1. Plant Biology

A host basal transcription factor is a key component for infection of rice by TALE-carrying bacteria

  1. Meng Yuan  Is a corresponding author
  2. Yinggen Ke
  3. Renyan Huang
  4. Ling Ma
  5. Zeyu Yang
  6. Zhaohui Chu
  7. Jinghua Xiao
  8. Xianghua Li
  9. Shiping Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, China
  2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Shandong Agricultural University, China
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Meng Yuan
  2. Yinggen Ke
  3. Renyan Huang
  4. Ling Ma
  5. Zeyu Yang
  6. Zhaohui Chu
  7. Jinghua Xiao
  8. Xianghua Li
  9. Shiping Wang
(2016)
A host basal transcription factor is a key component for infection of rice by TALE-carrying bacteria
eLife 5:e19605.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) are sequence-specific DNA binding proteins found in a range of plant pathogenic bacteria, where they play important roles in host-pathogen interactions. However, it has been unclear how TALEs, after they have been injected into the host cells, activate transcription of host genes required for infection success. Here, we show that the basal transcription factor IIA gamma subunit TFIIAγ5 from rice is a key component for infection by the TALE-carrying bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, the causal agent for bacterial blight. Direct interaction of several TALEs with TFIIAγ5 is required for activation of disease susceptibility genes. Conversely, reduced expression of the TFIIAγ5 host gene limits the induction of susceptibility genes and thus decreases bacterial blight symptoms. Suppression or mutation of TFIIAγ5 can also reduce bacterial streak, another devastating disease of rice caused by TALE-carrying X. oryzae pv. oryzicola. These results have important implications for formulating a widely applicable strategy with which to improve resistance of plants to TALE-carrying pathogens.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.001

eLife digest

Around the world, bacterial infections reduce the yields of many important crops like rice, tomatoes, peppers and citrus fruits. Xanthomonas is a particularly widespread genus of bacteria; it consists of almost 30 species that cause diseases in more than 400 plant hosts, including bacterial blight and bacterial streak in rice plants.

Plants do have an immune system that is able to detect invading microbes and trigger a defensive response against them; however, many disease-causing bacteria have evolved ways to avoid or counteract this response. For example, at least five Xanthomonas species use proteins called transcription activator-like effectors (or TALEs for short) to infect their host plants. The bacterial proteins are essentially injected into the plant’s cells where they activate specific plant genes that make the host more susceptible to infection. Like other organisms, plants use proteins called transcription factors to switch genes on or off. However, it was not clear if the TALEs hijack the plant’s transcriptional machinery to activate these “susceptibility genes” or if they activate the genes via some other means.

Now, Yuan et al. show that TALE-carrying bacteria do make use of at least one of rice’s own transcription factors to cause bacterial blight and bacterial streak. The transcription factor in question is rice’s version of a general transcription factor, called TFIIAγ, which is essential for gene activation in plants, animals and fungi. Yuan et al. also identify the region of the TALE that binds to the transcription factor, and show that rice plants with lower levels of the transcription factor are protected against bacterial blight and bacterial streak.

Uncovering how disease-causing Xanthomonas bacteria use TALEs to infect plants will hopefully help researchers to develop crop plants that are more resistant to these harmful bacteria. Further work is now needed to see if the gene that encodes TFIIAγ in crop plants can be edited to achieve this goal, or whether genes encoding resistant variants of the protein already exist in other plant species.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.002

Introduction

Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) are important effectors of plant pathogenic bacteria of the genus Xanthomonas (Boch et al., 2009). The bacteria inject TALEs via their Type III secretion system (T3SS) into host cells, where they translocate to the nucleus and bind host gene promoters in a sequence-specific manner. The DNA binding domain consists of variable repeats that together account for a predictable DNA recognition code (Boch et al., 2009; Moscou and Bogdanove, 2009). This property has been exploited for programmable DNA binding, and has allowed targeted genome editing by combining TALE DNA binding domains with nucleases (TALENs) (Maggio and Gonçalves, 2015). TALE-like proteins are not restricted to the genus Xanthomonas, and have also been found in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum (de Lange et al., 2014), and in the endosymbiont Burkholderia rhizoxinica (de Lange et al., 2014; Juillerat et al., 2014). TALE-like proteins thus may play not only antagonistic roles in host-microbe interactions.

Xanthomonas infect many important crops including barley, bean, brassica, cassava, citrus, cotton, mango, pepper, rice, rye, tomato, triticale, and wheat (Schornack et al., 2013; Boch et al., 2014). In rice, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) causes bacterial blight and X. oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xoc) causes bacterial streak, both of which are highly devastating diseases. The recessive resistance gene xa5 is widely used to improve rice resistance to Xoo (Kottapalli et al., 2007). xa5 is a natural allele of the gene for the transcription factor IIA gamma subunit 5 (TFIIAγ5), changing a valine to a glutamine (TFIIAγ5V39E thereafter) (Iyer and McCouch, 2004; Sugio et al., 2007). TFIIA is a basal transcription factor of eukaryotes and it is essential for polymerase II–dependent transcription (Høiby et al., 2007). It consists of two subunits, the large subunit TFIIAαβ and the small subunit TFIIAγ (Li et al., 1999).

