Thermotaxis: Some like it hot, but not too hot
- Brandeis University, United States
From warm summer days to cold winter nights, temperature is a ubiquitous sensory stimulus. All animals rely on their ability to detect environmental temperatures to avoid harm and to seek out more optimal conditions. Some animals, such as mosquitoes, also use their temperature sensors for a more nefarious purpose: to locate warm prey for a blood meal.
The ability of the mosquito to home in on warm bodies was first recognized over a century ago (Brown, 1951; Howlett, 1910), but the details of this behavior are still not fully understood. Now, in eLife, Roman Corfas and Leslie Vosshall from Rockefeller University report on the molecular basis of temperature-sensing behavior in Aedes aegypti, the mosquito that spreads yellow fever (Corfas and Vosshall, 2015). They show how avoiding high temperatures can stop these insects from being attracted to targets that are too hot to represent a suitable host: in other words, while these mosquitoes like it hot, they don’t like it too hot.
Corfas and Vosshall’s study is grounded in previous work on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Barbagallo and Garrity, 2015). Fruit flies use at least two molecular receptors to guide their movements in response to warmth (Hamada et al., 2008; Ni et al., 2013), and while about 250 million years of evolution separate flies and mosquitoes, versions of each receptor are present in A. aegypti. It is unclear precisely where these receptors, TRPA1 and GR19, are expressed in Aedes mosquitoes, but in the malaria-spreading mosquito Anopheles gambiae, TRPA1 is expressed at the tips of the antennae (Wang et al., 2009). This is intriguing, because the tip of a mosquito antenna houses very sensitive thermoreceptors that could help drive host-seeking behavior (Davis and Sokolove, 1975).
Female mosquitoes normally prefer temperatures around 23°C. However, a puff of carbon dioxide (which could indicate that a metabolically active host is nearby) drives the mosquitoes to seek out temperatures that are closer to the body temperature of a mammal or bird (that is, between about 37°C and 43°C; McMeniman et al., 2014). Corfas and Vosshall started by further characterizing this heat-seeking behavior. They found that mosquitoes were strongly attracted to a target when it was heated to temperatures above ambient, but only up to ~50°C. When it got hotter, this attraction declined strongly.
To probe the molecular mechanisms that might control this response, Corfas and Vosshall exploited genome-editing techniques to knock out the genes for GR19 and TRPA1 in A. aegypti. They found that mosquitoes lacking GR19 behaved like wild type mosquitoes and showed normal responses to heat. However, mosquitoes without TRPA1 continued to be attracted to the target even when its temperature reached potentially harmful levels (> 50°C).
While the ability of animals to avoid high temperatures is commonly viewed from the perspective of damage avoidance, Corfas and Voshall raise the possibility that this response could also help a heat-seeking mosquito to choose among multiple potential targets. In fact, when tested for their ability to discriminate between two hot targets (one at 40°C, the other at 50°C), TRPA1-knockout mosquitoes showed a greatly reduced preference for a 40°C target over a 50°C target. Thus, while TRPA1 is not required for heat seeking, per se, it helps to set an upper limit on the temperatures mosquitoes seek, which prevents them from being attracted to stimuli warmer than their hosts.
While the work of Corfas and Voshall advances our understanding of temperature sensing in A. aegypti, the identity of the receptor (or receptors) that drives heat-seeking behavior remains elusive. However, the recent use of rapid genome-editing techniques in Aedes mosquitoes (including the CRISPR-Cas9 system; Kistler et al., 2015), has dramatically simplified the study of the function of genes in this organism. This greatly increases the likelihood that more of the molecules behind heat seeking and other mosquito sensory responses will be uncovered in the near future. As mosquito-borne illnesses kill more than a million people every year, interventions that can reduce the spread of such diseases are crucial. It is hoped that an increased understanding of how mosquitoes target their hosts can help accelerate the development of new control strategies.
References
-
Temperature sensation in DrosophilaCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 34:8–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.002
-
Temperature responses of antennal receptors of the mosquito, Aedes aegyptiJournal of Comparative Physiology 96:223–236.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612696
-
Anopheles gambiae TRPA1 is a heat-activated channel expressed in thermosensitive sensilla of female antennaeEuropean Journal of Neuroscience 30:967–974.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06901.x
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: December 15, 2015 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2015, Greppi et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,998
- Page views
-
- 148
- Downloads
-
- 2
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Thermotaxis: Some like it hot, but not too hot
eLife 4:e12838.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12838
Further reading
-
Mosquitos identify human targets by detecting body heat.
-
- Neuroscience
The synchronization of canonical fast sleep spindle activity (12.5–16 Hz, adult-like) precisely during the slow oscillation (0.5–1 Hz) up peak is considered an essential feature of adult non-rapid eye movement sleep. However, there is little knowledge on how this well-known coalescence between slow oscillations and sleep spindles develops. Leveraging individualized detection of single events, we first provide a detailed cross-sectional characterization of age-specific patterns of slow and fast sleep spindles, slow oscillations, and their coupling in children and adolescents aged 5–6, 8–11, and 14–18 years, and an adult sample of 20- to 26-year-olds. Critically, based on this, we then investigated how spindle and slow oscillation maturity substantiate age-related differences in their precise orchestration. While the predominant type of fast spindles was development-specific in that it was still nested in a frequency range below the canonical fast spindle range for the majority of children, the well-known slow oscillation-spindle coupling pattern was evident for sleep spindles in the adult-like canonical fast spindle range in all four age groups—but notably less precise in children. To corroborate these findings, we linked personalized measures of fast spindle maturity, which indicate the similarity between the prevailing development-specific and adult-like canonical fast spindles, and slow oscillation maturity, which reflects the extent to which slow oscillations show frontal dominance, with individual slow oscillation-spindle coupling patterns. Importantly, we found that fast spindle maturity was uniquely associated with enhanced slow oscillation-spindle coupling strength and temporal precision across the four age groups. Taken together, our results suggest that the increasing ability to generate adult-like canonical fast sleep spindles actuates precise slow oscillation-spindle coupling patterns from childhood through adolescence and into young adulthood.
