1. Genes and Chromosomes
  2. Plant Biology
Download icon

Presence versus absence of CYP734A50 underlies the style-length dimorphism in primroses

  1. Cuong Nguyen Huu
  2. Christian Kappel
  3. Barbara Keller
  4. Adrien Sicard
  5. Yumiko Takebayashi
  6. Holger Breuninger
  7. Michael D Nowak
  8. Isabel Bäurle
  9. Axel Himmelbach
  10. Michael Burkart
  11. Thomas Ebbing-Lohaus
  12. Hitoshi Sakakibara
  13. Lothar Altschmied
  14. Elena Conti
  15. Michael Lenhard Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Potsdam, Germany
  2. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  3. RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Japan
  4. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  5. University of Oslo, Norway
  6. Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Germany
  7. Gartenbau Ebbing-Lohaus, Germany
Short Report
Cited
6
Views
1,915
Comments
0
Cite as: eLife 2016;5:e17956 doi: 10.7554/eLife.17956

Abstract

Heterostyly is a wide-spread floral adaptation to promote outbreeding, yet its genetic basis and evolutionary origin remain poorly understood. In Primula (primroses), heterostyly is controlled by the S-locus supergene that determines the reciprocal arrangement of reproductive organs and incompatibility between the two morphs. However, the identities of the component genes remain unknown. Here, we identify the Primula CYP734A50 gene, encoding a putative brassinosteroid-degrading enzyme, as the G locus that determines the style-length dimorphism. CYP734A50 is only present on the short-styled S-morph haplotype, it is specifically expressed in S-morph styles, and its loss or inactivation leads to long styles. The gene arose by a duplication specific to the Primulaceae lineage and shows an accelerated rate of molecular evolution. Thus, our results provide a mechanistic explanation for the Primula style-length dimorphism and begin to shed light on the evolution of the S-locus as a prime model for a complex plant supergene.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17956.001

eLife digest

Flowers are highly specialized structures that many plants use to reproduce. Male organs called stamens on the flowers make pollen that can be transferred – usually by insect carriers or the wind – to a female structure called the stigma on another plant. However, since many flowers contain both male and female organs, it is also possible for the pollen to land on the stigma of the same flower, leading to a process called “self-fertilization”.

Many plants have developed mechanisms that prevent self-fertilization. For example, primroses produce two different types of flowers that arrange their stamens and stigmas differently. The stigma sits on the top of a stalk known as the style. Some primroses produce flowers with short stamens and a long style, resulting in the stigma being located high up in the flower (“pin” flowers), while others produce flowers with a short style and long stamens (“thrum” flowers). Primrose pollen is carried by insects and the different lengths of the styles and stamens make it more likely that pollen from a pin flower will land on the stigma of a thrum flower instead of a pin flower (and vice versa).

Although primrose flowers have fascinated botanists for centuries, the genes responsible for making the two types of flower had not been identified. Genetic studies indicated that different genes control the length of the stamens and style. However, these genes appear to be very close to each other on primrose DNA, which made it difficult to study them individually.

Huu et al. identified a gene called CYP734A50 that is responsible for the difference in style length in the flowers of a primrose called Primula veris. The gene is only present in the plants that have thrum flowers across a wide range of primrose species and genetic mutations that inactivate the gene in these plants result in flowers with longer styles. CYP734A50 encodes an enzyme that breaks down plant hormones called brassinosteroids, which normally promote growth. Treating thrum flowers with brassinosteroids increased the length of the styles. Future challenges are to identify the other genes that are responsible for producing pin and thrum flowers and to understand how this group of genes evolved.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17956.002

Introduction

Heterostyly is a prominent, wide-spread adaptation to promote outbreeding (Barrett, 2002, 1992). Individuals of heterostylous species belong to two or three morphs with reciprocal reproductive-organ arrangement and intra-morph incompatibility (Barrett, 2002). Since Darwin’s seminal book on The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species (Darwin, 1877), Primula (primroses) has been the prime model for studying heterostyly (Barrett, 1992; Gilmartin, 2015; Weller, 2009). Heterostyly in Primula is controlled by the S-locus supergene that likely comprises five tightly linked genes, determining style length (the so-called G locus), anther height, pollen size and male and female intra-morph incompatibility (Figure 1A; Figure 1—figure supplement 1) (Ernst, 1936; Lewis and Jones, 1992). The S-morph haplotype carries dominant alleles at all loci, resulting in short styles due to reduced cell elongation (Webster and Gilmartin, 2006) and anthers at the mouth of the flower; the L-morph haplotype carries the recessive alleles, causing long styles and low anthers. S-morphs are heterozygous for the two haplotypes, and L-morphs homozygous recessive; the absence of homozygotes for the S-morph haplotype likely results from a recessive lethal mutation on this haplotype (Kurian and Richards, 1997). Efficient fertilization is only possible in inter-morph crosses. A candidate for a causal distyly gene has been described from Fagopyrum (Yasui et al., 2012); also, S-locus linked sequences have been identified from Primula and Turnera (Labonne and Shore, 2011; Labonne et al., 2009; Li et al., 2007, 2015; Nowak et al., 2015). However, in Primula no causal distyly gene has been isolated, and no plausible mechanistic explanation for style length dimorphism is available in any species, hampering progress in understanding the evolution of the S-locus supergene.

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all
Identification of CYP734A50 as an S-morph and style-specific gene.

