Molecular mechanism of activation-triggered subunit exchange in Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II

  1. Moitrayee Bhattacharyya
  2. Margaret M Stratton
  3. Catherine C Going
  4. Ethan D McSpadden
  5. Yongjian Huang
  6. Anna C Susa
  7. Anna Elleman
  8. Yumeng Melody Cao
  9. Nishant Pappireddi
  10. Pawel Burkhardt
  11. Christine L Gee
  12. Tiago Barros
  13. Howard Schulman
  14. Evan R Williams
  15. John Kuriyan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  2. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, United States
  3. Stanford University, United States
  4. Smith College, United States
  5. Marine Biological Association, United States
  6. Allosteros Therapeutics, United States

Abstract

Activation triggers the exchange of subunits in Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), an oligomeric enzyme that is critical for learning, memory, and cardiac function. The mechanism by which subunit exchange occurs remains elusive. We show that the human CaMKII holoenzyme exists in dodecameric and tetradecameric forms, and that the calmodulin(CaM)-binding element of CaMKII can bind to the hub of the holoenzyme and destabilize it to release dimers. The structures of CaMKII from two distantly diverged organisms suggest that the CaM-binding element of activated CaMKII acts as a wedge by docking at intersubunit interfaces in the hub. This converts the hub into a spiral form that can release or gain CaMKII dimers. Our data reveal a three-way competition for the CaM-binding element, whereby phosphorylation biases it towards the hub interface, away from the kinase domain and calmodulin, thus unlocking the ability of activated CaMKII holoenzymes to exchange dimers with unactivated ones.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Moitrayee Bhattacharyya

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Margaret M Stratton

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Catherine C Going

    Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ethan D McSpadden

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Yongjian Huang

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Anna C Susa

    Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Anna Elleman

    Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Yumeng Melody Cao

    Department of Physics, Smith College, Northampton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Nishant Pappireddi

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Pawel Burkhardt

    The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Plymouth, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Christine L Gee

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Tiago Barros

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Howard Schulman

    Allosteros Therapeutics, Sunnyvale, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Evan R Williams

    Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. John Kuriyan

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    kuriyan@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    John Kuriyan, Senior editor, eLife.

Copyright

© 2016, Bhattacharyya et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,249
    views
  • 1,253
    downloads
  • 95
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Moitrayee Bhattacharyya
  2. Margaret M Stratton
  3. Catherine C Going
  4. Ethan D McSpadden
  5. Yongjian Huang
  6. Anna C Susa
  7. Anna Elleman
  8. Yumeng Melody Cao
  9. Nishant Pappireddi
  10. Pawel Burkhardt
  11. Christine L Gee
  12. Tiago Barros
  13. Howard Schulman
  14. Evan R Williams
  15. John Kuriyan
(2016)
Molecular mechanism of activation-triggered subunit exchange in Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
eLife 5:e13405.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13405

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13405

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.