memory’ that may alter how the cells respond to future activity.
These results challenge the previously held view that the CaV1.2 channels open and close independently of one another. Future studies will seek to understand the molecular details of how these channels cluster together, and how this clustering affects changes in heart rate and heart abnormalities like long QT syndrome.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05608.002
L-type Ca2+ channels are composed of a pore-forming α1 subunit and four additional accessory subunits (α2, β, γ, δ) (Catterall, 1995). Four different α1 subunits have been identified to date, one of which, CaV1.2, is expressed in neurons as well as cardiac and arterial smooth muscle (Koch et al., 1990; Navedo et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2007). Four distinct genes encode L-type Ca2+ channel β-subunits, each with multiple splice variants. In addition, four α2δ genes have been identified. Both cell- and tissue-specific combinations of these CaV1.2 subunits endow the channels with distinct functional properties (Catterall, 2000).
A prominent characteristic of CaV1.2 channels is the tight regulation of their activity by the Ca2+ signals they produce (Ben-Johny and Yue, 2014). For example, increases in [Ca2+]i have been implicated in CaV1.2 facilitation; this Ca2+-dependent facilitation (CDF) is a form of positive feedback that amplifies Ca2+ influx. An increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) has also been proposed to exert the opposite effect—Ca2+-dependent inactivation (CDI). Thus, the balance between CDF and CDI of CaV1.2 channels plays a key role in regulating the magnitude of Ca2+ influx. The general consensus is that CDF and CDI involve Ca2+ binding to calmodulin (CaM) in the IQ domain in the C-terminal tail of these channels.
During excitation-contraction (EC) coupling, membrane depolarization opens CaV1.2 channels in the sarcolemma of ventricular myocytes. This allows a small amount of Ca2+ to enter ventricular myocytes that can be detected optically in the form of a ‘CaV1.2 sparklet’, raising local [Ca2+]i beyond the threshold for activation of ryanodine receptors (RyRs) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (Wang et al., 2001). Synchronous activation of multiple RyRs by CaV1.2 channels produces a global rise in [Ca2+]i that initiates myocardial contraction (Cheng et al., 1993).
EC coupling in ventricular myocytes is remarkably reproducible, with each action potential (AP) invariably evoking a whole-cell [Ca2+]i transient that results in contraction. At the membrane potentials reached during the plateau of the ventricular AP (approximately +50 mV), the driving force for Ca2+ entry at physiological Ca2+ levels (∼2 mM) is so low that opening of a single CaV1.2 channel is not sufficient to raise local [Ca2+]i beyond the RyR activation threshold. However, the probability of RyR activation during this phase of the AP is very high (>0.9). This degree of reliability would presumably require 5–10 CaV1.2 channels to open simultaneously (Inoue and Bridge, 2003; Sobie and Ramay, 2009). However, because the maximum open probability (Po) of CaV1.2 channels at physiological [Ca2+]o is ∼0.3 (Josephson et al., 2010), the probability of 5–10 independently gating channels opening simultaneously is extremely low (i.e., 0.35 to 0.310). This raises a fundamental question: if the probability of coincident openings of the requisite number of CaV1.2 channels is so low, why is the probability of RyR activation during the cardiac AP so high? Answering this question is critical for understanding the mechanistic basis of reliable cardiac performance.
A potential answer to this conundrum lies in the recently proposed concept that clusters of Cav1.2 channels can be functionally coupled to one another through physical interactions between their C-terminal tails (Dixon et al., 2012). This interaction enables physically linked channels to coordinate their gating, leading to amplification of Ca2+ influx, Ca2+ current facilitation, and EC coupling in ventricular myocytes. Importantly, this model challenges the long-held assumption that Cav1.2 channels, like other classes of voltage-gated channels, function exclusively as monomers that gate independently of one another. To date, however, the mechanism underlying functional CaV1.2 channel coupling has remained unknown.
Here, using a combination of super-resolution nanoscopy, Ca2+-imaging, electrophysiology and two methodologically distinct assays of protein–protein interaction, we have assembled a body of evidence that significantly alters our current understanding of Ca2+/CaM regulation of CaV1.2 channels and reconciles diverse observations about Ca2+ signaling in ventricular myocytes. We discovered that binding of Ca2+ to CaM induces C-terminal-to-C-terminal CaV1.2 channel interactions that increase the activity of adjoined channels, facilitating Ca2+ currents and increasing Ca2+ influx. Notably, we found that functional coupling outlasts the Ca2+ current that evokes it, providing evidence for a type of ‘molecular memory’ that could transiently shape the response of the cell to subsequent APs. We propose that cooperative gating of CaV1.2 channels is a new general mechanism for the regulation of excitability and Ca2+ influx in cardiac myocytes and suggest that this concept can be extended to other excitable cells.
We began our study by expressing CaV1.2 channels in tsA-201 cells and recording elementary CaV1.2 currents from cell-attached patches. Currents were elicited with a step depolarization to −30 mV with Ba2+ or Ca2+ as the charge carrier (Figure 1A,B). The mean amplitudes of iCa and iBa were 0.50 ± 0.02 (n = 6) and 1.45 ± 0.01 pA (n = 6), respectively. All-points histograms revealed that multi-channel openings were more likely with Ca2+ than with Ba2+. Accordingly, the activity (nPo), defined as the number of channels (n) times the open probability (Po), of CaV1.2 channels within a patch, was significantly higher with Ca2+ (0.24 ± 0.10) than Ba2+ (0.02 ± 0.01; Figure 1C). Closer inspection of the multi-channel openings revealed that, with Ca2+ as the charge carrier, multiple channels frequently opened together instantaneously and subsequently closed together. For example, in the enlarged trace in Figure 1B, four channels opened simultaneously, followed by the opening of four additional channels. The eight channels remained open for a time (∼11.5 ms), then all closed simultaneously. This apparent coordinate gating of multiple CaV1.2 channels was not observed when Ba2+ was used as the charge carrier. These results challenge the long-held and generally accepted view that individual CaV1.2 channels gate independently, and instead strongly suggest that these channels frequently exhibit ‘cooperative gating’. An additional implication is that Ca2+ itself increases the probability of cooperative CaV1.2 channel gating.
To test whether this hypothesis holds true in primary cells, we recorded CaV1.2 Ca2+ sparklet activity in freshly isolated adult ventricular myocytes (Figure 1D and Video 1). A multi-Gaussian fit to the all-points histogram of the calibrated Ca2+ signal obtained with 20 mM [Ca2+]o revealed quantal amplitudes of 36.8 ± 4.2 nM (Figure 1E), in excellent agreement with the ∼38 nM reported previously for CaV1.2 Ca2+ sparklets in arterial smooth muscle cells and tsA-201 cells (Navedo et al., 2005, 2006). Consistent with our single-channel data, we frequently observed multi-quantal Ca2+ sparklets corresponding to the simultaneous opening of several CaV1.2 channels. We next applied a coupled Markov chain model to determine whether these Ca2+-influx events were solely attributable to stochastic, independently gating CaV1.2 channels or instead reflected cooperative channel gating. The model assigns a coupling coefficient (κ) value to each Ca2+ sparklet site, ranging from 0 for independently gating channels to 1 for channels that gate exclusively in a cooperative manner (Chung and Kennedy, 1996; Navedo et al., 2010). Using κ > 0.1 as a threshold for cooperative gating (Navedo et al., 2010), we found that the majority of Ca2+ sparklet sites displayed cooperative or ‘coupled’ gating behavior, consistent with our hypothesis. Together, these data suggest that functional coupling of CaV1.2 channels is a Ca2+-dependent phenomenon.
If the trigger for CaV1.2 channel coupling were a local elevation in [Ca2+]i resulting from the opening of a single channel, then the efficacy of this signal in recruiting a nearby channel would be critically dependent on the distance separating the channels. Using super-resolution nanoscopy (Folling et al., 2008), we examined the spatial organization of endogenous CaV1.2 channels in ventricular myocytes (Figure 2A–C) and heterologously expressed CaV1.2 channels in tsA-201 cells (Figure 3A–C). Our data clearly show that CaV1.2 channels formed clusters along the sarcolemmal Z-lines of ventricular myocytes (Figure 2A,B) and throughout the plasma membrane (PM) of tsA-201 cells (Figure 3A,B). The average area occupied by a CaV1.2 channel cluster was 2555 ± 82 nm2 in ventricular myocytes (n = 5; Figure 2C) and 2190 ± 20 nm2 in tsA-201 cells (n = 9; Figure 3C).