Rice TFIIAγ5 has been suggested to be a cofactor that directly enables TALEs to induce host gene expression (Iyer-Pascuzzi and McCouch, 2007), either as a helper of TALE function (Boch et al., 2014), or as a TALE-targeted host gene (Gu et al., 2009). The latter scenario is supported by the finding that the TALE PthXo7 directly activates expression of another TFIIAγ encoding gene, TFIIAγ1 (Sugio et al., 2007).

In this paper, we reveal that TALEs from two Xanthomonas pathogens, Xoo and Xoc directly interact with TFIIAγ5 to activate host susceptibility genes, and that RNAi-mediated suppression or mutation of TFIIAγ5 confers disease resistance. Our results suggest that modifying host TFIIAγ genes by mutation or suppression may provide a widely applicable strategy to improve plant resistance to TALE-carrying pathogens.

Results

TFIIAγ5 is required for TALE-dependent induction of host genes

To assess whether host TFIIAγ is required for TALE-regulated transcriptional activation of rice susceptibility genes, we first assessed how pair of rice near-isogenic lines, IR24 carrying TFIIAγ5 and IRBB5 carrying mutant TFIIAγ5V39E in the IR24 background, responded to 15 different TALE-carrying Xoo strains (Yang and White, 2004). IRBB5 always showed fewer disease symptoms than IR24 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Xoo infection did not induce RNA expression of TFIIAγ5 in IR24 or TFIIAγ5V39E in IRBB5 (Figure 1A), which correlates with the absence of predicted DNA binding motifs for known TALEs in the TFIIAγ5 promoter. In contrast, expression of known disease susceptibility genes Os8N3, TFIIAγ1, OsTFX1, and Os11N3, each of which is targeted by a different TALE (Römer et al., 2010; Sugio et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2006), was always lower in IRBB5 (p<0.01), although not necessarily completely abolished (Figure 1A). Together, these results point to TFIIAγ5 being a host co-factor for TALE-dependent induction of susceptibility genes.

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Effects of TFIIAγ5 on the expression of disease susceptibility genes Os8N3, Os11N3, TFIIAγ1, or OsTFX1, after Xoo infection.

Plants were inoculated with Xoo strain PXO99 (harbouring TALEs PthXo1, PthXo7, and PthXo6), PXO86 (harbouring TALE PthXo3) or PXO61 (harbouring TALE AvrXa7) at the booting (panicle development) stage. It is known that PthXo1, PthXo7, and PthXo6 induce Os8N3, TFIIAγ1, and OsTFX1, respectively, and PthXo3 and AvrXa7 all induce Os11N3. Each bar represents mean (three replicates) ± standard deviation. (A) Mutation of TFIIAγ5 (rice line IRBB5). b, significant difference between IR24 and IRBB5 at p<0.01. (B) TFIIAγ5-RNAi lines. b, significant difference between wild-type (WT) and transgenic plants at p<0.01.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.003

To determine directly the role of TFIIAγ5 in host gene expression, we suppressed its activity by RNA interference (RNAi). Only the expression of TFIIAγ5, but not of TFIIAγ1 was reduced in T0 transgenic plants, and the reduction in TFIIAγ5 expression correlated with enhanced resistance to Xoo PXO99 in T0 and T1 plants (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B,C). TFIIAγ5-RNAi plants also had enhanced resistance to a diverse collection of 13 additional Xoo strains (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D), and Xoo-induced expression of Os8N3 and OsTFX1 was reduced in TFIIAγ5-RNAi plants (Figure 1B). Suppressing TFIIAγ5 did not obviously influence growth and development of the transgenic plants.

TALE DNA-binding motifs have been detected in the promoters of some disease resistance genes, an apparent evolutionary response against TALE-carrying bacteria (Gu et al., 2005; Römer et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2015). Xoo TALE AvrXa23 activates the Xa23 resistance gene, resulting in resistance to Xoo (Wang et al., 2015). To investigate the role of TFIIAγ5 in Xa23 resistance, we crossed rice lines IRBB5, with a xa23 susceptibility and a TFIIAγ5V39E resistance allele, and CBB23, with a Xa23 resistance and a TFIIAγ5 susceptibility allele. F2 plants of genotypes Xa23/Xa23 or Xa23/xa23 were completely resistant to PXO99 in the TFIIAγ5/TFIIAγ5 or TFIIAγ5/TFIIAγ5V39E background, but showed the reduced resistance in the TFIIAγ5V39E/TFIIAγ5V39E background (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A). Consistent with the resistance phenotype, Xa23 expression was rapidly induced by PXO99 in Xa23/Xa23 or Xa23/xa23 plants when they also were of genotype TFIIAγ5/TFIIAγ5 or TFIIAγ5/TFIIAγ5V39E (Figure 1—figure supplement 2B). Xa23 induction was completely lost in TFIIAγ5V39E/TFIIAγ5V39E plants. These results suggest that TFIIAγ5 plays dual roles in Xoo−rice interactions: it is required by TALE-containing Xoo to cause disease, but at the same time it can help to protect against disease in the presence of certain resistance genes that have TALE-binding motifs in their promoters.

