1. Developmental Biology
  2. Genetics and Genomics
Download icon

Protein Tagging: Building a ladder to Hershey Heaven

  1. Kai Zinn  Is a corresponding author
  1. California Institute of Technology, United States
Insight
  • Cited 0
  • Views 1,039
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2016;5:e15591 doi: 10.7554/eLife.15591

Abstract

A genome-wide resource looks set to turn an experimental ideal into a reality for the Drosophila community.

Main text

When Alfred Hershey, one of the founders of molecular biology, was asked to describe his idea of scientific happiness, he said that it would be “to have one experiment that works, and keep doing it all the time”. By this he meant that it would be ideal to be able to conduct every experiment using the same tools and methods, and yet always generate new and interesting data (see Creager, 2001). However, molecular geneticists have not yet reached this “Hershey Heaven”. Today, when researchers want to discover more about a protein in an animal – for example, which tissues and cell types express the protein – they usually have to rely on antibodies that bind to the protein of interest. Unfortunately, good antibodies do not exist for most proteins, and it is time-consuming and expensive to generate and characterize new antibodies.

Biologists who work on the model organism Drosophila melanogaster have addressed this problem by making “protein traps”. This involves inserting specific sequences into genes in the fruit fly’s genome in order to mark its proteins in a way that makes them easily identifiable without a specific antibody. Some inserted sequences directly encode markers such as fluorescent proteins, while others can be replaced by different marker sequences at a later stage (e.g., Venken et al., 2011; Nagarkar-Jaiswal et al., 2015). Another approach employs transgenic flies that carry an extra functional copy of a gene, with this "third copy" being tagged. Most Drosophila genes are relatively compact, which means that they can be contained within DNA fragments that are short enough to be efficiently inserted into the genome.

Now, in eLife, Mihail Sarov, Pavel Tomancak, Frank Schnorrer and colleagues describe a new resource of tagged genes that will be intensively used by all Drosophila biologists (Sarov et al., 2016). The researchers – who are based at Max Planck Institutes in Dresden and Martinsried, and other centers in India, the United States and Ireland – generated a library of tagged clones in bacteria for almost 10,000 Drosophila genes (which is ~75% of all Drosophila genes). Each protein has a multipurpose tag added to its C-terminus, which provides a number of ways to localize or purify a protein of interest, without the need for specific antibodies. The clones are available to the community and can be injected directly into fruit fly embryos to make transgenic lines via the ‘third copy’ strategy. Sarov et al. have already made 880 transgenic lines from the clones, and their data suggest that about two-thirds of the tagged genes will produce functional proteins.

Sarov et al. used the green fluorescent protein in the multipurpose tag to confirm that many of the tagged proteins tended to localize correctly within living cells. They were also able to track protein expression and localization in live animals. Finally, Sarov et al. also demonstrated that tags could be used to purify proteins of interest, along with other components of protein complexes that contain them.

Researchers working with Drosophila and other model systems often conduct large genetic screens to identify the genes that control various biological processes. It would be ideal if any new set of genes identified in such a screen could be examined by using a set of transgenic lines and/or clones in which all the genes are tagged in the same way and can be studied using the same tools. The new resource developed by Sarov et al. is a ladder leading toward this experimental heaven, just as Alfred Hershey imagined it.

In the future, researchers will be able to obtain clones for any gene within the new library and make their own transgenic lines. They will then, it is hoped, deposit these new lines in public collections to expand the number available for future study. Finally, Sarov et al. have generated a ‘pre-tagged’ library that is also publicly available. Researchers will now be able to use high-throughput strategies to insert any tags they wish into the genes in this library to make ‘second-generation’ libraries. For example, these could include proteins tagged with different colors so that multiple proteins could be visualized at the same time.

Although this new resource will greatly help work on most Drosophila proteins, it comes with some limitations. First, some proteins will be inactivated or destabilized by the addition of tags to the C-terminus. Second, large tags like the ones used in this library may alter the localization or expression of some proteins. Third, some genes encode sets of proteins with different C-termini, and each “isoform” of the protein may have different localizations and/or expression patterns. The present library installs tags on only one of these isoforms. Fourth, ~20% of Drosophila genes are too long to be transferred via traditional techniques. All of these problems can be addressed by using CRISPR-based methods to insert tags into any desired position within a gene (e.g., Chen et al., 2015; Gratz et al., 2015). Each gene studied in this manner will represent a separate project. However, if CRISPR-tagged lines for the problem genes also become publicly available, Drosophila biologists may eventually be able to study any protein they wish using only publicly available materials. This will greatly speed up research, make it more affordable, and make Hershey Heaven a realistic scenario for the Drosophila community.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
    Hershey heaven
    1. ANH Creager
    (2001)
    Nature Structural Biology 8:18–19.
    https://doi.org/10.1038/82991
  3. 3
  4. 4
    A library of MiMICs allows tagging of genes and reversible, spatial and temporal knockdown of proteins in Drosophila
    1. S Nagarkar-Jaiswal
    2. P-T Lee
    3. ME Campbell
    4. K Chen
    5. S Anguiano-Zarate
    6. M Cantu Gutierrez
    7. T Busby
    8. W-W Lin
    9. Y He
    10. KL Schulze
    11. BW Booth
    12. M Evans-Holm
    13. KJT Venken
    14. RW Levis
    15. AC Spradling
    16. RA Hoskins
    17. HJ Bellen
    (2015)
    eLife, 4, 10.7554/eLife.05338.
  5. 5
  6. 6

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kai Zinn

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    For correspondence
    zinnk@caltech.edu
    Competing interests
    The author declares that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6706-5605

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: March 29, 2016 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2016, Zinn

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,039
    Page views
  • 71
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Bicheng He et al.
    Research Article
    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Human Biology and Medicine
    Benjamin R Thomson et al.
    Short Report