(A) Dissected P. veris L- (left) and S-morph flowers (right), showing reciprocal differences in style length and anther position (yellow arrowheads). Blue arrowheads indicate stigmas on top of styles. (B) Expression levels of CYP734A50 in P. veris based on RNA-seq (= 3 biological replicates each). See also Figure 1—source data 1. (C) Expression of CYP734A50 and TUBULIN in dissected floral organs. Full gel images and qRT-PCR quantification based on three biological replicates are shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 2 and 3.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17956.003

Results and discussion

We performed transcriptome sequencing on styles versus corolla tubes including fused stamens from P. veris L- and S-morphs. Candidates for the G locus were selected based on stronger expression in S-morph styles than S-morph corollas and both organs in L-morphs; this identified 11 genes, seven of which were almost exclusively expressed in S-morphs (Figure 1—source data 1). We focussed on transcript DN148700_c0_g1, encoding CYP734A50 as a member of the cytochrome P450 CYP734A-family that degrade brassinosteroids (Ohnishi et al., 2006; Thornton et al., 2011), a class of plant hormones promoting cell elongation. No reads mapping to CYP734A50 were detected in L-morph samples (Figure 1B; Figure 1—source data 1). RT-PCR confirmed specific expression in styles of S-morphs of P. veris and the closely related P. vulgaris (Figure 1C; Figure 1—figure supplement 2; Figure 1—figure supplement 3). Genotyping P. veris and P. vulgaris individuals indicated that the gene was present in each of 154 P. veris S-morphs from a natural population exhibiting very short linkage disequilibrium close to the S-locus (Nowak et al., 2015), while none of the five exons could be amplified in any of 151 L-morph plants; the same was seen in 41 S- and 40 L-morph plants of P. vulgaris (Figure 2A,B; Figure 2—figure supplement 1). A public genome-sequencing dataset of P. vulgaris contained essentially no reads mapping to CYP734A50 from L-morph samples; in S-morph samples, the read coverage of CYP734A50 exons was only half as deep as for a related CYP gene (see below) (Figure 2—source data 1). Together, these observations indicate that the hemizygous CYP734A50 locus is only present on the S-morph haplotype in strict linkage to the dominant G allele.

Figure 2 with 6 supplements see all
Co-segregation of CYP734A50 with the style phenotype.

(AC) PCR-genotyping of individuals with the indicated phenotypes of P. veris (A), P. vulgaris (B) and P. forbesii (C). ‘Long homo (UK)’ are naturally occurring long homostyles from England; ‘long homo mutant’ are long homostyles from the commercially grown population. ‘Long homo’ P. forbesii are long-homostylous putative recombinants found in our experimental population. Multiplex PCR amplified CYP734A50 exons (arrowheads) and ITS as an internal control. Enlarged arrowhead marks absence of exon 4 in the mutant. Asterisk in (B) marks a segregating L-morph individual. (D) Expression of CYP734A50 in dissected floral organs of naturally occurring long homostyles, S- and L-morphs of P. vulgaris, normalized to α-TUBULIN. Values are mean ± SD from three biological replicates. (E,F) PCR-genotyping of individuals with the indicated phenotypes from species in Primula sect. Primula (E) and Primula sect. Aleuritia (F). Long homostylous species are indicated in bold. Multiplex PCR was performed using primers to amplify exon 3 of CYP734A50 (arrowhead) and ITS as an internal control. Full gel images are shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Specificity of PCR amplification for CYP734A50 is shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Each set of plants was genotyped at least twice independently.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17956.008

Heterostyly evolved only once in the genus Primula (Mast et al., 2006). Thus, the same causal genes should co-segregate with morph phenotypes in all heterostylous Primula species. To test this for CYP734A50, we sequenced style transcriptomes of the distantly related P. forbesii S- and L-morphs (divergence time P. verisP. forbesii ~20–25 Mya [de Vos et al., 2014]). Again, the P. forbesii CYP734A50 homologue was exclusively expressed in styles of S-, but not L-morphs (Figure 1C; Figure 1—source data 1; Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Each of its five exons was PCR-amplified from 10 P. forbesii S-morphs, but none of 10 L-morphs (Figure 2C; Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Genome sequencing of pooled S- versus L-morphs detected no CYP734A50-specific reads in L-morphs, and read coverage in S-morphs was only half that of a closely related gene (Figure 2—source data 1). Thus, the presence/absence polymorphism of CYP734A50 has been maintained as a trans-specific polymorphism in strict linkage with the G locus over more than 20 million years of evolution, indicating that it is under strong balancing selection, as predicted for a causal heterostyly locus (Mast and Conti, 2006).

The hypothesis that CYP734A50 represents the G locus and limits cell expansion by degrading brassinosteroids makes three testable predictions. First, loss of CYP734A50 activity should lengthen styles; second, S-morph styles should contain lower amounts of active brassinosteroids than L-morph styles; third, cell expansion of S-morph styles should be rescued by brassinosteroid treatment.

We assayed the CYP734A50 genotype in seven derived long homostyles with independent evolutionary origins (Mast et al., 2006). Classic models predict that long homostyles originate via recombination in the S locus affecting both the G and the linked female-compatibility locus, hence they are self-compatible (Barrett, 1992; Lewis and Jones, 1992); by contrast, in self-incompatible long homostyles only the G locus should be affected by mutation or recombination (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Indeed, in Primula sect. Aleuritia (Mast et al., 2001; Richards, 2003), CYP734A50 was present in all tested S-, but none of the L-morphs of the heterostylous P. frondosa (n = 5 each) and P. farinosa (n = 5 each), and in none of the long-homostylous P. scotica (n = 8) and P. halleri (n = 9) (Figure 2F; Figure 2—figure supplement 2; Figure 2—figure supplement 3). Similarly in Primula sect. Primula, CYP734A50 was present in all S-, but none of the L-morphs of the heterostylous P. elatior (n = 15 each) and P. juliae (n = 2 each), nor in the homostylous P. grandis (n = 11) (Figure 2E; Figure 2—figure supplement 2; Figure 2—figure supplement 3). Our P. forbesii population included self-compatible long homostyles; as expected, none of these (= 6) contained the CYP734A50 locus (Figure 2C; Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Natural P. vulgaris populations including long-homostyles occur in two regions in southern England (Crosby, 1940, 1949) (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). Unexpectedly, the CYP734A50 locus was present in all tested long homostyles and in the S-morphs, but in none of the L-morphs from both regions (Figure 2B). However, quantitative RT-PCR on RNA from styles of the three morphs indicated strongly reduced CYP734A50 expression in the long homostyles compared to S-morphs (Figure 2D). This suggests that a promoter mutation or epigenetic silencing of CYP734A50 is responsible for the long-style phenotype, providing an alternative route to the formation of self-compatible long homostyles in nature (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). We newly identified long-homostylous, yet apparently self-incompatible mutants from commercially grown P. vulgaris and P. x pruhoniciana (Figure 3B,C; Figure 2—figure supplement 5). Exon 4 of CYP734A50 was deleted in both, and no full-length transcript could be detected in the P. vulgaris mutants (Figure 2B; Figure 2—figure supplement 5). Lastly, we used virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) to downregulate CYP734A50 expression in P. forbesii (Figure 2—figure supplement 6). Two treated S-morph individuals showed reduced CYP734A50 expression and formed longer styles than mock-treated or virus-treated S-morphs with unaffected CYP734A50 expression (Figure 2—figure supplement 6). When the P. veris gene was overexpressed in tobacco, leaf and stem growth were not reduced as seen for other CYP734A family members (Ohnishi et al., 2006; Thornton et al., 2011), likely reflecting the considerable sequence divergence of the P. veris CYP734A50 protein (see below); this mirrors the failure of certain mouse SRY alleles to induce correct male development in a different genetic background (Albrecht et al., 2003). Thus, the CYP734A50 presence/absence polymorphism strictly cosegregates with the morph type in all heterostylous species sampled across the Primula phylogeny, and the gene is absent or inactivated in all seven cases of derived long homostyly. Together with the VIGS results, this strongly supports the conclusion that CYP734A50 is the G locus of the Primula heterostyly supergene that determines the style-length polymorphism.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Endogenous brassinosteroid content in styles and response to exogenous brassinosteroid treatment in P. vulgaris.

