Geminivirus-encoded TrAP suppressor inhibits the histone methyltransferase SUVH4/KYP to counter host defense

  1. Claudia Castillo-González
  2. Xiuying Liu
  3. Changjun Huang
  4. Changjiang Zhao
  5. Zeyang Ma
  6. Tao Hu
  7. Feng Sun
  8. Yijun Zhou
  9. Xiu-Jie Wang
  10. Xueping Zhou
  11. Xiuren Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Texas A&M University, United States
  2. Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  4. Zhejiang University, China

Abstract

Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) can serve as an innate immunity against invading DNA viruses throughout Eukaryotes. Geminivirus code for TrAP protein to suppress the TGS pathway. Here we identified an Arabidopsis H3K9me2 histone methyltransferase, Su(var)3-9 homolog 4 (SUVH4/KYP), as a bona fide cellular target of TrAP. TrAP interacts with the catalytic domain of KYP and inhibits its activity in vitro. TrAP elicits developmental anomalies phenocopying several TGS mutants, reduces the repressive H3K9me2 mark and CHH DNA methylation, and reactivates numerous endogenous KYP-repressed loci in vivo. Moreover, KYP binds to the viral chromatin, and controls its methylation to combat virus infection. Notably, kyp mutants support systemic infection of TrAP-deficient Geminivirus. We conclude that TrAP attenuates the TGS of the viral chromatin by inhibiting KYP activity to evade host surveillance. These findings provide new insight on the molecular arms race between host antiviral defense and virus counter defense at an epigenetic level.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Claudia Castillo-González

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xiuying Liu

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Changjun Huang

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Changjiang Zhao

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zeyang Ma

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tao Hu

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Feng Sun

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yijun Zhou

    Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Xiu-Jie Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Xueping Zhou

    Biotechnology Institute, College of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xiuren Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    For correspondence
    xiuren.zhang@tamu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Castillo-González et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Claudia Castillo-González
  2. Xiuying Liu
  3. Changjun Huang
  4. Changjiang Zhao
  5. Zeyang Ma
  6. Tao Hu
  7. Feng Sun
  8. Yijun Zhou
  9. Xiu-Jie Wang
  10. Xueping Zhou
  11. Xiuren Zhang
(2015)
Geminivirus-encoded TrAP suppressor inhibits the histone methyltransferase SUVH4/KYP to counter host defense
eLife 4:e06671.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06671

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06671

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Raphael Vidal, Eoin Leen ... Gabriele Büchel
    Research Article

    MYC family oncoproteins regulate the expression of a large number of genes and broadly stimulate elongation by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). While the factors that control the chromatin association of MYC proteins are well understood, much less is known about how interacting proteins mediate MYC’s effects on transcription. Here, we show that TFIIIC, an architectural protein complex that controls the three-dimensional chromatin organisation at its target sites, binds directly to the amino-terminal transcriptional regulatory domain of MYCN. Surprisingly, TFIIIC has no discernible role in MYCN-dependent gene expression and transcription elongation. Instead, MYCN and TFIIIC preferentially bind to promoters with paused RNAPII and globally limit the accumulation of non-phosphorylated RNAPII at promoters. Consistent with its ubiquitous role in transcription, MYCN broadly participates in hubs of active promoters. Depletion of TFIIIC further increases MYCN localisation to these hubs. This increase correlates with a failure of the nuclear exosome and BRCA1, both of which are involved in nascent RNA degradation, to localise to active promoters. Our data suggest that MYCN and TFIIIC exert an censoring function in early transcription that limits promoter accumulation of inactive RNAPII and facilitates promoter-proximal degradation of nascent RNA.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Daphne R Knudsen-Palmer, Pravrutha Raman ... Antony M Jose
    Research Article

    Since double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is effective for silencing a wide variety of genes, all genes are typically considered equivalent targets for such RNA interference (RNAi). Yet, loss of some regulators of RNAi in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can selectively impair the silencing of some genes. Here, we show that such selective requirements can be explained by an intersecting network of regulators acting on genes with differences in their RNA metabolism. In this network, the Maelstrom domain-containing protein RDE-10, the intrinsically disordered protein MUT-16, and the Argonaute protein NRDE-3 work together so that any two are required for silencing one somatic gene, but each is singly required for silencing another somatic gene, where only the requirement for NRDE-3 can be overcome by enhanced dsRNA processing. Quantitative models and their exploratory simulations led us to find that (1) changing cis-regulatory elements of the target gene can reduce the dependence on NRDE-3, (2) animals can recover from silencing in non-dividing cells, and (3) cleavage and tailing of mRNAs with UG dinucleotides, which makes them templates for amplifying small RNAs, are enriched within ‘pUG zones’ matching the dsRNA. Similar crosstalk between pathways and restricted amplification could result in apparently selective silencing by endogenous RNAs.