Neuronal Development: Rethinking sensorimotor circuits
New research shows that the neural circuit responsible for stabilising gaze can develop in the absence of motor neurons, contrary to a long-standing model in the field.
- School of Psychology and Neuroscience and Centre of Biophotonics, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom
As you nod in agreement, or furiously shake your head side-to-side, your gaze stays almost perfectly stable. This remarkable ability to fix your eyes on whoever you may be agreeing (or disagreeing) with relies on a sensorimotor neural circuit in the brain that adjusts eye position to accommodate shifts in head orientation.
Sensorimotor circuits are made up of three key components: (i) sensory neurons that detect external stimuli; (ii) projection neurons that transmit information from sensory neurons; and (iii) motor neurons that receive this information and innervate muscle cells to produce a response. In the circuit that stabilizes gaze – known as the vestibulo-ocular reflex (or VOR for short) – the sensory neurons detect changes in balance caused by movements of the head (Figure 1A). This information is then relayed via the projection neurons to extraocular motor neurons, which move the eyes in the opposite direction of the movement of the head in order to maintain visual stability.
Figure 1
Testing the retrograde specification model.
(A) The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) circuit in zebrafish larvae contains three core components: sensory neurons (black), projection neurons (yellow), and extraocular motor neurons (blue). The sensory neurons detect changes in head orientation and relay this information via synapses (represented as triangles) to the projection neurons, which then pass it to the motor neurons that innervate muscles in the eye. (B) It has been proposed that motor neurons have an important role in specifying the fate of projection neurons during development. However, when Goldblatt et al. tested this ‘retrograde specification model’ by genetically removing motor neurons from the VOR circuit in zebrafish larvae, they found that the mutations did not alter the connectivity, activity or gene expression of the projection neurons.
Graphic of zebrafish in panel A adapted from Yang et al., 2022.
For decades, scientists have theorised that motor neurons have an essential role during the development of sensorimotor circuits that involves specifying the fate of the projection neurons (Glover, 2000; Glover, 2003). This ‘retrograde specification model’ was in part inspired by the observation that extraocular motor neurons establish connections with muscle cells before projection neurons connect to them. This suggests that projection neurons might require additional cues to know what sensory information to transmit and which cells to target. Now, in eLife, David Schoppik and colleagues at New York University – including Dena Goldblatt as first author – report new findings that challenge this theory (Goldblatt et al., 2024).
To test the retrograde specification model, the team studied the development of the VOR circuit in zebrafish larvae – a model organism that is ideal for investigating the nervous system due to its transparency, relatively simple neural circuitry and genetics. Goldblatt et al. removed a gene called phox2a that specifies the fate of extraocular motor neurons to prevent the zebrafish larvae from developing these types of cells (Guo et al., 1999; Nakano et al., 2001; Coppola et al., 2005; Hasan et al., 2010).
Before testing whether this modification affects the wiring of the VOR circuit, Goldblatt et al. confirmed that the phox2a mutant larvae were definitely lacking extraocular motor neurons. These neurons typically express the transcription factor isl1 and are located in cranial nucleus III and cranial nucleus IV, two regions in the brain that control eye movement (Greaney et al., 2017). Goldblatt et al. found the mutation nearly eliminated all isl1-expressing cells. They were also unable to detect another motor neuron marker called vachta. Moreover, the eyes of the mutant larvae rotated toward their ears, an effect that is often seen when motor neurons are lost from cranial nuclei III and IV.
According to the retrograde specification model, projection neurons in the VOR circuit in the mutant zebrafish should no longer be able to receive sensory information about how the head is tilted, because they either failed to develop or are mis-wired. However, Goldblatt et al. found that projection neurons in the phox2a mutants maintained normal patterns of activity, and their anatomy and quantity was unaffected. This suggests that the connections between sensory and projection neurons in the VOR circuit can still form correctly even in the absence of functional motor neurons (Figure 1B).