Since CaV1.2 channel clusters were localized to the t-tubule regions of ventricular myocytes where the junctional SR (jSR) comes into close apposition to the myocyte PM, one might predict that the channel clusters would similarly localize to PM-adjacent ER structures in tsA-201 cells. To test this idea, we co-expressed mCherry-sec61β (a general ER marker (Zurek et al., 2011)) in tsA-201 cells together with CaV1.2 channels. Super-resolution imaging revealed that CaV1.2 channel cluster distribution was not restricted to regions of the surface membrane where the ER was located (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). Instead, these channels were broadly distributed along the PM surface. It is possible that the lack of organization of CaV1.2 channels along ER junctions in tsA-201 cells reflects a lack of contact points or excessive distance between the ER and the PM. In ventricular myocytes, the membrane binding protein junctophilin-2 (JPH2) has been suggested to tether the jSR to the t-tubule membrane (Takeshima et al., 2000). Thus, we attempted to anchor the ER to the PM by co-transfecting tsA-201 cells with JPH2. However, even in the presence of JPH2, the CaV1.2 channel cluster distribution was not limited to PM-ER junctions in the manner that they are in cardiomyocytes (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). These data suggest that CaV1.2 channel clustering occurs independently of SR/ER microdomains.
To determine the number of channels within CaV1.2 clusters, we injected mice with an adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9) designed to express photo-activatable-GFP–tagged Cavβ2a, and examined ventricular myocyte CaV1.2 clusters 5 wk later using single-particle photobleaching (Ulbrich and Isacoff, 2007). CaVβ2a is a palmitoylated peripheral membrane protein that binds to the α1 pore-forming subunit of CaV1.2 with a 1:1 stoichiometry (Dalton et al., 2005); therefore, photo-activation of this protein with 405-nm light provides a fluorescent marker of CaV1.2 channels. Single CaV1.2 were identified and excited using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. The number of channels in each cluster was determined by continuous photobleaching and counting of stepwise decreases in fluorescence intensity (Figure 2D–F). A preponderance (47%) of CaV1.2 clusters displayed 1 to 6 stepwise decreases in fluorescence (Figure 2F). A single photobleaching step was observed in only 1% of the spots analyzed. Indeed, the mean number of bleaching steps per cluster was 7.91 ± 0.23 (n = 25). This suggests that CaV1.2 channels preferentially cluster in groups of about 8 channels in adult ventricular myocytes. We did not discriminate cluster size based on location; thus, our estimate of 8 channels/cluster combines dyadic and extra-dyadic populations.
Similar stepwise photobleaching experiments were performed on enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-tagged CaV1.2 channels heterologously expressed in tsA-201 cells (Figure 3D–F). TIRF imaging showed that CaV1.2 clusters displayed a mean of 5.07 ± 0.15 (n = 10) discrete bleaching steps. Taken together with the data from ventricular myocytes, these findings suggest that the formation of multi-channel clusters is a fundamental property of CaV1.2 channels with important implications for Ca2+ signaling.
To investigate the mechanisms regulating CaV1.2-CaV1.2 interactions in living cells (Figure 4), we applied a bimolecular fluorescence complementation approach using CaV1.2 channels fused with either the N- or C-terminus of the split-Venus fluorescent protein system to yield CaV1.2-VN155(I152L) and CaV1.2-VC155, respectively. In isolation, VN155(I152L) and VC155 are non-fluorescent; however, when brought into close proximity by interacting proteins, they can reconstitute a full, fluorescent Venus protein. Thus, Venus fluorescence can be used to report spontaneous interactions between adjacent CaV1.2 channels, as depicted in Figure 4A. In cells expressing CaV1.2-VN155(I152L) and CaV1.2-VC155 channels, Venus fluorescence at −80 mV was very low, suggesting that CaV1.2-CaV1.2 channel interactions are rare at this hyperpolarized membrane potential. To determine whether an increase in [Ca2+]i is sufficient to induce CaV1.2-CaV1.2 channel interactions, we loaded tsA-201 cells with DMNP-EDTA (caged Ca2+) via the patch pipette and induced flash photolysis of DMNP-EDTA with pulses of 405-nm light while holding cells at −80 mV. Photolysis of DMNP-EDTA induced a transient increase in [Ca2+]i and a concomitant increase in Venus fluorescence (Figure 4—figure supplement 1), demonstrating that an elevation in [Ca2+]i is indeed sufficient to induce CaV1.2-CaV1.2 interactions.
To determine if Ca2+ influx via CaV1.2 channels is required for channel interactions, we depolarized cells and recorded Venus fluorescence and membrane currents in the presence of Ba2+ or Ca2+. Cells were dialyzed with an intracellular solution containing 10 mM EGTA to restrict the local [Ca2+]i signal to about 1 μm from the channel and maintain very low global [Ca2+]i. With Ba2+ in the external solution, depolarization evoked currents (IBa) over a wide range of potentials, but Venus fluorescence was very low at all membrane potentials (Figure 4B,F,G and Figure 4—figure supplement 2A–C). After switching to a Ca2+-containing external solution, application of the same voltage protocol activated currents (ICa) and induced graded increases in Venus fluorescence (Figure 4C,F,G and Figure 4—figure supplement 2D–F). The fluorescence-voltage and ICa conductance-voltage relationships were sigmoidal. The normalized conductance and Venus fluorescence exhibited similar voltage dependencies (Figure 4—figure supplement 2E,F). Taken together with super-resolution, photobleaching and DMNP-EDTA data, these findings suggest that local and global [Ca2+]i signals produced by Ca2+ influx via CaV1.2 channels are required for physical interactions between adjacent channels within a cluster.
We next investigated the mechanisms underlying Ca2+-dependent coupling of CaV1.2 channels, focusing on CaM since this protein binds Ca2+, associates with CaV1.2 C-terminal pre-IQ and IQ domains, and is involved in CDI and CDF of CaV1.2 channels (Eckert and Tillotson, 1981). Dialysis with an intracellular solution containing the CaM inhibitory peptide MLCKp (0.1 μM) prevented Venus reconstitution during membrane depolarization (Figure 4D,F,G), without altering the rate of inactivation of ICa (Figure 4—figure supplement 3). Expression of a mutant CaM that does not bind Ca2+ (CaM1234) also prevented CaV1.2-VN-CaV1.2-VC fusion upon membrane depolarization (Figure 4E,F,G). However, unlike MLCKp, CaM1234 did slow the rate of ICa inactivation (Figure 4—figure supplement 3), suggesting that two functionally distinct CaM molecules are involved in CDI and CaV1.2-to-CaV1.2 channel interactions.
Given the apparently essential role of Ca2+/CaM, we next examined the importance of IQ and pre-IQ motif CaM-binding sites for CaV1.2-CaV1.2 channel interactions. To do so, we mutated critical residues in each segment and used bimolecular fluorescence complementation to evaluate changes in channel coupling ability. CaV1.2-VN and CaV1.2-VC channels with an I1654E mutation in their IQ domains were able to fuse upon membrane depolarization (Figure 4—figure supplement 4). This isoleucine residue is crucial for CaM binding to the IQ motif. Previous in vitro studies have reported that the I1654E (or the human homolog I1624E) mutation decreases the affinity of the IQ motif for CaM by ∼100-fold (Zühlke et al., 1999, 2000). Thus, our results suggest that CaM binding to the IQ-motif is not required for CaV1.2 channel coupling. To investigate the role of the pre-IQ motif in channel interactions, we exchanged a 33-amino-acid segment of the pre-IQ domain for 33 non-identical amino acids (Figure 4—figure supplement 4A). A similar segment exchange performed on human CaV1.2 channels expressed in tsA-201 cells was previously shown to impair channel clustering on the PM and reduce Po compared to wild-type (WT) channels (Kepplinger et al., 2000). Interestingly, the pre-IQ ‘swap’ mutation rendered CaV1.2-VN and CaV1.2-VC channels incapable of functional coupling (Figure 4—figure supplement 4C). Collectively, these results suggest that pre-IQ domains are required for Ca2+/CaM-dependent CaV1.2 channel oligomerization. Additional credence is given to this finding by the previously published crystal structure of dimeric cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels showing two pre-IQ helices bridged by two Ca2+/CaMs (Fallon et al., 2009).
