Systemic light chain amyloidosis is a disease that occurs when individuals produce too much of an immune protein. The excess protein chains normally exist in the body as individual molecules called “monomers” or in pairs called “dimers,” and they can readily switch between these two forms. However, the monomers are also prone to forming amyloid fibrils, which are difficult to break down. Amyloid fibrils are often deposited in the heart and kidneys and can lead to organ failure and death.

Finding molecules that prevent the formation of amyloid fibrils could help to develop treatments for amyloidosis. Now, Brumshtein, Esswein et al. have screened 27 compounds to identify those that stabilize the dimer form of the protein. This would reduce the number of monomers in the body, and so reduce the number of immune proteins that can form amyloid fibrils.

The experiments identified four compounds that could stabilize the dimers, including one called methylene blue. Comparing the chemical structures of these compounds with the structures of drugs approved for medical use identified thirteen drugs. However, follow-up tests showed that only one, called sulfasalazine, reduced the formation of amyloid fibrils. Neither methylene blue nor sulfasalazine is likely to have a strong enough effect to treat amyloidosis, but they may serve as templates for future drug designs.

Amyloid fibrils are protein deposits often associated with disease. These deposits show common structural and biochemical characteristics, including non-covalent self-complementary fibrils, resistance to proteolysis, insolubility in aqueous solution, binding of thioflavin dye, and generation of a cross-β X-ray diffraction pattern. The spine of amyloid fibrils, termed a 'steric zipper,' is built by paired β-sheets with interdigitating side chains and serves as the scaffold for fibril extension. The inter-strand and inter-sheet distances give rise to a characteristic cross-β X-ray diffraction pattern of two perpendicular reflections at ~4.8 and ~10 Å (Geddes et al., 1968; Hobbs, 1973; Sipe and Cohen, 2000; Nelson et al., 2005). Formation of a steric zipper requires the presence of a discrete peptide segment with an amino acid sequence capable of forming a self-complimentary propagating structure. Such segments are commonly found as integral parts of globular proteins and trigger aggregation into amyloid fibrils only upon exposure to solvent through full or partial denaturation (Nelson et al., 2005).

Cases of systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL), associated with multiple myeloma, were first described in the mid-19^th century; however, the etiology of the disease was not clear. In 1848, Dr. Bence-Jones discovered the disease-associated substance in urine, though it was only later identified as immunoglobulin light chains (LC) associated with amyloidosis (Kyle, 2001; 2011; Dahlin and Dockerty, 1950; Glenner et al., 1970; 1971; Glenner, 1973; Sipe et al., 2014). Systemic AL amyloidosis is characterized by overexpression of monoclonal LCs, which are able to form homo-dimers. Despite renal clearance of excess protein, the full-length LCs or their fragments still form amyloid fibril deposits in patients’ tissues, most frequently in the heart and kidneys, which result in organ failure (Falk et al., 1997; Buxbaum, 1986). Although it is clear this deposition causes organ dysfunction, much remains to be discovered about the molecular process by which immunoglobulins assemble into amyloid fibrils. It is unknown which peptide segments form steric zippers and how to block their assembly into the amyloid spine.

LCs are produced by plasma cells and their final amino acid sequence is determined by somatic recombination (Sakano et al., 1979; Marchalonis and Schluter, 1989). LCs are classified by their amino acid sequence as either κ or λ. They consist of two domains, the variable (V_L) and constant (C_L), which are connected by a joining segment (J). In patients, amyloid fibrils are found to include either V_Ls or full-length LCs (V_L-J-C_L), yet the ubiquitous presence of V_Ls indicates that this domain may be the minimal and essential unit for fibril assembly (Falk et al., 1997; Buxbaum, 1986; 1992; Olsen et al., 1998; Lavatelli et al., 2008; Vrana et al., 2009; Bodi et al., 2009).

