Fluorine is the thirteenth-most abundant element in the Earth’s crust, and fluoride ions are found in both soil and water, where they accumulate through the weathering of rocks or from industrial pollution. However, high levels of fluoride ions can inhibit two processes essential to life: the production of energy by glycolysis and the synthesis of DNA and RNA bases. In polluted areas, organisms such as bacteria, algae and plants must remove fluoride ions from their cells in order to survive.

Since ions cannot freely cross lipid membranes, organisms use proteins called channels or carriers to move ions into and out of their cells. Channel proteins form a pore, or channel, in the cell membrane, through which ions can quickly move from areas of high concentration to areas of low concentration. In contrast, carrier proteins can transport ions in both directions—that is, to and from areas of high concentration—but they are slower than channel proteins.

A family of proteins that export fluoride from microbe and plant cells, thus allowing them to grow in the presence of this toxic ion, was discovered recently, but it was not clear if these proteins function as channels or as carrier proteins. Now, Stockbridge et al. find that these proteins, called Fluc proteins, are fluoride channels with an unusual architecture.

Fluc proteins are found in many species of bacteria, and Stockbridge et al. show that a number of these, when purified and inserted into a lipid membrane, are channel proteins. Additionally, they do not transport related ions such as chloride, which means that they are unusually selective for ion channels. Two Fluc polypeptides associate to form a channel in the cell membrane, and Stockbridge et al. show that these two subunits are arranged in an antiparallel formation. Although this architecture is unprecedented among ion channels, it has been observed in carrier proteins in a range of organisms, and may indicate that Fluc proteins offer an evolutionary model for many carrier proteins.

Fluoride pervades our biosphere, appearing in groundwater, sea, and soil typically at 10–100 μM levels (Weinstein and Davison, 2004). This ubiquitous inorganic xenobiotic inhibits two enzymes essential for glycolytic metabolism and nucleic acid synthesis: enolase and pyrophosphatase (Marquis et al., 2003; Samygina et al., 2007). Accordingly, many unicellular organisms, as well as green plants, use F⁻ exporter proteins in their cell membranes to keep cytoplasmic F⁻ concentration low, thereby minimizing the anion’s toxic effects (Baker et al., 2012; Stockbridge et al., 2012). Two separate, phylogenetically unrelated families of F⁻ exporters are now known: CLC^F-type F⁻/H⁺ antiporters, a subclass of the widespread CLC superfamily of anion-transport proteins, and a group of small membrane proteins known as the ‘crcB’ family or, as we rename them here (to avoid confusion with the CLCs), the ‘Fluc’ family. Fluc proteins are widespread among unicellular organisms. Deletion of the single Fluc gene in Escherichia coli produces hypersensitivity to F⁻, and this growth-phenotype may be rescued by F⁻ exporter genes from a variety of bacterial species (Baker et al., 2012; Stockbridge et al., 2012). By expressing, purifying, and functionally reconstituting several bacterial Fluc homologs, we demonstrate that these are highly selective F⁻-conducting ion channels constructed as dimers of identical or homologous membrane-embedded domains arranged in an inverted-topology fashion. This type of molecular architecture is unprecedented among ion channels but is reminiscent of the dual-topology construction of small multidrug transporters (Rapp et al., 2006; Schuldiner, 2009; Morrison et al., 2012) and of the inverted structural repeats appearing in many membrane transport proteins (Forrest et al., 2010).

Prokaryotic Fluc sequences consist of 120–130 residues with four predicted transmembrane (TM) helix motifs (Figure 1A), short N- and C-termini, and a strongly conserved sequence (GxxGGxTTFSTFxxE) in TM3. A survey of 47 bacterial Flucs yielded several biochemically and electrophysiologically tractable homologues, nicknamed here Ec2, Bpe, La1, La2 (Table 1); we also examine several fused constructs in which La1 and La2 are joined together in tandem into single polypeptides. The purified proteins run cleanly on SDS-PAGE (Figure 1—figure supplement 1) near the predicted molecular weights and migrate on size-exclusion columns (SEC) as monodisperse peaks about 0.6 ml ahead of the expected monomer position (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Both Ec2 and Bpe are particularly stable, with chromatographic profiles unaltered even after several days in detergent solution at 37°C.

