Promoter nucleosome dynamics regulated by signaling through the CTD code

  1. Philippe Materne
  2. Jayamani Anandhakumar
  3. Valerie Migeot
  4. Ignacio Soriano
  5. Carlo Yague-Sanz
  6. Elena Hidalgo
  7. Carole Mignion
  8. Luis Quintales
  9. Francisco Antequera
  10. Damien Hermand  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Namur, Belgium
  2. LSU Health Sciences Center, United States
  3. Universidad de Salamanca, Spain
  4. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain

Abstract

The phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II CTD plays a key role in delineating transcribed regions within chromatin by recruiting histone methylases and deacetylases. Using genome-wide nucleosome mapping, we show that CTD S2 phosphorylation controls nucleosome dynamics in the promoter of a subset of 324 genes, including the regulators of cell differentiation ste11 and metabolic adaptation inv1. Mechanistic studies on these genes indicate that during gene activation a local increase of phosphoS2 CTD nearby the promoter impairs the phosphoS5 CTD dependent recruitment of Set1 and the subsequent recruitment of specific HDACs, which leads to nucleosome depletion and efficient transcription. The early increase of phosphoS2 results from the phosphorylation of the CTD S2 kinase Lsk1 by MAP kinase in response to cellular signaling. The artificial tethering of the Lsk1 kinase at the ste11 promoter is sufficient to activate transcription. Therefore, signaling through the CTD code regulates promoter nucleosomes dynamics.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Philippe Materne

    Namur Research College, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jayamani Anandhakumar

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Valerie Migeot

    Namur Research College, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ignacio Soriano

    Instituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Carlo Yague-Sanz

    Namur Research College, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Elena Hidalgo

    Departament de Ciencies Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Carole Mignion

    Namur Research College, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Luis Quintales

    Instituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Francisco Antequera

    Instituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Damien Hermand

    Namur Research College, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
    For correspondence
    Damien.Hermand@unamur.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Materne et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,710
    views
  • 643
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Philippe Materne
  2. Jayamani Anandhakumar
  3. Valerie Migeot
  4. Ignacio Soriano
  5. Carlo Yague-Sanz
  6. Elena Hidalgo
  7. Carole Mignion
  8. Luis Quintales
  9. Francisco Antequera
  10. Damien Hermand
(2015)
Promoter nucleosome dynamics regulated by signaling through the CTD code
eLife 4:e09008.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09008

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09008

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ananda Kishore Mukherjee, Subhajit Dutta ... Shantanu Chowdhury
    Research Article

    Telomeres are crucial for cancer progression. Immune signalling in the tumour microenvironment has been shown to be very important in cancer prognosis. However, the mechanisms by which telomeres might affect tumour immune response remain poorly understood. Here, we observed that interleukin-1 signalling is telomere-length dependent in cancer cells. Mechanistically, non-telomeric TRF2 (telomeric repeat binding factor 2) binding at the IL-1-receptor type-1 (IL1R1) promoter was found to be affected by telomere length. Enhanced TRF2 binding at the IL1R1 promoter in cells with short telomeres directly recruited the histone-acetyl-transferase (HAT) p300, and consequent H3K27 acetylation activated IL1R1. This altered NF-kappa B signalling and affected downstream cytokines like IL6, IL8, and TNF. Further, IL1R1 expression was telomere-sensitive in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) clinical samples. Infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) was also sensitive to the length of tumour cell telomeres and highly correlated with IL1R1 expression. The use of both IL1 Receptor antagonist (IL1RA) and IL1R1 targeting ligands could abrogate M2 macrophage infiltration in TNBC tumour organoids. In summary, using TNBC cancer tissue (>90 patients), tumour-derived organoids, cancer cells, and xenograft tumours with either long or short telomeres, we uncovered a heretofore undeciphered function of telomeres in modulating IL1 signalling and tumour immunity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article Updated

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme – the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) – driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here, we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.