Reconstructing the in vivo dynamics of hematopoietic stem cells from telomere length distributions

  1. Benjamin Werner  Is a corresponding author
  2. Fabian Beier
  3. Sebastian Hummel
  4. Stefan Balabanov
  5. Lisa Lassay
  6. Thorsten Orlikowsky
  7. David Dingli
  8. Tim H Brümmendorf
  9. Arne Traulsen
  1. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Germany
  2. Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University Hospital, Germany
  3. University Hospital of Zürich, Switzerland
  4. Mayo Clinic, United States

Abstract

We investigate the in vivo patterns of stem cell divisions in the human hematopoietic system throughout life. In particular, we analyze the shape of telomere length distributions underlying stem cell behavior within individuals. Our mathematical model shows that these distributions contain a fingerprint of the progressive telomere loss and the fraction of symmetric cell proliferations. Our predictions are tested against measured telomere length distributions in humans across all ages, collected from lymphocyte and granulocyte sorted telomere length data of 356 healthy individuals, including 47 cord blood and 28 bone marrow samples. We find an increasing stem cell pool during childhood and adolescence and an approximately maintained stem cell population in adults. Furthermore, our method is able to detect individual differences from a single tissue sample, i.e. a single snapshot. Prospectively, this allows us to compare cell proliferation between individuals and identify abnormal stem cell dynamics, which affects the risk of stem cell related diseases.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Benjamin Werner

    Department of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany
    For correspondence
    werner@evolbio.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Fabian Beier

    Department of Hematology and Oncology, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sebastian Hummel

    Department of Hematology and Oncology, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stefan Balabanov

    Division of Hematology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lisa Lassay

    Department of Pediatrics, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thorsten Orlikowsky

    Department of Pediatrics, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David Dingli

    Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Tim H Brümmendorf

    Department of Hematology and Oncology, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Arne Traulsen

    Department of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Human subjects: All samples and the approval for publication were taken with informed consent of all patients at the University Hospital Aachen according to the guidelines and the approval of the ethics committees at the University Hospital Aachen.

Copyright

© 2015, Werner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,855
    views
  • 723
    downloads
  • 75
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Benjamin Werner
  2. Fabian Beier
  3. Sebastian Hummel
  4. Stefan Balabanov
  5. Lisa Lassay
  6. Thorsten Orlikowsky
  7. David Dingli
  8. Tim H Brümmendorf
  9. Arne Traulsen
(2015)
Reconstructing the in vivo dynamics of hematopoietic stem cells from telomere length distributions
eLife 4:e08687.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08687

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08687

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Cesare V Parise, Marc O Ernst
    Research Article

    Audiovisual information reaches the brain via both sustained and transient input channels, representing signals’ intensity over time or changes thereof, respectively. To date, it is unclear to what extent transient and sustained input channels contribute to the combined percept obtained through multisensory integration. Based on the results of two novel psychophysical experiments, here we demonstrate the importance of the transient (instead of the sustained) channel for the integration of audiovisual signals. To account for the present results, we developed a biologically inspired, general-purpose model for multisensory integration, the multisensory correlation detectors, which combines correlated input from unimodal transient channels. Besides accounting for the results of our psychophysical experiments, this model could quantitatively replicate several recent findings in multisensory research, as tested against a large collection of published datasets. In particular, the model could simultaneously account for the perceived timing of audiovisual events, multisensory facilitation in detection tasks, causality judgments, and optimal integration. This study demonstrates that several phenomena in multisensory research that were previously considered unrelated, all stem from the integration of correlated input from unimodal transient channels.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Franck Simon, Maria Colomba Comes ... Herve Isambert
    Tools and Resources

    Live-cell microscopy routinely provides massive amounts of time-lapse images of complex cellular systems under various physiological or therapeutic conditions. However, this wealth of data remains difficult to interpret in terms of causal effects. Here, we describe CausalXtract, a flexible computational pipeline that discovers causal and possibly time-lagged effects from morphodynamic features and cell–cell interactions in live-cell imaging data. CausalXtract methodology combines network-based and information-based frameworks, which is shown to discover causal effects overlooked by classical Granger and Schreiber causality approaches. We showcase the use of CausalXtract to uncover novel causal effects in a tumor-on-chip cellular ecosystem under therapeutically relevant conditions. In particular, we find that cancer-associated fibroblasts directly inhibit cancer cell apoptosis, independently from anticancer treatment. CausalXtract uncovers also multiple antagonistic effects at different time delays. Hence, CausalXtract provides a unique computational tool to interpret live-cell imaging data for a range of fundamental and translational research applications.