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Fluc proteins form F⁻ specific ion channels

Purified Fluc proteins are functional, as seen in F⁻ and Cl⁻ efflux experiments in reconstituted liposomes (Stockbridge et al., 2012), with ion-specific electrodes following the appearance of the anions in the external solution. Liposomes were reconstituted under ‘Poisson-dilution’ conditions, that is, with Ec2 or Bpe at protein densities so low that 30–50% of the liposomes are devoid of protein, and most of the protein-containing liposomes carry only a single functional unit (Walden et al., 2007). The liposomes were loaded with 150 mM each of KF and KCl and suspended in iso-osmotic solution containing 1 mM KF and KCl along with 300 mM K-isethionate (2-hydroxyethanesulfonate, a membrane-impermeant monovalent anion). Valinomycin (Vln), a K⁺ ionophore, was then added to start the efflux by allowing the anions to move down their gradients. After protein-catalyzed ion efflux had reached completion, detergent was added to disrupt all the liposomes and reveal the protein-free fraction. Two striking results are apparent from the F⁻ and Cl⁻ efflux kinetics (Figure 2A). First, the proteoliposomes are selectively permeable to F⁻; Cl⁻ efflux is undetectable on this timescale, and similar experiments in the absence of F⁻ recapitulate this lack of Cl⁻ transport. Second, Fluc-mediated F⁻ efflux is so fast that an initial rate measurement is precluded by the 1-s dead-time of the stirred-cuvette system. An estimate based on a 35-nm liposome radius leads to a lower limit of ∼30,000 s⁻¹ for the single-Fluc transport rate. Since this is substantially higher than turnover of any conformational-cycle based membrane transporter (Jayaram et al., 2008), it intimates that Fluc might be a F⁻ channel.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Accordingly, we recorded ionic currents mediated by Fluc-Ec2 inserted into planar phospholipid bilayers. Initial experiments aimed at maximizing the electrical signal used liposomes with high protein density, 10–50 Fluc copies per liposome. When fused into planar bilayers, these liposomes evoke a robust increase in bilayer conductance in discrete steps (Figure 2B), each of which reports a single liposome inserting its packet of ion-conducting proteins. The heterogeneity in step-size reflects the wide distribution of liposome size (Miller and Racker, 1976; Accardi et al., 2004). After a few minutes, liposomes are perfused away to stabilize the bilayer conductance, thereby allowing examination of its properties. We applied a series of pulses to voltages from −100 mV to +150 mV and recorded the resulting currents to determine current-voltage (I–V) relations under various ionic conditions. As shown in the inset to Figure 2C, recorded in the presence of a salt gradient (300 mM NaF//30 mM NaF), the current appears as a ‘leak’ without any time- or voltage-dependent gating over a wide voltage range. The Fluc-mediated conductance is ideally selective for F⁻ over Na⁺, as seen from the zero-current voltage (reversal potential) of 53 mV, indistinguishable from the Nernst potential for F⁻ in the eightfold ionic activity gradient. High selectivity is further illustrated by the I–V relation under bi-ionic conditions (300 mM NaF//300 mM NaCl), whose high reversal potential (119 mV) sets a lower limit of ∼100 on the F⁻/Cl⁻ permeability ratio.

To detect single-channel currents, we prepared Fluc-reconstituted liposomes under Poisson-dilution conditions and fused them as above into planar bilayers. Figure 3A shows examples of Fluc-insertion events in three separate bilayers, along with a histogram of Fluc insertion-step amplitudes taken from ∼50 bilayers (Figure 3B, upper panel). Most of these insertion-steps are 1.8 pA under these conditions, equivalent to 7 pS, while a minority (<20%) are 30–50% of this main step-size (illustrated in the third trace). The current shows occasional discrete fluctuations of two types: subsecond-timescale closing events and rare millisecond-timescale excursions to a substate of 50–60% of the main-state amplitude. The ‘full-open’ state persists >95% of the time at all voltages (−200 mV to +200 mV). Its high open probability further shows itself in an extended recording with three channels in the bilayer (Figure 3A, red trace) and from the amplitude histogram of a typical single channel (right panel lower histogram). These channels display voltage-independent, anion-selective characteristics in harmony with the macroscopic currents reported above, and their appearance is strictly dependent on reconstituting Fluc protein into the liposomes. Accordingly, we conclude that these unitary current-steps reflect activity of single Fluc proteins, with single-molecule turnover of ∼10⁷ F⁻ ions/sec at −200 mV, a rate typical for ion channels and three to four orders of magnitude higher than the fastest known transporters. Thus, Fluc-Ec2 is a highly F⁻-selective channel, a protein with a transmembrane pore through which F⁻ ion moves thermodynamically downhill by electrodiffusion.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Fluc channels are dimers