The crystal structures of full-length LCs and structures of just their V_Ls both reveal homo-dimers, which resemble the light chain and heavy chain hetero-dimer of the antigen-binding fragment (Fab) of a full antibody. Fab is a hetero-dimer composed of both light and heavy chains, each with constant (C_L and C_H) and variable (V_L and V_H) immunoglobulin domains. LC homo-dimers, in which the V_L domain is covalently linked to the C_L domain, resemble the quaternary structure of the Fab hetero-dimer, and non-covalently linked dimers of only V_Ls structurally resemble the variable region of the Fab (V_L and V_H) (Edmundson et al., 1969; Colman et al., 1977; Firca et al., 1978). The interfaces between the variable domains of physiological hetero-dimers and pathological homo-dimers are lined with apolar residues encompassing a hydrophobic cavity capable of accommodating small molecules (Edmundson et al., 1984; 1993).

Our work focuses on a λ patient-derived V_L homo-dimer named Mcg whose structure and properties were detailed in pioneering studies by Edmundson and coworkers (Edmundson et al., 1969; 1984; 1993; Firca et al., 1978). The cavity between the two V_L domains in Mcg is capable of binding a wide array of ligands, including synthetic organic molecules and peptides, which form contacts with the side chains of the dimer cavity. The cavity spans most of the 24 Å-long dimer interface; it is cylindrically shaped and can be considered to constitute three sites: A, B and C (Edmundson et al., 1984). Based on the geometry of the dimer with some deviation from the original nomenclature by Edmundson et al., we designate side chains of residues Y34, Y93, D97 and F99 on one side of the cylindrical cavity as the 'A-site,' S36, Y51, E52, S91 and F101 as the 'B-site,' and Y38, Q40, V48 and Y89 as the 'C-site' (Figure 1). Some ligands bind the cavity in a sequential manner without a distinct preference for one of the sites. For example, 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid binds in either the A or C-sites and can migrate between them, whereas fluorescein binds to both sites with partial occupancy. Other molecules, such as menadione, preferentially bind to only one of the sites (Edmundson et al., 1984). Regardless of binding location, this demonstrates the dimer cavity is capable of accommodating various hydrophobic and aromatic ligands.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

V_Ls exist in equilibrium between homo-dimers and amyloid-prone monomers. Experiments conducted in denaturing conditions indicate that reducing the stability of the monomeric state promotes amyloid fibril formation, and mutations that induce dimer disassociation or promote monomer unfolding increase the propensity to form amyloid fibrils (Bernier and Putnam, 1963; Kishida et al., 1975; Qin et al., 2007; Wetzel, 1994; Hurle et al., 1994; Brumshtein et al., 2014; Baden et al., 2008). Likewise, mutations that stabilize the structure of V_Ls or covalently fix V_L dimers inhibit formation of amyloid fibrils. These results indicate that formation of amyloid fibrils involves two steps: V_L dimer disassociation into monomers followed by partial or full unfolding. The mechanism of amyloid formation also suggests that shifting the equilibrium away from the amyloid-prone monomer by stabilizing the dimer would hinder formation of amyloid fibrils (Figure 2) (Bulawa et al., 2012; Bellotti et al., 2000).

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

The monomer-dimer equilibrium of V_Ls suggests that systemic AL amyloidosis may be mitigated by binding ligands to the cavity at the V_L dimer interface (Figure 2). This approach proved effective for transthyretin-related amyloidosis, another type of systemic amyloidosis for which stabilizing the quaternary state led to the development of therapeutics (Miroy et al., 1996). Upon transthyretin tetramer disassociation into amyloid-prone monomers, it forms amyloid fibrils in an acidic environment. The binding of thyroxine inhibits disassociation and subsequent amyloid formation (Baures et al., 1998). Following the same principle, a modified ligand with a disassociation constant in the nano-molar range prevents transthyretin from forming amyloid fibrils and is effective in vivo.

Here we apply structural and biochemical methods to investigate ligands that hinder amyloid formation by stabilizing the V_L homo-dimer. We identify ligands that may serve as prototypes for therapies for treating LC amyloidosis and our results are consistent with a mechanism for amyloidosis that proceeds via dimer disassociation to amyloid-prone monomers (Qin et al., 2007; Brumshtein et al., 2014).

