Synovial joints are the lubricated connections between the bones of our body that are commonly affected in arthritis. It is assumed that synovial joints first evolved as vertebrates came to land, with ray-finned fishes lacking lubricated joints. Here, we examine the expression and function of a critical lubricating protein of mammalian synovial joints, Prg4/Lubricin, in diverse ray-finned fishes. We find that Prg4 homologs are specifically enriched at the jaw and pectoral fin joints of zebrafish, stickleback, and gar, with genetic deletion of the zebrafish prg4b gene resulting in the same age-related degeneration of joints as seen in lubricin-deficient mice and humans. Our data support lubricated synovial joints evolving much earlier than currently accepted, at least in the common ancestor of all bony vertebrates. Establishment of the first arthritis model in the highly regenerative zebrafish will offer unique opportunities to understand the aetiology and possible treatment of synovial joint disease.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16415.001
We owe our flexibility to the lubricated joints that connect the bones of our body. Unfortunately, these joints tend to deteriorate over time, leading to a condition called osteoarthritis that affects millions of people.
Scientists had thought that lubricated joints first evolved when backboned animals started walking on land, with fish lacking these types of joints. However, by studying zebrafish, Askary, Smeeton et al. now show that fish do have lubricated joints; in fact, the joints in the jaw and fins of zebrafish have a similar structure to those in humans. These zebrafish joints make an important protein called Lubricin that is known to lubricate joints in mice and humans. Furthermore, analyzing two other fish species – a stickleback and a primitive fish called a spotted gar – revealed that fish joints in general produce Lubricin. This pushes back the evolutionary origins of lubricated joints millions of years, to at least the common ancestor of all backboned animals.
Next, Askary, Smeeton et al. used a new type of molecular scissors to eliminate the ability of zebrafish to produce Lubricin. These mutant fish developed the same early onset arthritis as mice and humans that lack Lubricin. Studying such fish should allow new approaches to be developed that will help us to understand how debilitating joint diseases progress. As zebrafish are highly regenerative, future studies could also explore whether they can regenerate damaged joints, which could spur new strategies for treating and reversing arthritis.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16415.002
Synovial joints allow for free movement between adjacent bones and are characterized by a fluid-filled cavity separating layers of hyaline articular cartilage. The synovial cavity is enclosed by a membrane, which is often strengthened externally by a fibrous capsule and contains lubricating molecules, such as hyaluronic acid and lubricin, that reduce friction at the joint surface (Koyama et al., 2014; Rhee et al., 2005). A prevailing hypothesis is that lubricated synovial joints first evolved in tetrapods in response to newfound mechanical challenges imposed on the weight-bearing joints of nascent limbs (van der Kraan, 2013a, 2013b) (Figure 1A). Whereas previous histological studies had suggested that the jaw joints of lungfish (a lobe-finned fish like humans) (Bemis, 1986), and potentially longnose gar and sturgeon (ray-finned fishes) (Haines, 1942), have synovial-like morphology, the extent to which these joints are molecularly and functionally similar to tetrapod synovial joints had remained untested. In particular, the assumption that ray-finned fishes lack the sophisticated types of lubricated joints found in humans has hampered the use of the zebrafish model for the study of synovial joint diseases such as arthritis. By examining the expression and function of homologs of a critical lubricating protein of mammalian joints, Lubricin, we provide evidence that certain joints of adult zebrafish are indeed true synovial joints.