Fluc-Ec2 runs as a homodimer in detergent micelles on a size-exclusion column, as determined by combined measurements of UV absorbance, refractive index, and static light scattering of the eluting peak (Figure 4A). Since an ion channel pore formed on a dimer axis is unprecedented, we also assessed Fluc’s oligomeric state in its native habitat, the lipid bilayer. For this, we prepared Fluc-Bpe for single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) photobleaching experiments (Tombola et al., 2008) by labeling a unique cysteine mutant, R29C, with Cy5-maleimide and reconstituting the protein at a very low density to favor single-channel liposomes. Upon illumination of these liposomes immobilized on a glass surface, the covalently attached fluorophores bleach in several minutes (Figure 4B,C), mostly in single and double steps (Figure 4D). Given the measured labeling efficiency (72%), the preponderance of single- and double-bleach events is fully consistent with a dimer (Figure 4E). Fewer than 5% bleach in three or four steps, consistent with co-localization of the liposomes, but not with trimeric or tetrameric architecture for the channel. The same conclusion was obtained in a second dataset using a different Bpe mutant, T3C (Figure 4—figure supplement 1).

Figure 4 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

We further tested the oligomeric state of Fluc in membranes by exploiting the F⁻-transport function of the channel in ‘Poisson-dump’ experiments. The crux of this approach is the Poisson statistics of channel insertion into liposomes during reconstitution (Goldberg and Miller, 1991; Maduke et al., 1999; Walden et al., 2007); as an increasing amount of protein is reconstituted into a fixed amount of liposomes, the fraction of liposomes devoid of protein, f_o, decreases exponentially. This protein-free fraction may be readily determined from F⁻ efflux experiments, as above. Upon Vln addition, F⁻ exits the liposomes that contain functionally active channels, but remains trapped within the protein-free fraction f₀, which is determined by detergent addition (Figure 4F):

(1) ${\mathrm{f}}_0=\exp (-\mathrm{\rho }/\text{nMk})\text{,}$

where ρ is the experimentally varied protein density (moles Fluc protein/mg lipid), M is the molecular weight of the Fluc subunit, n is the number of subunits in the active channel, and k is a constant dependent on the poorly known size and shape distribution of the liposomes. This constant is determined by calibrating the system with a channel of known molecular weight; for calibration we use Cl⁻ efflux mediated by a high-turnover mutant of the Cl⁻/H⁺ antiporter CLC-ec1-E148A/Y445A (Jayaram et al., 2008), a homodimer of 52 kDa subunits (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Figure 4G shows f_o curves expected for monomer, dimer, trimer, and tetramer architecture, along with experimental points from multiple preps, which coincide well with the dimer curve. The best exponential fit to the Fluc-Ec2 data corresponds to a molecular weight of 31.7 kDa for the functional channel, in unreasonably good agreement with the predicted size of the homodimer, 31.6 kDa. Similar results were obtained in parallel experiments with Fluc-Bpe (Figure 4—figure supplement 3).