Identification of ligands that inhibit formation of amyloid fibrils. Based on the previous work of Edmundson et al., we screened a panel of 27 hydrophobic and aromatic ligands for an inhibitory effect on the formation of amyloid fibrils (Figure 3) (Edmundson et al., 1976; 1984; 1993). Such ligands may stabilize V_L dimers and decrease disassociation into amyloid-prone monomers. Varying concentrations of ligands up to 1 mM were used to evaluate the effect of complexes on formation of amyloid fibrils. Formation of amyloid fibrils was monitored using both ThT fluorescence assays and EM micrographs. Molecules that showed an inhibitory effect with concentrations under 1 mM were 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid [5], methylene blue [10], Chicago Sky Blue 6B [14] and Phenol Red [20] (Figure 3B).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Methylene blue, Chicago Sky Blue 6B, and Phenol Red (10, 14 and 20) were used to search DrugBank for approved biomedical compounds resembling their chemical structures and properties with a similarity threshold value of 0.3 (Law et al., 2014). The search identified 13 compounds that were tested for an amyloid inhibitory effect by means of ThT assays and EM analysis (Figure 3C). Of these 13 molecules from DrugBank, only sulfasalazine [34] showed an inhibitory effect on formation of amyloid fibrils. Among all the molecules tested, including the ligands initially screened and the subsequent approved biomedical compounds, the two that show the most potent effect are methylene blue [10] and sulfasalazine [34]; both hinder amyloid fibril formation at effective concentrations of 0.1 and 0.5 mM respectively (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Equilibrium dialysis binding of methylene blue and sulfasalazine. Equilibrium dialysis was used to assess the binding constants of methylene blue and sulfasalazine to Mcg. Measured concentrations were fit to the corresponding model equations and their curves were represented as binding and Scatchard plots (Figure 5) (Scatchard, 1949; Spitzer and McDonald, 1956). The constants were derived from a least squares fit of equations to data and are given in Table 1. Although both methylene blue and sulfasalazine bind to Mcg, the Scatchard plots indicate that binding proceeds through somewhat different pathways: methylene blue shows positive cooperative binding, signifying at least two sites with different binding constants, while sulfasalazine shows no cooperativity and suggests an additional, non-specific binding site (Figure 5). The best fit for the sulfasalazine-binding data was achieved using a model for two identical, independent binding sites per V_L dimer, followed by non-specific binding.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Crystal structures of methylene blue and sulfasalazine bound to the V_L dimer. In the crystal structures of Mcg with methylene blue and sulfasalazine, the ligands bind at the cavity between the two V_L domains (Figure 6, Table 2). In the structure of Mcg with methylene blue, one ligand is bound to the A-site of the dimer. This differs from equilibrium dialysis results in solution, which indicate at least two methylene blue binding sites. The structure of Mcg with sulfasalazine indicates two symmetry-related molecules bound in the hydrophobic cavity of the dimer with both ligands simultaneously binding to three sites of the V_L dimer cavity.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Effect of ligand binding on quaternary state. We used analytical ultracentrifugation to assess whether ligand binding shifts the equilibrium of Mcg towards more dimers or whether ligands bind to monomers as well. The wavelengths used for optical density readings of methylene blue (550 nm) and sulfasalazine (420 nm) did not overlap with protein absorbance. Distributions of molecular weights were fit to the absorbance data, thus permitting detection of only the apparent molecular weights of the protein in complex with ligand (Figure 7, Table 3). The observed molecular weights indicate that ligands bind only to V_L dimers. For methylene blue, the measured molecular weight was slightly larger than expected; therefore, we performed an additional ultracentrifugation meniscus depletion experiment to detect possible monomers. The experiment identified no methylene blue bound to V_L monomers.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

The identification of ligands that inhibit LC amyloid formation by stabilizing the V_L dimer has therapeutic implications for systemic light chain amyloidosis. By utilizing the known ability of ligands to bind the hydrophobic cavity of V_L dimers, we prevent dimer disassociation into monomers and thus hinder amyloid formation (Edmundson et al., 1984; 1993). A similar approach was used to design therapies for transthyretin-related amyloidosis by stabilizing the tetrameric state of the protein (Miroy et al., 1996). Initial screening for ligands that hinder V_L amyloid formation revealed four ligands showing this effect, with methylene blue as the strongest binding ligand. A subsequent search in the DrugBank aimed to identify similarly effective ligands that are already approved for medical use.