We next examined the spatial distribution of CaV1.2(pre-IQ swap) channels in tsA-201 cells co-transfected with mCherry-sec61β (to permit visualization of the ER). Surprisingly, CaV1.2(pre-IQ swap) channels still formed clusters in tsA-201 cells despite their inability to functionally interact (Figure 4—figure supplement 5A). Indeed, under identical imaging conditions (i.e., using the same fixative and TIRF penetration depth), CaV1.2(pre-IQ swap) channel cluster areas were not significantly different from those of WT channels. As noted above for WT channels, the CaV1.2(pre-IQ swap) channel cluster distribution was not limited to PM-ER junctions, even in the presence of JPH2 (Figure 4—figure supplement 5A,B). These results suggest that, while the physical proximity of Cav1.2 channels is necessary for channel interactions, it is not sufficient for functional coupling of the channels.
An important prediction of our findings is that the functional coupling produced by Ca2+-induced CaV1.2-CaV1.2 channel interactions manifests as enhanced channel activity. To test this, we exploited the fact that Venus reconstitution is irreversible, recording CaV1.2 sparklets (Wang et al., 2001; Navedo et al., 2005) before and after Ca2+-induced CaV1.2 coupling during membrane depolarization. Prior to membrane depolarization, CaV1.2 sparklet activity (nPs) was low (0.002 ± 0.001). However, after depolarization, nPs increased ∼40-fold (0.085 ± 0.022) and CaV1.2 sparklet density increased almost 10-fold (Figure 5A,C,D and Video 2; n = 5 cells). Membrane depolarization failed to significantly alter nPs or CaV1.2 sparklet density in cells co-expressing the Ca2+-insensitive CaM1234 mutant (Figure 5B–D; n = 6 cells). These data indicate that the post-depolarization augmentation of CaV1.2 sparklet activity resulted from a Ca2+/CaM-dependent increase in the activity of previously active sites as well as the emergence of new, high-activity Ca2+ sparklet sites that appear to lack CDI. These findings suggest that CaV1.2 channel interactions increase Ca2+ influx and, consequently, total conductance by increasing the extent to which the channels are functionally coupled.
Having demonstrated that physical CaV1.2-to-CaV1.2 interactions functionally couple adjoining channels to enhance channel activity, we investigated the dynamics of these interactions. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments are unable to provide information about channel-interaction dynamics, since Venus reconstitution is irreversible (Kerppola, 2006). Instead, we sought to detect fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between EGFP and red fluorescent protein (RFP)-tagged CaV1.2 channels as a function of [Ca2+]i. Flash photolysis of DMNP-EDTA (at −80 mV) induced a transient increase in [Ca2+]i and enhanced the CaV1.2-RFP/CaV1.2-EGFP FRET ratio (FRETr; Figure 6A). The time courses of [Ca2+]i and FRETr were similar (Figure 6B), with a time-to-peak of 605.8 ± 98.8 ms for [Ca2+]i and 531.5 ± 57.5 ms for FRETr. The [Ca2+]i-FRETr relationship was sigmoidal, yielding a FRETr1/2 at a [Ca2+]i of approximately 250 nM (Figure 6C). Both [Ca2+]i and FRETr traces followed triple exponential decay kinetics; for [Ca2+]i, the decay time constants (τ) for fast, intermediate and slow components were 0.62 ± 0.15, 2.19 ± 0.40 and 3.15 ± 0.26 s, respectively, and the corresponding values for FRETr were 0.64 ± 0.48, 1.09 ± 0.97 and 3.71 ± 0.73 s (n = 5). The time to decay to 50% of the peak (T50%) was 2.65 ± 0.22 s for [Ca2+]i and 0.63 ± 0.23 s for FRETr. The complex multi-component decay kinetics of each trace reflects the multiple Ca2+ binding sites and affinities of the two lobes of CaM for Ca2+ (Faas et al., 2011; Faas and Mody, 2012).
Concurrent recordings of currents and FRETr during membrane depolarization in the presence of Ca2+ (with 10 mM EGTA in the pipette solution) showed that depolarization to +10 mV evoked a transient increase in FRETr (Figure 6D). The increase in FRETr appeared biphasic, with a large amplitude spike followed by a lower level plateau that was sustained for the duration of the increase in [Ca2+]i. These data suggest that CaV1.2-CaV1.2 interactions are dynamic and regulated by local and global changes in [Ca2+]i. Notably, the increase in FRETr persisted after the Ca2+ current had decayed to baseline, indicating that channels remained coupled for a time in the absence of a stimulus.
An explicit implication of our results is that physical CaV1.2-CaV1.2 interactions are critical for CDF in ventricular myocytes. To test this hypothesis, we investigated whether Ba2+ permeation and inhibition of CaM with MLCKp—both of which prevent CaV1.2-CaV1.2 interaction (see above)—decreases or eliminates CDF in ventricular myocytes. Because Ca2+/CaM-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) has been implicated in Ca2+ current facilitation (Anderson et al., 1994; Xiao et al., 1994; Yuan and Bers, 1994), we included 10 mM EGTA in the patch pipette to maintain global [Ca2+]i < 50 nM, which is below the threshold (>200 nM) for activation of this kinase (Miller and Kennedy, 1986). Experiments were performed in cells dialyzed with 100 nM or 1 μM MLCKp. The rationale for using these two concentrations of MLCKp is that, whereas 100 nM MLCKp inhibits CaM (Török and Trentham, 1994; Török et al., 1998), we found that it does not change CaMKII activity (p < 0.05). However, we found that 1 μM MLCKp inhibits CaM and eliminates CaMKII activity. Thus, using these two MLCKp concentrations, we can selectively dissect the contribution of CaM and locally activated (i.e., near the channel pore) CaMKII.
We used a three-step protocol (Figure 7A) to record facilitated CaV1.2 currents as previously described (Poomvanicha et al., 2011). Briefly, cells were held at −80 mV and ICa was elicited with a 200-ms control pulse (V1) to 0 mV. Cells were held again at −80 mV for 10 s followed by a 200-ms prepulse to +80 mV (Vpre). In light of our FRET results suggesting that CaV1.2 channels remain coupled for a time in the absence of a stimulus, we held the cells at −80 mV for a variable interpulse interval of 0.1–1.6 s before beginning the second 200-ms test pulse (V2) to 0 mV. Fast Na+ currents were inactivated with a 50-ms step to −40 mV applied prior to each control (V1) or test pulse (V2). The ratio of ICa resulting from test and control pulses (I2/I1) was used as a measure of facilitation (I2/I1 > 1) and recovery from inactivation (I2/I1 ≈ 1).
In control cells (no peptide, 2 mM external Ca2+), this protocol induced ICa facilitation (i.e., I2/I1 > 1) (Figure 7B). Note, however, that the magnitude of ICa facilitation varied with interpulse duration, reaching a peak at a Vpre-V2 interval of 0.3 s. Longer Vpre-V2 intervals induced progressively less ICa facilitation. Indeed, I2/I1 was statistically indistinguishable from 1 at interpulse durations longer than 1.2 s, suggesting no ICa facilitation at stimulation rates >0.8 Hz.
In the presence of extracellular Ca2+, intracellular dialysis with 0.1 μM MLCKp suppressed ICa facilitation at interpulse intervals of 0.1–0.3 s (n = 10 for 0.1 s intervals; n = 5 for 0.2 and 0.3 s intervals), but control levels of facilitation returned with intervals of 0.4–1 s (n = 5–9, p < 0.05; Figure 7B). Dialysis with a 10-fold higher concentration of MLCKp (1 μM) eliminated ICa facilitation at all interpulse intervals (n = 4; Figure 7B). Finally, superfusion of ventricular myocytes with Ba2+ was as effective as dialysis with 1 μM MLCKp in preventing ICa facilitation (Figure 7B–D).
We performed a detailed analysis of our data to gain more insights into the relationship between CaV1.2 channel coupling and ICa facilitation during high frequency stimulation. The amplitude of I2 in the paired pulse facilitation would depend, in part, on the degree of recovery from inactivation. A previous study has determined that the time course of ICa recovery from inactivation follows a single exponential function with a τrecovery of about 375 ms (Blaich et al., 2010). Our FRET data in Figure 6D suggest that the number of coupled CaV1.2 channels will fade exponentially with an estimated τdecoupling of 333 ms upon repolarization. In Figure 7E (left), we show a simulation of the time-course of ICa recovery and CaV1.2 channel decoupling (middle) during repolarization using exponential functions with these τdecoupling and τrecovery values. Note that the time-course of ICa facilitation data obtained from myocytes superfused with Ca2+ is well described by the product of the recovery and decoupling functions (Figure 7E; right). This analysis is consistent with a model in which ICa facilitation during high frequency stimulation is directly proportional to the number of coupled channels and the number of channels available for activation.