Fluc channels are built by dual-topology architecture

In about half of the bacterial genomes in which it is found, Fluc appears as a single gene, as with the homodimeric channels Ec2 and Bpe (Figure 5A). Other prokaryotes carry a pair of homologous Fluc genes arranged in tandem (∼25% sequence identity), strongly suggestive of primeval gene duplication. To test the function of paired Fluc proteins, we individually expressed, purified and reconstituted each of the twin Flucs of Lactobacillus acidophilus, La1 and La2 (Figure 1). Although the low yield of La2 precludes detailed biochemical analysis, functional examination of these fraternal twins produces an unambiguous result (Figure 5B). Neither La1 nor La2 alone catalyzes F⁻ efflux from liposomes, but co-reconstituting both proteins produces rapid F⁻ efflux, indicating that the active channel requires heteromeric assembly.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Comparison of Fluc sequences of singletons vs fraternal twins shows striking differences in charge distributions on the loops connecting the helices. The twin Flucs possess abundantly charged loops; for one of the pair, a positive charge bias resides on the N- and C-termini and loop 2, while its homologous partner exhibits a converse bias, with excess positive charge on loops 1 and 3 (Figure 5D). Thus, according to the positive-inside rule for charge distribution in bacterial membrane proteins, (von Heijne, 1989) one of the twins is predicted to insert into the membrane with the termini in the cytoplasm, and the second should be oppositely oriented. In striking contrast, the singletons display relatively balanced charge distributions on either face. In a genomic analysis of small membrane proteins, including Fluc, Rapp and colleagues (Rapp et al., 2006) proposed that a balanced Arg+Lys distribution in loops indicates dual-topology oligomeric construction, in which subunits insert randomly in both transmembrane orientations, and those of opposite orientations associate together (Figure 5C). Do singletons like Ec2 and Bpe find partners in the membrane from a pool of randomly oriented Flucs to form inverted-topology homodimers? Do the fraternal Flucs find their homologous companions oppositely oriented in the membrane? A strong indication of antiparallel assembly appears in eukaryotic Fluc genomes. These genes all code for a pair of homologous Fluc sequences within a single open reading frame, and the linker connecting them contains a predicted TM helix (Figure 5A). This ‘inversion linker’ would force the second Fluc domain to adopt a transmembrane topology upside down with respect to the first. These genomic characteristics of Fluc channels constitute compelling evidence for dual-topology construction, but since no previously known ion channels are built in this way, experimental support is needed to test such sequence-based suggestions.

We approach the question in two ways. First, amino-group cross-linking of Fluc subunits is examined in detergent micelles. Even though the Ec2 subunit contains four amino groups, the dimer cannot be cross-linked by glutaraldehyde (Figure 6A). Since these amines are all located on the same face of the protein—in loop 2 and both termini—glutaraldehyde would be expected to cross-link a conventional parallel dimer but not an antiparallel dimer. With an additional lysine substituted on the opposite face, in loop 1 (R25K) or loop 3 (N95K), glutaraldehyde treatment now leads to the appearance of a dimer band on the PAGE gel (Figure 6A). Similarly, lysine-less Bpe is not cross-linked by glutaraldehyde, despite its solvent-accessible N-terminal amino group. Single lysine mutations on the side opposite to the N-terminus, in loop 1 (R29K) or loop 3 (R95K), beget a cross-linked dimer (Figure 6B), whereas solvent-accessible lysines on loops 2 (R68K), on the C-terminus (R130K), or on both do not (Figure 6B). These results are in natural harmony with antiparallel orientation and are difficult to understand in terms of a parallel-topology dimer, but do not by themselves provide rigorous proof.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

A second test of the dual-topology idea applies the fused-dimer strategy of Schuldiner and colleagues (Steiner-Mordoch et al., 2008; Nasie et al., 2010) to the Fluc La1/La2 heterodimer. We expressed several constructs in which La1 and La2 are fused together with linkers designed to force the two domains into parallel or antiparallel orientations (Figure 6C). For the antiparallel construct, Laf-TM, the domains are linked with a non-dimerizing glycophorin-A TM helix (Lemmon et al., 1992; Fleming et al., 1997). Guided by eukaryotic Fluc sequences, we made loop 4 long and hydrophilic (18 residues), and loop 5 short (8 residues). The domains of the parallel constructs, LapA and LapB, are connected by hydrophilic linkers of 14 or 26 residues, respectively. All three fused constructs were expressed, purified, and reconstituted into liposomes, Laf-TM giving the best yield and chromatographic monodispersity (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Both parallel constructs have minimal transport activity, as shown for LapA (Figure 6D). In marked contrast, Laf-TM behaves quantitatively in Poisson-dump experiments like a fully active monomeric F⁻ channel (Figure 6E,F) with high selectivity for F⁻ over Cl⁻. This result strongly implies that functional Fluc channels are built with the two 4-TM subunits or domains in antiparallel transmembrane topology, an arrangement that prohibits axial symmetry along the pore (Figure 6C).

In this work, we have taken four initial steps towards understanding the molecular character of the Fluc family of F⁻ exporters. The results demonstrate that the mechanism by which Fluc transports F⁻ is thermodynamically passive electrodiffusion through a transmembrane channel, that the channel is unusually F⁻-selective, and that it is constructed as a dimer of subunits or homologous domains. In addition, the two subunits in the functional dimer are very likely oriented antiparallel to each other within the membrane.

