Cortical flow aligns actin filaments to form a furrow

  1. Anne-Cecile Reymann
  2. Fabio Staniscia
  3. Anna Erzberger
  4. Guillaume Salbreux  Is a corresponding author
  5. Stephan W Grill  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  3. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Germany
  4. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
6 figures, 7 videos and 2 tables

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Flow and ingression during pseudocleavage and cytokinesis.

(a) Average active RhoA biosensor intensity profiles along the AP axis (0 represents the embryo center; N = 14 embryos for pseudocleavage and N = 7 for cytokinesis; errors represent the standard …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.005
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Details of actin organization during the polarization flow phase.

(a) Actomyosin gel dynamics in the C. elegans zygote. Single cortical and medial planes from a timelapse sequence of a representative embryo expressing both Lifeact::mKate2 and NMY-2::GFP. Anterior …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.006
Figure 2 with 5 supplements
Cortical flows compress the gel to generate alignment.

(a) Filament orientation is quantified by a nematic order parameter; flow fields are obtained from Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) analysis. (b) Gel flow, compression rate, filament orientation and …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.007
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Quantification methods developed.

(a) Example of the filaments alignment quantification (red lines) and the flow velocity field (yellow arrows), as well as nematic order parameters conventions. (b) Time evolution of flow (light …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.008
Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Spatiotemporal correlations.

Plots of the spatiotemporal correlations between the compression, alignment and ingression data sets taken during the pseudocleavage stationary phase (a) and cytokinesis onset stationary phase (b). …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.009
Figure 2—figure supplement 3
Nematic order parameter quantification of artificial images with and without directional bias.

(a) Example of a simulated isotropic actin meshwork (see Appendix for details). (b) Example of a simulated actin meshwork for which the angle of the starting direction is biased toward vertical (see …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.010
Figure 2—figure supplement 4
Impact of image quality on the nematic order parameter quantification.

(a) An artificial filamentous network is obtained by a random iteration process with controllable parameters in Matlab (see Appendix for more details). (b-d) We chose to maintain a vertical bias in …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.011
Figure 2—figure supplement 5
Comparison of different actin labeling strains and actin-binding protein localization.

(a–c) Average AP profiles of flow velocity (light green) and nematic order parameter (blue) at the time of stationary flow during pseudocleavage of respectively 22 embryos expressing Lifeact:GFP, …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.012
Figure 3 with 4 supplements
Theory predicts an alignment peak.

(a) Schematic representation of flow-based alignment. For full theory refer to Appendix. (b) Average AP profiles of gel flow (light green, smoothened), compression rates (dark green) and nematic …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.015
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Influence of the gel material parameters for the nematic order parameter.

(a) Nematic order parameter profiles obtained when varying independently each of the fitting parameters τ, βτ, away from their the best fit values obtained for cytokinesis. Dashed red line, best …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.016
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Contribution of active alignment to the nematic order parameter profile.

(a) Average AP profiles of gel flow (light green), compression rates (dashed dark green), nematic order parameter (blue) and myosin fluorescence (magenta) at the time of stationary flow during …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.017
Figure 3—figure supplement 3
Ingression through anisotropic stress generation in the aligned gel.

(a) Top, a representative embryo is used to visualize the time course of ingression. Bottom, Kymograph obtained from the region specified by the dashed white box in the upper pannel. The …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.018
Figure 3—figure supplement 4
Shape and ingression distance quantification.

Left column, plots of the cell shape (mean radius for all embryos during the stationary flow phase and eggshell reference) for pseudocleavage (a) and cytokinesis (b). Error bars, the standard error …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.019
Figure 4 with 2 supplements
Flows and compression are required to generate alignment.

(a-d) Average AP profiles of gel flow (light green, smoothened), compression rates (dark green) and nematic order parameter (blue) at the time of stationary flow during pseudocleavage onset for mlc-4

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.022
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Cytoskeletal organization under RNAi perturbation.

(a-d) Actin organization and myosin distribution under nop-1(RNAi), ani-1(RNAi) and mlc-4(RNAi). Inserts with fluorescence intensity profiles during pseudocleavage and cytokinesis onset are overlaid …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.023
Figure 4—figure supplement 2
Flows, compression and alignment at cytokinesis onset.

(a-d) Results of nop-1(RNAi), ani-1(RNAi) and mlc-4(RNAi). Average AP profiles of gel flow (light green, smoothened), compression rates (dark green) and nematic order parameter (blue) at the time of …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.024
Compression drives alignment for furrowing.

Schematic illustration of flows, cytoskeletal organization and cell shape changes during pseudocleavage and at the onset of cytokinesis.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.025
Author response image 1
Actomyosin ring closure dynamics.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.029

Videos

Video 1
Actomyosin gel dynamics in the C. elegans zygote.

Cortical and medial planes of an embryo expressing both Lifeact::mKate2 and endogenous NMY-2::GFP. Left panel, medial plane Lifeact:mKate2, center, cortical NMY-2::GFP, right panel, cortical …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.003
Video 2
Three-dimensional reconstruction of an early one-cell embryo of C. elegans expressing Lifeact::mKate2.

The back of the embryo is dimmer due to imaging.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.004
Video 3
Cortical dynamics at flow initiation.

