The preRC protein ORCA organizes heterochromatin by assembling histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases on chromatin

  1. Sumanprava Giri
  2. Vasudha Aggarwal
  3. Julien Pontis
  4. Zhen Shen
  5. Arindam Chakraborty
  6. Abid Khan
  7. Craig Mizzen
  8. Kannanganattu V Prasanth
  9. Slimane Ait-Si-Ali
  10. Taekjip Ha
  11. Supriya G Prasanth  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France

Abstract

Heterochromatic domains are enriched with repressive histone marks, including histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, written by lysine methyltransferases (KMTs). The pre-replication complex protein Origin Recognition Complex-Associated (ORCA/LRWD1) preferentially localizes to heterochromatic regions in post-replicated cells. Its role in heterochromatin organization remained elusive. ORCA recognizes methylated H3K9 marks and interacts with repressive KMTs, including G9a/GLP and Suv39H1 in a chromatin context-dependent manner. Single-molecule pull-down assays demonstrate that ORCA-ORC and multiple H3K9 KMTs exist in a single complex and that ORCA stabilizes H3K9 KMT complex. Cells lacking ORCA show alterations in chromatin architecture, with significantly reduced H3K9 di- and tri-methylation at specific chromatin sites. Changes in heterochromatin structure due to loss of ORCA affects replication timing, preferentially at the late-replicating regions. We demonstrate that ORCA acts as a scaffold for the establishment of H3K9 KMT complex and its association and activity at specific chromatin sites is crucial for the organization of heterochromatin structure.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sumanprava Giri

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology,, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Vasudha Aggarwal

    Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Julien Pontis

    Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratoire Epigénétique et Destin Cellulaire, UMR7216, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Zhen Shen

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Arindam Chakraborty

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Abid Khan

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Craig Mizzen

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kannanganattu V Prasanth

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Slimane Ait-Si-Ali

    Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratoire Epigénétique et Destin Cellulaire, UMR7216, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Taekjip Ha

    Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    Competing interests
    Taekjip Ha, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  11. Supriya G Prasanth

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States
    For correspondence
    supriyap@life.illinois.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Copyright

© 2015, Giri et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,158
    views
  • 778
    downloads
  • 36
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sumanprava Giri
  2. Vasudha Aggarwal
  3. Julien Pontis
  4. Zhen Shen
  5. Arindam Chakraborty
  6. Abid Khan
  7. Craig Mizzen
  8. Kannanganattu V Prasanth
  9. Slimane Ait-Si-Ali
  10. Taekjip Ha
  11. Supriya G Prasanth
(2015)
The preRC protein ORCA organizes heterochromatin by assembling histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases on chromatin
eLife 4:e06496.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06496

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06496

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.