Axon Guidance: Watching axons on the move
The human brain contains billions of neurons, and the connections between these neurons give rise to networks that are responsible for controlling our behaviors. To understand how a neuron ‘knows’ where to go in order to connect with another neuron, one can think of how we use cars to move around: there are many types of cars (neurons) and many types of roads (brain regions), and car drivers need to abide by a series of rules (cues) to get to their destination (target neuron). The equivalent process in the brain involves a structure called an axon – a long, slender projection from a neuron – being guided to its target (another neuron) by a combination of short-range and long-range cues.
These cues work by means of a ligand that is localized within the extracellular matrix, and a receptor that is located at the tip of the growing axon. Several types of ligand-receptor systems are known, with some ligand-receptor interactions being attractive and others being repulsive (Dickson, 2002). As an axon grows or migrates towards its target, these receptors search for the presence of their respective ligands within the extracellular matrix and either grow towards the ligand or avoid it. However, many aspects of how this process works in vivo are not well understood.
Now, in eLife, Ev Nichols, Joo Lee and Kang Shen of Stanford University report the results of experiments on the worm C. elegans that shed new light on the axon guidance ligand called Netrin, which is also known as UNC-6 (Nichols et al., 2024). Previously the Shen laboratory and other research groups have used genetic techniques to investigate the role played by Netrin in axon guidance and other functions in C. elegans by studying worms that contained mutant versions of the genes for Netrin and/or its receptor, which is called DCC or UNC-40 (Chan et al., 1996; Colón-Ramos et al., 2007; Hedgecock et al., 1990; Ziel and Sherwood, 2010). Nichols et al. built on these previous experiments by using time-lapse imaging to visualize and quantify in vivo how the axon responded to each genetic intervention as it migrated to its target. The fact that C. elegans is translucent and contains just 302 neurons (Brenner, 1974) makes it well suited to such an imaging approach.
Nichols et al. first examined what happens when the axon of the PDE neuron migrates towards its target, which is the ventral nerve cord (Hedgecock et al., 1990; Norris et al., 2014). Surprisingly, they observed that the axon paused for a short time at an intermediary region, before continuing on to the ventral nerve cord and forming a number of branches with it. However, only one of these branches was later stabilized, while the others were discarded (Figure 1).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef79f/ef79f04b69413c8d95fad4eef61dcee046f4f19b" alt=""
Exploring the axon guidance process in C. elegans.
In wild-type C. elegans (top row), the PDE axon (black) migrates to the ventral nerve cord (VNC) in four steps: axon outgrowth (A); stabilization at the intermediate target (IT), with the DCC receptors (red) binding to the Netrin ligands (blue; B); directed growth (C); and stabilization at target (D). The axon forms a number of branches with the VNC, but only one of these becomes stabilized, and the rest are discarded (not shown). In mutant worms lacking Netrin (middle row), the axon does not reach the intermediate target or the ventral nerve cord (E–H). Adding a membrane-tethered version of Netrin at the intermediate target and the ventral nerve cord in the mutant worms (bottom row) restores the stabilization at the intermediate target (J), but not the subsequent steps (K, L). This is consistent with Netrin working as a haptotactic signal to guide the axon to the intermediate target, and as a chemotactic signal to guide the axon from the intermediate target to the ventral nerve cord. When the Netrin is tethered to a membrane it cannot move to establish a concentration gradient, and thus cannot act as a chemotactic signal.
Next they analyzed each step of axon guidance process – axon outgrowth, stabilization at the intermediate target, directed growth, and stabilization at the target – in various mutant worms. As expected, mutants that lacked Netrin exhibited abnormalities at every step (Figure 1). To identify whether Netrin was working as a chemotactic signal (i.e., if the axon was moving in response to changes in the concentration of the Netrin), or as a haptotactic signal (i.e., if the axon was physically adhering to the Netrin), they expressed Netrin tethered to a membrane in the intermediate target region of the mutants.
The researchers found that the first two steps of the process – axon outgrowth and stabilization at the intermediate target – were restored, but subsequent steps were not. This observation showed that Netrin works as a haptotactic signal to stabilize the axon at the intermediate target, and also as a chemotactic signal to allow the axon to grow from the intermediate target to the ventral nerve cord. This conclusion was further supported by the observation of a gradient in the concentration of Netrin in wild type worms, with the ligand being enriched at the intermediate target and also at the ventral nerve cord. A chemical gradient is a classic sign of chemotaxis.
The findings and approach of Nichols et al. set the stage for researchers to investigate what happens during specific steps of axon guidance, and to explore how specific ligand/receptor complexes function within the overall process. Their findings suggest that a given ligand-receptor pair can have more than one mode of action when guiding axons, such as chemotaxis and haptotaxis in the case of Netrin. However, it remains unclear how the axon transitions between these modes of action, and it also remains to be seen if other ligand-receptor interactions have a role in modulating the function of Netrin during the axon guidance process.
References
-
Molecular mechanisms of axon guidanceScience 298:1959–1964.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072165
-
Roles for netrin signaling outside of axon guidance: a view from the wormDevelopmental Dynamics 239:1296–1305.https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22225
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2025, Lazaro-Pena and Diaz-Balzac
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Developmental Biology
Previously, we showed that propranolol reduces experimental murine cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) and prevents embryonic caudal venous plexus (CVP) lesions in zebrafish that follow mosaic inactivation of ccm2 (Li et al., 2021). Because morpholino silencing of the β1 adrenergic receptor (adrb1) prevents the embryonic CVP lesion, we proposed that adrb1 plays a role in CCM pathogenesis. Here, we report that adrb1-/- zebrafish exhibited 86% fewer CVP lesions and 87% reduction of CCM lesion volume relative to wild type brood mates at 2dpf and 8–10 weeks stage, respectively. Treatment with metoprolol, a β1 selective antagonist, yielded a similar reduction in CCM lesion volume. Adrb1-/- zebrafish embryos exhibited reduced heart rate and contractility and reduced CVP blood flow. Similarly, slowing the heart and eliminating the blood flow in CVP by administration of 2,3-BDM suppressed the CVP lesion. In sum, our findings provide genetic and pharmacological evidence that the therapeutic effect of propranolol on CCM is achieved through β1 receptor antagonism.
-
- Developmental Biology
Cell migration is a key process in the shaping and formation of tissues. During sprouting angiogenesis, endothelial tip cells invade avascular tissues by generating actomyosin-dependent forces that drive cell migration and vascular expansion. Surprisingly, endothelial cells (ECs) can still invade if actin polymerization is inhibited. In this study, we show that endothelial tip cells employ an alternative mechanism of cell migration that is dependent on Aquaporin (Aqp)-mediated water inflow and increase in hydrostatic pressure. In the zebrafish, ECs express aqp1a.1 and aqp8a.1 in newly formed vascular sprouts in a VEGFR2-dependent manner. Aqp1a.1 and Aqp8a.1 loss-of-function studies show an impairment in intersegmental vessels formation because of a decreased capacity of tip cells to increase their cytoplasmic volume and generate membrane protrusions, leading to delayed tip cell emergence from the dorsal aorta and slower migration. Further inhibition of actin polymerization resulted in a greater decrease in sprouting angiogenesis, indicating that ECs employ two mechanisms for robust cell migration in vivo. Our study thus highlights an important role of hydrostatic pressure in tissue morphogenesis.