Abstract

The RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) play a major role in sensing RNA virus infection to initiate and modulate antiviral immunity. They interact with particular viral RNAs, most of them being still unknown. To decipher the viral RNA signature on RLRs during viral infection, we tagged RLRs (RIG-I, MDA5, LGP2) and applied tagged protein affinity purification followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of associated RNA molecules. Two viruses with negative- and positive-sense RNA genome were used: measles (MV) and chikungunya (CHIKV). NGS analysis revealed that distinct regions of MV genome were specifically recognized by distinct RLRs: RIG-I recognized defective interfering genomes, whereas MDA5 and LGP2 specifically bound MV nucleoprotein-coding region. During CHIKV infection, RIG-I associated specifically to the 3' untranslated region of viral genome. This study provides the first comparative view of the viral RNA ligands for RIG-I, MDA5 and LGP2 in the presence of infection.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Raul Y Sanchez David

    Unité de Génomique Virale et Vaccination, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chantal Combredet

    Unité de Génomique Virale et Vaccination, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Odile Sismeiro

    Transcriptome and Epigenome, BioMics Pole, Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marie-Agnès Dillies

    Transcriptome and Epigenome, BioMics Pole, Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bernd Jagla

    Transcriptome and Epigenome, BioMics Pole, Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jean-Yves Coppée

    Transcriptome and Epigenome, BioMics Pole, Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Marie Mura

    Unité de Génomique Virale et Vaccination, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mathilde Guerbois Galla

    University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Philippe Despres

    Technology platform CYROI, University of Reunion Island, Saint-Clotilde, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Frédéric Tangy

    Unité de Génomique Virale et Vaccination, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Anastassia V Komarova

    Unité de Génomique Virale et Vaccination, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    stasy@pasteur.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2016, Sanchez David et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,436
    views
  • 1,078
    downloads
  • 80
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Raul Y Sanchez David
  2. Chantal Combredet
  3. Odile Sismeiro
  4. Marie-Agnès Dillies
  5. Bernd Jagla
  6. Jean-Yves Coppée
  7. Marie Mura
  8. Mathilde Guerbois Galla
  9. Philippe Despres
  10. Frédéric Tangy
  11. Anastassia V Komarova
(2016)
Comparative analysis of viral RNA signatures on different RIG-I-like receptors
eLife 5:e11275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11275

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Shih-Wen Huang, Yein-Gei Lai ... Nan-Shih Liao
    Research Article

    Natural killer (NK) cells can control metastasis through cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production independently of T cells in experimental metastasis mouse models. The inverse correlation between NK activity and metastasis incidence supports a critical role for NK cells in human metastatic surveillance. However, autologous NK cell therapy has shown limited benefit in treating patients with metastatic solid tumors. Using a spontaneous metastasis mouse model of MHC-I+ breast cancer, we found that transfer of IL-15/IL-12-conditioned syngeneic NK cells after primary tumor resection promoted long-term survival of mice with low metastatic burden and induced a tumor-specific protective T cell response that is essential for the therapeutic effect. Furthermore, NK cell transfer augments activation of conventional dendritic cells (cDCs), Foxp3-CD4+ T cells and stem cell-like CD8+ T cells in metastatic lungs, to which IFN-γ of the transferred NK cells contributes significantly. These results imply direct interactions between transferred NK cells and endogenous cDCs to enhance T cell activation. We conducted an investigator-initiated clinical trial of autologous NK cell therapy in six patients with advanced cancer and observed that the NK cell therapy was safe and showed signs of effectiveness. These findings indicate that autologous NK cell therapy is effective in treating established low burden metastases of MHC-I+ tumor cells by activating the cDC-T cell axis at metastatic sites.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Sofia V Krasik, Ekaterina A Bryushkova ... Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
    Research Article

    The current understanding of humoral immune response in cancer patients suggests that tumors may be infiltrated with diffuse B cells of extra-tumoral origin or may develop organized lymphoid structures, where somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection occur locally. These processes are believed to be significantly influenced by the tumor microenvironment through secretory factors and biased cell-cell interactions. To explore the manifestation of this influence, we used deep unbiased immunoglobulin profiling and systematically characterized the relationships between B cells in circulation, draining lymph nodes (draining LNs), and tumors in 14 patients with three human cancers. We demonstrated that draining LNs are differentially involved in the interaction with the tumor site, and that significant heterogeneity exists even between different parts of a single lymph node (LN). Next, we confirmed and elaborated upon previous observations regarding intratumoral immunoglobulin heterogeneity. We identified B cell receptor (BCR) clonotypes that were expanded in tumors relative to draining LNs and blood and observed that these tumor-expanded clonotypes were less hypermutated than non-expanded (ubiquitous) clonotypes. Furthermore, we observed a shift in the properties of complementarity-determining region 3 of the BCR heavy chain (CDR-H3) towards less mature and less specific BCR repertoire in tumor-infiltrating B-cells compared to circulating B-cells, which may indicate less stringent control for antibody-producing B cell development in tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, we found repertoire-level evidence that B-cells may be selected according to their CDR-H3 physicochemical properties before they activate somatic hypermutation (SHM). Altogether, our work outlines a broad picture of the differences in the tumor BCR repertoire relative to non-tumor tissues and points to the unexpected features of the SHM process.