The target of the DEAH-box NTP triphosphatase Prp43 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae spliceosomes is the U2 snRNP-intron interaction

  1. Jean-Baptiste Fourmann
  2. Olexandr Dybkov
  3. Dmitry E Agafonov
  4. Marcel J Tauchert
  5. Henning Urlaub
  6. Ralf Ficner
  7. Patrizia Fabrizio
  8. Reinhard Lührmann  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max-Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany
  3. Georg August University of Göttingen, Germany

Abstract

The DEAH-box NTPase Prp43 and its cofactors Ntr1 and Ntr2 form the NTR complex and are required for disassembling intron-lariat spliceosomes (ILS) and defective earlier spliceosomes. However, the Prp43 binding site in the spliceosome and its target(s) are unknown. We show that Prp43 fused to Ntr1's G patch motif (Prp43_Ntr1GP) is as efficient as the NTR in ILS disassembly, yielding identical dissociation products and recognizing its natural ILS target even in the absence of Ntr1's C-terminal-domain (CTD) and Ntr2. Unlike the NTR, Prp43_Ntr1GP disassembles earlier spliceosomal complexes (A, B, Bact), indicating that Ntr2/Ntr1-CTD prevents NTR from disrupting properly assembled spliceosomes other than the ILS. The U2 snRNP-intron interaction is disrupted in all complexes by Prp43_Ntr1GP, and in the spliceosome contacts U2 proteins and the pre-mRNA, indicating that the U2 snRNP-intron interaction is Prp43's major target.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jean-Baptiste Fourmann

    Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max-Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Olexandr Dybkov

    Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Dmitry E Agafonov

    Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max-Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marcel J Tauchert

    Department of Molecular Structure Biology, Institute for Microbiology and Genetics, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Henning Urlaub

    Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Group, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ralf Ficner

    Molecular Structure Biology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Patrizia Fabrizio

    Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Reinhard Lührmann

    Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    Reinhard.Luehrmann@mpi-bpc.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2016, Fourmann et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,420
    views
  • 361
    downloads
  • 51
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jean-Baptiste Fourmann
  2. Olexandr Dybkov
  3. Dmitry E Agafonov
  4. Marcel J Tauchert
  5. Henning Urlaub
  6. Ralf Ficner
  7. Patrizia Fabrizio
  8. Reinhard Lührmann
(2016)
The target of the DEAH-box NTP triphosphatase Prp43 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae spliceosomes is the U2 snRNP-intron interaction
eLife 5:e15564.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15564

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15564

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Pavla Nedbalová, Nikola Kaislerova ... Tomáš Doležal
    Research Article

    During parasitoid wasp infection, activated immune cells of Drosophila melanogaster larvae release adenosine to conserve nutrients for immune response. S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) is a methyl group donor for most methylations in the cell and is synthesized from methionine and ATP. After methylation, SAM is converted to S-adenosylhomocysteine, which is further metabolized to adenosine and homocysteine. Here, we show that the SAM transmethylation pathway is up-regulated during immune cell activation and that the adenosine produced by this pathway in immune cells acts as a systemic signal to delay Drosophila larval development and ensure sufficient nutrient supply to the immune system. We further show that the up-regulation of the SAM transmethylation pathway and the efficiency of the immune response also depend on the recycling of adenosine back to ATP by adenosine kinase and adenylate kinase. We therefore hypothesize that adenosine may act as a sensitive sensor of the balance between cell activity, represented by the sum of methylation events in the cell, and nutrient supply. If the supply of nutrients is insufficient for a given activity, adenosine may not be effectively recycled back into ATP and may be pushed out of the cell to serve as a signal to demand more nutrients.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Adrian CD Fuchs
    Research Article

    The protein ligase Connectase can be used to fuse proteins to small molecules, solid carriers, or other proteins. Compared to other protein ligases, it offers greater substrate specificity, higher catalytic efficiency, and catalyzes no side reactions. However, its reaction is reversible, resulting in only 50% fusion product from two equally abundant educts. Here, we present a simple method to reliably obtain 100% fusion product in 1:1 conjugation reactions. This method is efficient for protein-protein or protein-peptide fusions at the N- or C-termini. It enables the generation of defined and completely labeled antibody conjugates with one fusion partner on each chain. The reaction requires short incubation times with small amounts of enzyme and is effective even at low substrate concentrations and at low temperatures. With these characteristics, it presents a valuable new tool for bioengineering.