Focal Adhesions: Bridging the gap
- University of Toronto, Canada
The extracellular matrix is a scaffold-like framework that surrounds and supports the cells in an animal’s tissues and organs. The cells attach to this matrix via structures on the cell surface known as focal adhesions; these structures contain a number of proteins including integrins.
Integrins span the surface membrane of the cell and essentially connect the extracellular matrix with the cell’s internal support structure: the cytoskeleton. Changing the interactions between focal adhesions and the underlying cytoskeleton is crucial for a variety of processes in living cells (Stehbens and Wittmann, 2012; Etienne-Manneville, 2013). This dynamic interplay relies on the ability of the cytoskeleton to bind temporarily to the focal adhesions in a highly regulated manner. Now, in eLife, Anna Akhmanova, Benjamin Goult and colleagues at Utrecht University, University of Kent and University of Turku unravel some of the molecular details behind these interactions (Bouchet et al., 2016).
The cytoskeleton of an animal cell is a complex network of interlinking filaments, including microfilaments and hollow cylinders called microtubules that extend throughout most of the cell. Microfilaments are made from a protein called actin, and the actin cytoskeleton plays a major role in focal adhesion assembly and maturation (reviewed in Gardel et al., 2010).
However, research conducted over a decade ago implicated microtubules as potent regulators of focal adhesions in migrating cells. For a cell to move within a tissue, its existing focal adhesions must be broken down. Microtubules were shown to repeatedly target growing focal adhesions, halting growth and initiating their disassembly and cause them to stop growing and disassemble instead (Kaverina et al., 1998; 1999). This occurred across the entire cell, but was more common at the cell’s rear. These findings suggested that the targeting events may efficiently control how focal adhesions behave across the entire cell (Kaverina and Straube, 2011).
How microtubules get to the focal adhesions, however, has been a long-standing question. It is plausible that microtubules grow along actin filaments towards focal adhesions (Etienne-Manneville, 2013). Another possible mechanism could be stabilization of microtubule tips at the cell surface membrane. In fact, protein complexes that contain several membrane-associated proteins and proteins that bind to the end of microtubules are believed to target microtubules to focal adhesions (Lim et al., 2016; Lansbergen et al., 2006; Stehbens et al., 2014). These multi-subunit structures are termed CMSCs (short for cortical microtubule stabilization complexes), but the exact linker of CMSCs to focal adhesions was previously unknown.
Akhmanova, Goult and colleagues, including Benjamin Bouchet as first author, have now identified two major players that bridge microtubules to the focal adhesions (Bouchet et al., 2016). First, Bouchet et al. demonstrated that the CMSC can only assemble if the adhesion site is under mechanical tension. Indeed, small molecule drugs that suppress the molecular motors that generate this tension also prevent the assembly of CMSCs. This finding led Bouchet et al. to ask whether force-bearing molecules in the focal adhesions were directly involved in assembling and localizing the CMSCs. The answer to this question was yes: talin, a core component of focal adhesions, can link to microtubules by binding to an adaptor protein in the CMSC called KANK1 (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
The role of the talin-KANK1 interaction in controlling the architecture of microtubules.
(A) The cortical microtubule stabilization complex (CMSC) is a collection of proteins that associates with the plasma membrane (PM) of human cells (top panel). Individual components of the complex are shown in different shades of blue, while microtubule end-binding proteins are shown in light green. Focal adhesions are multi-protein assemblies containing integrins (shown in red) that connect the cell to the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). Talin and vinculin (shown in yellow and purple, respectively) link integrins to the actin cytoskeleton. Bouchet et al. report that a mechanically sensitive adaptor protein talin must interact with another protein, called KANK1 (orange), to link the CMSC to focal adhesions. This interaction prevents microtubules from growing too much at the edge of the cell (bottom panel). The green arrows depict growing microtubules, and the speed of microtubule growth is depicted by the size of the arrowhead. (B) If the talin-KANK1 interaction is disrupted, CMSC components are not recruited to focal adhesions and the CMSC cannot capture microtubules (top panel). Disrupting the talin-KANK1 interaction does not, however, stop focal adhesions from assembling. Disrupting the talin-KANK1 interaction leads to the microtubules growing faster and becoming disorganized at the cell’s edge (bottom panel).