Given the suggested synovial-like morphology of jaw joints in several fishes, we examined whether joints of the widely used teleost species, the zebrafish (Danio rerio), also display synovial morphology (Figure 1A). Bone μCT of adult zebrafish shows that the jaw joint, an articulation between the anguloarticular and quadrate bones, resembles a hinge joint (Video 1), with manual opening and closing of the mouth in fixed Alcian-Blue-stained animals revealing movement in a single plane (Figure 1B). While study of zebrafish has contributed to our understanding of the embryonic development of the jaw joint, zebrafish larvae at the most commonly studied stage, 6 days post-fertilization (dpf), show little evidence of a synovial cavity (Miller et al., 2003). However, whether this joint acquires synovial characteristics later had not been described. Our histological investigations revealed the variable presence of a partial cavity as early as 14 dpf, and a prominent and consistently present cavity by 28 dpf (Figure 1C,D). In adult zebrafish (12 months post-fertilization, mpf), distinct layers of flattened articular chondrocytes line the jaw joint cavity, with hypertrophic chondrocytes located beneath the articular surface (Figure 1E,F). We also observed similar cavities lined by flattened chondrocytes in joints of the pectoral fin in adult zebrafish, in particular between the proximal and distal radials and between the marginal ray and scapula (Figure 1B,G). We next used sox10 and tricho-rhino-phalangeal syndrome 1 (trps1) transgenes (Askary et al., 2015) to visualize jaw joint cavitation over time in living zebrafish. At 3, 7, and 14 dpf, the early chondrocyte marker trps1:GFP labels the subset of sox10:dsRed+ chondrocytes at the joint surface, with a partial cavity variably apparent at 14 dpf (Figure 2A–C). At 1, 2 and 8 mpf, trps1:GFP is maintained in articular chondrocytes as the cavity expands, with a subset of cells marked by sox10:dsRed (Figure 2D–F). In the jaw of the relatively small zebrafish, the presence of a cavity and joint-lining cells, with a minimal fibrous capsule, is consistent with it being a synovial-like joint in miniature, similar to the homologous incudomalleolar synovial joint of the mammalian middle ear (Whyte et al., 2002).
To examine whether synovial-like morphology is a conserved feature of ray-finned fish, we also examined juveniles of the distantly related teleost fish, the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), and an outgroup of teleost fish, the ray-finned spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) (Braasch et al., 2016). Both stickleback and spotted gar jaw joints displayed synovial cavities lined by flattened cells (Figure 1H,I). In the jaw joint of the larger spotted gar (standard length 10.2 cm), an internal one-cell-thick membrane and thick external fibrous capsule enclosed the cavity, with joint cartilage divided into the same superficial, transitional, radial, and calcified layers seen in mammalian synovial joints (Figure 1J,K). The presence of these additional morphological features in the gar jaw supports synovial-like features being an ancestral property of bony vertebrates.
Given the synovial-like morphology of several types of joints in fish, we next examined whether the chondrocytes lining these joints share a common molecular signature with those of mammalian joints. Chondrocytes lining mammalian synovial joints differ from those in the growth plate by expressing Prg4, which encodes a lubricin proteoglycan that forms a cross-linked network with hyaluronan and Aggrecan to reduce friction across the joint surface (Jay and Waller, 2014). Consistent with the appearance of a synovial cavity in juvenile stages, we find that the joint-lining cells of the zebrafish jaw express prg4b starting from 15 dpf and continuing throughout adulthood (Figure 3A–D). We observed much weaker levels of expression at other joints of the face, such as the midline ceratohyal-ceratohyal joint (Figure 3A, arrowhead) and hyoid joint (Figure 3E), which lack synovial morphology. Expression of prg4b was not detected in the jaw joint at earlier stages (7 dpf, data not shown), consistent with the late onset of Prg4 expression at mammalian joints (Rhee et al., 2005). In addition, prg4b expression appeared in joint-lining cells of the synovial-like ray-scapula articulation of the pectoral fin at 3 mpf, but not in the non-synovial intervertebral discs (Figure 3F,G). Zebrafish also expressed prg4b outside of joints, including conserved expression with mammalian Prg4 in liver (Ikegawa et al., 2000) and possibly ligaments (Sun et al., 2006) (Figure 3A,G). Similar to zebrafish, stickleback expressed prg4b and gar expressed prg4 in joint-lining cells of the juvenile jaw (Figure 3H–J). In contrast, the related prg4a gene is not enriched at the jaw joint in either zebrafish or stickleback, instead showing expression throughout cartilage (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Of note, the lineage leading to the spotted gar diverged before the teleost genome duplication (Amores et al., 2011), resulting in zebrafish and stickleback having two Prg4 co-orthologs and gar a single ortholog (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Analysis of the single prg4 gene in gar therefore reveals that enriched expression of Prg4 within articular chondrocytes existed before the divergence of ray-finned and lobe-finned vertebrates.