Xoo TALEs directly interact with TFIIAγ5

Xoo TALEs typically have an amino-terminal translocation signal (TS), a central repeat region (RR), a transcription factor binding (TFB) region, a nuclear localization signal (NLS), and a carboxyl-terminal transcription activation domain (AD) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1, Figure 2—source data 1) (Yang et al., 2006; Schreiber et al., 2015). When fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain, Xoo TALE PthXo1 on its own could activate reporter gene expression in yeast. This was observed whenever the TS or AD were present, but not with the RR, TFB or NLS (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). This is similar to what has been reported for Xoo TALE AvrXa10 and X. euvesicatoria TALE AvrBs3 (Szurek et al., 2001; Zhu et al., 1998).

We hypothesized that TALEs use TFIIAγ5 directly as a co-factor to induce transcription of susceptibility genes. In yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays, truncated PthXo1, RR-TFB-NLS, lacking transcriptional activation ability, interacted strongly with TFIIAγ5, somewhat less so with the mutant TFIIAγ5V39E, and not at all with the large subunit of TFIIA, TFIIAαβ (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B,C). The interaction with TFIIAγ5 required the TFB (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D).

To determine whether this observation of interaction of a TALE TFB with TFIIAγ5, was general, we isolated the TFB encoding DNA fragments from 14 of the 18 other TALE genes in Xoo pv. PXO99 (Salzberg et al., 2008). These TFBs are 134 to 145 amino acids long, with the Tal7b and Tal8b TFBs predicted to be identical (Figure 2—source data 2). All 14 TFB fragments interacted with TFIIAγ5, but only two (Tal7a and Tal8a) with TFIIAγ5V39E (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E,F). Notably, different from PthXo1, Tal7a and Tal8a interacted equally well with TFIIAγ5 and TFIIAγ5V39E. The TFBs of Tal7a, Tal8a, and PthXo1 differed by 1 to 20 residues from the other 12 TFBs that interacted only with TFIIAγ5 (Figure 2—source data 2).

We confirmed the interactions observed in the Y2H system by transient expression of Myc- and FLAG-labeled proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana, followed by co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) (Figure 2A). We found the interaction of full-length PthXo1 with TFIIAγ5 or TFIIAγ5V39E, of the TFBs of PthXo1, PthXo6, PthXo7, Tal3a, Tal7a, and Tal9e with TFIIAγ5, and of the TFBs of PthXo1 and Tal7a with TFIIAγ5V39E (Figure 2B).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Detection of interactions between rice TFIIAγs and TALEs from Xoo in planta by co-immunoprecipitation.

The protein–protein interaction assays were performed in N. benthamiana leaf cells. Proteins before (input) and after immunoprecipitation (IP) were detected with anti-myc and anti-FLAG antibodies. (A) Interaction of the myc-labelled full-length PthXo1 with FLAG-labelled TFIIAγ5, TFIIAγ5V39E, and mutated rice TFIIAγ1 (TFIIAγ1S47E). (B) Interactions of the myc-labelled TFB regions of six TALEs with FLAG-labelled rice TFIIAγs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.006
Figure 2—source data 1

The defined domains/motifs and sequences of TALE PthXo1 from Xoo strain PXO99.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.007
Figure 2—source data 2

Amino acid sequence alignment of the TFB regions of TALEs from Xanthomonas oryzae strains, composed of either 134 or 145 amino acids.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.008

TALE-dependent induction of host genes requires interaction with TFIIAγ5 but not TFIIAγ1

To learn whether the TFB region of TALEs is directly responsible for TALE-induced host gene expression, we generated recombinant Xoo strains in which the TFB of PthXo1 was replaced with different TFBs, chosen based on their differential interaction with TFIIAγ5 and TFIIAγ5V39E: PthXo1 (TFIIAγ5 > TFIIAγ5V39E), Tal7a (TFIIAγ5 = TFIIAγ5V39E), and PthXo7 and AvrXa23 (TFIIAγ5 but not TFIIAγ5V39E) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B,E,F). In addition, we generated a TFB deletion in PthXo1. The constructs were introduced into Xoo pv. T7174 and KACC10331, both of which lack PthXo1. Rice strain IR24, which carries TFIIAγ5, is strongly susceptible to T7174 and moderately susceptible to KACC10331, while IRBB5, which carries TFIIAγ5V39E, is resistant to both Xoo strains (Figure 3A, Figure 1—figure supplement 1A, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1A).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Effects of the TFB region of TALE PthXo1 on the virulence of Xoo strains and on the expression of rice susceptibility gene in rice−Xoo interaction.

Each bar represents mean (total 30 to 35 leaves from five plants for lesion length; three replicates for gene expression and bacterial growth rate) ± standard deviation. (A) Virulence of wild-type strain T7174 and recombinant strains carrying PthXo1 and its derivatives in IR24 and IRBB5. b, significant difference between T7174 and recombinant strains in each rice line at p<0.01. (B) Growth of different Xoo strains in rice leaves. b, significant difference between 0 day (30 min after infection) and 12 days after infection of each strain at p<0.01. (C) Expression of susceptibility gene Os8N3 after infection of different strains. b, significant difference between non-inoculated (ck) and inoculated (at 48 hr after infection of a strain) plants in each rice line at p<0.01.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.010
Figure 3—source data 1

Effects of leucine residues of PthXo1 TFB region on TALE-mediated infection.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.011

