GLO-Roots: an imaging platform enabling multidimensional characterization of soil-grown root systems

  1. Rubén Rellán-Álvarez
  2. Guillaume Lobet
  3. Heike Lindner
  4. Pierre-Luc Pradier
  5. Jose Sebastian
  6. Muh-Ching Yee
  7. Yu Geng
  8. Charlotte Trontin
  9. Therese LaRue
  10. Amanda Schrager-Lavelle
  11. Cara H Haney
  12. Rita Nieu
  13. Julin Maloof
  14. John P Vogel
  15. José R Dinneny  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico
  2. University of Liège, Belgium
  3. Carnegie Institution for Science, United States
  4. United States Department of Agriculture, United States
  5. Stanford University, United States
  6. University of California, Davis, United States
  7. Harvard Medical School, United States
  8. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, United States

Abstract

Root systems develop different root types that individually sense cues from their local environment and integrate this information with systemic signals. This complex multi-dimensional amalgam of inputs enables continuous adjustment of root growth rates, direction and metabolic activity that define a dynamic physical network. Current methods for analyzing root biology balance physiological relevance with imaging capability. To bridge this divide, we developed an integrated imaging system called Growth and Luminescence Observatory for Roots (GLO-Roots) that uses luminescence-based reporters to enable studies of root architecture and gene expression patterns in soil-grown, light-shielded roots. We have developed image analysis algorithms that allow the spatial integration of soil properties, gene expression and root system architecture traits. We propose GLO-Roots as a system that has great utility in presenting environmental stimuli to roots in ways that evoke natural adaptive responses and in providing tools for studying the multi-dimensional nature of such processes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rubén Rellán-Álvarez

    Unidad de Genómica Avanzada, Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Irapuato, Mexico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Guillaume Lobet

    PhytoSystems, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Heike Lindner

    Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pierre-Luc Pradier

    Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jose Sebastian

    Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Muh-Ching Yee

    Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yu Geng

    Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Charlotte Trontin

    Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Therese LaRue

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Amanda Schrager-Lavelle

    Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Cara H Haney

    Department of Genetics, Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rita Nieu

    Western Regional Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Julin Maloof

    Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. John P Vogel

    Department of Energy, Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. José R Dinneny

    Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    jdinneny@carnegiescience.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Rellán-Álvarez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 12,407
    views
  • 2,346
    downloads
  • 200
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rubén Rellán-Álvarez
  2. Guillaume Lobet
  3. Heike Lindner
  4. Pierre-Luc Pradier
  5. Jose Sebastian
  6. Muh-Ching Yee
  7. Yu Geng
  8. Charlotte Trontin
  9. Therese LaRue
  10. Amanda Schrager-Lavelle
  11. Cara H Haney
  12. Rita Nieu
  13. Julin Maloof
  14. John P Vogel
  15. José R Dinneny
(2015)
GLO-Roots: an imaging platform enabling multidimensional characterization of soil-grown root systems
eLife 4:e07597.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07597

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07597

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Théo Le Moigne, Martina Santoni ... Julien Henri
    Research Article

    The Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (CBBC) performs carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms. Among the eleven enzymes that participate in the pathway, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase) is expressed in photo-autotrophs and catalyzes the hydrolysis of sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate (SBP) to sedoheptulose-7-phosphate (S7P). SBPase, along with nine other enzymes in the CBBC, contributes to the regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, the carbon-fixing co-substrate used by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). The metabolic role of SBPase is restricted to the CBBC, and a recent study revealed that the three-dimensional structure of SBPase from the moss Physcomitrium patens was found to be similar to that of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), an enzyme involved in both CBBC and neoglucogenesis. In this study we report the first structure of an SBPase from a chlorophyte, the model unicellular green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. By combining experimental and computational structural analyses, we describe the topology, conformations, and quaternary structure of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii SBPase (CrSBPase). We identify active site residues and locate sites of redox- and phospho-post-translational modifications that contribute to enzymatic functions. Finally, we observe that CrSBPase adopts distinct oligomeric states that may dynamically contribute to the control of its activity.

    1. Plant Biology
    Maryam Rahmati Ishka, Hayley Sussman ... Magdalena M Julkowska
    Research Article

    Soil salinity is one of the major threats to agricultural productivity worldwide. Salt stress exposure alters root and shoots growth rates, thereby affecting overall plant performance. While past studies have extensively documented the effect of salt stress on root elongation and shoot development separately, here we take an innovative approach by examining the coordination of root and shoot growth under salt stress conditions. Utilizing a newly developed tool for quantifying the root:shoot ratio in agar-grown Arabidopsis seedlings, we found that salt stress results in a loss of coordination between root and shoot growth rates. We identify a specific gene cluster encoding domain-of-unknown-function 247 (DUF247), and characterize one of these genes as Salt Root:shoot Ratio Regulator Gene (SR3G). Further analysis elucidates the role of SR3G as a negative regulator of salt stress tolerance, revealing its function in regulating shoot growth, root suberization, and sodium accumulation. We further characterize that SR3G expression is modulated by WRKY75 transcription factor, known as a positive regulator of salt stress tolerance. Finally, we show that the salt stress sensitivity of wrky75 mutant is completely diminished when it is combined with sr3g mutation. Together, our results demonstrate that utilizing root:shoot ratio as an architectural feature leads to the discovery of a new stress resilience gene. The study’s innovative approach and findings not only contribute to our understanding of plant stress tolerance mechanisms but also open new avenues for genetic and agronomic strategies to enhance crop environmental resilience.