Since the emission spectra of ThT partly overlaps with the absorption spectra of the ligands, both ThT assays and EM analysis were necessary to confirm the ability of the ligands to inhibit amyloid formation. Analysis of electron micrographs and ThT assays indicates that increasing the concentration of methylene blue or sulfasalazine hinders the formation of amyloid fibrils. One of the molecules from our screen, epigallocatechin gallate, was recently suggested to hinder the formation of amyloid fibrils, yet in our experiments it did not show any effect (Pelaez-Aguilar et al., 2015).

Though both of the ligands bind Mcg and induce amyloid hindering effects, the mechanism of binding slightly differs. Methylene blue binds through positive cooperativity. This result indicates the presence of two binding sites, one strong and one weak, where binding to the second site begins only after the first site is fully occupied. Scatchard plots for sulfasalazine show that the two specific binding sites on Mcg are identical with the same disassociation constant and that this specific ligand binding is followed by non-specific binding.

We addressed the difference in the binding mechanisms of methylene blue and sulfasalazine to Mcg in solution by crystal structures and analytical ultracentrifugation. The crystal structure of Mcg with methylene blue shows binding at the A-site of the V_L dimer cavity and coordination by the side chains of residues Y34, Y93, D97 and F99. The crystal belongs to space group P2₁ with one dimer per asymmetric unit, and the symmetry between the two V_L domains of Mcg is broken by the presence of a sulfate ion bound to only one of the V_L domains (Figure 6A). Analytical ultracentrifugation analysis of the soluble quaternary state indicates the dimer as the most prevalent form of the complex versus monomer without a bound ligand (Brumshtein et al., 2014). We also observed a small fraction of oligomers with molecular weights larger than dimers, as confirmed by the meniscus depletion experiment. The meniscus depletion distributes quaternary states along the path length of the sample cell during analytical centrifugation, thus verifying which state accounts for the deviation in apparent molecular weight. The most significant outcome is the complete absence of soluble monomer in complex with the ligand, which verifies our conjecture that the ligands bind and stabilize dimers. In the case of sulfasalazine, to confirm binding specifically to soluble dimers, the analytical ultracentrifugation experiments identified dimers as the only quaternary state of the ligand-bound complex.

The reconciliation of our three experiments on the binding of methylene blue to Mcg V_Ls suggests blocking of the secondary binding site in the crystals. The three experimental findings are: cooperative binding of methylene blue as measured by equilibrium dialysis, binding of the ligand to the A-site in the crystal structure, and the absence of monomeric V_L in complex with ligand. Taken together, these observations indicate that the secondary binding site of methylene blue may not be available in the crystalline state, but available in solution. Secondary binding to either the B or C-sites may require conformational changes that are less favorable in crystals or induce the higher-order assembly of complexes larger than dimers.

The crystal structure of Mcg with sulfasalazine explains why only one disassociation constant for specific binding was measured. Crystals of the complex belong to space group P2₁2₁2 with two symmetry-related ligands bound per Mcg dimer, and thus one ligand bound per V_L in the asymmetric unit (Figure 6B). Therefore, the equivalence of the two sulfasalazine ligands in the crystal explains why only one disassociation constant was measured by means of equilibrium dialysis. The crystal structure shows that each of the sulfasalazine ligands occupy all three A-B-C-sites simultaneously; each ligand binds to the A and B-sites on one of the V_Ls composing the dimer, while C-site binding is on the symmetry-related V_L. This contrasts with methylene blue, which is bound only to the A-site. Despite differences in the exact orientation of the side chains where the ligands bind, both ligands bind in the cavity of the Mcg dimer (Figure 6C).