Left panel, cortical NMY-2::GFP, center cortical Lifeact:mKate2 and a zoom is shown in the right panel (min:s).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.013
Video 4
Cortical dynamics of an embryo in which flow was initiated at the side (bottom) and far from the posterior pole of the embryo.

Actin filament alignment follows flow and compression, thus transitions from a horizontal to a vertical direction (min:s).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.014
Video 5
Actomyosin gel dynamics in the C. elegans zygote after 24 hr nop-1(RNAi).

Cortical and medial planes of an embryo expressing both Lifeact::mKate2 and endogenous NMY-2::GFP. Left panel, medial plane Lifeact:mKate2, center, cortical NMY-2::GFP, right panel, cortical …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.026
Video 6
Actomyosin gel dynamics in the C. elegans zygote after 26 hr ani-1(RNAi).

Cortical and medial planes of an embryo expressing both Lifeact::mKate2 and endogenous NMY-2::GFP. Left panel, medial plane Lifeact:mKate2, center, cortical NMY-2::GFP, right panel, cortical …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.027
Video 7
Actomyosin gel dynamics in the C. elegans zygote after 14 hr mlc-4(RNAi).

Cortical and medial planes of an embryo expressing both Lifeact::mKate2 and endogenous NMY-2::GFP. Left panel, medial plane Lifeact:mKate2, center, cortical NMY-2::GFP, right panel, cortical …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.028

Tables

Table 1

Best fit gel material parameters, bootstrapping. The median values together with the standard 68% confidence bounds of the distribution of the bootstrap data are given.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.020

Pseudocleavage

Cytokinesis

non RNAi

non RNAi

τ, min

< 0.5 (n.d.)

2.26 (1.89, 2.71)

β τ, min

0.626 (0.577, 0.7)

0.646 (0.548, 0.713)

, μm

4.72 (3.12, 6.09)

1.74 (1.37, 2.44)

nop-1 RNAi

nop-1 RNAi

τ, min

n.d. *

< 0.5 (n.d.)

β τ, min

n.d. *

0.771 (0.694, 2.75)

, μm

n.d. *

2.67 (1.7, 11.5)

ani-1 RNAi

ani-1 RNAi

τ, min

< 0.5 (n.d.)

0.989 (0.555, 1.79)

β τ, min

1.45 (0.969, 18)

0.724 (0.636, 0.929)

, μm

12.3 (6.39, 58.4)

3.38 (2.97, 6.16)

mlc-4 (57 hr) RNAi

mlc-4 (57 hr) RNAi

τ, min

< 0.5 (n.d.)

4.76 (3.67, 6.6)

β τ, min

0.467 (0.451, 0.503)

0.637 (0.567, 0.768)

, μm

2.75 (2.38, 4.1)

6.58 (5.31, 6.85)

mlc-4 (79 hr) RNAi

mlc-4 (79 hr) RNAi

τ, min

n.d. *

< 0.5 (n.d.)

β τ, min

n.d. *

0.916 (0.82, 1.04)

, μm

n.d. *

3.12 (2.49, 4.18)

  1. *n.d. denotes parameters which could not be determined,

  2. < 0.5 (n.d.) denotes parameters which could not be determined, but could be determined to be below 0.5 (see Figure 3—figure supplement 1b),

  3. denotes values that could be determined but that were not well constrained.

Table 2

Best fit gel material parameters, no bootstrapping. The mean values together with its 95% confidence bounds are given.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17807.021

Pseudocleavage

Cytokinesis

non RNAi

non RNAi

τ, min

< 0.5 (n.d.)

2.34 (1.74, 3.14)

β τ, min

0.59 (0.513, 0.806)

0.652 (0.541, 0.764)

, μm

5.38 (3.27, 8.85)

1.69 (1.04, 2.75)

nop-1 RNAi

nop-1 RNAi

τ, min

n.d. *

< 0.5 (n.d.)

β τ, min

n.d. *

0.738 (0.0.614, 0.862)

, μm

n.d. *

1.79 (0.64, 5.03)

ani-1 RNAi

ani-1 RNAi

τ, min

< 0.5 (n.d.)

1.01 (0.989, 1.03)

β τ, min

1.31 (0.428, 2.19)

0.74 (0.588, 0.892)

, μm

10.4 (4.91, 21.9)

4.08 (2.68, 6.2)

mlc-4 (57 hr) RNAi

mlc-4 (57 hr) RNAi

τ, min

< 0.5 (n.d.) **

4.37 (3.08, 6.21)

β τ, min

0.454 (0.437, 0.47)

0.614 (0.501, 0.727)

, μm

2.24 (1.87, 2.67)

5.81 (5.02, 6.72)

mlc-4 (79 hr) RNAi

mlc-4 (79 hr) RNAi

τ, min

n.d. *

< 0.5 (n.d.)

β τ, min

n.d. *

0.97 (0.931, 1.01)

, μm

n.d. *

2.98 (2.88, 3.08)

  1. *n.d. denotes parameters which could not be determined,

  2. < 0.5(n.d.) denotes parameters which could not be determined, but could be determined to be below 0.5 (see Figure 3—figure supplement 1b),

  3. denotes values that could be determined but that were not well constrained. Caption for Videos 1Videos 1 to 7

Download links