We next examined whether articular chondrocytes of the zebrafish jaw display other features of chondrocytes lining mammalian synovial joints, including enriched expression of hyaluronan synthase (Has) enzymes in the radial layer (Hiscock et al., 2000) and lower levels of types II and X Collagen, Aggrecan, and Matrilin compared to growth plate chondrocytes (Khan et al., 2007). Consistently, we observed relative depletion of col10a1, acana, and matrilin1 mRNA and Col2a1a and Aggrecan protein in articular versus deeper chondrocytes, as well as enriched expression of has3 in the radial layer of the juvenile zebrafish jaw joint (Figure 3K–M, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Although none of these markers are exclusive to synovial joints, the shared expression of Lubricin and hyaluronan synthase enzymes and relative absence of cartilage maturation genes (e.g. Collagen II/X, Aggrecan, Matrilin1) demonstrates a common molecular signature between articular chondrocytes of the zebrafish jaw and mammalian synovial joints.
A major function of the synovial cavity is to lubricate the joint, with loss of lubrication resulting in age-related joint degeneration. We therefore asked whether expression of Prg4 orthologs by cells lining synovial-like joints in ray-finned fishes reflects a conserved requirement of lubricin protein in lubricating and hence maintaining these joints. To do so, we used TALE nucleases (Huang et al., 2011; Sander et al., 2011) to generate loss-of-function deletion alleles for zebrafish prg4a and prg4b (Figure 4A). Mice lacking Prg4 function (Koyama et al., 2014; Rhee et al., 2005) and humans with homozygous loss of PRG4 in Camptodactyly-arthropathy-coxa vara-pericarditis syndrome (Marcelino et al., 1999) have a progressive deterioration of joint surfaces that includes loss of articular chondrocytes, accumulation of acellular matrix in the cavity, synovial hyperplasia, and thickening of the deep chondrocyte layer. Consistent with the lack of early joint defects in Prg4-/- mice, zebrafish doubly mutant for prg4a and prg4b had no defects in the jaw joint at either 6 dpf or 1 mpf and no gross defects of the adult skeleton (Figure 4B–D). However, prg4a-/-; prg4b-/- zebrafish began to display a weak accumulation of acellular matrix in limited domains of the joint surface at 2 mpf (Figure 4E), a phenotype that became more severe by 6 mpf (Figure 4F). By 12 mpf, prg4a-/-; prg4b-/- zebrafish had multiple jaw joint abnormalities, including an acellular matrix at the joint surface, synovial hyperplasia, increased numbers of deep chondrocytes, and in some cases complete erosion of the joint surface accompanied by underlying bone defects (Figure 4G, Figure 4—figure supplement 1, and additional examples in Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Quantification of jaw joint defects using an Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) scoring system (Pritzker et al., 2006) that we modified for zebrafish (Figure 4—figure supplement 2) confirmed that joint defects increased in severity during aging (Figure 4H), consistent with the progressive arthritis seen in Prg4-/- mice (Koyama et al., 2014; Rhee et al., 2005) and patients with CACP (Marcelino et al., 1999). Defects found in prg4a-/-; prg4b-/- double mutants were also not confined to the jaw joint, appearing in the ray-scapula and inter-radial joints of the pectoral fin (Figure 5A–C). Further, consistent with only prg4b being enriched in jaw joint chondrocytes, prg4b but not prg4a single mutants displayed ray-scapula fin joint defects and a similar severity of jaw joint defects as double mutants at 12 mpf (Figure 4G,H and Figure 5B). In contrast, we detected no changes in the hyoid joints of the face and the intervertebral discs in 12 mpf prg4a-/-; prg4b-/- mutants (Figure 5D,E), consistent with these joints lacking synovial cavities and high-level prg4b expression. Our data therefore support a specific requirement for zebrafish Prg4 homologs in the adult maintenance of joints with synovial-like morphology.