As expected, the deletion control PthXo1-ΔTFB did not change the success of infection by T7174 or KACC10331 (Figure 3A, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1A), while the TFBs from PthXo1 and Tal7a, which can interact with both TFIIAγ5 and TFIIAγ5V39E, enhanced infection success in both hosts, IR24 (TFIIAγ5) and IRBB5 (TFIIAγ5V39E). Consistent with Tal7a, but not PthXo1, interacting equally well with TFIIAγ5 and TFIIAγ5V39E, only the Tal7a TFB caused similar sized lesions in both IR24 and IRBB5 (Figure 3A, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). The TFBs of PthXo7 and AvrXa23, which can interact only with TFIIAγ5, accordingly increased disease symptoms only on IR24. Lesion size in these experiments was correlated with titer of bacterial growth (Figure 3B, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1B) and expression of Os8N3 (Figure 3C, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1C).

The TFB region of the TALEs harbours an imperfect leucine zipper motif, a known protein-protein interaction domain (Schreiber et al., 2015). We generated three TFB mutants of PthXo1, substituting leucine with alanine residues (Figure 3—source data 1A). The muations did, however, not compromise interaction with TFIIAγ5, nor infection success (Figure 3—source data 1B,C).

The other TFIIAγ encoded in the rice genome, TFIIAγ1, shares 86% sequence identity with TFIIAγ5 (Figure 4—source data 1), but has a very restricted expression profile, with highest expression in endosperm and stamens (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). TFIIAγ1 did not interact with full-length or truncated PthXo1 or other Xoo TALE TFBs in yeast or in planta (Figure 2, and Figure 2—figure supplement 1B,E,F).

We produced eight TFIIAγ1 derivatives with TFIIAγ5 substitutions at six positions (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Of 15 TFBs tested, those of PthXo1, Tal3a, Tal7a, Tal8a, Tal9d and Tal9e could interact in yeast with TFIIAγ1S47E, but not with other TFIIAγ1 mutants (Figure 4—figure supplement 2, and Figure 2—figure supplement 1E). Four of these interactions could be confirmed in planta (Figure 2B).

We then generated TFIIAγ1-RNAi plants as well as transgenic plants expressing the TFIIAγ1S47E mutant from TFIIAγ1 regulatory sequence. Both types of plants were morphologically normal. Some T0 TFIIAγ1-RNAi plants showed enhanced resistance to Xoo pv. PXO99 (Figure 4—figure supplement 3). Increased resistance was associated with reduced TFIIAγ1 expression, whereas TFIIAγ5 expression was unaffected (Figure 4—figure supplement 3), which was confirmed in two T1 families (Figure 4A). However, these plants did not show enhanced resistance to other 13 Xoo strains (Figure 4B). This is in agreement with previous suggestions that the TFIIAγ1 promoter is a target of the TALE PthXo7 from PXO99 (Boch et al., 2009; Sugio et al., 2007). PthXo7-induced TFIIAγ1 expression is dependent on TFIIAγ5 (Figure 1).

Figure 4 with 4 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Effects of TFIIAγ1 on response to infections by different Xoo strains.

Plants were inoculated with Xoo at the booting stage. Each bar represents mean (three replicates for gene expression and total 35 to 40 leaves from five plants for lesion length) ± standard deviation. (A) Suppressing TFIIAγ1 enhanced rice resistance to strain PXO99. b, significant difference between wild-type (WT) Zhonghua 11 and transgenic plants at p<0.01. (B) Suppressing TFIIAγ1 did not change rice response to other strains. b, significant difference between WT and transgenic plants at p<0.01. (C) PTFIIAγ1:TFIIAγ1S47E-transgenic plants showed susceptibility to PXO99 and PXO341 compared to IRBB5. b, significant difference between IRBB5 and transgenic plants at p<0.01.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.013
Figure 4—source data 1

Amino acid sequence alignment of basal transcription factor IIA gamma subunit (TFIIAγ) from different species.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.014
Figure 4—source data 2

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TFIIAγ1 coding region of 1419 rice accessions from RiceVarMap (http://ricevarmap.ncpgr.cn).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.015
Figure 4—source data 3

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TFIIAγ5 coding region of 1419 rice accessions from RiceVarMap (http://ricevarmap.ncpgr.cn).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.016

In the background of TFIIAγ5V39E, the TFIIAγ1S47E-transgenic plants showed increased susceptibility to Xoo pv. PXO99 and PXO341 (Figure 4C). The increased susceptibility to PXO99 might be due to an interaction between TFIIAγ1S47E and PthXo1 (Figure 2B) to induce the susceptibility gene Os8N3 (Figure 4—figure supplement 4), while the susceptibility to PXO341 may be explained by another TALE (see the TFBs tested in Figure 2—figure supplement 1E,F) that can interact with TFIIAγ1S47E.

Genetic variation in TFIIAγ5 and TFIIAγ1 genes

We searched the RiceVarMap database of 1419 rice accessions (http://ricevarmap.ncpgr.cn; Zhao et al., 2015) for allelic variation at TFIIAγ1 and TFIIAγ5. There were no non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TFIIAγ1 (Figure 4—source data 2). Thirty-three rice accessions shared the same two non-synonymous SNPs diagnostic for the TFIIAγ5V39E allele (Figure 4—source data 3). Twenty-nine of these belong to the Aus group, which is mainly from South Asia, and the other four accessions belong to the Indica II group, mainly from Southeast Asia (Xie et al., 2015) (Figure 4—source data 3). The regional distribution of the TFIIAγ5V39E resistance allele likely reflects the high disease pressure in these regions.