(A) Castasterone levels in styles of P. vulgaris. Values are mean ± SD from four biological replicates. (B) Anther height, style and style-cell lengths of plants with the indicated phenotypes after brassinolide (BL) treatment. Numbers of flowers used for stamen and style-length measurements are indicated in the bars. Six cells from 10 styles each were measured, except for long homostyle mutant (four styles). Values are mean ± SD. Samples were compared using a two-sided t-test assuming unequal variance, followed by Bonferroni correction. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. (C,D) Flower phenotypes (C) and style cells (D) from the indicated treatments. Representative cells are marked in yellow. Scale bars: 5 mm (C), 100 μm (D). A replicate experiment using P. forbesii is shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17956.016

If CYP734A50 degrades brassinosteroids, S-morph styles should contain less active brassinosteroids than L-morph styles. While castasterone was present in L-morph styles, it was virtually undetectable in S-morph styles (Figure 3A); brassinolide was undetectable in styles of either morph. When treating developing P. vulgaris and P. forbesii flowers with brassinolide, treated S-morphs developed significantly longer styles in a concentration-dependent manner; by contrast, styles of L-morph plants did not show a consistent response, as did corolla-tubes in either morph, indicating that exogenous brassinolide treatment specifically enhances growth of S-morph styles (Figure 3B,C; Figure 3—figure supplement 1). This effect was entirely due to increased cell elongation after brassinolide treatment (Figure 3D; Figure 3—figure supplement 1).

P. veris and P. forbesii genome and transcriptome sequences identified a closely related CYP734A50 paralogue, CYP734A51, in both morphs (Figure 2—source data 1). A molecular phylogeny of angiosperm CYP734A proteins found in sequenced genomes indicated that CYP734A50 arose via a gene duplication specific to the Primula lineage (Figure 4; Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Like the male sex-determining gene SRY in mammals (O'Neill and O'Neill, 1999; Tucker and Lundrigan, 1995), a causal heterostyly gene present on only one of the two homologous chromosomes in a non-recombining region should be subject to two opposing effects. The effective population size for such a gene is approximately one fourth that of unlinked diploid genes, resulting in reduced efficacy of selection and stronger drift, including the accumulation of repetitive elements (Uyenoyama, 2005); at the same time, purifying selection should maintain the function of the gene. Indeed, the four introns of P. veris CYP734A50 were exceptionally long and contained multiple transposon-derived repetitive sequences (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Comparing P. veris and P. forbesii CYP734A50 gave a Ka/Ks ratio of 0.56, considerably higher than that of CYP734A51 at 0.31. This difference was entirely due to a higher rate of non-synonymous substitutions for CYP734A50 (p<0.01), while the rate of synonymous substitutions was indistinguishable (Figure 4—source data 1). Similarly, Tajima’s relative rate test indicated that CYP734A50 had accumulated significantly more amino-acid exchanges than CYP734A51 since their duplication (Figure 4). We used branch-site tests 1 and 2 developed by Zhang et al., 2005 on the subtree shown in Figure 4 to determine whether this was likely due to relaxed constraints or to positive selection on CYP734A50 genes. No evidence for positive selection was found for the CYP734A50 branches or the branch separating the two CYP734A50 genes from their CYP734A51 paralogues based on likelihood ratio test 2 (Figure 4; Figure 4—source data 2). By contrast, relaxed constraints were supported for the PfoCYP734A50 branch by test 1 (orange branch in Figure 4). While rigorously ruling out positive selection would likely require sequences of the paralogues from more Primula species, based on the above results we favour the explanation that the faster rate of molecular evolution of CYP734A50 proteins is due to a reduced efficacy of purifying selection as predicted by theory.

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all
Phylogenetic analysis of CYP734A-like proteins.

Molecular phylogeny of CYP734A50-related proteins based on Neighbour Joining. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths (below branches) measured as number of substitutions per site. Numbers next to nodes indicate percent support from bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates). Cyan brackets with asterisks show significant differences in evolutionary rates compared to CYP734A7 (bold) as outgroup as assessed by Tajima’s relative rate test (p<0.01). CYP734A7 causes BR-deficient phenotypes when overexpressed (Ohnishi et al., 2006). The orange branch shows evidence for relaxed constraint, but not for positive selection based on branch-site tests 1 and 2. The full tree is shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Full results of branch-site tests 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 4—source data 2.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17956.018

Thus, our combined evidence indicates that CYP734A50 represents the G locus in the Primula heterostyly supergene, whose expression in S-morph styles causes brassinosteroid degradation, limiting cell expansion and style elongation (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Evolutionarily, CYP734A50 arose via a lineage-specific gene duplication and presumably gain of style-specific expression. Two main models have been proposed to explain the evolutionary origin of distyly. While they differ in the sequence of events, assuming either that morphological features evolved first (Lloyd and Webb, 1992) or that intra-morph incompatibility arose first (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1979), they both postulate that the first morphological change was the reduction of style length by a dominant mutation. The proposed duplication and gain of style-specific expression of CYP734A50 in the ancestor of the Primulaceae likely represents this dominant style-shortening mutation. As such, CYP734A50 is a rare example of an identified causal locus in a supergene underlying an adaptive polymorphism (Schwander et al., 2014) that opens the way for understanding the evolutionary origin of the Primula S-locus as an iconic case of a complex supergene.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

The P. veris plants used for RNA-seq analysis were from a commercially grown line obtained from Jungpflanzen Braun (Kurzlipsdorf, Germany) and were cultivated in the field in the Botanical Garden at the University of Potsdam. P. veris plants for testing co-segregation of the CYP734A50 presence/absence polymorphism with the S-locus genotype were from a semi-natural population in Park Sanssouci, Potsdam (Nowak et al., 2015).