Although our experiments were performed using only V_Ls rather than full-length LCs, the ligand-binding site between V_Ls is maintained in full-length LCs. While full-length LCs are disulfide linked at their C_L C-termini, crystal structures indicate that the conformation of V_Ls is independent of connected constant domains (Ely et al., 1989; Terzyan et al., 2003; Makino et al., 2007). In full-length LCs, the joining (J) segment between V_Ls and C_Ls provides the flexibility for V_Ls to maintain the same hydrophobic cavity as that seen in the V_L homo-dimer alone. This indicates the strategy of using ligands to stabilize the V_L dimer and hinder amyloid fibril formation may also be effective for full-length homo-dimers.

The ability of ligands to hinder the aggregation of V_Ls into amyloid fibrils by stabilizing V_L dimers indicates a promising approach for treatment of systemic light chain amyloidosis disease. While the light chain amino acid sequence differs between patients, the characteristic hydrophobic cavity of the homo-dimer formed by overexpressed LCs is conserved (Bodi et al., 2009; Bork et al., 1994; Edmundson et al., 1976; Solomon and Weiss, 1995). Although our experiments were performed using a single V_L variant, LCs of both λ and κ maintain a similar tertiary structure and hydrophobic cavity (Qin et al., 2007; Wetzel, 1994; Brumshtein et al., 2014; Bellotti et al., 2000; Fink, 1998; Khurana et al., 2001). This conserved hydrophobic pocket indicates a possible target for designing medications that inhibit LC amyloidosis. Although methylene blue and sulfasalazine may not bind tightly enough to be directly repurposed as treatments for the disease, these ligands may serve as prototypes for development of effective medications. As indicated by the ability of these molecules to inhibit amyloid fibril formation, this approach may result in alleviated symptoms for systemic light chain amyloidosis patients.

1. 1. Baden EM
   2. Randles EG
   3. Aboagye AK
   4. Thompson JR
   5. Ramirez-Alvarado M

   (2008) Structural insights into the role of mutations in amyloidogenesis

   Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:30950–30956.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M804822200

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Baures PW
   2. Peterson SA
   3. Kelly JW

   (1998)

   Discovering transthyretin amyloid fibril inhibitors by limited screening

   Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 6:1389–1401.

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Bellotti V
   2. Mangione P
   3. Merlini G

   (2000) Review: immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis-the archetype of structural and pathogenic variability

   Journal of Structural Biology 130:280–289.

   https://doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.2000.4248

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bernier GM
   2. Putnam FW

   (1963) Monomer-Dimer Forms of Bence Jones Proteins

   Nature 200:223–225.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/200223b0

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bodi K
   2. Prokaeva T
   3. Spencer B
   4. Eberhard M
   5. Connors LH
   6. Seldin DC

   (2009) AL-base: a visual platform analysis tool for the study of amyloidogenic immunoglobulin light chain sequences

   Amyloid 16:1–8.

   https://doi.org/10.1080/13506120802676781

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bork P
   2. Holm L
   3. Sander C

   (1994) The immunoglobulin fold. structural classification, sequence patterns and common core

   Journal of Molecular Biology 242:309–320.

   https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.1582

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Brumshtein B
   2. Esswein SR
   3. Landau M
   4. Ryan CM
   5. Whitelegge JP
   6. Phillips ML
   7. Cascio D
   8. Sawaya MR
   9. Eisenberg DS

   (2014) Formation of amyloid fibers by monomeric light chain variable domains

   Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:27513–27525.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.585638

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Bulawa CE
   2. Connelly S
   3. DeVit M
   4. Wang L
   5. Weigel C
   6. Fleming JA
   7. Packman J
   8. Powers ET
   9. Wiseman RL
   10. Foss TR
   11. Wilson IA
   12. Kelly JW
   13. Labaudiniere R

   (2012) Tafamidis, a potent and selective transthyretin kinetic stabilizer that inhibits the amyloid cascade

   Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:9629–9634.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121005109

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Buxbaum J

   (1986) Aberrant immunoglobulin synthesis in light chain amyloidosis. free light chain and light chain fragment production by human bone marrow cells in short-term tissue culture

   Journal of Clinical Investigation 78:798–806.

   https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112643

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Buxbaum J

    (1992)

    Mechanisms of disease: monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition. amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease, and light and heavy chain deposition disease

    Hematology/oncology Clinics of North America 6:323–346.