Xoc TALEs hijack TFIIAγ5 to cause bacterial streak

To learn whether TALEs of other pathogenic bacteria also exploit TFIIAγ5 to cause disease, we investigated the interaction of TFIIAγ5 with TALEs from Xoc, which causes bacterial streak. Xoc pv. RH3 has at least 11 TALE genes based on DNA blot analysis (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). All TFBs of RH3 TALEs (GenBank accession numbers KU163014 to KU163031) interacted with TFIIAγ5 in yeast, and two were confirmed in planta (Figure 5A, and Figure 5—figure supplement 2A). Seven randomly chosen TFBs did not interact with TFIIAγ5V39E or TFIIAγ1, but three interacted with TFIIAγ1S47E in yeast, and at least one in planta (Figure 5A, and Figure 5—figure supplement 2B). Consistent with these results, rice accession IRBB5 (TFIIAγ5V39E) was more resistant to infection by different Xoc strains than IR24 (TFIIAγ5) (Figure 5—figure supplement 2C). TFIIAγ5-RNAi plants also showed enhanced resistance to Xoc, whereas suppressing TFIIAγ1 had no effect on resistance to Xoc (Figure 5B).

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Effect of TFIIAγ on rice-Xoc interaction.

(A) Interactions of myc-labelled TFB regions of TALEs from Xoc RH3 and FLAG-labelled rice TFIIAγs in N. benthamiana leaf cells analysed by CoIP assays. Proteins before (input) and after immunoprecipitation (IP) were detected with anti-myc and anti-FLAG antibodies. (B) TFIIAγ5-RNAi but not TFIIAγ1-RNAi plants showed enhanced resistance to Xoc strains. Each bar represents mean (total 30 to 35 leaves from five plants) ± standard deviation. b, significant difference between wild-type and transgenic plants after infection of a strain at p<0.01. (C) Mutation of TFIIAγ5 (rice line IRBB5) reduced expression of disease susceptibility gene OsSULTR3;6 after infection. Each bar represents mean (three replicates) ± standard deviation. b, significant difference between IR24 and IRBB5 at p<0.01.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.021

A recent study has shown that a major quantitative trait locus for resistance to Xoc col-localizes with TFIIAγ5 (Xie et al., 2014). Two additional studies have revealed that a TALE that occurs in at least 10 sequenced Xoc strains transcriptionally activates the gene for the sulphate transporter OsSULTR3;6, a major susceptibility gene in rice−Xoc interactions (Cernadas et al., 2014; Wilkins et al., 2015). Xoc-induced expression of OsSULTR3;6 was significantly reduced (p<0.01) in IRBB5 relative to IR24 (Figure 5C), suggesting that TALE-containing Xoc also requires TFIIAγ5 to infect rice via TALE-induced expression of host susceptibility genes.

Discussion

TFIIAγ is indispensable for polymerase II–dependent transcription (Li et al., 1999). We have shown here how TALE-carrying Xoo and Xoc exploit rice TFIIAγ5 for activating transcription of downstream susceptibility genes (Figure 6). TALEs from Xoo and Xoc bind to TFIIAγ5 through their TFB regions, and the binding and binding strength are associated with the induction of susceptibility genes. Thus, TFIIAγ5 functions as a key component for TALE-induced host gene expression.

Figure 6
Download asset Open asset
A model showing TFIIAγ5 as a key component of rice infection by Xanthomonas bacteria.

The bacteria hijack rice basal transcription factor TFIIAγ5 (IIAγ) by the transcription factor binding (TFB) region of their TALEs to induce host susceptibility (S) genes for infection. TS, amino-terminal translocation signal; RR, central repeat region; NLS, nuclear localization signal; AD, carboxyl-terminal transcription activation domain. The IIAγ belongs to the transcription pre-initiation complex. This complex consists of transcription factors IIA, which is composed of IIAβα subunit and IIAγ subunit, IIB, IID, IIE, IIF, and IIH, RNA polymerase II (Pol II), and TATA-binding protein (TBP). The binding of transcription pre-initiation complex to the TATA box of promoter was adopted and modified based on Yudkovsky et al. (2000).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605.024

It is striking that the only TFIIAγ5 paralog in rice, TFIIAγ1, apparently functions as a downstream susceptibility gene for Xoo PXO99, such that the TALE PthXo7 directly activates TFIIAγ1 transcription (Sugio et al., 2007), which differs from the protein-protein interaction of several Xoo TALEs with TFIIAγ5.