P. vulgaris plants for sampling styles for brassinosteroid measurements and for BR treatment experiments were commercially grown hybrids bred by Gartenbau Ebbing-Lohaus, Heiden, Germany and provided by Gärtnerei Schultz, Potsdam-Sacrow. For the duration of the BR treatment, these were grown in a glasshouse at 18°C. Flowers of naturally occurring long homostyles of P. vulgaris and of neighbouring L- and S-morphs were sampled in Somerset, UK, near Wyke Champflower (grid reference: ST656339; http://www.gridreferencefinder.com/), Wanstrow (ST718405) and Sparkford (ST620285); and in the Chilterns, UK, near Great Missenden (SP897014). Both the commercially grown and naturally occurring P. vulgaris plants were used for testing co-segregation of the CYP734A50 presence/absence polymorphism with the S-locus genotype. Samples for qRT-PCR analysis were collected near Great Missenden (long homostyles); as there were no S-morph individuals in this population, L- and S-morph control plants were collected near Oxford. The experiment shown in Figure 2D used material sampled in 2015. A replicate experiment using material sampled in 2016 confirmed this result. The long homostyle mutant of P. vulgaris carrying the exon-4 deletion was provided by Gartenbau Ebbing-Lohaus, Heiden, Germany, where it arose spontaneously as a single plant in a large P. vulgaris population; the exon-4 deletion mutant of P. x pruhoniciana (a hybrid of P. juliae and P. vulgaris) was found in a local garden center in Berlin. Therefore, both mutants were considered to be independently arisen.

P. forbesii seeds were obtained from the Botanical Garden at the University of Zurich (accession 20050032) and grown in a growth room at 18°C, initially under short-day conditions (8 hr light, 16 hr dark) to stimulate flowering, then under long-day conditions (16 hr light, 8 hr dark). The long homostyle recombinants were found to segregate in this population.

Material for the remaining species (P. elatior, P. juliae, P. grandis, P. frondosa, P. farinosa, P. scotica, P. halleri, and P. vulgaris) was sampled either from living plants cultivated at the Botanical Garden of the University of Zurich, or from material collected in the field. Primula elatior was collected from several (semi) natural populations in Switzerland by BK: Botanical Garden of Zürich (ZH; 47°21’29’’N, 8°33’37’’E), Niederönz (BE; 47°11’41’’N, 7°41’37’’), Staufenbach (BE; 47°08’58’’N, 7°43’53’’E), and Allerheiligenberg (SO; 47°20’58’’, 7°48’50’’E). Primula farinosa was collected from a natural population at Alpe Campolungo (TI, Switzerland; 64°28’15’’N, 8°43’14’’E) by Jurriaan M. de Vos and seeds (accession IT0Z-20050747) were obtained from the Paradisia Alpine Botanical Garden (Cogne, Italy). Primula frondosa seeds (accession XX0Z-20070548) were obtained from the Botanical Garden Hamborn (Duisburg, Germany). Primula grandis seeds (accessions XX0Z-20110194 and XX0Z-20130917) were obtained from the Akureyri Botanical Garden (Akureyri, Island) and the Scottish Rock Garden Club, respectively. Primula halleri was collected from several natural populations across the Binntal (VS, Switzerland; 46°22’46’’N, 8°14’52’’E) by Jurriaan M. de Vos. Primula juliae was collected from a natural population in the Shzoma gorge (Lagodekhi, Georgia; 41°52'27.5''N, 46°19'47.0''E) by Rita Ganz. Primula scotica was collected from a natural population at Faraid Head (Sutherland, Scotland; 58°37’00.05’’N, 4°46’00.00’’W) by Jurriaan M. de Vos. Primula vulgaris was collected from two semi natural populations in Switzerland by BK: Botanical Garden of Zürich (ZH; 47°21’29’’N, 8°33’37’’E) and Niederönz (BE; 47°11’41’’N, 7°41’37’’E).

RNA-seq

Styles and petal tubes with attached anthers of L- and S-morph flowers of P. veris were sampled when petals were between 4 and 10 mm long, corresponding to the time when the difference in style length and anther position develops (Stirling, 1932; Webster and Gilmartin, 2006). Three replicate samples were collected per morph and organ, pooling organs of 25 plants per sample. Similarly, styles of L- and S-morph flowers of P. forbesii were sampled from young, unopened flower buds. One sample per morph was collected. Tissue was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen following manual dissection of the flowers. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). TruSeq RNA libraries were generated according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina) and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2500 instrument (2 × 100 cycles), essentially as described (Mascher et al., 2013).

Primula forbesii genome sequencing

Genomic DNA of S- and L-morph plants of P. forbesii was extractred using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). For sequencing one NextSeq library each was generated per morph as described by the manufacturer (Illumina) and sequenced on a NextSeq500 instrument (paired-end mode, 2 × 150 cycles). In addition, a TruSeq DNA library was constructed for the S-morph as described by the manufacturer (Illumina); sequencing was performed using an Illumina HiSeq2500 instrument (paired-end mode, 2 × 100 bp reads), essentially as described (Mascher et al., 2013).