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Cohn E
    2. Edsall J

    (1943)

    Proteins, Amino Acids and Peptides as Ions and Dipolar Ions

    Density and apparent specific volume of proteins, Proteins, Amino Acids and Peptides as Ions and Dipolar Ions, New York, Reinhold Publishing Corporation.

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Colman PM
    2. Schramm HJ
    3. Guss JM

    (1977) Crystal and molecular structure of the dimer of variable domains of the bence-jones protein ROY

    Journal of Molecular Biology 116:73–79.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(77)90119-X

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Dahlin DC
    2. Dockerty MB

    (1950)

    Amyloid and myeloma

    The American Journal of Pathology 26:581–593.

    • Google Scholar
14. Software

    1. DeLano W
    2. Schrödinger, Llc

    (2002)

    The PyMol Molecular Graphics System, version  Version 1.7.4

    The PyMol Molecular Graphics System.
15. 1. Edmundson AB
    2. Wood MK
    3. Schiffer M
    4. Hardman KD
    5. Ainsworth CF

    (1969)

    A crystallographic investigation of the mcg myeloma protein. ANL-7635

    ANL pp. 283–285.

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Edmundson AB
    2. Ely KR
    3. Abola EE
    4. Schiffer M
    5. Panagiotopoulos N
    6. Deutsch HF

    (1976)

    Conformational isomerism, rotational allomerism, and divergent evolution in immunoglobulin light chains

    Federation Proceedings 35:2119–2123.

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Edmundson AB
    2. Ely KR
    3. Herron JN

    (1984)

    A search for site-filling ligands in the mcg bence-jones dimer: crystal binding studies of fluorescent compounds

    Molecular Immunology 21:561–576.

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Edmundson AB
    2. Harris DL
    3. Fan Z-C
    4. Guddat LW
    5. Schley BT
    6. Hanson BL
    7. Tribbick G
    8. Geysen HM

    (1993) Principles and pitfalls in designing site-directed peptide ligands

    Proteins 16:246–267.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340160304

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Ely KR
    2. Herron JN
    3. Harker M
    4. Edmundson AB

    (1989) Three-dimensional structure of a light chain dimer crystallized in water

    Journal of Molecular Biology 210:601–615.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(89)90135-6

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Falk RH
    2. Comenzo RL
    3. Skinner M

    (1997) The systemic amyloidoses

    The New England Journal of Medicine 337:898–909.

    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199709253371306

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Fink AL

    (1998) Protein aggregation: folding aggregates, inclusion bodies and amyloid

    Folding & Design 3:R9–R23.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00002-9

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Firca JR
    2. Ely KR
    3. Kremser P
    4. Westholm FA
    5. Dorrington KJ
    6. Edmundson AB

    (1978) Interconversion of conformational isomers of light chains in the mcg immunoglobulins

    Biochemistry 17:148–158.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00594a022

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Geddes AJ
    2. Parker KD
    3. Atkins EDT
    4. Beighton E

    (1968) “cross-β” conformation in proteins

    Journal of Molecular Biology 32:343–358.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(68)90014-4

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Glenner GG
    2. Harbaugh J
    3. Ohms JI
    4. Harada M
    5. Cuatrecasas P

    (1970) An amyloid protein: the amino-terminal variable fragment of an immunoglobulin light chain

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 41:1287–1289.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(70)90227-5

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Glenner GG
    2. Ein D
    3. Eanes ED
    4. Bladen HA
    5. Terry W
    6. Page DL

    (1971) Creation of "amyloid" fibrils from bence jones proteins in vitro

    Science 174:712–714.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.174.4010.712

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Glenner GG

    (1973) Immunoglobulin and amyloid fibril proteins

    British Journal of Haematology 24:533–537.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1973.tb01679.x

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Hobbs JR

    (1973)

    An ABC of amyloid

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 66:705–710.