Although we do not know if Prg4b protein is secreted into joint cavities in zebrafish, or whether the cavities are fully enclosed as in mammals, the finding that the jaw and fin joints of zebrafish require the molecular lubricant lubricin for their maintenance supports zebrafish having synovial-like lubricated joints. Contrary to existing dogma (van der Kraan, 2013b), our data suggest that lubricated synovial joints evolved before vertebrates moved onto land in at least the common ancestor to all bony vertebrates. Although fish are not subject to gravity in the same way as tetrapods, the evolution of synovial joints in fish-like ancestors may have facilitated movement of first the jaw, and then the fins, against water resistance. Interestingly, recent studies show that the radial joints of the pectoral fin, which we find to have synovial morphology and prg4b dependency in zebrafish, are homologous to those of the tetrapod wrist (Gehrke et al., 2015). The existence of these synovial joints at the base of the pectoral fins of ancestral bony fish may therefore have facilitated their later functional evolution into the larger synovial joints of tetrapod limbs. Our findings show that zebrafish can be a relevant model to understand the development of synovial specializations, including the poorly understood process of cavitation. The establishment of the first genetic model of arthritis in zebrafish will also allow a better understanding of the developmental progression of synovial joint disease. In the future, it will be exciting to test whether the articular cartilage lining synovial joints, which is affected in arthritis, displays the same regenerative potential as many of the other tissues in zebrafish (Knopf et al., 2011; Morgan, 1900; Poss et al., 2002).
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Southern California, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Oregon approved all zebrafish (Danio rerio), three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) procedures, respectively – (IACUC #10885). Previously reported zebrafish lines used in this study include Tg(sox10:dsRED)el10 (Das and Crump, 2012), trps1j127aGt (RRID:ZFIN_ZBD-GENO-100809-11) (Talbot et al., 2010), and Tg(col2a1aBAC:GFP)el483 (Askary et al., 2015).
Adult zebrafish samples were fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C for 7 days. Following fixation, animals were cut into smaller pieces to facilitate embedding and sectioning of the desired structures. The samples were then decalcified in 20% EDTA solution for 10 days at room temperature. For embedding, the tissue was first dehydrated through a series of ethanol washes (30, 50, 70, 95, and 100%) for 20 min each. Then ethanol was replaced with xylene substitute Hemo-De (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) in a series of 15 min washes (50, 75, and 100% Hemo-De). The samples were then incubated in a 1:1 Hemo-De:paraffin (Paraplast X-tra, VWR, Radnor, PA) solution at 65°C for an hour before an overnight incubation in 100% paraffin at 65°C. The following day, the samples were embedded in freshly melted paraffin. Larval and juvenile samples were prepared following the same general procedure with shorter fixation and decalcification steps (2 days fixation and 4 days decalcification). Animals younger than 3 weeks did not require decalcification. Juvenile stickleback and spotted gar samples were processed as above for adult zebrafish with the following changes: stickleback were decalcified in 20% EDTA for 7 days at room temperature; isolated spotted gar heads were fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C for 10–14 days and decalcified in 20% EDTA for 14 days at room temperature. For hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining, 5 μm paraffin sections were deparaffinized with xylene and re-hydrated through an ethanol series to distilled water. Sections were then stained in hematoxylin (VWR) for 2 min followed by brief acetic acid rinse and 2 min in Blueing Reagent solution (VWR); 2 × 30 s washes in water, 2 × 30 s in 95% ethanol. The sections were stained in Eosin (VWR) for 30 s followed by 3 × 1 min washes in 95% ethanol and 2 × 1 min washes in 100% ethanol. Following 2 × 2 min in Hemo-De, samples were mounted with cytoseal (Richard-Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI) for imaging. For Trichrome staining, 5 μm paraffin sections were deparaffinized with xylene and re-hydrated through an ethanol series to distilled water. Trichrome stain was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions using the Trichrome, Gomori One-Step, Aniline Blue Stain (Newcomer Supply, Middleton, WI). For SafraninO staining, 5 μm paraffin sections were deparaffinized with xylene and re-hydrated to distilled water. They were then stained in Weigert’s Iron Hematoxylin (Newcomer Supply) for 5 min, washed in distilled water for 5 changes, differentiated in 0.06 N HCl solution in 70% ethanol for 2 s followed by 3 more washes in water. Sections were then stained in 0.02% Fast Green FCF (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 1 min and rinsed for 30 s in 1% acetic acid. Staining in 1% SafraninO (Newcomer Supply) was then performed for 30 min, followed by 3 × 1 min washes in 95% ethanol. Slides were then washed 2 × 1 min in 100% ethanol and 2 × 2 min in Hemo-De, before mounting with cytoseal for imaging. For Alcian staining, juvenile zebrafish were processed as described (Walker and Kimmel, 2007), and adult zebrafish were processed using a modified version of an online protocol (https://wiki.zfin.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=13107375).
Probes were generated for zebrafish prg4a, prg4b, has3, acana, col10a1, and matn1 using PCR amplification from cDNA. See Supplementary file 1A for primers used in amplification of zebrafish probe templates. Probes for stickleback prg4a and prg4b and gar prg4 were synthesized from gBlocks Gene Fragments (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA). The DNA sequences used for probe generation are listed in Supplementary file 1B. Stickleback prg4b sequence was determined through sequence homology comparison with zebrafish Prg4b protein sequence using BlastP search in Ensembl. Two independent probes were designed for the putative stickleback prg4b (ENSGACG00000007505; ENSGACG00000007501) and both showed the same expression pattern in three independent animals. gBlocks or PCR products from cDNA amplification were subcloned into pCR-Blunt II TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Following sequence confirmation, digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled antisense probes were synthesized using T7 or SP6 RNA polymerase (Roche, Switzerland). In situ hybridization protocol was modified from (Lien et al., 2006). In brief, after de-paraffinization, slides were digested in 7.5 µg/ml proteinase K for 5 min and fixed in 4% PFA/0.2% gluteraldehyde for 20 min. Each slide was incubated overnight at 65°C with 1 μg of DIG-labeled riboprobe diluted in hybridization buffer. After hybridization, slides were washed three times in 1x SSC/Formamide at 65°C for 30 min, and three times in MABT for 15 min. Following 1 hr of blocking in 2% Blocking Buffer (Roche), hybridization was detected with anti-DIG-AP antibody (Roche, RRID:AB_514497) and developed with NBT/BCIP substrate colorimetric reaction (Roche). Slides were counterstained with nuclear fast red (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) prior to mounting.
Paraffin sections (5 µm) were de-paraffinized with xylene and rehydrated through an ethanol series to 1xPBST. Antigen retrieval was performed using pH 6.0 sodium citrate buffer in a steamer for 35 min. The sections were blocked with 2% donkey serum in PBST for 30 min at room temperature. The sections were incubated with primary antibodies against Col2a1 (goat polyclonal, SC7763, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, RRID:AB_2229686) and Aggrecan (Cat# 13880-1-AP, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL) overnight at 4°C. Sections were further incubated in secondary antibodies and Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain for 1 hr at room temperature prior to mounting with Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL).