Bioinformatic analysis

RNA-seq data were processed using Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014) to remove adapter sequences. Quality control was done using FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Transcriptome assembly was done separately for P. veris and P. forbesii using Trinity version 2.1.1 (Grabherr et al., 2011). Assemblies were further explored using Trinity downstream analysis scripts to estimate abundances using Kallisto (Bray et al., 2016) and to obtain differential gene expressions for P. veris samples by comparing all samples to S-morph style ones using DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014). Genes with higher expression in S-morph styles for all three comparisons having a p-value below 0.05 were considered as G locus candidates. Functional annotations for those genes were based on tblastx search against TAIR10 cDNA sequences. PveCYP734A50 exons were identified based on the P. veris draft genome (Nowak et al., 2015). The corresponding P. forbesii PfoCYP734A50 was identified by blastn and tblastx alignments. PveCYP734A50 and PfoCYP734A50 coding sequences were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and are included in Supplementary file 2. They are also available in GenBank under accession numbers KX589238, KX589239, KX589240 and KX589241. PveCYP734A50 intron lengths were compared to genome-wide P. veris structural gene annotations (Nowak et al., 2015). Repeats and transposable elements in the PveCYP734A50 locus were identified by comparison to RepBase (Jurka et al., 2005) version 21.03 using CENSOR (Kohany et al., 2006). The CYP734A50 gene was named as such after consultation with Dr. David Nelson (http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html).

P. forbesii S-morph DNA-seq data obtained using HiSeq2500 sequencing were assembled using SOAPdenovo2 version 2.04 (Luo et al., 2012) to identify PfoCYP734A50 exons. Close CYP734A50 homologs for both P. veris and P. forbesii were identified by tblastx alignments against the corresponding genome and transcriptome assemblies.

Public P. vulgaris DNA-seq data from NCBI SRA projcect PRJEB9683 for L- and S-morphs were mapped against the PveCYP734A50 and PveCYP734A51 exons separated by stretches of 100 Ns using bwa mem (Li, 2013). Our P. forbesii DNA-seq data was mapped the same way against the PfoCYP734A50 and PfoCYP734A51 exons. Mapped reads were counted to obtain a relative abundance estimate.

Expression analysis

To determine gene expression in different floral organs, recently opened flowers of L- and S-morph plants were manually dissected and the tissue frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was performed using oligo(dT) priming and SuperScript III (Invitrogen). RT-PCR products were separated on agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the Bioline SensiMix SYBR Low-ROX kit and a Roche LightCycler LC480. The Primula TUBULIN gene was used as a reference. Primers used for RT-PCR are indicated in Supplementary file 1.

Phylogenetic analysis of CYP734A50 homologues

CYP homologs were identified within the Phytozome version 11 (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov) by aligning CYP734A50 and CYP734A51 sequences from P. veris and P. forbesii using blastp. Multiple sequence alignments were generated using MUSCLE. Sequences used and multiple-sequence alignments are available as Supplementary files 25. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 14.64379199 is shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method and are in the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The analysis involved 109 amino acid sequences (Supplementary files 25). All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 183 positions in the final dataset. Pair-wise Ka/Ks ratios were determined from MUSCLE-generated multiple-sequence alignments of coding sequences using the Nei-Gojobori model with uniform rates and complete deletion of missing data. Number of substitutions were extracted and the total number of sites calculated from the Ka and Ks values and the absolute numbers of substitutions; these were used in the Fisher’s exact tests in Figure 4—source data 1. Qualitatively similar results were obtained when calculating Ka and Ks values using only pair-wise deletions. Evolutionary rates were compared between CYP734A50 and CYP734A51 using Tajima’s relative rate test (Tajima, 1993). Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016).

To test for selection we performed branch-site tests 1 and 2 as described by Zhang et al. (2005), using codeml implemented in PAML (Yang, 2007) on the subtree shown in Figure 4. We performed a likelihood ratio test comparing model A with variable ω in the foreground branch to its null model with fixed ω value to identify positive selection. We did the same test comparing model A to model M1a to identify overall relaxed constraints or positive selection. Codon alignments were done using TranslatorX (Abascal et al., 2010) in combination with MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004). Full results of the tests are shown in Figure 4—source data 2.

PCR-based genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaf material using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). PCR-genotyping was performed using the primers indicated in Supplementary file 1. Primers for genotyping for presence/absence of CYP734A50 across the different species in Figure 2 were designed based on conservation between the P. veris and P. forbesii CYP734A50 sequences. To monitor successful PCR amplification, internal-control primers targeting ITS were included in each PCR reaction. PCR products were separated on agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide or UView 6x Loading Dye (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc) staining.

Brassinosteroid measurements and treatment

Styles were sampled from mixed-stage unopened flower buds of L- and S-morph P. vulgaris plants, ranging from a petal length of about 10 mm to buds just before opening. Tissue was frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. After weighing, the tissue was freeze-dried. Extraction, semi-purification, and quantification of castasterone and brassinolide were carried out as described (Sawai et al., 2014). While castasterone was readily detectable in styles of L-morph plants, but virtually undetectable in styles of S-morph plants, brassinolide was undetectable in styles of either morph.

For the brassinosteroid treatment experiment, young flower buds of commercially grown P. vulgaris and of P. forbesii were injected every other day with solutions containing 1 nM, 100 nM or 10 μM homobrassinolide (dissolved in DMSO), 0.1% Tween-20 or a mock solution containing 0.1% DMSO (corresponding to the DMSO concentration in the solution with 10 μM homobrassinolide), 0.1% Tween. Injections were started on flower buds with petals of about 8 and 3 mm length, respectively. Once fully opened, flowers were bisected, photographed and organ sizes were determined using ImageJ. Styles were excised and placed in 1x PBS for processing for confocal microscopy.

To measure cell lengths in styles, styles were briefly dewaxed in chloroform and stained with propidium iodide. Stained tissue was imaged with a Zeiss LSM 710 using a 488 nm excitation laser line while emission was detected at 560–750 nm for FM4-64. Style-cell lengths were determined from digital micrographs using ImageJ.

Virus-induced gene silencing

To prepare vectors for virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), a fragment containing exon 4 and exon 5 of CYP734A50 in P. forbesii was cloned and inserted into vector TRV2 (Liu et al., 2002) to produced TRV2-CYP734A50. As a control, a fragment of the PHYTOENE DESATURASE (PDS) gene was used. Primer sequences are provided in Supplementary file 1. Vectors TRV1 (Liu et al., 2002), TRV2-CYP734A50 and TRV2-PDS were then introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Preparation steps for VIGS assay were done as described (Padmanabhan and Dinesh-Kumar, 2009). P. forbesii plants were grown under long-day conditions (16 hr light, 8 hr dark) at 18°C. Agrobacterium cultures were infiltrated into inflorescence stems using a 2-ml syringe with needle. The treatment was repeated after one week. In total 22 plants were infected with Agrobacterium.