The recessive disease resistance allele TFIIAγ5V39E confers markedly reduced TALE-dependent induction of downstream susceptibility genes, apparently without compromising the overall activity of TFIIA. The rice accession IRBB5 carrying TFIIAγ5V39E is indistinguishable from the near-isogenic line IR24 in plant morphology and agronomic performance, including heading date, flag leaf length, number of panicles per plant, panicle length, grains per panicle, 1000-grain weight, yield per plant, seed setting rate, grain length, width, and thickness, with only slightly reduced plant height (Supplementary file 1). Here, we have shown that not only the specific point mutant TFIIAγ5V39E has increased Xoo resistance, but also that this can also be achieved by RNAi mediated knockdown of TFIIAγ5. In addition, we have shown that TALEs from other Xanthomonas pathogens, such as Xoc, exploit TFIIAγ5. Alteration of TFIIAγ5 activity, either through the introduction of the TFIIAγ5V39E allele, or through other reduction-of-function mutations, can provide a general strategy for improving rice resistance to TALE-carrying pathogens. TALE-carrying bacteria cause diseases in many other crops (Schornack et al., 2013; Boch et al., 2014). If these bacteria also exploit the host TFIIAγ for infection, modification of TFIIAγ may provide a road to improving disease resistance in other crops as well.

Materials and methods

Plant and bacterial materials

Request a detailed protocol

A pair of near-isogenic lines, IR24 (TFIIAγ5) and IRBB5 (TFIIAγ5V39E), and the variety Zhonghua 11 were used in this study. Plants were grown during the normal rice growing season under natural field conditions in the Experimental Stations of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.

Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Pilipino Xoo strains were used to study rice resistance to bacterial blight disease (Gao et al. 2010; Li et al., 2012). Resistance to Xoc was tested using Chinese strains (Ke et al., 2014). X. campestris pv. campestris strain was used for Southern blot analysis of TALE genes (He et al., 2007). All Xanthomonas strains were grown at 28°C on nutrient agar medium. Antibiotics were used at the following final concentrations as required: ampicillin at 100 μg ml−1, rifampicin at 75 μg ml−1, kanamycin at 25 μg ml−1, and spectinomycin at 50 μg ml−1 when genetic manipulation of bacteria.

Transformation

Request a detailed protocol

To construct RNA interference vector, the 3′ untranslated regions of TFIIAγ5 and TFIIAγ1 were amplified with primers listed in Supplementary file 2 and inserted into vector pDS1301 (Yuan et al., 2010). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice was performed (Lin and Zhang, 2005; Ge et al., 2006).

Pathogen inoculation

View detailed protocol

Xoo inoculation described in more detail at Bio-protocol (Ke et al., 2017). To evaluate reaction of rice plants to Xoo, plants were inoculated with the Xoo strains by the leaf-clipping method at the booting (panicle development) stage (Chen et al., 2002). The disease was scored by measuring the lesion length at 14 days after inoculation. Each bacterial inoculation assay was repeated at least twice. The disease of some plants was also evaluated by analysing bacterial growth based on a count of the colony-forming units as described previously (Sun et al., 2004). For measuring bacterial growth, one Xoo-infected leaf from each plant was examined as one replicate, and a total of three plants for each sample were analysed.

To evaluate Xoc resistance, rice plants were inoculated with Xoc strains by the penetration method using a needleless syringe at the booting stage (Ke et al., 2014). Disease was scored by lesion length at 14 days after inoculation. Each bacterial inoculation assay was repeated twice.

Gene expression analysis

Request a detailed protocol

The 2-cm leaf segments next to the bacterial infection sites in the rice plants were collected for RNA isolation. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted using gene-specific primers (Supplementary file 3) as described previously (Qiu et al., 2007). The expression level of the rice actin gene was used to normalize the measurement of the expression. Each rice sample was a mixture of leaf tissue from at least five plants, with 8 to 10 leaves per plant. For transgenic plants, segments from three to five leaves of the plant were sampled. Each qRT-PCR assay was repeated at least twice, with each repetition having three technical replicates.

Vector construction

Request a detailed protocol

The TALE PthXo1 was cloned into pHM1 vector to produce pHM1pthXo1, and transferred into Xoo strains T7174 and KACC10331 following published method (Yang and White, 2004). The TFB region of PthXo1 was replaced with TFB regions of other TALEs by Gibson assembly (Gibson et al., 2009). The recombinant strains were confirmed by PCR amplification of TALE fragments.

Southern hybridization analysis

Request a detailed protocol

A standard procedure for Southern hybridization of the bacterial DNA was performed (Gu et al., 2009). Genomic DNA from different Xanthomonas strains was digested with SphI, separated by electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gel in TAE buffer, blotted onto a nylon membrane, and hybridized using a 32P-labeled 2.9-kb SphI fragment of PthXo1.

Transactivation activity assay

Request a detailed protocol

The transactivation activity of PthXo1 was analysed in yeast cells as described previously (Deng et al., 2012). The open reading frame of pthXo1 was ligated into pGBKT7 vector and fused in frame with the yeast GAL4 DNA binding domain. The recombinant vector was transformed into yeast strain AH109. The transformed yeast cells were plated on SD/−Trp or SD/−Trp-His medium and cultured for 3 days as described previously (Yuan et al., 2010).

