The DEG/ENaC cation channel protein UNC-8 drives activity-dependent synapse removal in remodeling GABAergic neurons

  1. Tyne W Miller-Fleming
  2. Sarah C Petersen
  3. Laura Manning
  4. Cristina Matthewman
  5. Megan Gornet
  6. Allison Beers
  7. Sayaka Hori
  8. Shohei Mitani
  9. Laura Bianchi
  10. Janet Richmond
  11. David M Miller III  Is a corresponding author
  1. Vanderbilt University, United States
  2. Kenyon College, United States
  3. University of Illinois at Chicago, United States
  4. University of Miami, United States
  5. Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan

Abstract

Genetic programming and neural activity drive synaptic remodeling in developing neural circuits, but the molecular components that link these pathways are poorly understood. Here we show that the C. elegans Degenerin/Epithelial Sodium Channel (DEG/ENaC) protein, UNC-8, is transcriptionally controlled to function as a trigger in an activity-dependent mechanism that removes synapses in remodeling GABAergic neurons. UNC-8 cation channel activity promotes disassembly of presynaptic domains in DD type GABA neurons, but not in VD class GABA neurons where unc-8 expression is blocked by the COUP/TF transcription factor, UNC-55. We propose that the depolarizing effect of UNC-8-dependent sodium import elevates intracellular calcium in a positive feedback loop involving the voltage-gated calcium channel UNC-2 and the calcium-activated phosphatase TAX-6/calcineurin to initiate a caspase-dependent mechanism that disassembles the presynaptic apparatus. Thus, UNC-8 serves as a link between genetic and activity-dependent pathways that function together to promote the elimination of GABA synapses in remodeling neurons.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tyne W Miller-Fleming

    Neuroscience Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sarah C Petersen

    Department of Neuroscien, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Laura Manning

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1597-0600
  4. Cristina Matthewman

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Megan Gornet

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Allison Beers

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sayaka Hori

    Department of Physiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shohei Mitani

    Department of Physiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Laura Bianchi

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Janet Richmond

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. David M Miller III

    Neuroscience Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    For correspondence
    david.miller@vanderbilt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9048-873X

Reviewing Editor

  1. Kang Shen, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 21, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 11, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 12, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 10, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: August 4, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Miller-Fleming et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,199
    views
  • 566
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tyne W Miller-Fleming
  2. Sarah C Petersen
  3. Laura Manning
  4. Cristina Matthewman
  5. Megan Gornet
  6. Allison Beers
  7. Sayaka Hori
  8. Shohei Mitani
  9. Laura Bianchi
  10. Janet Richmond
  11. David M Miller III
(2016)
The DEG/ENaC cation channel protein UNC-8 drives activity-dependent synapse removal in remodeling GABAergic neurons
eLife 5:e14599.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14599

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14599

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ivan Tomić, Paul M Bays
    Research Article

    Probing memory of a complex visual image within a few hundred milliseconds after its disappearance reveals significantly greater fidelity of recall than if the probe is delayed by as little as a second. Classically interpreted, the former taps into a detailed but rapidly decaying visual sensory or ‘iconic’ memory (IM), while the latter relies on capacity-limited but comparatively stable visual working memory (VWM). While iconic decay and VWM capacity have been extensively studied independently, currently no single framework quantitatively accounts for the dynamics of memory fidelity over these time scales. Here, we extend a stationary neural population model of VWM with a temporal dimension, incorporating rapid sensory-driven accumulation of activity encoding each visual feature in memory, and a slower accumulation of internal error that causes memorized features to randomly drift over time. Instead of facilitating read-out from an independent sensory store, an early cue benefits recall by lifting the effective limit on VWM signal strength imposed when multiple items compete for representation, allowing memory for the cued item to be supplemented with information from the decaying sensory trace. Empirical measurements of human recall dynamics validate these predictions while excluding alternative model architectures. A key conclusion is that differences in capacity classically thought to distinguish IM and VWM are in fact contingent upon a single resource-limited WM store.

    1. Neuroscience
    Emilio Salinas, Bashirul I Sheikh
    Insight

    Our ability to recall details from a remembered image depends on a single mechanism that is engaged from the very moment the image disappears from view.