How could a passive channel move F⁻ out of the cell against an environmental F⁻ challenge? It might seem that an active transport mechanism would be required, as in bacteria that use CLC^F–type F⁻/H⁺ antiporters. However, Fluc channels can work to effectively expel F⁻ in two ways. First, the negative membrane potential maintained by many classes of metabolizing cells tilts the anion’s equilibrium towards expulsion. Second, the high pK_a of HF (∼3.4), anomalous among haloacids, dictates that in weakly acidic environments, a significant amount of extracellular HF is present (Baker et al., 2012). This membrane-permeant acid readily enters the cell and dissociates at the higher cytoplasmic pH. F⁻ would therefore accumulate far above its extracellular concentration if no conductive pathway for the anion were present in the membrane, but a passive F⁻ channel would undermine this weak-acid accumulation effect.

A deeper enigma is Fluc’s remarkable discrimination between F⁻, which is so difficult to desolvate, and Cl⁻, which is orders of magnitude more abundant in the environment. Liposome flux experiments establish a far more dramatic F⁻/Cl⁻ selectivity than the 100-fold lower limit set by electrical recording. Anion-efflux assays measure Cl⁻ turnover <30 ions/s, while in the same assays with F⁻, unitary turnover rates exceed 30,000 s⁻¹, and direct single-channel recording yields a turnover of 10⁶–10⁷ F⁻/sec. These values conservatively put F⁻/Cl⁻ selectivity >10⁴-fold, the highest value known between close analogs for any ion channel. It is this formidable selectivity that allows a bacterium or yeast to express a constitutively open F⁻ channel in its energy-coupling membrane while avoiding a massive Cl⁻ conductance that would otherwise catastrophically collapse its membrane potential. High ion selectivity requires that F⁻ be largely desolvated as it passes through the Fluc channel (Hille, 2001), an energetically demanding step (>100 kcal/mol) that has been an obstacle to the development of F⁻-selective small-molecule ligands (Cametti and Rissanen, 2009). This chemical problem motivates future work to identify selectivity regions in Fluc sequences and, ultimately, structures.

The molecular architecture inferred here is unconventional and unexpected. Most ion channel proteins are built on a barrel-stave plan in which three to seven similar subunits surround an axial pore running perpendicular to the membrane plane, the wider pores requiring a larger number of subunits. But an ion-conduction pore formed by a two-stave barrel—a dimer—is unprecedented until now. We are obliged to point out, however, that Fluc’s high open probability precludes a definitive conclusion that the observed single-channel currents are mediated by a single pore rather than two in parallel, especially in light of the infrequent subconductance (Figure 3). However, this substate is not precisely half the condunctance of the fully open channel, and the protein’s small size makes a two-pore dimer, along the lines of CLC channels (Middleton et al., 1994; Ludewig et al., 1996; Middleton et al., 1996), unlikely, but a picture like this is not firmly ruled out at our investigation’s early stage.

A final surprise that provides an intriguing glimpse into the evolution of membrane transport proteins is the dual-topology construction inferred for Fluc. Unprecedented among known ion channels, dual topology has been observed in the SMR family of proton-coupled multidrug antiporters such as EmrE (Schuldiner, 2009, 2012; Morrison et al., 2012), and it recalls the inverted structural repeats that provide the mechanistic scaffolds of many transporters (Forrest et al., 2010). Oppositely oriented repeats within subunits are rare in ion channels, and so it is unclear whether this architecture provides particular mechanistic advantages for Flucs. The inverted structural repeats of transporters almost certainly evolved from gene duplication and subsequent fusion of sequences coding for dimeric proteins with an odd number of TM helices (Zuckerkandl and Pauling, 1965; Forrest and Rudnick, 2009). The Fluc family obligingly provides examples in modern genomes of all stages along such an evolutionary pathway, including duplicated gene-pairs in bacteria and fused homologues in eukaryotes. Fusion of the latter genes must have required evolutionary gymnastics to capture a TM helix as an inversion linker for maintaining antiparallel topology of subunits with an even number of membrane crossings.

