Abstract

Although it is clear that trisomy 21 causes Down syndrome, the molecular events acting downstream of the trisomy remain ill defined. Using complementary genomics analyses, we identified the interferon pathway as the major signaling cascade consistently activated by trisomy 21 in human cells. Transcriptome analysis revealed that trisomy 21 activates the interferon transcriptional response in fibroblast and lymphoblastoid cell lines, as well as circulating monocytes and T cells. Trisomy 21 cells show increased induction of interferon-stimulated genes and decreased expression of ribosomal proteins and translation factors. An shRNA screen determined that the interferon-activated kinases JAK1 and TYK2 suppress proliferation of trisomy 21 fibroblasts, and this defect is rescued by pharmacological JAK inhibition. Therefore, we propose that interferon activation, likely via increased gene dosage of the four interferon receptors encoded on chromosome 21, contributes to many of the clinical impacts of trisomy 21, and that interferon antagonists could have therapeutic benefits.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kelly D Sullivan

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    For correspondence
    kelly.d.sullivan@ucdenver.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Hannah C Lewis

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Amanda A Hill

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ahwan Pandey

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Leisa P Jackson

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Joseph M Cabral

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Keith P Smith

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. L Alexander Liggett

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Eliana B Gomez

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Matthew D Galbraith

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. James DeGregori

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Joaquín M Espinosa

    Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
    For correspondence
    joaquin.espinosa@ucdenver.edu
    Competing interests
    Joaquín M Espinosa, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9048-1941

Funding

Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome

  • Joaquín M Espinosa

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Joaquín M Espinosa

National Institutes of Health (R01CA117907, P30CA046934-27)

  • Joaquín M Espinosa

National Science Foundation (MCB-1243522)

  • Joaquín M Espinosa

Anna and John J. Sie Foundation

  • Joaquín M Espinosa

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols of the University of Colorado. The protocol was approved by the University of Colorado IACUC (Protocol Number: B-41413(04)1E).

Human subjects: All individuals in this study were consented on Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB)-approved protocols (Protocol Numbers: 11-1790 or 15-1774) and samples collected and processed as describe in the Materials and Methods.

Copyright

© 2016, Sullivan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,731
    views
  • 1,530
    downloads
  • 244
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kelly D Sullivan
  2. Hannah C Lewis
  3. Amanda A Hill
  4. Ahwan Pandey
  5. Leisa P Jackson
  6. Joseph M Cabral
  7. Keith P Smith
  8. L Alexander Liggett
  9. Eliana B Gomez
  10. Matthew D Galbraith
  11. James DeGregori
  12. Joaquín M Espinosa
(2016)
Trisomy 21 consistently activates the interferon response
eLife 5:e16220.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16220

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16220

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Liza Dahal, Thomas GW Graham ... Xavier Darzacq
    Research Article

    Type II nuclear receptors (T2NRs) require heterodimerization with a common partner, the retinoid X receptor (RXR), to bind cognate DNA recognition sites in chromatin. Based on previous biochemical and overexpression studies, binding of T2NRs to chromatin is proposed to be regulated by competition for a limiting pool of the core RXR subunit. However, this mechanism has not yet been tested for endogenous proteins in live cells. Using single-molecule tracking (SMT) and proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), we monitored interactions between endogenously tagged RXR and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) in live cells. Unexpectedly, we find that higher expression of RAR, but not RXR, increases heterodimerization and chromatin binding in U2OS cells. This surprising finding indicates the limiting factor is not RXR but likely its cadre of obligate dimer binding partners. SMT and PAPA thus provide a direct way to probe which components are functionally limiting within a complex TF interaction network providing new insights into mechanisms of gene regulation in vivo with implications for drug development targeting nuclear receptors.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ananda Kishore Mukherjee, Subhajit Dutta ... Shantanu Chowdhury
    Research Article

    Telomeres are crucial for cancer progression. Immune signalling in the tumour microenvironment has been shown to be very important in cancer prognosis. However, the mechanisms by which telomeres might affect tumour immune response remain poorly understood. Here, we observed that interleukin-1 signalling is telomere-length dependent in cancer cells. Mechanistically, non-telomeric TRF2 (telomeric repeat binding factor 2) binding at the IL-1-receptor type-1 (IL1R1) promoter was found to be affected by telomere length. Enhanced TRF2 binding at the IL1R1 promoter in cells with short telomeres directly recruited the histone-acetyl-transferase (HAT) p300, and consequent H3K27 acetylation activated IL1R1. This altered NF-kappa B signalling and affected downstream cytokines like IL6, IL8, and TNF. Further, IL1R1 expression was telomere-sensitive in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) clinical samples. Infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) was also sensitive to the length of tumour cell telomeres and highly correlated with IL1R1 expression. The use of both IL1 Receptor antagonist (IL1RA) and IL1R1 targeting ligands could abrogate M2 macrophage infiltration in TNBC tumour organoids. In summary, using TNBC cancer tissue (>90 patients), tumour-derived organoids, cancer cells, and xenograft tumours with either long or short telomeres, we uncovered a heretofore undeciphered function of telomeres in modulating IL1 signalling and tumour immunity.