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Hurle M
    2. Helms L
    3. Li L
    4. Chan W
    5. Wetzel R

    (1994) A role for destabilizing amino acid replacements in light-chain amyloidosis

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91:5446–5450.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.12.5446

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Kabsch W

    (2010) Xds

    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 66:125–132.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909047337

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Khurana R
    2. Gillespie JR
    3. Talapatra A
    4. Minert LJ
    5. Ionescu-Zanetti C
    6. Millett I
    7. Fink AL

    (2001) Partially folded intermediates as critical precursors of light chain amyloid fibrils and amorphous aggregates ^†

    Biochemistry 40:3525–3535.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi001782b

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kishida F
    2. Azuma T
    3. Hamaguchi K

    (1975)

    A type kappa bence jones protein containing a cysteinyl residue in the variable region

    Journal of Biochemistry 77:481–491.

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kyle RA

    (2001)

    Amyloidosis: a convoluted story

    British Journal of Haematology 114:529–538.

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Kyle RA

    (2011) Amyloidosis: a brief history

    Amyloid 18 Suppl 1:6–7.

    https://doi.org/10.3109/13506129.2011.574354001

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Laue T
    2. Shah B
    3. Ridgeway T
    4. Pelletier S

    (1992)

    Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science

    Computer-Aided Interpretation of Analytical Sedimentation Data for Proteins, Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science, Cambridge, Great Britain, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Lavatelli F
    2. Perlman DH
    3. Spencer B
    4. Prokaeva T
    5. McComb ME
    6. Theberge R
    7. Connors LH
    8. Bellotti V
    9. Seldin DC
    10. Merlini G
    11. Skinner M
    12. Costello CE

    (2008) Amyloidogenic and associated proteins in systemic amyloidosis proteome of adipose tissue

    Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 7:1570–1583.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M700545-MCP200

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Law V
    2. Knox C
    3. Djoumbou Y
    4. Jewison T
    5. Guo AC
    6. Liu Y
    7. Maciejewski A
    8. Arndt D
    9. Wilson M
    10. Neveu V
    11. Tang A
    12. Gabriel G
    13. Ly C
    14. Adamjee S
    15. Dame ZT
    16. Han B
    17. Zhou Y
    18. Wishart DS

    (2014) DrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism

    Nucleic Acids Research 42:D1091–D1097.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1068

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Makino D
    2. Henschen-Edman A
    3. Larson S
    4. McPherson A

    (2007) Bence jones kwr protein structures determined by x-ray crystallography

    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 63:780–792.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444907021981

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Marchalonis JJ
    2. Schluter SF

    (1989)

    Evolution of variable and constant domains and joining segments of rearranging immunoglobulins

    Faseb Journal 3:2469–2479.

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Miroy G
    2. Lai Z
    3. Lashuel H
    4. Peterson S
    5. Strang C
    6. Kelly J

    (1996) Inhibiting transthyretin amyloid fibril formation via protein stabilization

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93:15051–15056.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.26.15051

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Murshudov G
    2. Vagin A
    3. Dodson E

    (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method

    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 53:240–255.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444996012255

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Nelson R
    2. Sawaya MR
    3. Balbirnie M
    4. Madsen AØ
    5. Riekel C
    6. Grothe R
    7. Eisenberg D

    (2005) Structure of the cross-beta spine of amyloid-like fibrils

    Nature 435:773–778.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03680

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Olsen KE
    2. Sletten K
    3. Westermark P

    (1998) Fragments of the constant region of immunoglobulin light chains are constituents of Al-amyloid proteins

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 251:642–647.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.9508