Several domains of the talin protein can stretch and relax to buffer the mechanical tension applied to the molecule. This means that mechanical forces can alter how talin interacts with other proteins (del Rio et al., 2009). Bouchet et al. mapped exactly where KANK1 binds to talin, and found that KANK1 binds to a part of the talin molecule called the rod domain. Applied tension causes the rod domain to unfold, exposing a hidden site that can bind the actin-associated protein vinculin, and reinforcing the actin anchoring (Yao et al., 2016).
Mutation analysis then confirmed that talin and KANK1 interact in cells, allowing Bouchet et al. to identify mutant versions of the proteins that do not interact with each other. These disruptive mutations had a dramatic effect on the organization of the CMSC and microtubule dynamics in human cells grown in the laboratory (Figure 1B). Replacing the cells’ own talin with the mutant that could not bind to KANK1 excluded KANK1 from the adhesion sites and also prevented the other CMSC components from accumulating at focal adhesions. Furthermore, the disruption of the CMSCs coincided with the microtubules becoming less organized – particularly at the cell periphery – and growing faster. Together, these findings demonstrate that the interaction between talin and KANK1 bridges the CMSC to the adhesion sites, and controls the dynamics of microtubules throughout the cell.
However, several questions remain to be answered. Does the talin-KANK1 interaction play a role in regulating focal adhesion dynamics across a cell? Does this interaction control cell shape and migration? These and other unresolved questions should still be addressed in future studies. Without a doubt, elucidating how microtubules regulate cellular behavior via focal adhesions will advance our understanding of how cells work, and may also help to identify new therapeutic targets to suppress diseases such as cancer.
References
-
Microtubules in cell migrationAnnual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 29:471–499.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155711
-
Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migrationAnnual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 26:315–333.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.011209.122036
-
Targeting, Capture, and Stabilization of Microtubules at Early Focal AdhesionsJournal of Cell Biology 142:181–190.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.142.1.181
-
Microtubule targeting of substrate contacts promotes their relaxation and dissociationJournal of Cell Biology 146:1033–1043.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.5.1033
-
Regulation of cell migration by dynamic microtubulesSeminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 22:968–974.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.09.017
-
Prickle1 promotes focal adhesion disassembly in cooperation with the CLASP–LL5β complex in migrating cellsJournal of Cell Science 129:3115–3129.https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.185439
-
Targeting and transport: how microtubules control focal adhesion dynamicsJournal of Cell Biology 198:481–489.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201206050
Article and author information
Author details
Sergey V Plotnikov
Publication history
Copyright
© 2016, Armitage et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,384
- views
-
- 222
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Focal Adhesions: Bridging the gap
eLife 5:e19733.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19733
Further reading
-
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates gene expression programs in response to ligand binding. Endogenous and synthetic ligands, including covalent antagonist inhibitors GW9662 and T0070907, are thought to compete for the orthosteric pocket in the ligand-binding domain (LBD). However, we previously showed that synthetic PPARγ ligands can cooperatively cobind with and reposition a bound endogenous orthosteric ligand to an alternate site, synergistically regulating PPARγ structure and function (Shang et al., 2018). Here, we reveal the structural mechanism of cobinding between a synthetic covalent antagonist inhibitor with other synthetic ligands. Biochemical and NMR data show that covalent inhibitors weaken—but do not prevent—the binding of other ligands via an allosteric mechanism, rather than direct ligand clashing, by shifting the LBD ensemble toward a transcriptionally repressive conformation, which structurally clashes with orthosteric ligand binding. Crystal structures reveal different cobinding mechanisms including alternate site binding to unexpectedly adopting an orthosteric binding mode by altering the covalent inhibitor binding pose. Our findings highlight the significant flexibility of the PPARγ orthosteric pocket, its ability to accommodate multiple ligands, and demonstrate that GW9662 and T0070907 should not be used as chemical tools to inhibit ligand binding to PPARγ.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.