These data support the view that ICa facilitation in ventricular myocytes depends on Ca2+ influx and CaM, but has CaMKII-dependent and independent components. In combination with our FRET and split-Venus data, these findings suggest that Ca2+ augments CaV1.2 channel activity at least in part by increasing the number of functionally coupled channels.
Our results support a new model for CaV1.2 channel function. An illustration of our proposed model for coupled gating of CaV1.2 channels is shown in Figure 8A–D. In our formulation, CDI and CDF are interrelated processes, both dependent on the coupling state of adjacent CaV1.2 channels. The C-terminal tail of the channel serves a dual role: inducing the functional coupling of adjacent channels via protein-to-protein interactions and regulating channel open probability. The physical interaction between clustered CaV1.2 channels is tightly regulated by local and global [Ca2+]i. The cascade of events that culminates in the coupling of CaV1.2 channels during an action potential begins with the gating of an individual channel within a cluster. The resulting CaV1.2 sparklet induces the binding of Ca2+ to CaM in the pre-IQ domain of the channel, which promotes physical interactions between contiguous channels. This increases the activity of adjoined channels, elevating local [Ca2+]i. As individual channels within a cluster undergo VDI and CDI and close, [Ca2+]i decreases and coupled channels disassemble. This, in turn, decreases channel opening probability and terminates Ca2+ flux. Thus, the overall activity of CaV1.2 channels within a cluster depends on the number of channels that form dimers or higher-order oligomers.
Our results have profound implications for current models of cardiac EC coupling as they provide an answer to a long-standing question in the field: What are the mechanisms that allow the simultaneous, coordinated opening of multiple CaV1.2 channels near the jSR? EC coupling starts with membrane depolarization. According to our model, membrane depolarization increases the probability of CaV1.2 sparklet occurrence. CaV1.2 sparklets elevate local [Ca2+]i, thereby increasing the number of channels that form dimers or higher-order oligomers. This physical coupling increases the probability of synchronous, coincident openings of channels within a cluster (∼5–10 channels) to reliably activate nearby RyRs through Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (Inoue and Bridge, 2003; Sobie and Ramay, 2009). Accordingly, the strength of cardiac contraction would depend, at least in part, on the number of physically and functionally coupled CaV1.2 channels.
Our data further suggest that the degree of CaV1.2-CaV1.2 coupling varies within the physiological range of [Ca2+]i reached in ventricular myocytes during a cardiac cycle. We found that CaV1.2 channel coupling is dynamic and has an apparent Kd of ∼250 nM. While the model assumes that CaV1.2-to-CaV1.2 coupling is initiated by a Ca2+ sparklet, it could also be induced by a Ca2+ spark resulting from the opening of a small cluster of closely apposed RyRs. This could induce local CaV1.2-to-CaV1.2 coupling, even if transiently, priming these channels for opening during the action potential. Note, however, that because Ca2+ spark activity is very low during diastole, the number of coupled CaV1.2 channels would likely be low. However, at the peak level of the [Ca2+]i transient (∼700 nM) during EC coupling (Santana et al., 2002), the cell would have reached a maximal level of CaV1.2-to-CaV1.2 coupling.
An important finding in our study is that, while CaV1.2 channel coupling fades as [Ca2+]i decreases, it persists longer than the current that evoked it. This is important because CaV1.2 channel activity remains elevated for as long as the channels remain coupled. Thus, by outlasting the [Ca2+]i signal that evoked it, CaV1.2 channel coupling acts as a type of ‘molecular memory’ that might serve to augment Ca2+ influx during repetitive membrane depolarization. As a consequence, an increase in action potential frequency can enhance Ca2+ influx via two mechanisms: first, it can increase [Ca2+]i, thereby increasing CaV1.2 channel coupling; and second, if an AP arrives while a subpopulation of CaV1.2 channels remain coupled, which could occur even if [Ca2+]i had decreased to basal levels owing to the molecular memory phenomenon, it would encounter a cell with a higher number of coupled—that is, more active—channels (see Figure 8E,F). This molecular memory might also manifest itself as CaV1.2 current facilitation (Marban and Tsien, 1982; Argibay et al., 1988; Gurney et al., 1989). In the case of cardiac muscle, CaV1.2 current facilitation augments contractile force during increases in heart rate (Pieske et al., 1999). In neurons, facilitation of CaV1.2 channels has been suggested to contribute to an intrinsic amplification of synaptic current and the enhancement of neuronal excitability (Powers and Binder, 2001; Striessnig et al., 2014).
Our data support the view that Ca2+ current facilitation in ventricular myocytes requires Ca2+ influx and CaM, but has CaMKII-dependent and -independent components. The latter likely involve Ca2+/CaM-induced CaV1.2-CaV1.2 channel coupling. Future experiments should investigate if CaMKII facilitates Ca2+ current in neurons and cardiac muscle by a similar mechanism.
Dynamic, [Ca2+]i-dependent CaV1.2 channel coupling could have pathological repercussions. For example, coupling of a mutant channel with a higher intrinsic open probability to a WT channel could increase Ca2+ influx. One condition associated with aberrantly high CaV1.2 channel gating is Timothy syndrome (TS), also known as long-QT syndrome 8. TS is an autosomal-dominant, multi-organ disorder caused by de novo gain-of-function missense mutations in exon 8 or an alternatively spliced exon 8A of Cav1.2 (Splawski et al., 2004, 2005). Forced physical interactions between Cav1.2 channels have an intriguing effect on adjoined channels: fusion of intrinsically hyperactive CaV1.2-TS channels to WT channels induces these latter channels to function like TS channels. These findings have important implications. If TS channels can form stable interactions with neighboring WT channels in TS patients, then these mutant channels, which constitute only ∼23% of the total cardiac Cav1.2 population, could have a disproportionally large effect on Ca2+ influx. We previously tested this idea in ventricular myocytes expressing our fusible Cav1.2 channels and found that fusion of TS channels with WT channels led to the development of arrhythmogenic spontaneous SR Ca2+ release events in addition to increasing the amplitude of [Ca2+]i transients and contractions (Dixon et al., 2012). These findings support the hypothesis that physical interactions between the C-termini of TS and WT channels produce a disproportionally large Ca2+ influx that ultimately induces arrhythmogenic changes in [Ca2+]i. Consistent with this, we found that the relationship between the level of CaV1.2-TS channel expression and the probability of a Ca2+ wave is non-linear, suggesting that even low levels of these channels are sufficient to induce maximal changes in [Ca2+]i (Drum et al., 2014).
Mutations in CaM have recently been linked to severe forms of long-QT syndrome, which are associated with life-threatening arrhythmias that occur very early in life (Limpitikul et al., 2014). Expression of these CaMs increases Cav1.2 activity and open times, effects similar to those produced by the TS mutation. Because CaM regulates many other Ca2+ channel subtypes, including those that predominate in neurons, these mutant CaMs could lead to a multi-system disorder similar to TS. An important direction for future experiments will be to investigate whether Cav1.2 channel dysfunction is associated with aberrant TSTS or TS-WT Cav1.2 channel coupling or coupling of channels with mutant CaM to channels with WT CaM.
In summary, our study demonstrates that dynamic, Ca2+-driven physical interactions among clustered CaV1.2 channels lead to cooperative gating of adjacent channels and enhanced Ca2+ influx. The physical proximity afforded by clustering of CaV1.2 channels is necessary, but not sufficient, for functional coupling of the channels and occurs whether the channels are functionally coupled or not. Future studies should investigate the mechanisms that dictate the clustered arrangement of CaV1.2 channels. It is likely that cooperative CaV1.2 channel gating also plays an important role in physiological functions as diverse as neuronal excitability and rate-dependent increases in cardiac contraction, as well as pathological conditions such as long-QT syndrome.
