Abundant toxin-related genes in the genomes of beneficial symbionts from deep-sea hydrothermal vent mussels

  1. Lizbeth Sayavedra
  2. Manuel Kleiner
  3. Ruby Ponnudurai
  4. Silke Wetzel
  5. Eric Pelletier
  6. Valerie Barbe
  7. Nori Satoh
  8. Eiichi Shoguchi
  9. Dennis Fink
  10. Corinna Breusing
  11. Thorsten BH Reusch
  12. Philip Rosenstiel
  13. Markus B Schilhabel
  14. Dörte Becher
  15. Thomas Schweder
  16. Stephanie Markert
  17. Nicole Dubilier
  18. Jillian M Petersen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Germany
  2. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Germany
  3. Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, France
  4. Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
  5. GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany
  6. Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Germany
  7. Institute of Marine Biotechnology, Germany
  8. University of Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Bathymodiolus mussels live in symbiosis with intracellular sulfur-oxidizing (SOX) bacteria that provide them with nutrition. We sequenced the SOX symbiont genomes from two Bathymodiolus species. Comparison of these symbiont genomes with those of their closest relatives revealed that the symbionts have undergone genome rearrangements, and up to 35% of their genes may have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer. Many of the genes specific to the symbionts were homologs of virulence genes. We discovered an abundant and diverse array of genes similar to insecticidal toxins of nematode and aphid symbionts, and toxins of pathogens such as Yersinia and Vibrio. Transcriptomics and proteomics revealed that the SOX symbionts express the toxin-related genes (TRGs) in their hosts. We hypothesize that the symbionts use these TRGs in beneficial interactions with their host, including protection against parasites. This would explain why a mutualistic symbiont would contain such a remarkable 'arsenal' of TRGs.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lizbeth Sayavedra

    Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Manuel Kleiner

    Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ruby Ponnudurai

    Institute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Silke Wetzel

    Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Eric Pelletier

    Genoscope - Centre National de Séquençage, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Valerie Barbe

    Genoscope - Centre National de Séquençage, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Evry, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Nori Satoh

    Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Eiichi Shoguchi

    Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dennis Fink

    Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Corinna Breusing

    Evolutionary Ecology, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Thorsten BH Reusch

    Evolutionary Ecology, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Philip Rosenstiel

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Markus B Schilhabel

    Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Dörte Becher

    Institute of Marine Biotechnology, Greifswald, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Thomas Schweder

    Institute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Stephanie Markert

    Institute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Nicole Dubilier

    Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Jillian M Petersen

    Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, Research Network Chemistry Meets Microbiology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    petersen@microbial-ecology.net
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Axel A Brakhage, Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Hans-Knöll-Institut, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: April 9, 2015
  2. Accepted: September 14, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 15, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 21, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Sayavedra et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,358
    views
  • 749
    downloads
  • 46
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lizbeth Sayavedra
  2. Manuel Kleiner
  3. Ruby Ponnudurai
  4. Silke Wetzel
  5. Eric Pelletier
  6. Valerie Barbe
  7. Nori Satoh
  8. Eiichi Shoguchi
  9. Dennis Fink
  10. Corinna Breusing
  11. Thorsten BH Reusch
  12. Philip Rosenstiel
  13. Markus B Schilhabel
  14. Dörte Becher
  15. Thomas Schweder
  16. Stephanie Markert
  17. Nicole Dubilier
  18. Jillian M Petersen
(2015)
Abundant toxin-related genes in the genomes of beneficial symbionts from deep-sea hydrothermal vent mussels
eLife 4:e07966.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07966

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07966

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Can Hu, Xue-Ting Zhu ... Jin-Qiu Zhou
    Research Article

    Telomeres, which are chromosomal end structures, play a crucial role in maintaining genome stability and integrity in eukaryotes. In the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the X- and Y’-elements are subtelomeric repetitive sequences found in all 32 and 17 telomeres, respectively. While the Y’-elements serve as a backup for telomere functions in cells lacking telomerase, the function of the X-elements remains unclear. This study utilized the S. cerevisiae strain SY12, which has three chromosomes and six telomeres, to investigate the role of X-elements (as well as Y’-elements) in telomere maintenance. Deletion of Y’-elements (SY12), X-elements (SY12XYΔ+Y), or both X- and Y’-elements (SY12XYΔ) did not impact the length of the terminal TG1-3 tracks or telomere silencing. However, inactivation of telomerase in SY12, SY12XYΔ+Y, and SY12XYΔ cells resulted in cellular senescence and the generation of survivors. These survivors either maintained their telomeres through homologous recombination-dependent TG1-3 track elongation or underwent microhomology-mediated intra-chromosomal end-to-end joining. Our findings indicate the non-essential role of subtelomeric X- and Y’-elements in telomere regulation in both telomerase-proficient and telomerase-null cells and suggest that these elements may represent remnants of S. cerevisiae genome evolution. Furthermore, strains with fewer or no subtelomeric elements exhibit more concise telomere structures and offer potential models for future studies in telomere biology.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.