Protein–protein interaction assay

Request a detailed protocol

The interaction between bacterial TALE proteins and host proteins in yeast cells was assayed using MATCHMAKER GAL4 Two-Hybrid System 3 (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) according the manufacturer’s instructions. To construct the interaction vectors, full-length and truncated TALEs and the TFB regions of TALEs and plant genes were amplified using the PCR primers listed in Supplementary file 2. The amplified DNA fragments were first inserted into vector pBluescript (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) for sequencing confirmation. The confirmed bacterial DNA fragments were then ligated into pGBKT7 vector, and the confirmed plant DNA fragments were then ligated into pGADT7 Rec vector. The recombinant pGBKT7 and pGADT7 plasmids were co-transformed into yeast strain AH109 for yeast two-hybrid assays following the lithium acetate method (Yuan et al., 2010). The yeast clones were first scribed on the synthetic defined premixes (SD) medium lacking leucine (L) and tryptophan (W) (−LW). The growth of yeast cells on SD/−LW medium indicated that they carried both pGBKT7 and pGADT7 plasmids. An aliquot (10 μl) of 1:10 diluted stationary phase cultured yeast clones grown on the SD/−LW medium was then scribed on the selective SD medium lacking L, W, histidine (H), and adenine (A) (−LWHA). The growth of yeast cells on SD/−LWHA medium indicated that the examined proteins interacted with each other. The interactions of these proteins were also assessed by examination of β-D-galactopyranoside (X-α-gal) activity and β-galactosidase (LacZ) activity as described previously (Yuan et al., 2010). Each yeast two-hybrid assay was repeated at least twice.

CoIP assays were performed to study the interaction between TALE proteins and plant proteins in planta. The 9×myc DNA fragment was amplified from pN-TAPa vector (Rubio et al., 2005) by using myc-specific primers (Supplementary file 2) and inserted into the SmaI- and BamHI-digested pU1301 vector (Cao et al., 2007), resulting in a vector that we named pU1301-9myc. The DNA fragments of full-length, truncated, or TFB region of TALEs were ligated into the pU1031-9myc vector. The DNA fragments of plant genes were ligated into the pU1301-3FLAG vector (Yuan et al., 2010). The recombinant vectors were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was performed by infiltration into N. benthamiana leaves using a needleless syringe (Yuan et al., 2010). CoIP assays were conducted using anti-FLAG antibody (RRID:AB_259529, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and anti-myc antibody (Tiangen, Beijing, China) as described previously (Yuan et al., 2010). Each CoIP assay was repeated at least twice.

Site-directed mutation

Request a detailed protocol

Mutations of plant genes and the Xoo TALE genes were made using the GeneTailor Site-Directed Mutagenesis System (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) as described previously (Yuan et al., 2011). The mutagenic primers are listed in Supplementary file 2.

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Differences between samples were analysed for statistical significance by t-test in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). Correlations between gene transcript level and disease level were calculated using CORREL analysis in the Microsoft Office Excel program.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Meng Yuan

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
    Contribution
    MY, Designed and performed most of the experiments, Analysed the data, Drafted the manuscript
    For correspondence
    myuan@mail.hzau.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Yinggen Ke

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
    Contribution
    YK, Helped to generate transgenic rice plants and Xoo mutant, analyse protein-protein interactions and amplify the transcription activator-like effector
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Renyan Huang

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
    Contribution
    RH, Helped to generate transgenic rice plants and Xoo mutant, analyse protein-protein interactions, and amplify the transcription activator-like effector
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Ling Ma

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
    Contribution
    LM, Helped to generate transgenic rice plants and Xoo mutant, analyse protein-protein interactions, and amplify the transcription activator-like effector
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Zeyu Yang

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
    Contribution
    ZY, Helped to generate transgenic rice plants and Xoo mutant, analyse protein-protein interactions, and amplify the transcription activator-like effector
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Zhaohui Chu

    State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China
    Contribution
    ZC, Helped to generate transgenic rice plants and Xoo mutant, analyse protein-protein interactions, and amplify the transcription activator-like effector
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8320-7872

  7. Jinghua Xiao

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
    Contribution
    JX, Provided biochemical and molecular analysis support and management and final approval of the manuscript
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Xianghua Li

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
    Contribution
    XL, Provided biochemical and molecular analysis support and management and final approval of the manuscript
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Shiping Wang

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
    Contribution
    SW, Supervised the project, Designed some of the experiments, Interpreted data, Revised the manuscript
    For correspondence
    swang@mail.hzau.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8743-3129

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31100875)

  • Meng Yuan

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31371926)

  • Meng Yuan

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2012CB114005)

  • Meng Yuan
  • Shiping Wang

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2014PY039)

  • Meng Yuan

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFD0100903)

  • Shiping Wang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31330062)

  • Shiping Wang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Gongyou Chen of Shanghai Jiao Tong University for kindly providing Xanthomonas bacterial strains and Professor Qifa Zhang of Huazhong Agricultural University and the eLife editorial team for their help in editing the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31330062, 31100875, and 31371926), the National Program on the Development of Basic Research in China (2012CB114005), the Special Key Project by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFD0100903), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2014PY039).