WT C57BL/6 mice were euthanized with a single lethal dose of sodium pentobarbital delivered via intraperitoneal injection, as approved by the University of Washington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Ventricular myocytes were isolated as previously described (Dixon et al., 2012). Briefly, the heart was excised and rinsed with cold 150 μM EGTA digestion buffer containing 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 3 mM Na-pyruvate, 25 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.33 mM NaH2PO4, and 22 mM glucose. The aorta was cannulated for Langendorff perfusion, and the coronary arteries were subsequently perfused with warmed (37°C) 150 μM EGTA digestion buffer until they were cleared of blood. The perfusate was then switched to digestion buffer (no EGTA) supplemented with 50 μM CaCl2, 0.04 mg/ml protease (XIV), and 1.4 mg/ml collagenase (type 2; Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ) for 8–10 min. The ventricles were then cut away from the atria, sliced, and placed in 37°C digestion buffer supplemented with 0.96 mg/ml collagenase, 0.04 mg/ml protease, 100 μM CaCl2, and 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumen (BSA). Gentle agitation was applied using a transfer pipette until the ventricles dissociated. The cells were then allowed to pellet by gravity for 15–20 min, after which they were washed in enzyme-free digestion buffer supplemented with 10 mg/ml BSA and 250 μM CaCl2, pelleted once more, and finally resuspended at room temperature in Tyrode's solution containing 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 2 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM MgCl2; pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH.
tsA-201 cells (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco-Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere and passaged every 3–4 day. Cells were transiently transfected at ∼70% confluence using jetPEI (Polyplus Transfection, New York, NY) transfection reagent and plated onto the appropriate coverglass ∼12 hr before experiments. For super-resolution imaging and photobleaching experiments, cells were plated onto 22 mm no. 1.5 coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). For all other experiments, cells were plated onto 25 mm no. 1 coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Plasmids used in this study include pcDNA clones of the pore-forming subunit of rabbit CaV1.2 (α1c) and rat auxillary subunits CaVα2δ and CaVβ3 (kindly provided by Dr Diane Lipscombe; Brown University, Providence, RI). Standard PCR techniques were used to fuse the carboxyl tail of CaV1.2 to different proteins depending on the experimental approach: for FRET experiments, to EGFP or tagRFP; for bimolecular fluorescence complementation, to either the N-fragment (VN) or the C-fragment (VC) of the Venus protein (27097, 22011; Addgene, Cambridge, MA) (Kodama and Hu, 2010); for photobleaching experiments, to the monomeric GFP variant GFP(A206K) (Zacharias et al., 2002), kindly provided by Dr Eric Goaux (Vollum Institute, Portland, OR). Ca2+-insensitive CaM1234 was a gift from Dr Johannes Hell (UC Davis, CA). Mutant rabbit CaV1.2(I1654E), analogous to human I1624E (Zühlke et al., 1999), was used in experiments designed to elucidate the role of the IQ motif in channel interactions. This single point mutation (I1672E) was introduced using the QuikChange II XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The role of the pre-IQ motif in channel interactions was examined by exchanging a 33-amino-acid segment, as illustrated in Figure 4—figure supplement 4A. The resultant CaV1.2(pre-IQ swap) was used in whole-cell patch-clamp and bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments. The general ER marker mCherry-Sec61β was a gift from Gia Voeltz (Addgene plasmid # 49155). Finally, JPH2-GFP was used to tether the ER to the PM in tsA-201 cells.
Ca2+ currents were recorded in the whole-cell voltage-clamp or cell-attached patch configurations using borosilicate patch pipettes with resistances of 3–6 μΩ for tsA cells and 2–3 μΩ for cardiomyocytes. Currents were sampled at a frequency of 20 kHz, low-pass–filtered at 2 kHz using an Axopatch 200B amplifier, and acquired using pClamp 10.2 software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). All membrane potentials referred to herein have been corrected for liquid junction potential. All experiments were performed at room temperature (22–25°C).
For whole-cell current recordings from tsA-201 cells, pipettes were filled with a Cs-based internal solution containing 87 mM Cs-aspartate, 20 mM CsCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA and 5 mM MgATP, adjusted to pH 7.2 with CsOH. In experiments requiring dialysis of the calmodulin inhibitory peptide MLCKp (EMD Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany; 208735), this chemical was added to the pipette solution. Cells were continuously superfused throughout experiments with our regular external solution containing 5 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 113 mM NMDG, 1 mM MgCl2 and 20 mM CaCl2, adjusted to pH 7.4 with HCl. For experiments in which Ba2+ was used as the charge carrier in place of Ca2+, the perfusate contained 5 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 140 mM NMDG, 1 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM BaCl2, adjusted to pH 7.4 with HCl. Current-voltage relationships were obtained by subjecting cells to a series of 300-ms depolarizing pulses from a holding potential of −80 mV to test potentials ranging from −60 to +80 mV. The voltage dependence of conductance was obtained by converting the resultant currents to conductances using the equation, G = ICa/[test pulse potential − reversal potential of ICa], normalizing (G/Gmax), and plotting conductance vs the test potential.
Cell-attached patch, single-channel currents (iCa) were recorded from tsA-201 cells superfused with high K+ solution to fix the membrane potential at ∼0 mV. The solution had the following composition: 145 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES and 10 mM glucose; pH was adjusted to 7.3 with KOH. Pipettes were filled with a solution containing 10 mM HEPES and either 110 mM CaCl2 or 110 mM BaCl2; pH was adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH. The dihydropyridine agonist BayK-8644 (500 nM) was included in the pipette solution to promote longer channel open times. A voltage-step protocol from a holding potential of −80 mV to a depolarized potential of −30 mV was used to elicit currents. The single-channel event-detection algorithm of pClamp 10.2 was used to measure single-channel opening amplitudes and nPo, and to construct all-points histograms.
To record ICa from isolated ventricular myocytes, cells were initially perfused with Tyrode's solution. Once the whole-cell configuration was successfully established, the external solution was replaced with one containing 5 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 140 mM NMDG, 1 mM MgCl2 and either 2 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM BaCl2, adjusted to pH 7.4 with HCl. The pipette was filled with the Cs-based internal solution described above. Facilitation of ICa was measured using a triple-pulse protocol consisting of two identical test pulses (V1 and V2), separated by a conditioning pulse to +80 mV (Vpre), as previously described (Poomvanicha et al., 2011) and illustrated in Figure 7A. The currents elicited by V1 and V2 were referred to as I1 and I2, and the ratio between their peaks (I2/I1) was used as a measure of facilitation.
To measure Ca2+ sparklets in tsA-201 cells or ventricular myocytes, cells were patch-clamped in whole-cell mode and held at a hyperpolarized potential of −80 mV to increase the driving force for Ca2+ entry. Sub-sarcolemmal Ca2+ signals were monitored by dialyzing cells with 200 μM Rhod-2 via the patch pipette and continuously perfusing them with the external solution described above containing 20 mM CaCl2 and 10 mM EGTA, a relatively slow Ca2+ buffer. With this buffer/indicator combination, Ca2+ entering the cell via membrane Cav1.2 channels binds to the relatively fast Ca2+ indicator Rhod-2 to generate a fluorescent signal, and the excess EGTA rapidly buffers Ca2+, restricting the signal to the point of entry. Sub-sarcolemmal Ca2+ signals (Ca2+ sparklets) were captured using a through-the-lens TIRF microscope built around an Olympus IX-70 inverted microscope equipped with an oil-immersion ApoN 60×/1.49 NA TIRF objective and an Andor iXON CCD camera. Images were acquired at 100 Hz using TILLvisION imaging software (TILL Photonics, FEI, Hillsboro, OR). Sparklets were detected and analyzed using custom software written in MATLAB (Source code 1). Rhod-2 fluorescence signals were converted to Ca2+ concentration units using the Fmax equation (Maravall et al., 2000). The activity of Ca2+ sparklets was determined by calculating the nPs of each Ca2+ sparklet site, where n is the number of quantal levels and Ps is the probability that a quantal Ca2+ sparklet event is active. A detailed description of this analysis can be found in Navedo et al. (Navedo et al., 2005, 2006).
The degree of coupling between single CaV1.2 channels or Ca2+ sparklet sites was assessed by further analyzing single-channel and sparklet recordings using a binary coupled Markov chain model (Source code 2), as first described by Chung and Kennedy (1996) and previously employed by our group (Navedo et al., 2010; Cheng et al., 2011; Dixon et al., 2012). The custom program, written in the MATLAB language, assigns a coupling-coefficient (κ) to each record, where κ can range from 0 (purely independently gating channels) to 1 (fully coupled channels). Elementary event amplitudes were set at 0.5 pA for iCa, 1.5 pA for iBa, and 38 nM for Ca2+ sparklets.
Transfected tsA-201 cells expressing the relevant CaV1.2 channel constructs were plated onto poly-L-lysine–coated #1.5 coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific) the day before fixation. For immunostaining, cells were fixed by incubating for 10 min in ice-cold methanol, then washed with PBS and blocked for 1 hr at room temperature in 50% SEA BLOCK (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 0.5% vol/vol Triton X-100 in PBS (blocking buffer). The pore-forming subunit of CaV1.2 was probed with a rabbit polyclonal primary antibody (anti-CNC1; kindly provided by Drs William Catterall and Ruth Westenbroek [Hulme et al., 2003]), diluted to 5 μg/ml in diluted blocking buffer (20% SEA BLOCK, 0.5% Triton X-100), by incubating overnight at 4°C. The following morning, cells were washed extensively, receiving three washes with PBS and five washes with diluted blocking buffer. Cells were then incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (2 μg/ml; Molecular Probes–Life Technologies) in diluted blocking buffer. Cells were finally washed thoroughly with PBS and mounted for imaging. Native Cav1.2 channels in freshly isolated adult ventricular myocytes were immunostained in an identical manner except that plating procedures differed. Specifically, myocytes were plated onto laminin and poly-L-lysine–coated #1.5 coverslips and allowed to adhere for 1 hr before fixation.