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Pelaez-Aguilar AE
    2. Rivillas-Acevedo L
    3. French-Pacheco L
    4. Valdes-Garcia G
    5. Maya-Martinez R
    6. Pastor N
    7. Amero C

    (2015) Inhibition of light chain 6aJL2-R24G amyloid fiber formation associated with light chain amyloidosis

    Biochemistry 54:4978–4986.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00288

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Qin Z
    2. Hu D
    3. Zhu M
    4. Fink AL

    (2007) Structural characterization of the partially folded intermediates of an immunoglobulin light chain leading to amyloid fibrillation and amorphous aggregation

    Biochemistry 46:3521–3531.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi061716v

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Sakano H
    2. Hüppi K
    3. Heinrich G
    4. Tonegawa S

    (1979) Sequences at the somatic recombination sites of immunoglobulin light-chain genes

    Nature 280:288–294.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/280288a0

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Scatchard G

    (1949) The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 51:660–672.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1949.tb27297.x

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Sipe JD
    2. Cohen AS

    (2000) Review: history of the amyloid fibril

    Journal of Structural Biology 130:88–98.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.2000.4221

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Sipe JD
    2. Benson MD
    3. Buxbaum JN
    4. Ikeda S
    5. Merlini G
    6. Saraiva MJ
    7. Westermark P

    (2014) Nomenclature 2014: amyloid fibril proteins and clinical classification of the amyloidosis

    Amyloid 21:221–224.

    https://doi.org/10.3109/13506129.2014.964858

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Solomon A
    2. Weiss DT

    (1995)

    Structural and functional properties of human lambda-light-chain variable-region subgroups

    Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 2:387–394.

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Spitzer R
    2. McDonald H

    (1956) Comparison of the binding properties of bovine plasma albumin and polyvinylpyrrolidone

    Clinica Chimica Acta 1:545–556.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(56)90042-0

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Terzyan SS
    2. Bourne CR
    3. Ramsland PA
    4. Bourne PC
    5. Edmundson AB

    (2003) Comparison of the three-dimensional structures of a human bence-jones dimer crystallized on earth and aboard US space shuttle mission STS-95

    Journal of Molecular Recognition 16:83–90.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.610

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Vrana JA
    2. Gamez JD
    3. Madden BJ
    4. Theis JD
    5. Bergen HR
    6. Dogan A

    (2009) Classification of amyloidosis by laser microdissection and mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis in clinical biopsy specimens

    Blood 114:4957–4959.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-07-230722

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Wall J
    2. Murphy CL
    3. Solomon A

    (1999) In vitro immunoglobulin light chain fibrillogenesis

    Methods in Enzymology 309:204–217.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)09016-3

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Waters NJ
    2. Jones R
    3. Williams G
    4. Sohal B

    (2008) Validation of a rapid equilibrium dialysis approach for the measurement of plasma protein binding

    Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 97:4586–4595.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21317

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Wetzel R

    (1994) Mutations and off-pathway aggregation of proteins

    Trends in Biotechnology 12:193–198.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(94)90082-5

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Boris Brumshtein

   1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
   2. UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, United States
   3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   BB, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Contributed equally with

   Shannon R Esswein

   For correspondence

   boris@mbi.ucla.edu

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Shannon R Esswein

   1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
   2. UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, United States
   3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   SRE, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Contributed equally with

   Boris Brumshtein

   For correspondence

   sesswein@mbi.ucla.edu

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5142-0190

3. Lukasz Salwinski

   1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
   2. UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, United States
   3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   LS, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Martin L Phillips

   1. UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, United States
   2. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   MLP, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

5. Alan T Ly

   1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
   2. UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, United States
   3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   ATL, Acquisition of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

6. Duilio Cascio

   1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
   2. UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, United States
   3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   DC, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

7. Michael R Sawaya

   1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
   2. UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, United States
   3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   MRS, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

8. David S Eisenberg

   1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
   2. UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, United States
   3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States

   Contribution

   DSE, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   For correspondence

   david@mbi.ucla.edu

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

• 2,399

  views

• 583

  downloads

• 53

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.