Flowers from treated plants showing rescued style length were photographed. Style length and anther height were measured using ImageJ. 6–8 styles were dissected for total RNA extraction and the expression analysis was performed as described above with primers in Supplementary file 1.

Statistical analysis

No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes; rather, the maximum number of available plants was used. The number of replicates performed is indicated in the respective figure legends. No data points were excluded. Trait values in the BL treatment and VIGS experiment departed from normality in some groups, based on a Shapiro-Wilk-test; also, variance were unequal between some of the groups. Student's t-test is robust to deviations from normality when sample sizes are large (n > 25) and comparable between the groups, both of which is the case here, and when using a two-sided test (Sawilowsky and Blair, 1992); also a correction for unequal variances is available. We therefore compared style lengths and anther heights of BL-treated to mock-treated groups using a two-sided t-test assuming unequal variances. Similarly, we compared style lengths and anther heights of VIGS-treated S-morph plants with mock-treated S-morph plants, and untreated S-morph plants with mock-treated S-morph plants using a two-sided t-test assuming unequal variances. The Bonferroni method was used to correct for multiple testing.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
    Sry expression level and protein isoform differences play a role in abnormal testis development in C57BL/6J mice carrying certain Sry alleles
    1. KH Albrecht
    2. M Young
    3. LL Washburn
    4. EM Eicher
    (2003)
    Genetics 164:277–288.
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
    The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species
    1. C Darwin
    (1877)
    London: John Murray.
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
    Heterostylie-Forschung
    1. A Ernst
    (1936)
    Zeitschrift Für Induktive Abstammungs- Und Vererbungslehre 71:156–230.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01848862
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
    The genetics of heterostyly
    1. D Lewis
    2. DA Jones
    (1992)
    In: SCH Barrett, editors. Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 129–150.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86656-2_5
  23. 23
    Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM
    1. H Li
    (2013)
    arXiv 13033997.
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
    The evolution of heterostyly
    1. DG Lloyd
    2. CJ Webb
    (2014)
    In: SCH Barrett, editors. Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 151–178.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86656-2_6
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
    The draft genome of Primula veris yields insights into the molecular basis of heterostyly
    1. MD Nowak
    2. G Russo
    3. R Schlapbach
    4. CN Huu
    5. M Lenhard
    6. E Conti
    (2015)
    Genome Biology, 16, 10.1186/s13059-014-0567-z.
  35. 35
    Whatever happened to SRY?
    1. MJ O'Neill
    2. RJ O'Neill
    (1999)
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 56:883–893.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s000180050481
  36. 36
  37. 37
    Virus-induced gene silencing as a tool for delivery of dsRNA into plants
    1. M Padmanabhan
    2. SP Dinesh-Kumar
    (2009)
    Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2009, 10.1101/pdb.prot5139.
  38. 38
    Primula
    1. J Richards
    (2003)
    Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
    Studies of Flowering in Heterostyled and Allied Species Part 1. The Primulaceae
    1. J Stirling
    (1932)
    Publ Hartley Bot Lab.
  43. 43
    Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis
    1. F Tajima
    (1993)
    Genetics 135:599–607.
  44. 44
  45. 45
    The nature of gene evolution on the mammalian Y chromosome: lessons from Sry
    1. PK Tucker
    2. BL Lundrigan
    (1995)
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 350:221–227.
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1995.0155
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51

Decision letter

  1. Christian S Hardtke
    Reviewing Editor; University of Lausanne, Switzerland

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "Presence versus absence of CYP734A50 underlies the style-length dimorphism in primroses" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Detlef Weigel as the Senior editor and three reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors. Two of the three reviewers have agreed to reveal their identity: Elena Kramer (Reviewer #2) and John Pannell (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

As you can see from their comments, all reviewers (and the Senior Editor) are very positive about your work and support publication. They have some suggestions for improvements, which should hopefully not too difficult to address. You can find those remarks in the reviews below.

Reviewer #1:

This manuscript by Lenhard and co-workers is an excellent piece of work that reports the identification of the causal variation within a supergene locus. Inherently, this is a difficult task because of the lack of recombination events within a supergene locus, but here the authors do a superb job in working around this. Basically, they were looking for presence-absence signs of gene expression in tissue-specific RNAseq experiments. This allowed them to home in on a candidate gene that codes for a brassinosteroid-degrading enzyme, which made sense because brassinosteroids are crucial for cell elongation and the heterostyly phenotypes of primula are due to differential cell elongation. Subsequently, they could show that the presence-absence of the pertinent CYP734A50 gene holds up in S- and L-morphs across several primula species as well as mutant lines, and follow up physiological assays support a direct role of CYP734A50 in the phenotype. Thus, despite the absence of a classic genetic linkage analysis, the identity of CYP734A50 as the causal locus has solid support from cross-species/variety mapping. There are only a few, minor improvements that I would like to ask for:

Introduction: "Darwin's seminal book". Maybe add the book's title here, I doubt many colleagues are aware of it. Also, the doi in the corresponding reference is missing.

The S-morph haplotype is dominant, but only exists in heterozygous state in nature, why is that? Because of incompatibility, or because of a detrimental dosage phenotype of CYP734A50 homozygosity?

Regarding the amplification of CYP734A50 genes from different Primula species, was this initially done with degenerate primers? And then the genotyping was performed with specific primers based on the amplified fragments? I think the authors should provide a list of oligonucleotides used to amplify different fragments in different genotypes.

Regarding the brassinosteroid deficiency in S-morphs, why did the authors only determine the castasterone level? Why not brassinolide itself? Is castasterone the main active brassinosteroid in Primula? And is it the direct substrate for CYP734A50, or is it brassinolide? Please specify and amend accordingly.