Finally, we note a conspicuous analogy to Fluc construction: the aquaporin channel. This protein’s narrow, water-permeable pore is formed within a single 6-TM subunit on the interface between two structurally similar domains in inverted orientation with respect to each other (Harries et al., 2004). It is thus entirely feasible to construct a narrow pore at a dual-topology dimer interface. The Fluc-aquaporin analogy is also of interest since the desolvated F⁻ ion, with a radius of 1.3 Å, is almost the same size as H₂O.

1. 1. Accardi A
   2. Kolmakova-Partensky L
   3. Williams C
   4. Miller C

   (2004) Ionic currents mediated by a prokaryotic homologue of CLC Cl- channels

   J Gen Physiol 123:109–119.

   https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200308935

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Baker JL
   2. Sudarsan N
   3. Weinberg Z
   4. Roth A
   5. Stockbridge RB
   6. Breaker RR

   (2012) Widespread genetic switches and toxicity resistance proteins for fluoride

   Science 335:233–235.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215063

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Cametti M
   2. Rissanen K

   (2009) Recognition and sensing of fluoride anion

   Chem Commun pp. 2809–2829.

   https://doi.org/10.1039/b902069a

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Fleming KG
   2. Ackerman AL
   3. Engelman DA

   (1997) The effect of point mutations on the free energy of transmembrane α-helix dimerization

   J Mol Biol 272:266–275.

   https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1236

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Folta-Stogniew E

   (2006) Oligomeric states of proteins determined by size-exclusion chromatography coupled with light scattering, absorbance, and refractive index detectors

   Methods Mol Biol 328:97–112.

   https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-026-X:97

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Forrest LR
   2. Kramer R
   3. Ziegler C

   (2010) The structural basis of secondary active transport mechanisms

   Biochim Biophys Acta 1807:167–188.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.10.014

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Forrest LR
   2. Rudnick G

   (2009) The rocking bundle: a mechanism for ion-coupled solute flux by symmetrical transporters

   Physiology 24:377–386.

   https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00030.2009

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Friedman LJ
   2. Chung J
   3. Gelles J

   (2006) Viewing dynamic assembly of molecular complexes by multi-wavelength single-molecule fluorescence

   Biophys J 91:1023–1031.

   https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.084004

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Goldberg AFX
   2. Miller C

   (1991) Solubilization and functional reconstitution of a chloride channel from Torpedo californica electroplax

   J Membr Biol 124:199–206.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01994354

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Harries WE
    2. Akhavan D
    3. Miercke LJ
    4. Khademi S
    5. Stroud RM

    (2004) The channel architecture of aquaporin 0 at a 2.2-A resolution

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14045–14050.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405274101

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Hayashi Y
    2. Matsui H
    3. Takagi T

    (1989) Membrane protein molecular weight determined by low-angle laser light-scattering photometry coupled with high-performance gel chromatography

    Methods Enzymol 172:514–528.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(89)72031-0

    • Google Scholar
12. Book

    1. Hille B

    (2001)

    Ion channels of excitable membranes (3rd ed.)

    Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Jayaram H
    2. Accardi A
    3. Wu F
    4. Williams C
    5. Miller C

    (2008) Ion permeation through a Cl–selective channel designed from a CLC Cl−/H+ exchanger

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11194–11199.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804503105

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Jin AJ
    2. Huster D
    3. Gawrisch K
    4. Nossal R

    (1999) Light scattering characterization of extruded lipid vesicles

    Eur Biophys J 28:187–199.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s002490050199

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Lemmon MA
    2. Flanagan JM
    3. Hunt JF
    4. Adair BD
    5. Bormann BJ
    6. Dempsey CE

    et al. (1992)

    Glycophorin A dimerization is driven by specific interactions between transmembrane alpha-helices

    J Biol Chem 267:7683–7689.

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Ludewig U
    2. Pusch M
    3. Jentsch TJ

    (1996) Two physically distinct pores in the dimeric ClC-0 chloride channel

    Nature 383:340–343.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/383340a0

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Maduke M
    2. Pheasant DJ
    3. Miller C

    (1999) High-level expression, functional reconstitution, and quaternary structure of a prokaryotic ClC-type chloride channel

    J Gen Physiol 114:713–722.

    https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.114.5.713

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Marquis RE
    2. Clock SA
    3. Mota-Meira M

    (2003) Fluoride and organic weak acids as modulators of microbial physiology

    FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:493–510.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2003.tb00627.x

