Gene Fusion: Decoding the identity of rare tumors
Gene fusions are common mutations that have been linked to several types of cancer, most notably chronic myelogenous leukemia, which is a result of the BCR gene on chromosome 22 fusing with the ABL gene on chromosome 9 (Nowell and Hungerford, 1960). Identifying fusion genes, and investigating the molecular behavior of the chimeric fusion proteins that arise from these mutations, may help with the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of certain cancers.
The fusion of two genes on chromosome 12 – NAB2 and STAT6 – has been found in a rare form of cancer, known as a solitary fibrous tumor, which can form in almost any part of the body (Thway et al., 2016). While the initial tumor can often be removed, around 40% of them can recur or metastasize, at which point they become untreatable.
In most healthy tissues, NAB2 and STAT6 function independently. NAB2 is a transcriptional co-regulator that – being physiologically sequestered in the cytoplasm – can restrict the nuclear activity of two transcription factors involved in cell proliferation, EGR1 and EGR2 (Svaren et al., 1996), whereas STAT6 is a transcription factor that travels to the nucleus to activate gene expression (Figure 1; Hu et al., 2021). However, the molecular function of the NAB2-STAT6 fusion protein remains obscure. Now, in eLife, Alessandro Gardini and colleagues at the Wistar Institute and the University of Pennsylvania – including Connor Hill as first author – report the results of studies that help clarify the role of this fusion protein in solitary fibrous tumors (Hill et al., 2024).
The researchers used a combination of cell-based studies, analyses of genome-wide binding patterns of specific proteins within tumor samples, and a comparative analysis of gene expression signatures. They found that compared to adjacent healthy tissue, primary solitary fibrous tumors had gene expression patterns characteristic of neuronal development, in particular, the targets of ERG1 were enriched in the tumors. Immune and cell signaling pathways were also significantly downregulated. To validate these findings, Hill et al. used cells derived from an osteosarcoma (a type of bone cancer) to create an in vitro model that expressed the NAB2-STAT6 fusion protein. This model also showed gene expression patterns characteristic of neuronal development and increased levels of NAB1, NAB2 and EGR1 bolstered by the fusion protein were also observed (Figure 1).
In both cell lines and samples from patients with cancer, the fusion protein and EGR1 bound to EGR1-targeted promoters and enhancers, increasing their accessibility and expression of the corresponding genes. The binding appeared to be mediated by the NAB2 portion, while the STAT6 portion was responsible for translocating the fusion protein to the cell nucleus.
Hill et al. then compared the gene expression signature of the solitary fibrous tumors with existing datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas, which revealed a striking similarity between solitary fibrous tumors and neuroendocrine tumors (arising from cells that can release hormones in response to signals from the nervous system), including glioblastoma. Moreover, an analysis of registered survival rates indicated a significantly worse outcome for cancer patients with a gene signature indicative of solitary fibrous tumors.
The study of Hill et al. provides valuable insights into the dynamics of solitary fibrous tumors and their unique neural-like gene expression signature that might be relevant for other, more common cancers. Their neuroendocrine identity driven by NAB2-STAT6 fusion highlights their similarity to other neuroendocrine malignancies, such as pheochromocytoma (affecting adrenal glands) and oligodendroglioma (affecting specific glial cells in the brain), raising the question of their cell-of-origin (Hill et al., 2024; Davanzo et al., 2018; Demicco et al., 2012).
Future research on the molecular consequences of the fusion of NAB2 and STAT6 may help refine cancer diagnosis and inform drug development. Targeting NAB2-STAT6 or its downstream pathways could help prevent the recurrence of this cancer, or serve as a strategy for patients who are not candidates for surgery. However, more research is needed to confirm these hypotheses. Being the first of its kind, the study of Hill et al. significantly advances our molecular understanding of solitary fibrous tumors, a critical first step toward targeted precision medicine approaches.
References
-
Solitary fibrous tumorTranslational Gastroenterology and Hepatology 3:94.https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2018.11.02
-
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinicSignal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 6:402.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1
-
Chromosome studies on normal and leukemic human leukocytesJournal of the National Cancer Institute 25:85–109.
-
NAB2, A corepressor of NGFI-A (Egr-1) and Krox20, is induced by proliferative and differentiative stimuliMolecular and Cellular Biology 16:3545–3553.https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.16.7.3545
-
The current status of solitary fibrous tumor: diagnostic features, variants, and geneticsInternational Journal of Surgical Pathology 24:281–292.https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896915627485
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Yuan et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 398
- views
-
- 37
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
- Cell Biology
Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.
-
- Cancer Biology
- Computational and Systems Biology
Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.