Geminivirus-encoded TrAP suppressor inhibits the histone methyltransferase SUVH4/KYP to counter host defense

  1. Claudia Castillo-González
  2. Xiuying Liu
  3. Changjun Huang
  4. Changjiang Zhao
  5. Zeyang Ma
  6. Tao Hu
  7. Feng Sun
  8. Yijun Zhou
  9. Xiu-Jie Wang
  10. Xueping Zhou
  11. Xiuren Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Texas A&M University, United States
  2. Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  4. Zhejiang University, China

Abstract

Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) can serve as an innate immunity against invading DNA viruses throughout Eukaryotes. Geminivirus code for TrAP protein to suppress the TGS pathway. Here we identified an Arabidopsis H3K9me2 histone methyltransferase, Su(var)3-9 homolog 4 (SUVH4/KYP), as a bona fide cellular target of TrAP. TrAP interacts with the catalytic domain of KYP and inhibits its activity in vitro. TrAP elicits developmental anomalies phenocopying several TGS mutants, reduces the repressive H3K9me2 mark and CHH DNA methylation, and reactivates numerous endogenous KYP-repressed loci in vivo. Moreover, KYP binds to the viral chromatin, and controls its methylation to combat virus infection. Notably, kyp mutants support systemic infection of TrAP-deficient Geminivirus. We conclude that TrAP attenuates the TGS of the viral chromatin by inhibiting KYP activity to evade host surveillance. These findings provide new insight on the molecular arms race between host antiviral defense and virus counter defense at an epigenetic level.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Claudia Castillo-González

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xiuying Liu

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Changjun Huang

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Changjiang Zhao

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zeyang Ma

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tao Hu

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Feng Sun

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yijun Zhou

    Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Xiu-Jie Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Xueping Zhou

    Biotechnology Institute, College of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xiuren Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    For correspondence
    xiuren.zhang@tamu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Detlef Weigel, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: January 25, 2015
  2. Accepted: September 5, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 7, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 16, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Castillo-González et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,249
    Page views
  • 1,034
    Downloads
  • 88
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Claudia Castillo-González
  2. Xiuying Liu
  3. Changjun Huang
  4. Changjiang Zhao
  5. Zeyang Ma
  6. Tao Hu
  7. Feng Sun
  8. Yijun Zhou
  9. Xiu-Jie Wang
  10. Xueping Zhou
  11. Xiuren Zhang
(2015)
Geminivirus-encoded TrAP suppressor inhibits the histone methyltransferase SUVH4/KYP to counter host defense
eLife 4:e06671.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06671

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06671

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erandi Velazquez-Miranda, Ming He
    Insight

    Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Monica Salinas-Pena, Elena Rebollo, Albert Jordan
    Research Article

    Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.