Pain Management: A promising alternative to opioids
Post-surgical pain affects millions of people every year, and managing it is a critical aspect of patient care (Tait et al., 2018). Effective pain relief is essential both for comfort and also for preventing complications such as chronic pain or delayed recovery.
Traditionally, a broad group of pain-relieving medicines known as opioids have been the cornerstone of post-surgical pain treatment. By binding to pain receptors, opioids reduce pain intensity. However, opioids can cause nausea, constipation and respiratory depression, and they also have the potential to be addictive (Stein, 2016). Indeed, their widespread use is believed to have contributed to an opioid epidemic that has resulted in high rates of addiction, overdose and death, particularly in the United States (Hornberger and Chhatwal, 2021; The Lancet., 2021). This underscores the need for alternative pain management strategies that can effectively control pain without causing dangerous side effects.
For decades, the amniotic membrane – the innermost layer of the placenta – has been used to heal wounds and to repair damage to the surface of the eye through its anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring properties (Díaz-Prado et al., 2011; Law et al., 2022). Now, in eLife, Yun Guan and Shao-Qui He of Johns Hopkins University and colleagues – including Chi Zhang, Qian Huang, and Neil Ford as joint first authors – report that a human amniotic membrane product shows promise as an opioid alternative for post-surgical pain management (Zhang et al., 2024).
Clarix Flo (or FLO for short) contains a rich matrix of biologically active molecules derived from the amniotic membrane that can modulate cellular activity. To investigate whether FLO can reduce post-surgical pain, Zhang et al. applied it to surgical sites in mice, finding that this significantly reduced sensitivity to post-surgical pain. This effect was shown to depend on CD44, a cell surface receptor that is involved in various physiological and pathological processes. By interacting with the CD44 receptor, FLO inhibits the activity of specialized sensory neurons located in the dorsal root ganglia that are responsible for transmitting pain signals to the central nervous system. This means that FLO targets pain signaling at its source, which is markedly different from how opioids work.
To identify the component within FLO responsible for this effect, the team isolated a complex known as HC-HA/PTX3, which is found in uniquely high amounts in birth tissues. Applying this complex alone replicated the pain-inhibiting effects of FLO. HC-HA/PTX3 was also purer than FLO and more soluble in water, which increases its therapeutic potential by making it less likely to cause adverse effects and more likely to reach its target site. Further experiments revealed that HC-HA/PTX3 induces cytoskeletal rearrangements in pain-sensing neurons. This inhibits critical sodium and high-voltage calcium currents that are vital for propagating pain signals, significantly reducing the ability of these neurons to transmit pain signals to the central nervous system (Figure 1).
The discovery that HC-HA/PTX3 is the key bioactive component in FLO makes it a potential candidate for acute post-surgical and chronic pain management in various clinical settings. While this opens exciting avenues for future research, before HC-HA/PTX3 can be fully translated from preclinical research to clinical application, important questions must be answered. One key challenge is determining whether the effects observed in mice translate to human patients. Although pain signaling pathways are largely conserved across species, human clinical trials are necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of HC-HA/PTX3. Researchers are also considering whether combining the complex with other non-opioid treatments, such as anti-inflammatory drugs or nerve growth inhibitors, could create a more comprehensive approach to pain management.
Despite these uncertainties, the findings of Zhang et al. represent a significant step forward in the search for effective, non-opioid pain therapies. By targeting the underlying pain mechanisms at the cellular level, rather than simply masking the symptoms as opioids do, biologically derived products like HC-HA/PTX3 could revolutionize post-surgical and chronic pain treatment. While much work remains to bring these discoveries to clinical practice, the promise of safer, more effective pain management is an exciting prospect in the ongoing fight against the opioid epidemic.
References
-
Opioid misuse: A global crisisValue in Health 24:145–146.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.003
-
Opioid ReceptorsAnnual Review of Medicine 67:433–451.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-062613-093100
-
Persistent post-mastectomy pain: Risk factors and current approaches to treatmentThe Journal of Pain 19:1367–1383.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.06.002
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Zhang and Cheng
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 553
- views
-
- 36
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
A complex extracted from the amniotic membrane in humans reduces post-surgical pain in mice
-
- Medicine
Background:
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is a severe and deadly adverse event following ERCP. The ideal method for predicting PEP risk before ERCP has yet to be identified. We aimed to establish a simple PEP risk score model (SuPER model: Support for PEP Reduction) that can be applied before ERCP.
Methods:
This multicenter study enrolled 2074 patients who underwent ERCP. Among them, 1037 patients each were randomly assigned to the development and validation cohorts. In the development cohort, the risk score model for predicting PEP was established via logistic regression analysis. In the validation cohort, the performance of the model was assessed.
Results:
In the development cohort, five PEP risk factors that could be identified before ERCP were extracted and assigned weights according to their respective regression coefficients: –2 points for pancreatic calcification, 1 point for female sex, and 2 points for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, a native papilla of Vater, or the pancreatic duct procedures (treated as ‘planned pancreatic duct procedures’ for calculating the score before ERCP). The PEP occurrence rate was 0% among low-risk patients (≤0 points), 5.5% among moderate-risk patients (1–3 points), and 20.2% among high-risk patients (4–7 points). In the validation cohort, the C statistic of the risk score model was 0.71 (95% CI 0.64–0.78), which was considered acceptable. The PEP risk classification (low, moderate, and high) was a significant predictive factor for PEP that was independent of intraprocedural PEP risk factors (precut sphincterotomy and inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulation) (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.8–6.3; p<0.01).
Conclusions:
The PEP risk score allows an estimation of the risk of PEP prior to ERCP, regardless of whether the patient has undergone pancreatic duct procedures. This simple risk model, consisting of only five items, may aid in predicting and explaining the risk of PEP before ERCP and in preventing PEP by allowing selection of the appropriate expert endoscopist and useful PEP prophylaxes.
Funding:
No external funding was received for this work.