Fluorescence imaging of live animals and sections was performed using a Zeiss LSM5 confocal microscope. Histology and colorimetric in situ hybridization slides were photographed using a Leica D8 2500 microscope. Alcian Blue-stained samples were imaged using a Leica S8APO microscope. For microCT (µCT), adult zebrafish were euthanized and fixed in 4% PFA overnight and rinsed twice in 1x PBS. The fish head was dissected and glued to a Pasteur pipette to place it next to the scan head. The scans were performed in air on a XT H 225S T µCT scanner (Nikon Metrology, Brighton, MI) with a PerkinElmer 1621 detector at 120 kVp, 26 uA 500 ms exposure time resulting in an isotropic 3 micron voxel volume. A molybdenum target was used with no additional filtration of the beam. Raw data were reconstructed in CT Pro 3D v4.3.4 (XT Software Suite, Nikon Metrology) and video rendering performed on VG StudioMax v2.2 (Volume Graphics GmbH, Germany). X-ray imaging of fixed adult zebrafish utilized an UltraFocus60 x-ray cabinet (Faxitron Bioptics, Tucson, AZ).
To make knockout alleles for prg4a and prg4b, two pairs of Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs) were used per gene to remove most of the coding sequence of the target genes. TALENs were designed and constructed as described previously (Sanjana et al., 2012). TALEN pairs were targeted toward the following sequences in the zebrafish genome: TTGGTCTCTTCTGGCTCTGC and TCGTCTGCTGCTCAGGGTGA for prg4a 5’ TALENs, TAGGCGTCCCGTCACCCATT and CGCTGCAACTGCCAGGGCAA for prg4a 3’ TALENs, TGCTGTTTGTGTGGGTCTCC and CACGTAAGCCAACAGATCGA for prg4b 5’ TALENs, and TCCCCCAGCTGCAGCACTGG and TCTCACGAACCTGGAGAGGA for prg4b 3’ TALENs. ARCA-capped RNA for each TALEN was transcribed in vitro using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Ultra Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The RNA for four TALENs corresponding to each gene were mixed and injected into one-cell stage embryos to generate founder lines. Founders were then outcrossed to wild-type fish and the progenies were tested for genomic deletions. Deletion alleles were identified in the F1 generation by cloning and sequencing of amplicons that span the TALEN target sites for each gene. We obtained single prg4ael687 (7686 bp deletion) and prg4bel594 (11,638 bp deletion) alleles by screening the progeny of 6 and 21 injected animals, respectively. For the list of genotyping primers see Supplementary file 1C.
5 µm serial sections throughout the jaw joint were stained with SafraninO and imaged as described above. For both the left and right jaw joint, three representative images were selected for each sample. Care was taken to select images that represent equivalent sectioning planes in wild-type and mutant joints. Grade (0–6) and stage (0–4) values were assigned to the anterior (anguloarticular) and posterior (quadrate) surfaces in each of the six joint images for each sample. The grade and stage value for each individual articular surface were multiplied to generate the score for that joint surface. Scores for both surfaces of the left and right joints were then averaged for each animal.
Data are presented as a scatter plot with a line for the mean. Statistical analysis of average OARSI scores was performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (RRID:SCR_002798), with a two-tailed Student’s t-test used to generate the p values.
Feeding systems of living dipnoi: anatomy and functionJournal of Morphology 190:249–275.https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051900417
Automated identification of conserved synteny after whole-genome duplicationGenome Research 19:1497–1505.https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.090480.108
Deep conservation of wrist and digit enhancers in fishProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112:803–808.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420208112
Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyMLMethods in Molecular Biology 537:113–137.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_6
Eudiarthrodial joints in fishesJournal of Anatomy 77:12–19.
