Spatial Attention: Time to get deep
As you read this text, you are probably focusing on a screen or piece of paper directly in front of you. This ability to focus on a specific object relies on the brain filtering out visual distractions from the surrounding area (Desimone and Duncan, 1995). However, if you wanted, you could suddenly shift your attention to the left or right, without moving your eyes. Understanding more about the relationship between attention and the anatomy of the brain is fundamental for research in neuroscience.
Previous studies have shown that attention is controlled by the cortex, the outer layer of the brain, which is thought to implement cognition, language, reasoning and other higher-order brain functions. However, much less is known about how structures deep within the brain affect this process. This is partly because most of the techniques commonly used to image brain activity are good at measuring the activity of neurons in the cortex but less so in deeper subcortical structures. Now, in eLife, Ole Jensen and colleagues at the University of Birmingham, University of New South Wales, and CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant – including Tara Ghafari as first author – report how they used two brain imaging techniques to investigate the role of subcortical structures in spatial attention (Ghafari et al., 2024).
First, the team used a technique called magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure magnetic fields generated by the electrical activity of neurons in the cortical layer. This method was applied to the brains of 33 individuals as they performed a task that required them to shift their attention between faces on the left and right of a computer screen (Gutteling et al., 2022). The same group of people were also placed in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner to assess the size of two brain structures, the thalamus and basal ganglia, both of which sit beneath the cortex.
When our attention shifts to the left or right, the balance of waves in the left versus the right hemisphere of the brain changes. This is particularly true for a pattern of electrical activity known as the alpha wave which repeats roughly ten times per second (first discovered by Berger, 1929). It is believed that this asymmetry reflects one side of the brain focusing on the relevant input, while the other suppresses distractions from the surrounding environment (Schneider et al., 2022).
However, the human brain is not perfectly symmetrical. For instance, structures which are present on both sides of the brain (such as the thalamus) might be larger in the right hemisphere in some individuals, but larger in the left in others. On top of this, the response of alpha waves to attention is also asymmetrical: a shift in attention might lead to a larger change in the alpha waves in one hemisphere for some individuals, and the opposite hemisphere for others (Mazzetti et al., 2019).
Ghafari et al. set out to find whether the size of subcortical structures in the left and right hemispheres correlates with the asymmetry in alpha modulations. They found that whichever brain hemisphere had the larger caudate nucleus or globus pallidus (two structures that make up the basal ganglia) also displayed a higher level of alpha wave modulation. However, this effect was reversed for the thalamus, with higher levels of modulation happening in the hemisphere with the smaller thalamus (Figure 1). Moreover, Ghafari et al. also report what happens to these relationships when various features of the relevant stimuli and irrelevant distractors used in the experiments are changed.
These new findings will help us understand the underlying subcortical circuitry that controls how spatial attention is allocated in humans. Not least, this work paves the way for further research on how changes in the subcortical regions in neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease or dementia alter the behavior of brain waves in the cortex.
Since the results of the present research are purely correlational, it remains unclear whether the asymmetry of subcortical structures is responsible for the asymmetry in alpha wave modulation. Furthermore, attention is just one of many perceptual and cognitive processes that modulate alpha waves (Clayton et al., 2018). It will thus be important for future studies to test if the results are specific to spatial attention or apply more generally to other cognitive processes and to other types of brain waves.
References
-
Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des MenschenArchiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 87:527–570.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797193
-
The many characters of visual alpha oscillationsThe European Journal of Neuroscience 48:2498–2508.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13747
-
Neural mechanisms of selective visual attentionAnnual Review of Neuroscience 18:193–222.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
-
Alpha oscillations reflect suppression of distractors with increased perceptual loadProgress in Neurobiology 214:102285.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102285
-
Hemispheric asymmetry of globus pallidus relates to alpha modulation in reward-related attentional tasksThe Journal of Neuroscience 39:9221–9236.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0610-19.2019
-
Target enhancement or distractor suppression? Functionally distinct alpha oscillations form the basis of attentionThe European Journal of Neuroscience 55:3256–3265.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15309
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Schulz and Wöstmann
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 393
- views
-
- 29
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
The circadian clock, an internal time-keeping system orchestrates 24 hr rhythms in physiology and behavior by regulating rhythmic transcription in cells. Astrocytes, the most abundant glial cells, play crucial roles in CNS functions, but the impact of the circadian clock on astrocyte functions remains largely unexplored. In this study, we identified 412 circadian rhythmic transcripts in cultured mouse cortical astrocytes through RNA sequencing. Gene Ontology analysis indicated that genes involved in Ca2+ homeostasis are under circadian control. Notably, Herpud1 (Herp) exhibited robust circadian rhythmicity at both mRNA and protein levels, a rhythm disrupted in astrocytes lacking the circadian transcription factor, BMAL1. HERP regulated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ release by modulating the degradation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (ITPRs). ATP-stimulated ER Ca2+ release varied with the circadian phase, being more pronounced at subjective night phase, likely due to the rhythmic expression of ITPR2. Correspondingly, ATP-stimulated cytosolic Ca2+ increases were heightened at the subjective night phase. This rhythmic ER Ca2+ response led to circadian phase-dependent variations in the phosphorylation of Connexin 43 (Ser368) and gap junctional communication. Given the role of gap junction channel (GJC) in propagating Ca2+ signals, we suggest that this circadian regulation of ER Ca2+ responses could affect astrocytic modulation of synaptic activity according to the time of day. Overall, our study enhances the understanding of how the circadian clock influences astrocyte function in the CNS, shedding light on their potential role in daily variations of brain activity and health.
-
- Neuroscience
The relation between neural activity and behaviorally relevant variables is at the heart of neuroscience research. When strong, this relation is termed a neural representation. There is increasing evidence, however, for partial dissociations between activity in an area and relevant external variables. While many explanations have been proposed, a theoretical framework for the relationship between external and internal variables is lacking. Here, we utilize recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to explore the question of when and how neural dynamics and the network’s output are related from a geometrical point of view. We find that training RNNs can lead to two dynamical regimes: dynamics can either be aligned with the directions that generate output variables, or oblique to them. We show that the choice of readout weight magnitude before training can serve as a control knob between the regimes, similar to recent findings in feedforward networks. These regimes are functionally distinct. Oblique networks are more heterogeneous and suppress noise in their output directions. They are furthermore more robust to perturbations along the output directions. Crucially, the oblique regime is specific to recurrent (but not feedforward) networks, arising from dynamical stability considerations. Finally, we show that tendencies toward the aligned or the oblique regime can be dissociated in neural recordings. Altogether, our results open a new perspective for interpreting neural activity by relating network dynamics and their output.