Version history

  1. Received: July 13, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 21, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 29, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 22, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: October 10, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Yuan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,497
    views
  • 1,128
    downloads
  • 96
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Meng Yuan
  2. Yinggen Ke
  3. Renyan Huang
  4. Ling Ma
  5. Zeyu Yang
  6. Zhaohui Chu
  7. Jinghua Xiao
  8. Xianghua Li
  9. Shiping Wang
(2016)
A host basal transcription factor is a key component for infection of rice by TALE-carrying bacteria
eLife 5:e19605.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19605

Categories and tags

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology

    Guanidine production by plant homoarginine-6-hydroxylases

    Dietmar Funck, Malte Sinn ... Jörg S Hartig
    Research Article

    Metabolism and biological functions of the nitrogen-rich compound guanidine have long been neglected. The discovery of four classes of guanidine-sensing riboswitches and two pathways for guanidine degradation in bacteria hint at widespread sources of unconjugated guanidine in nature. So far, only three enzymes from a narrow range of bacteria and fungi have been shown to produce guanidine, with the ethylene-forming enzyme (EFE) as the most prominent example. Here, we show that a related class of Fe2+- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (2-ODD-C23) highly conserved among plants and algae catalyze the hydroxylation of homoarginine at the C6-position. Spontaneous decay of 6-hydroxyhomoarginine yields guanidine and 2-aminoadipate-6-semialdehyde. The latter can be reduced to pipecolate by pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase but more likely is oxidized to aminoadipate by aldehyde dehydrogenase ALDH7B in vivo. Arabidopsis has three 2-ODD-C23 isoforms, among which Din11 is unusual because it also accepted arginine as substrate, which was not the case for the other 2-ODD-C23 isoforms from Arabidopsis or other plants. In contrast to EFE, none of the three Arabidopsis enzymes produced ethylene. Guanidine contents were typically between 10 and 20 nmol*(g fresh weight)-1 in Arabidopsis but increased to 100 or 300 nmol*(g fresh weight)-1 after homoarginine feeding or treatment with Din11-inducing methyljasmonate, respectively. In 2-ODD-C23 triple mutants, the guanidine content was strongly reduced, whereas it increased in overexpression plants. We discuss the implications of the finding of widespread guanidine-producing enzymes in photosynthetic eukaryotes as a so far underestimated branch of the bio-geochemical nitrogen cycle and propose possible functions of natural guanidine production.

    1. Plant Biology

    Rapid translocation of NGR proteins driving polarization of PIN-activating D6 protein kinase during root gravitropism

    Ivan Kulich, Julia Schmid ... Jiří Friml
    Research Article

    Root gravitropic bending represents a fundamental aspect of terrestrial plant physiology. Gravity is perceived by sedimentation of starch-rich plastids (statoliths) to the bottom of the central root cap cells. Following gravity perception, intercellular auxin transport is redirected downwards leading to an asymmetric auxin accumulation at the lower root side causing inhibition of cell expansion, ultimately resulting in downwards bending. How gravity-induced statoliths repositioning is translated into asymmetric auxin distribution remains unclear despite PIN auxin efflux carriers and the Negative Gravitropic Response of roots (NGR) proteins polarize along statolith sedimentation, thus providing a plausible mechanism for auxin flow redirection. In this study, using a functional NGR1-GFP construct, we visualized the NGR1 localization on the statolith surface and plasma membrane (PM) domains in close proximity to the statoliths, correlating with their movements. We determined that NGR1 binding to these PM domains is indispensable for NGR1 functionality and relies on cysteine acylation and adjacent polybasic regions as well as on lipid and sterol PM composition. Detailed timing of the early events following graviperception suggested that both NGR1 repolarization and initial auxin asymmetry precede the visible PIN3 polarization. This discrepancy motivated us to unveil a rapid, NGR-dependent translocation of PIN-activating AGCVIII kinase D6PK towards lower PMs of gravity-perceiving cells, thus providing an attractive model for rapid redirection of auxin fluxes following gravistimulation.

    1. Plant Biology

    The structural repertoire of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici effectors revealed by experimental and computational studies

    Daniel S Yu, Megan A Outram ... Simon J Williams
    Research Article

    Plant pathogens secrete proteins, known as effectors, that function in the apoplast or inside plant cells to promote virulence. Effector recognition by cell-surface or cytosolic receptors results in the activation of defence pathways and plant immunity. Despite their importance, our general understanding of fungal effector function and recognition by immunity receptors remains poor. One complication often associated with effectors is their high sequence diversity and lack of identifiable sequence motifs precluding prediction of structure or function. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated that fungal effectors can be grouped into structural classes, despite significant sequence variation and existence across taxonomic groups. Using protein X-ray crystallography, we identify a new structural class of effectors hidden within the secreted in xylem (SIX) effectors from Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol). The recognised effectors Avr1 (SIX4) and Avr3 (SIX1) represent the founding members of the Fol dual-domain (FOLD) effector class, with members containing two distinct domains. Using AlphaFold2, we predicted the full SIX effector repertoire of Fol and show that SIX6 and SIX13 are also FOLD effectors, which we validated experimentally for SIX6. Based on structural prediction and comparisons, we show that FOLD effectors are present within three divisions of fungi and are expanded in pathogens and symbionts. Further structural comparisons demonstrate that Fol secretes effectors that adopt a limited number of structural folds during infection of tomato. This analysis also revealed a structural relationship between transcriptionally co-regulated effector pairs. We make use of the Avr1 structure to understand its recognition by the I receptor, which leads to disease resistance in tomato. This study represents an important advance in our understanding of Fol-tomato, and by extension plant–fungal interactions, which will assist in the development of novel control and engineering strategies to combat plant pathogens.