For double-labeling experiments used to examine the co-localization of CaV1.2 channels and the ER, tsA-201 cells transfected with CaV1.2 channels (WT or pre-IQ swap mutants) and mCherry-Sec61β were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 10 min followed by extensive washing in PBS and reduction for 5 min in ∼0.1% sodium borohydride in water to reduce background fluorescence. Cells were washed and blocked as described above and were then incubated in primary antibody solution containing 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-CNC1 and 2 μg/ml rat monoclonal anti-mCherry (Life Technologies) for 1 hr at room temperature. Excess primary antibody was removed by three washes with PBS and five washes with diluted blocking buffer. Cells were then incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated chicken anti-rat secondary antibodies (2 μg/ml each; Molecular Probes–Life Technologies) in diluted blocking buffer. Cells were finally washed thoroughly with PBS and mounted for imaging. In some experiments, tsA-201 cells co-expressing JPH2-GFP were fixed and stained as per the double-staining protocol described above. JPH2-GFP was not immunostained, but simply imaged in TIRF mode by exciting the GFP tag.
Coverslips were mounted with MEA-GLOX (for double staining) or β-ME-GLOX imaging buffer on glass depression slides (neoLab, Heidelberg, Germany) and sealed with Twinsil (Picodent, Wipperfürth, Germany). The imaging buffers contained TN buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl), GLOX oxygen scavenging system (0.56 mg/ml glucose oxidase, 34 μg/ml catalase, 10% wt/vol glucose), and either 100 mM MEA (cysteamine) or 142 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (β-ME). Excess imaging buffer was blotted away before application of the Twinsil sealant. This is particularly important with the β-ME-GLOX imaging buffer as the Twinsil will not set if it contacts this buffer.
GSD super-resolution images of CaV1.2 channels in fixed ventricular myocytes or CaV1.2 channels and mCherry-Sec61β in fixed tsA-201 cells were generated using a Leica SR GSD 3D system. The system is built around a Leica DMI6000 B TIRF microscope and is equipped with a Leica oil-immersion HC PL APO 160×/1.43 NA super-resolution objective, four laser lines (405 nm/30 mW, 488 nm/300 mW, 532 nm/500 mW, and 642 nm/500 mW), and an Andor iXon3 EM-CCD. Images were collected in TIRF mode at a frame rate of 100 Hz for 20,000–100,000 frames using Leica Application Suite (LAS AF) software. CaV1.2 cluster area sizes were determined using binary masks of the images in ImageJ/Fiji.
tsA-201 cells expressing CaV1.2 channels tagged at their C-terminus with monomeric GFP were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (10 min) and imaged in TIRF mode on the Leica 3D-GSD system described above using a 160×/1.43 NA objective. The core Leica DMI6000 B TIRF microscope in this system is capable of functioning outside of GSD SR imaging mode as a conventional TIRF microscope. Cells were illuminated with 488-nm laser light, and image stacks of 2000 frames were acquired at 30 Hz. The first five images after the shutter was opened were averaged, and a rolling-ball background subtraction was applied using ImageJ/Fiji. This image was then low-pass filtered with a 2-pixel cut-off and high-pass filtered with a 5-pixel cut-off (see Figures 2D and 3D). Thresholding was then applied to identify connected regions of pixels that were above threshold. The ImageJ/Fiji plugin ‘Time Series Analyzer v2.0’ was then used to select 4 × 4 pixel regions of interest (ROIs) centered on the peak pixel in each spot. Next, z-axis intensity profiles (where z is time) from these ROIs were examined over the entire image stack. To facilitate the identification of bleaching steps, the signal-to-noise ratio was improved by applying a 5-pixel rolling-ball background subtraction, a median filter (1 pixel radius), and a 10 frame moving average. Bleaching steps were then manually counted.
Identical procedures were performed on cardiomyocytes expressing photo-activatable, GFP-tagged CaVβ2 auxiliary subunits. This subunit binds to the pore-forming α1 subunit of the channel with a 1:1 stoichiometry; thus, expression of this protein in cardiomyocytes represents a photo-activatable fluorescent marker of CaV1.2 channels. Since adult cardiomyocytes are impervious to chemical transfection, we used adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9) to transfer this gene into mice via retro-orbital injection, a strategy that has been successfully used by others to transfer cardiac genes in mice (Fang et al., 2012). The AAV9-packaged CaVβ2-PA-GFP was engineered from CaVβ2-PA-GFP pcDNA by Vector Biolabs. Mice were sacrificed 5 week after retro-orbital injection. Successful gene transfer was confirmed by photo-activating the CaVβ2-PA-GFP with 405 nm laser light. Prior to photo-activation, no GFP fluorescence emission was detected upon excitation with 488 nm laser light, but after photo-activation, robust GFP fluorescence emission was observed in the z-lines of isolated ventricular myocytes (data not shown). For stepwise photobleaching experiments, GFP was photo-activated prior to starting movie recordings.
Spontaneous interactions of CaV1.2 channels were assayed using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. In these experiments, CaV1.2 channels were tagged at their C-terminus with non-fluorescent N- (VN(1-154, I152L)) or C-terminal (VC(155-238, A206K)) halves of a ‘split’ Venus fluorescent protein. When CaV1.2-VN and CaV1.2-VC are brought close enough together to interact, the full Venus protein can fold into its functional, fluorescent confirmation. The magnitude of Venus fluorescence emission therefore provides an indicator of CaV1.2 interactions. Venus fluorescence was monitored in tsA-201 cells expressing CaV1.2-VN and CaV1.2-VC using TIRF microscopy, as described above (‘recording of Ca2+ sparklets’). Transfected cells were identified by co-expression of tagRFP or, in experiments requiring Ca2+ imaging with Rhod-2, by weak initial Venus expression.
The relationship between membrane voltage and CaV1.2 interactions was obtained by subjecting patch-clamped cells in whole-cell mode to a series of 9-s depolarizations from a holding potential of −80 mV to test potentials ranging from −60 to +80 mV. Maturation of newly reconstituted Venus protein takes some time, hence the long depolarizing pulse (Nagai et al., 2002). Cells were superfused throughout with the 20 mM Ca2+ external solution described above. A TTL pulse generated by the TILL imaging system was used to trigger the onset of each voltage sweep. The cell TIRF footprint was illuminated using 491-nm light throughout each voltage sweep, and PM-localized Venus fluorescence emission was monitored in a TIRF movie acquired at a rate of 100 Hz. The final six frames of each movie were averaged to generate a single image for each voltage sweep. These images were median filtered (1 pixel radius) then divided by the −60 mV image to obtain Venus F/F0 images. Finally, the images were smoothed and pseudo-colored using the ‘red hot’ lookup table in ImageJ/Fiji. The Ca2+ dependence of CaV1.2 interactions was tested by performing the aforementioned procedure first with 2 mM Ba2+ as the conducting ion, then switching the perfusate to our regular external solution described above (20 mM Ca2+) and running the procedure again on the same cell (see Figure 4—figure supplement 2).
Reconstitution of the Venus protein is irreversible; thus, once channels spontaneously interact, they remain fused together. We exploited this feature of the bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay in experiments designed to investigate the physiological effects of CaV1.2 interactions. In these experiments, transfected tsA-201 cells expressing the split-Venus–tagged channels were patch-clamped in whole-cell mode and dialyzed with 200 μM Rhod-2 via the pipette. Ca2+ sparklets were recorded while holding the cell at −80 mV. The depolarizing step protocol described above was performed, and Venus fluorescence was monitored as before. Increases in Venus fluorescence emission during the protocol provide an indication of Cav1.2 interactions. Holding cells once more at −80 mV, Ca2+ sparklet activity was recorded from the irreversibly fused CaV1.2 channels.