Expression of hyaluronan synthases in articular cartilageOsteoarthritis and Cartilage 8:120–126.https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.1999.0280
Heritable gene targeting in zebrafish using customized TALENsNature Biotechnology 29:699–700.https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1939
Isolation, characterization and mapping of the mouse and human PRG4 (proteoglycan 4) genesCytogenetic and Genome Research 90:291–297.https://doi.org/10.1159/000056791
MAFFT: iterative refinement and additional methodsMethods in Molecular Biology 1079:131–146.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_8
Bone regenerates via dedifferentiation of osteoblasts in the zebrafish finDevelopmental Cell 20:713–724.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.04.014
Lubricin is required for the structural integrity and post-natal maintenance of TMJJournal of Dental Research 93:663–670.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514535807
Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and stagingOsteoarthritis and Cartilage 14:13–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.07.014
The secreted glycoprotein lubricin protects cartilage surfaces and inhibits synovial cell overgrowthJournal of Clinical Investigation 115:622–631.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI200522263
Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENsNature Biotechnology 29:697–698.https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1934
Mapping lubricin in canine musculoskeletal tissuesConnective Tissue Research 47:215–221.https://doi.org/10.1080/03008200600846754
Understanding developmental mechanisms in the context of osteoarthritisCurrent Rheumatology Reports 15:333.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-013-0333-3
A two-color acid-free cartilage and bone stain for zebrafish larvaeBiotechnic & Histochemistry 82:23–28.https://doi.org/10.1080/10520290701333558
Fetal development of the human tympanic ossicular chain articulationsCells Tissues Organs 171:241–249.https://doi.org/10.1159/000063124
Didier Y R StainierReviewing Editor; Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany
In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.
Thank you for submitting your article "Ancient origin of lubricated joints in bony vertebrates" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Janet Rossant (Senior editor) and two reviewers, one of whom, Didier Stainier, is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors.
The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.
This concise and interesting paper from the Crump lab provides convincing evidence that synovial joints are present in ray-finned fishes, i.e., earlier than previously thought. Given the importance of joint dysfunction (including arthritis), this finding is significant, especially as the authors go on to develop a zebrafish model of arthritis.
1) The authors claim that their knockout model resembles osteoarthritis, which is a progressive disease. Therefore, adding quantitative data about the progression of the disease in these fish would reinforce the proposed model. For example, OARSI score can be provided for different time points.
2) Some of the figures, such as Figure 3M, would be clearer and more informative by the addition of magnifications. Another example is Figure 4E, where it isn't clear whether matrilin1 is excluded from articular chondrocytes, as in higher vertebrates.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16415.015
1) The authors claim that their knockout model resembles osteoarthritis, which is a progressive disease. Therefore, adding quantitative data about the progression of the disease in these fish would reinforce the proposed model. For example, OARSI score can be provided for different time points.
We have now examined jaw joint defects at two additional intermediate stages (2 and 6 months – new Figure 4E, F). We also developed a modified OARSI scoring system for zebrafish (new Figure 4—figure supplement 2). This allowed us to generate quantitative data (new Figure 4H) showing progressively worse joint defects from 2 to 6 to 12 months (in combination with our previous result of no joint defects at one month, Figure 4D). This is now described in the main text: “Quantification of jaw joint defects using an Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) scoring system that we modified for zebrafish (Figure 4—figure supplement 2) confirmed that joint defects increased in severity during aging (Figure 4H), consistent with the progressive arthritis seen in Prg4-/- mice and CACP patients.”
2) Some of the figures, such as Figure 3M, would be clearer and more informative by the addition of magnifications. Another example is Figure 4E, where it isn't clear whether matrilin1 is excluded from articular chondrocytes, as in higher vertebrates.
For the OA phenotypes in Figure 4E, F, G (i.e. old Figure 4E and new 2mpf and 6mpf sections), we now provide magnified boxes to highlight changes at the joint surface. We have also repeated the matrilin1 in situ. Compared to the original version where the in situ reaction was overexposed, this new image (Figure 3M) more clearly shows exclusion of matrilin1 from the surface layer of articular chondrocytes at 14 dpf. We also now show continued exclusion of matrilin1 from articular chondrocytes of the jaw joint at 1 month (Figure 3—figure supplement 1).https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16415.016
- Amjad Askary
- Joanna Smeeton
- John Postlethwait
- J Gage Crump
- J Gage Crump
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
We thank Megan Matsutani and Jennifer DeKoeyer Crump for fish care and Seth Ruffins for video editing.
Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Southern California, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Oregon approved all zebrafish (Danio rerio), three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) procedures, respectively. Protocol #10885 was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Southern California.
- Didier Y R Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany
© 2016, Askary et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.