Further experiments revealed that removal of phox2a did not cause the axons of the projection neurons to misroute or connect to the wrong target. In addition, the set of genes that assemble the synapses of projection neurons in wildtype cells were still expressed in the mutant larvae. This suggests that the projection neurons do not require extraocular motor neurons to select and form connections with the correct target cells.
Finally, Goldblatt et al. tested if the projection neurons depend on their target motor neurons to determine which genes to express. They found no meaningful differences in gene expression between the phox2a mutants and wild-type larvae, providing further evidence that projection neurons can develop normally without their pre-synaptic motor neuron partners.
These findings are significant not only for understanding the VOR, but also for other sensorimotor circuits. Similar principles might apply to circuits in the spinal cord that control motor responses to other types of sensory stimuli. The study also adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that certain neurons may develop more independently than previously thought (Sürmeli et al., 2011; Sweeney et al., 2018), an insight that could reshape our understanding of how sensorimotor circuits form across the nervous system.
References
-
BookNeuroepithelial ‘compartments’ and the specification of vestibular projectionsIn: Gerrits NM, Ruigrok TJH, de Zeeuw CI, editors. Progress in Brain Research. Elesiver. pp. 3–21.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(00)24004-1
-
The development of vestibulo-ocular circuitry in the chicken embryoJournal of Physiology, Paris 97:17–25.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2003.10.003
-
Extraocular motoneuron pools develop along a dorsoventral axis in zebrafish, Danio rerioThe Journal of Comparative Neurology 525:65–78.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24042
-
PHOX2A regulation of oculomotor complex nucleogenesisDevelopment 137:1205–1213.https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.041251
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Zwart
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 615
- views
-
- 56
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Neuronal Development: Rethinking sensorimotor circuits
eLife 13:e104111.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104111
Further reading
-
- Developmental Biology
Apical constriction is a basic mechanism for epithelial morphogenesis, making columnar cells into wedge shape and bending a flat cell sheet. It has long been thought that an apically localized myosin generates a contractile force and drives the cell deformation. However, when we tested the increased apical surface contractility in a cellular Potts model simulation, the constriction increased pressure inside the cell and pushed its lateral surface outward, making the cells adopt a drop shape instead of the expected wedge shape. To keep the lateral surface straight, we considered an alternative model in which the cell shape was determined by cell membrane elasticity and endocytosis, and the increased pressure is balanced among the cells. The cellular Potts model simulation succeeded in reproducing the apical constriction, and it also suggested that a too strong apical surface tension might prevent the tissue invagination.
-
- Cancer Biology
- Developmental Biology
Missense ‘hotspot’ mutations localized in six p53 codons account for 20% of TP53 mutations in human cancers. Hotspot p53 mutants have lost the tumor suppressive functions of the wildtype protein, but whether and how they may gain additional functions promoting tumorigenesis remain controversial. Here, we generated Trp53Y217C, a mouse model of the human hotspot mutant TP53Y220C. DNA damage responses were lost in Trp53Y217C/Y217C (Trp53YC/YC) cells, and Trp53YC/YC fibroblasts exhibited increased chromosome instability compared to Trp53-/- cells. Furthermore, Trp53YC/YC male mice died earlier than Trp53-/- males, with more aggressive thymic lymphomas. This correlated with an increased expression of inflammation-related genes in Trp53YC/YC thymic cells compared to Trp53-/- cells. Surprisingly, we recovered only one Trp53YC/YC female for 22 Trp53YC/YC males at weaning, a skewed distribution explained by a high frequency of Trp53YC/YC female embryos with exencephaly and the death of most Trp53YC/YC female neonates. Strikingly, however, when we treated pregnant females with the anti-inflammatory drug supformin (LCC-12), we observed a fivefold increase in the proportion of viable Trp53YC/YC weaned females in their progeny. Together, these data suggest that the p53Y217C mutation not only abrogates wildtype p53 functions but also promotes inflammation, with oncogenic effects in males and teratogenic effects in females.