For this set of experiments, tsA-201 cells were transfected with expression constructs for CaV1.2-EGFP and CaV1.2-tagRFP. FRET from CaV1.2-EGFP (donor) to CaV1.2-tagRFP (acceptor) was measured on an Olympus Fluoview 1000 (FV1000) confocal laser-scanning microscope equipped with an Olympus APON 60×/1.49 NA oil-immersion objective. A 473-nm diode laser was used to excite the sample. Emitted light was separated with an SDM560 beam splitter, collected with BA490-540 and BA575-675 emission filters, and detected by a photomultiplier tube. The resultant raw donor and acceptor images were corrected for background and bleed-through of GFP emission into the RFP channel. In separate experiments using cells expressing only CaV1.2-tagRFP, bleed-through was determined to be ∼16%. Intensity measurements from the corrected images, referred to as GFPg and RFPg respectively (where g refers to excitation of GFP with 473 nm light), were extracted using Metamorph or ImageJ software. FRET was expressed as the ratio, FRETr = RFPg/GFPg. In some experiments, the time course of FRETr was monitored during photolysis of caged Ca2+. In others, the time course of FRETr was recorded simultaneously with whole-cell CaV1.2 currents. A TTL pulse generated by the FV1000 system at the onset of imaging was used to trigger a voltage protocol consisting of a 500-ms depolarizing pulse from a holding potential of −80 to +10 mV. Finally, the Ca2+ dependence of FRET between CaV1.2 channels was monitored while perfusing cells with external solutions containing 5 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 140 mM NMDG, 1 mM MgCl2 and increasing concentrations (0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 800 and 5000 nM) of CaCl2. The solutions were adjusted to pH 7.4, and 1 μM ionomycin was added to equilibrate intracellular and extracellular Ca2+.
tsA cells were perfused with a ‘zero calcium’ external solution containing 5 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 140 mM NMDG, 1 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM BaCl2 (pH. 7.4). Cells were patch-clamped in whole-cell mode as previously described (Tadross et al., 2013) using an internal solution containing 5 mM CsCl, 40 mM HEPES, 135 mM CsMeSO3, 1 mM citrate and 1.6 mM CaCl2, adjusted to pH 7.4 and frozen into aliquots. On the day of experiments, the Ca2+ cage DMNP-EDTA (2 mM; Invitrogen, D6814) was added. Mg2+ was omitted from the pipette solution since DMNP-EDTA can also cage Mg2+. Internal solutions were supplemented with 0.25 μM PI(4,5)P2 (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL; 840046P) and 0.5 μM okadaic acid (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA; O-2220) to stabilize ICa (Tadross et al., 2013). This enabled us to record stable currents and achieve successful uncaging of Ca2+, as assayed with the Ca2+-sensitive dyes, Fluo-4 AM or Rhod-2 AM (see Figure 6A and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Uncaging experiments were performed on an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope equipped with a SIM scanner unit that permits simultaneous laser light uncaging (100% 405 nm for two frames) and recording of Venus, Fluo-4, Rhod-2 or EGFP/tagRFP FRET fluorescence emission.
CaMKII activity was measured using the ‘SignaTECT Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Assay System’ (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI). Mouse hearts were homogenized in a lysis buffer solution containing 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, PhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and cOmplete, Mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics). Hearts were subjected to three 5 s pulses at 12,000–17,000 rpm using a PRO200 Homogenizer Unit (Pro Scientific, Oxford, CT). The homogenate was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min and the resultant supernatant was collected and assayed for CaMKII activity as per the manufacturers instructions. To determine the effect of MLCKp on CaMKII activity, 0.1 or 1 μM MLCKp was added to the reaction.
Calmodulin regulation (calmodulation) of voltage-gated calcium channelsThe Journal of General Physiology 143:679–692.https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311153
Facilitation of murine cardiac L-type Ca(v)1.2 channel is modulated by calmodulin kinase II-dependent phosphorylation of S1512 and S1570Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 107:10285–10289.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914287107
Structure and function of voltage-gated ion channelsAnnual Review of Biochemistry 64:493–531.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.002425
Structure and regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channelsAnnual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 16:521–555.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.521
Ca2+ signaling amplification by oligomerization of L-type Cav1.2 channelsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 109:1749–1754.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116731109
Cellular mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias in a mouse model of Timothy syndrome (long QT syndrome 8)Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 66:63–71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.10.021
Measuring the kinetics of calcium binding proteins with flash photolysisBiochimica Et Biophysica Acta 1820:1195–1204.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.09.012
Crystal structure of dimeric cardiac L-type calcium channel regulatory domains bridged by Ca2+-calmodulinsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 106:5135–5140.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807487106
Comparison of adeno-associated virus serotypes and delivery methods for cardiac gene transferHuman Gene Therapy Methods 23:234–241.https://doi.org/10.1089/hgtb.2012.105
Beta-adrenergic regulation requires direct anchoring of PKA to cardiac CaV1.2 channels via a leucine zipper interaction with A kinase-anchoring protein 15Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 100:13093–13098.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2135335100
Physiologic gating properties of unitary cardiac L-type Ca2+ channelsBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 396:763–766.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.05.016
cDNA cloning of a dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channel from rat aorta. Evidence for the existence of alternatively spliced formsThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 265:17786–17791.
Calmodulin mutations associated with long QT syndrome prevent inactivation of cardiac L-type Ca currents and promote proarrhythmic behavior in ventricular myocytesJournal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 74:115–124.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.04.022
Mechanisms underlying heterogeneous Ca2+ sparklet activity in arterial smooth muscleJournal of General Physiology 127:611–622.https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200609519
Cav1.3 channels produce persistent calcium sparklets, but Cav1.2 channels are responsible for sparklets in mouse arterial smooth muscleAmerican Journal of Physiology Heart and Circulatory Physiology 293:H1359–H1370.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00450.2007
Facilitation and Ca2+-dependent inactivation are modified by mutation of the Ca(v)1.2 channel IQ motifThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:26702–26707.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.247841
Functional coupling of calcineurin and protein kinase A in mouse ventricular myocytesThe Journal of Physiology 544:57–69.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.020552
Excitation-contraction coupling gain in ventricular myocytes: insights from a parsimonious modelThe Journal of Physiology 587:1293–1299.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.163915
Severe arrhythmia disorder caused by cardiac L-type calcium channel mutationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 102:8089–8096.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502506102
Ca2+ channel nanodomains boost local Ca2+ amplitudeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 110:15794–15799.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313898110
Dual regulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II activity by membrane voltage and by calcium influxProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 91:9659–9663.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.20.9659
Ca-dependent facilitation of cardiac Ca current is due to Ca-calmodulin-dependent protein kinaseThe American Journal of Physiology 267:H982–H993.
Role of Cav1.2 L-type Ca2+ channels in vascular tone: effects of nifedipine and Mg2+American Journal of Physiology Heart and Circulatory Physiology 292:H415–H425.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01214.2005
Richard AldrichReviewing Editor; The University of Texas at Austin, United States
eLife posts the editorial decision letter and author response on a selection of the published articles (subject to the approval of the authors). An edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the substantive concerns or comments; minor concerns are not usually shown. Reviewers have the opportunity to discuss the decision before the letter is sent (see review process). Similarly, the author response typically shows only responses to the major concerns raised by the reviewers.
Thank you for sending your work entitled “Graded Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent coupling of voltage-gated CaV1.2 channels” for consideration at eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Eve Marder (Senior editor) and 3 reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors.
The following individuals responsible for the peer review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Richard Aldrich (Reviewing editor) and Robert Kass (peer reviewer). A further reviewer remains anonymous.
The Reviewing editor and the other reviewers discussed their comments before we reached this decision, and the Reviewing editor has assembled the following comments to help you prepare a revised submission.
The present work is a follow up of a previous study by the same group published in 2012 (Dixon et al., PNAS) and in which they showed that CaV1.2 channels form clusters in ventricular myocytes and that oligomerisation of L-type calcium channels via their C-termini result in the amplification of Ca2+ influx into cells. In the present work, the authors use a combination of super resolution nanoscopy, Ca2+ imaging, electrophysiology and two methodologically distinct assays of protein-protein interaction to investigate the molecular basis for CaV1.2 channels oligomerisation and its functional impact. The goal of this work is to determine the mechanisms allowing the simultaneous opening of calcium channels near the junctional SR in order to explain the high probability of RYR activation during the cardiac AP. The main findings of this study are that: i) Cav1.2 channels form clusters containing 5 channels in tsA201 cells and 8 channels in mouse ventricular myocytes; ii) within these clusters, Cav1.2 channels interact with each other via their C-termini and this interaction, which can occur in presence of elevated cytosolic Ca2+, requires Ca2+ entry through L-type calcium channels; iii) CaM molecules are involved in Cav1.2-to-Cav1.2 interaction via their C-termini by binding to a pre-IQ sequence and this is also required for Cav1.2 channels clustering; iv) the functional impact of Cav1.2 channel coupling within a cluster consists in the instantaneous opening of channels together (and subsequent closing together) which is associated with multi-quantal Ca2+ sparklets. Also, Cav1.2 channels coupling transiently persists after L-type calcium current has entered the cell and this is associated with Ca2+-dependent facilitation in cardiac myocytes. In addition, the possible dynamic clustering and de-clustering of Cav1.2 channels provides a mechanism of molecular memory, in which, the temporal limitation of channel disassociation following a first event could facilitation the activation of the subsequent events. These data provide novel insights of intracellular signaling networks of facilitation and are reminiscent of long-term potentiation and synaptic plasticity in neuronal networks.