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Middleton RE
    2. Pheasant DJ
    3. Miller C

    (1994) Purification, reconstitution, and subunit composition of a voltage-gated chloride channel from Torpedo electroplax

    Biochemistry 33:13189–13198.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00249a005

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Middleton RE
    2. Pheasant DJ
    3. Miller C

    (1996) Homodimeric architecture of a ClC-type chloride ion channel

    Nature 383:337–340.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/383337a0

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Miller C
    2. Racker E

    (1976) Calcium-induced fusion of fragmented sarcoplasmic reticulum with artificial planar bilayers

    J Membr Biol 30:283–300.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01869673

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Morrison EA
    2. DeKoster GT
    3. Dutta S
    4. Vafabakhsh R
    5. Clarkson MW
    6. Bahl A

    et al. (2012) Antiparallel EmrE exports drugs by exchanging between asymmetric structures

    Nature 481:45–50.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10703

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Nasie I
    2. Steiner-Mordoch S
    3. Gold A
    4. Schuldiner S

    (2010) Topologically random insertion of EmrE supports a pathway for evolution of inverted repeats in ion-coupled transporters

    J Biol Chem 285:15234–15244.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.108746

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Rapp M
    2. Granseth E
    3. Seppala S
    4. von Heijne G

    (2006) Identification and evolution of dual-topology membrane proteins

    Nat Struct Mol Biol 13:112–116.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1057

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Samygina VR
    2. Moiseev VM
    3. Rodina EV
    4. Vorobyeva NN
    5. Popov AN
    6. Kurilova SA

    et al. (2007) Reversible inhibition of Escherichia coli inorganic pyrophosphatase by fluoride: trapped catalytic intermediates in cryo-crystallographic studies

    J Mol Biol 366:1305–1317.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.082

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Schuldiner S

    (2009) EmrE, a model for studying evolution and mechanism of ion-coupled transporters

    Biochim Biophys Acta 1794:748–762.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.12.018

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Schuldiner S

    (2012) Undecided membrane proteins insert in random topologies. Up, down and sideways: it does not really matter

    Trends Biochem Sci 37:215–219.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2012.02.006

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Slotboom DJ
    2. Duurkens RH
    3. Olieman K
    4. Erkens GB

    (2008) Static light scattering to characterize membrane proteins in detergent solution

    Methods 46:73–82.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.06.012

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Steiner-Mordoch S
    2. Soskine M
    3. Solomon D
    4. Rotem D
    5. Gold A
    6. Yechieli M

    et al. (2008) Parallel topology of genetically fused EmrE homodimers

    EMBO J 27:17–26.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601951

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Stockbridge RB
    2. Lim HH
    3. Otten R
    4. Williams C
    5. Shane T
    6. Weinberg Z

    et al. (2012) Fluoride resistance and transport by riboswitch-controlled CLC antiporters

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:15289–15294.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210896109

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Tombola F
    2. Ulbrich MH
    3. Isacoff EY

    (2008) The voltage-gated proton channel Hv1 has two pores, each controlled by one voltage sensor

    Neuron 58:546–556.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.026

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. von Heijne G

    (1989) Control of topology and mode of assembly of a polytopic membrane protein by positively charged residues

    Nature 341:456–458.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/341456a0

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Walden M
    2. Accardi A
    3. Wu F
    4. Xu C
    5. Williams C
    6. Miller C

    (2007) Uncoupling and turnover in a Cl⁻/H⁺ exchange transporter

    J Gen Physiol 129:317–329.

    https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200709756

    • Google Scholar
34. Book

    1. Weinstein LH
    2. Davison A

    (2004)

    Fluorides in the environment: effects on plants and animals

    Cambridge, Massachusetts: CABI Publishing.

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Zuckerkandl E
    2. Pauling L

    (1965) Molecules as documents of evolutionary history

    J Theor Biol 8:357–366.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(65)90083-4

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Randy B Stockbridge

   Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States

   Contribution

   RBS, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Janice L Robertson

   Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States

   Present address

   Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States

   Contribution

   JLR, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

3. Ludmila Kolmakova-Partensky

   Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States

   Contribution

   LK-P, Acquisition of data

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Christopher Miller

   Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States

   Contribution

   CM, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   For correspondence

   cmiller@brandeis.edu

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

• 2,382

  views

• 405

  downloads

• 104

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.