Reviewer #2:

In this manuscript, the authors provide a very thorough analysis of the genetic basis for style length differences segregating among individuals of Primula. This phenomenon, termed distyly, has only evolved once in this genus, although it has also evolved independently in other taxa. The authors used differential expression to identify a candidate gene, CYP734A50, that is only expressed in S-morphs. This cytochrome P450 is involved in degrading brassinosteroids, a class of hormones often associated with cell elongation. The authors further demonstrate that 1) style-specific expression of the gene is associated with the S-morph phenotype of multiple Primula species, 2) the presence/absence of the locus specifically segregrates with the S-morph phenotype in multiple species, 3) suppression of activity lengthens styles, 4) presence of activity results in lower brassinosteroid concentrations, 5) application of excess brassinosteroids can rescue the short style phenotype, and 6) presence/absence of the locus correlates with cell length. The data are clearly presented and discussed. I think that this is a really lovely paper that addresses a classic question in plant genetics and pollination biology. I have no suggestions for major revisions.

Reviewer #3:

This manuscript reveals the identity of the gene responsible for the expression of short styles in distylous species of the primrose family. The gene, CYP734A50, degrades brassinosteroids, which promote cell elongation. Absence of this gene leads to short short-styled individuals; indeed, the gene was found only in short-styled individuals of several species of the genus Primula, and estimates of transcript read coverage were consistent with the gene being hemizygous in short-styled individuals. Also consistent with the inference that CYP734A50 is indeed the gene responsible for style length in Primula is the fact that it was absent not only in typical long-styled individuals, but also in long homostyled individuals of P. forbesii or P. grandis (though interestingly not in those of P. vulgaris, suggesting that homostyly in the latter may have evolved via a different route). Virus-induced gene silencing of CYP734A50 showed reduced expression of the gene in short-styled plants, and the development of longer styles. Moreover, the brassinosteroid castasterone, which is degraded by CYP734A50, was present in L-morph but not S-morph styles. I am not qualified to comment on many of the methodological details behind these aspects of the study, but the case made by the authors seems convincing on the whole, and I found the study exciting. It is also very well written.

The authors carry out an analysis of sequence variation at CYP734A50 and find that its Ka/Ks ratio is twice as high as that found for its paralog CYP734A51. I would like to see the P-value for this analysis given in the text itself. The authors infer from this difference that there has been reduced purifying selection on CYP734A50, consistent with an hypothesis of its likely reduced effective population size. But how can they rule out the alternative hypothesis that the greater number of non-synonymous substitutions have in fact been driven by selection, e.g., in establishing the novel function of this gene in stylar tissue of the S-morph? It would be interesting to know when the substitutions actually occurred? Are they common to all species of Primula, i.e., did they occur at the base of the tree, or have different non-synonymous substitutions accumulated in different lineages during diversification of the genus? The latter possibility would perhaps be consistent with the authors' hypothesis of relaxed purifying selection, whereas the former would be more consistent with their fixation by selection. This would be well worth considering with more analytic rigour.

The main results of this paper are, I think, very exciting and represent an important advance. However, I feel the authors do not do their paper justice in their discussion of its evolutionary implications. It is commonly thought that distyly almost always evolves through the selection of a dominant mutation that suppresses stylar growth in the S-morph, and that, subsequently, anther lengths of the two morphs are adjusted, i.e., that the starting point is a population with approach herkogamy, and that the first step towards distyly is the spread of a dominant mutation that reduces style length. The authors' findings are entirely consistent with these theoretical explanations, yet they make too little of this fact. (Here, it would also be worth explaining briefly to the reader why the first mutation is more likely to be one that reduces rather than extends style length.) The authors might also stress the significance of the fact that the dominant action of CYP734A50 is nicely explained by the gene duplication that their study reveals.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17956.032

Author response

As you can see from their comments, all reviewers (and the Senior Editor) are very positive about your work and support publication. They have some suggestions for improvements, which should hopefully not too difficult to address. You can find those remarks in the reviews below.

Reviewer #1:

This manuscript by Lenhard and co-workers is an excellent piece of work that reports the identification of the causal variation within a supergene locus. Inherently, this is a difficult task because of the lack of recombination events within a supergene locus, but here the authors do a superb job in working around this. Basically, they were looking for presence-absence signs of gene expression in tissue-specific RNAseq experiments. This allowed them to home in on a candidate gene that codes for a brassinosteroid-degrading enzyme, which made sense because brassinosteroids are crucial for cell elongation and the heterostyly phenotypes of primula are due to differential cell elongation. Subsequently, they could show that the presence-absence of the pertinent CYP734A50 gene holds up in S- and L-morphs across several primula species as well as mutant lines, and follow up physiological assays support a direct role of CYP734A50 in the phenotype. Thus, despite the absence of a classic genetic linkage analysis, the identity of CYP734A50 as the causal locus has solid support from cross-species/variety mapping. There are only a few, minor improvements that I would like to ask for:

Introduction: "Darwin's seminal book". Maybe add the book's title here, I doubt many colleagues are aware of it. Also, the doi in the corresponding reference is missing.

We have added the book title. As we could not locate a doi for the book, we have provided a link to the website where a digital version is available.

The S-morph haplotype is dominant, but only exists in heterozygous state in nature, why is that? Because of incompatibility, or because of a detrimental dosage phenotype of CYP734A50 homozygosity?

The absence of S-morph haplotype homozygotes is likely due to a recessive-lethal mutation on this haplotype, as suggested by genetic analysis. We have added an explanation to the Introduction.

Regarding the amplification of CYP734A50 genes from different Primula species, was this initially done with degenerate primers? And then the genotyping was performed with specific primers based on the amplified fragments? I think the authors should provide a list of oligonucleotides used to amplify different fragments in different genotypes.

We did not use degenerate primers; rather, the primers for genotyping for presence/absence of CYP734A50 across the different species in Figure 2 were designed based on high conservation between the P. veris and P. forbesii CYP734A50 sequences in exon 3. We have added more detailed information about which primers were used on which sequences to the list of oligonucleotides in Supplementary file 1.

Regarding the brassinosteroid deficiency in S-morphs, why did the authors only determine the castasterone level? Why not brassinolide itself? Is castasterone the main active brassinosteroid in Primula? And is it the direct substrate for CYP734A50, or is it brassinolide? Please specify and amend accordingly.

We also attempted to measure brassinolide levels; however, it was undetectable in both morphs. We have added this clarification to the Results section. Unfortunately, we do not know what is the direct substrate for CYP734A50.