This is an excellent paper that has no substantial flaws. However there are a few relatively minor issues that need to be addressed.
1) Using high resolution nanoscopy, the authors elegantly show that Cav1.2 channels localize along the t-tubules and SR junctions of isolated cardiac myocytes. If these small SR microdomains are important for the localized signaling (i.e., channel clustering) and lead to Cav1.2 activation and facilitation, wouldn't the authors predict that in their tsA-201 expression, the Cav1.2 clusters would co-localize with SR/ER structures? This should be discussed.
2) The authors bring up an interesting concept of “molecular memory”, in which following the termination of the first event, Cav1.2 de-clustering persist and this lag time could transiently facilitate an increase in the Ca2+-sensitivity and activation of subsequent events. This “priming” through maintenance of clusters (or slow dissociated of channels from clusters) would therefore be dependent on magnitude and/or time of the first, or cluster-inducing stimulus. In the experiments performed in Figure 7, does the increase in V2 amplitude (in the present of Ca2+) depend on the length of the Vpre pulse? Is there a temporal threshold needed to elicit a second facilitated response? And could the mechanism of clustering and de-clustering of Cav1.2 be a possible Ca2+ sensitive graded response.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05608.021
1) Using high resolution nanoscopy, the authors elegantly show that Cav1.2 channels localize along the t-tubules and SR junctions of isolated cardiac myocytes. If these small SR microdomains are important for the localized signaling (i.e., channel clustering) and lead to Cav1.2 activation and facilitation, wouldn't the authors predict that in their tsA-201 expression, the Cav1.2 clusters would co-localize with SR/ER structures? This should be discussed.
The reviewers pose an interesting question about potential co-localization of Cav1.2 channel clusters and the ER in tsA-201 cells. Epithelial tsA-201 cells (derived from HEK293 cells) are neither excitable nor contractile and lack a specialized ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca2+ release mechanism. Accordingly the tsA-201 cells do not possess the same specialized architecture or couplon structures observed in cardiac myocytes. Further, these cells do not express detectable levels of endogenous Cav1.2 channels (Perez-Garcia et al., 1995) or ryanodine receptors (Rossi et al., 2002; Tong et al., 1999). Nonetheless, we concede the possibility that heterologous expression of Cav1.2 channels in these cells might result in their co-localization with ER structures that are present in the cells. To address this question, we used super-resolution imaging to examine Cav1.2 channel-expressing tsA-201 cells double labeled with antibodies directed against: (i) Cav1.2 channels and, (ii) mCherry-Sec61β (a general ER marker; Zurek et al., 2011). The results of these experiments, presented in Figure 3–figure supplement 1A, revealed that Cav1.2 channel clusters are not preferentially co-localized to tsA-201 ER structures. We further explored this idea by co-transfecting tsA-201 cells with the membrane-binding protein Junctophilin-2 (JPH2). This protein is known to stabilize the junctional membrane complex in cardiomyocytes by tethering the junctional SR membrane to the t-tubule membrane (Takeshima et al., 2000). We used JPH2-GFP to increase anchor points between the ER and PM in tsA-201 cells. However, even in the presence of JPH2, Cav1.2 channel clusters were not distributed along the PM-ER junctions in the manner that they are in cardiomyocytes. These data, now presented in Figure 3–figure supplement 1B, suggest that Cav1.2 channel clustering occurs independently of SR/ER microdomains.
We performed additional imaging experiments on tsA-201 cells expressing Cav1.2 channels with the ‘pre-IQ swap’ mutation that prevents Cav1.2 channel interactions (assayed with BiFC and presented in Figure 4–figure supplement 4). In these experiments, we found that Cav1.2(pre-IQ swap) channels still formed clusters in tsA-201 cells, despite their inability to interact functionally. Indeed, under identical imaging conditions (i.e., using the same fixative and TIRF penetration depth), Cav1.2 (pre-IQ swap) channel cluster areas were not significantly different from those of WT channels. These results suggest that while the physical proximity of Cav1.2 channels is necessary for channel interactions, it is not sufficient for their functional coupling. These data have now been added to Figure 4–figure supplement 5. The implications of these new data are that the clustered arrangement of Cav1.2 channels may be dictated by another unknown protein scaffold. The identity of these proteins will be sought in future studies.
2) The authors bring up an interesting concept of “molecular memory”, in which following the termination of the first event, Cav1.2 de-clustering persist and this lag time could transiently facilitate an increase in the Ca2+-sensitivity and activation of subsequent events. This “priming” through maintenance of clusters (or slow dissociated of channels from clusters) would therefore be dependent on magnitude and/or time of the first, or cluster-inducing stimulus. In the experiments performed in Figure 7, does the increase in V2 amplitude (in the present of Ca2+) depend on the length of the Vpre pulse? Is there a temporal threshold needed to elicit a second facilitated response? And could the mechanism of clustering and de-clustering of Cav1.2 be a possible Ca2+ sensitive graded response.
We thank the reviewers for raising these interesting points. We want to clarify that we are not suggesting that channels dynamically cluster and de-cluster but rather that channels within pre-defined clusters dynamically and functionally interact with one another during calcium influx events. This is how we considered the reviewers question in our response. We now include additional experiments designed to address these questions. Specifically, we measured I2/I1 current amplitude ratios with interpulse intervals ranging from 0.05 to 1.6 s in control ventricular myocytes and in myocytes dialyzed with 100 nM or 1 μM MLCKp. In control myocytes, peak levels of ICa facilitation were apparent with an interpulse interval of 300 ms and declined thereafter whereas facilitation was absent at all interpulse-interval durations in myocytes superfused with Ba2+ or dialyzed with 1 μM MLCKp. These results are consistent with our hypothesis that Ca2+ ions, not Ba2+ ions, augment CaV1.2 channel activity, likely by increasing the number of functionally coupled channels. Furthermore, these experiments reveal the “priming” phenomenon that we had proposed based on our FRET experiments. These new and exciting data have now been added to Figure 7.
Perez-Garcia, M.T., Kamp, T.J., and Marban, E. (1995). Functional properties of cardiac L-type calcium channels transiently expressed in HEK293 cells. Roles of alpha 1 and beta subunits. J Gen Physiol 105, 289-305.10.1085/jgp.105.2.289
Rossi, D., Simeoni, I., Micheli, M., Bootman, M., Lipp, P., Allen, P.D., and Sorrentino, V. (2002). RyR1 and RyR3 isoforms provide distinct intracellular Ca2+ signals in HEK 293 cells. J Cell Sci 115, 2497-2504
Takeshima, H., Komazaki, S., Nishi, M., Iino, M., and Kangawa, K. (2000). Junctophilins: a novel family of junctional membrane complex proteins. Molecular cell 6, 11-22.10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00005-5
Tong, J., Du, G.G., Chen, S.R., and MacLennan, D.H. (1999). HEK-293 cells possess a carbachol- and thapsigargin-sensitive intracellular Ca2+ store that is responsive to stop-flow medium changes and insensitive to caffeine and ryanodine. The Biochemical Journal 343 Pt 1, 39-44. 0.1042/0264-6021:3430039
Zurek, N., Sparks, L., and Voeltz, G. (2011). Reticulon short hairpin transmembrane domains are used to shape ER tubules. Traffic 12, 28-41.
- Luis F Santana
- Manuel F Navedo
- Luis F Santana
- Marc D Binder
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
We thank Dr Joshua Vaughan for help with super-resolution imaging procedures and analyses. Drs William Catterall and Ruth E Westenbroek provided antibodies against CaV1.2. The work was supported by grants from the NIH (HL085870, HL085686 and NS077863) and AHA (14GRNT18730054).
Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#3374-01) of the University of Washington.
- Richard Aldrich, The University of Texas at Austin, United States
© 2015, Dixon et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.