Reviewer #3:

The authors carry out an analysis of sequence variation at CYP734A50 and find that its Ka/Ks ratio is twice as high as that found for its paralog CYP734A51. I would like to see the P-value for this analysis given in the text itself. The authors infer from this difference that there has been reduced purifying selection on CYP734A50, consistent with an hypothesis of its likely reduced effective population size. But how can they rule out the alternative hypothesis that the greater number of non-synonymous substitutions have in fact been driven by selection, e.g., in establishing the novel function of this gene in stylar tissue of the S-morph? It would be interesting to know when the substitutions actually occurred? Are they common to all species of Primula, i.e., did they occur at the base of the tree, or have different non-synonymous substitutions accumulated in different lineages during diversification of the genus? The latter possibility would perhaps be consistent with the authors' hypothesis of relaxed purifying selection, whereas the former would be more consistent with their fixation by selection. This would be well worth considering with more analytic rigour.

To test for significance of the different Ka/Ks ratios, we determined Ka and Ks values for the pair-wise comparisons of CYP734A50 and CYP734A51 genes, determined the absolute number of substitutions and calculated the total number of synonymous and non-synonymous sites from these. Note that to do so, we could not use the Jukes-Cantor correction, as we had done for the previous version of the manuscript, which explains the slightly different Ka/Ks values given in the text compared to the previous version. Fisher’s exact test was used to test whether there was a difference in the number of non-synonymous substitutions or of synonymous substitutions between the CYP734A50 and the CYP734A51 paralogues. This indicated a significantly higher rate of non-synonymous substitutions in CYP734A50, but no difference for the synonymous substitutions. This conclusion was robust to different treatments of missing data (complete versus pair-wise deletion). The results of this calculation are shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 3.

To address the issue of relaxed purifying versus positive selection more rigorously, we have performed the branch-site tests developed by Zhang et al. as implemented in PAML. While test 1 can detect signatures of either relaxed or positive selection, but cannot discriminate between them, test 2 specifically asks for positive selection. The branch for PfoCYP734A50 shows a significant signal in test 1, but not in test 2. These results are highlighted in Figure 4, and the full test results are included as Figure 4—figure supplement 4. There is no evidence for positive selection acting on the CYP734A50 copies. Therefore, these results indicate to us that the faster rate of protein evolution of the CYP734A50 copies relative to the CYP734A51 paralogues is most likely due to less efficient purifying selection, as predicted by theory.

However, we agree that we likely lack the sampling depth across the Primula phylogeny to fully rule out positive selection.

The main results of this paper are, I think, very exciting and represent an important advance. However, I feel the authors do not do their paper justice in their discussion of its evolutionary implications. It is commonly thought that distyly almost always evolves through the selection of a dominant mutation that suppresses stylar growth in the S-morph, and that, subsequently, anther lengths of the two morphs are adjusted, i.e., that the starting point is a population with approach herkogamy, and that the first step towards distyly is the spread of a dominant mutation that reduces style length. The authors' findings are entirely consistent with these theoretical explanations, yet they make too little of this fact. (Here, it would also be worth explaining briefly to the reader why the first mutation is more likely to be one that reduces rather than extends style length.) The authors might also stress the significance of the fact that the dominant action of CYP734A50 is nicely explained by the gene duplication that their study reveals.

We have added a brief discussion of the two competing models for the origin of distyly and pointed out that the proposed duplication and gain of style-specific expression of CYP734A50 in the ancestor of Primulaceae is likely to represent the dominant style-shortening mutation assumed as the first morphological change in both models.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17956.033

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Cuong Nguyen Huu

    1. Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany
    Contribution
    CNH, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Christian Kappel

    1. Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany
    Contribution
    CK, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon 0000-0002-1450-1864
  3. Barbara Keller

    1. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Contribution
    BK, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Adrien Sicard

    1. Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany
    Contribution
    AS, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Yumiko Takebayashi

    1. RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan
    Contribution
    YT, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Holger Breuninger

    1. Department of Plant Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    HB, Acquisition of data, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Michael D Nowak

    1. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    2. Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
    Contribution
    MDN, Provided prepublication access to P. veris genome sequence, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Isabel Bäurle

    1. Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany
    Contribution
    IB, Acquisition of data, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon 0000-0001-5633-8068
  9. Axel Himmelbach

    1. Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, Germany
    Contribution
    AH, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Michael Burkart

    1. Botanical Garden, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
    Contribution
    MB, Acquisition of data, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Thomas Ebbing-Lohaus

    1. Gartenbau Ebbing-Lohaus, Heiden, Germany
    Contribution
    TE-L, Provided the long-homostylous P. vulgaris mutant, Contributed unpublished essential data or reagents
    Competing interests
    TE-L: The owner of Ebbing-Lohaus Gartenbau and an employee of Ebbing-Lohaus Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH.
  12. Hitoshi Sakakibara

    1. RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan
    Contribution
    HS, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Lothar Altschmied

    1. Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, Germany
    Contribution
    LA, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Elena Conti

    1. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Contribution
    EC, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Michael Lenhard

    1. Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany
    Contribution
    ML, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    For correspondence
    1. michael.lenhard@uni-potsdam.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon 0000-0001-8661-6911

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (3100-061674.00/1)

  • Elena Conti

Claraz Foundation

  • Elena Conti

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the staff of the Botanical Garden of the University of Potsdam for plant care and Jurriaan de Vos, Rita Ganz and Annette Becker for material. We thank John Richards for discussion and for suggesting the use of Primula forbesii. We thank Michael Hofreiter and Nils Stein for additional Illumina sequencing, and Ines Walde and Sandra Driesslein for help with library construction and sequencing. This work was supported by initial grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (no. 3100-061674.00/1) and the Claraz Foundation to EC.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christian S Hardtke, Reviewing Editor, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Publication history

  1. Received: May 18, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 21, 2016
  3. Version of Record published: September 6, 2016 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2016, Huu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,915
    Page views
  • 390
    Downloads
  • 6
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Comments

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Genes and Chromosomes
    2. Genomics and Evolutionary Biology
    Xavier Grau-Bové et al.
    Research Article
    1. Developmental Biology and Stem Cells
    Cyrille Ramond et al.
    Research Article