Computationally designed high specificity inhibitors delineate the roles of BCL2 family proteins in cancer

  1. Stephanie Berger  Is a corresponding author
  2. Erik Procko
  3. Daciana Margineantu
  4. Erinna F Lee
  5. Betty W Shen
  6. Alex Zelter
  7. Daniel-Adriano Silva
  8. Kusum Chawla
  9. Marco J Herold
  10. Jean-Marc Garnier
  11. Richard Johnson
  12. Michael J MacCoss
  13. Guillaume Lessene
  14. Trisha N Davis
  15. Patrick S Stayton
  16. Barry L Stoddard
  17. W Douglas Fairlie
  18. David M Hockenbery
  19. David Baker  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Washington, United States
  2. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
  3. LaTrobe Institute for Molecular Science, Australia
  4. The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Australia

Abstract

Many cancers overexpress one or more of the six human pro-survival BCL2 family proteins to evade apoptosis. To determine which BCL2 protein or proteins block apoptosis in different cancers, we computationally designed three-helix bundle protein inhibitors specific for each BCL2 pro-survival protein. Following in vitro optimization, each inhibitor binds its target with high picomolar to low nanomolar affinity and at least 300-fold specificity. Expression of the designed inhibitors in human cancer cell lines revealed unique dependencies on BCL2 proteins for survival which could not be inferred from other BCL2 profiling methods. Our results show that designed inhibitors can be generated for each member of a closely-knit protein family to probe the importance of specific protein-protein interactions in complex biological processes.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Stephanie Berger

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    berger389@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3738-5907
  2. Erik Procko

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daciana Margineantu

    Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Erinna F Lee

    Department of Chemistry and Physics, LaTrobe Institute for Molecular Science, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Betty W Shen

    Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alex Zelter

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Daniel-Adriano Silva

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kusum Chawla

    Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marco J Herold

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jean-Marc Garnier

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Richard Johnson

    Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Michael J MacCoss

    Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Guillaume Lessene

    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1193-8147
  14. Trisha N Davis

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4797-3152
  15. Patrick S Stayton

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Barry L Stoddard

    Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. W Douglas Fairlie

    Department of Chemistry and Physics, LaTrobe Institute for Molecular Science, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. David M Hockenbery

    Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. David Baker

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    dabaker@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7896-6217

Funding

National Institutes of Health (P41GM103533)

  • Stephanie Berger
  • Erik Procko
  • David Baker

Australian Research Council (FT150100212)

  • Erinna F Lee

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM115545)

  • Betty W Shen
  • Barry L Stoddard

National Institutes of Health (R01 CA158921-04)

  • Daciana Margineantu
  • David M Hockenbery

Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA1-10-0040)

  • Stephanie Berger
  • Erik Procko
  • David Baker

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI-027779)

  • Stephanie Berger
  • Erik Procko
  • David Baker

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship Program)

  • Stephanie Berger

Worldwide Cancer Research (15-0025)

  • Erinna F Lee
  • W Douglas Fairlie

Cancer Council Victoria (1057949)

  • Erinna F Lee
  • W Douglas Fairlie

Pew Charitable Trusts

  • Daniel-Adriano Silva

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología

  • Daniel-Adriano Silva

National Health and Medical Research Council (1024620)

  • Erinna F Lee

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2016, Berger et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,359
    views
  • 1,115
    downloads
  • 71
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Stephanie Berger
  2. Erik Procko
  3. Daciana Margineantu
  4. Erinna F Lee
  5. Betty W Shen
  6. Alex Zelter
  7. Daniel-Adriano Silva
  8. Kusum Chawla
  9. Marco J Herold
  10. Jean-Marc Garnier
  11. Richard Johnson
  12. Michael J MacCoss
  13. Guillaume Lessene
  14. Trisha N Davis
  15. Patrick S Stayton
  16. Barry L Stoddard
  17. W Douglas Fairlie
  18. David M Hockenbery
  19. David Baker
(2016)
Computationally designed high specificity inhibitors delineate the roles of BCL2 family proteins in cancer
eLife 5:e20352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20352

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20352

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Zijing Wang, Bihan Xia ... Jilin Yang
    Research Article

    Bestrophin isoform 4 (BEST4) is a newly identified subtype of the calcium-activated chloride channel family. Analysis of colonic epithelial cell diversity by single-cell RNA-sequencing has revealed the existence of a cluster of BEST4+ mature colonocytes in humans. However, if the role of BEST4 is involved in regulating tumour progression remains largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that BEST4 overexpression attenuates cell proliferation, colony formation, and mobility in colorectal cancer (CRC) in vitro, and impedes the tumour growth and the liver metastasis in vivo. BEST4 is co-expressed with hairy/enhancer of split 4 (HES4) in the nucleus of cells, and HES4 signals BEST4 by interacting with the upstream region of the BEST4 promoter. BEST4 is epistatic to HES4 and downregulates TWIST1, thereby inhibiting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in CRC. Conversely, knockout of BEST4 using CRISPR/Cas9 in CRC cells revitalises tumour growth and induces EMT. Furthermore, the low level of the BEST4 mRNA is correlated with advanced and the worse prognosis, suggesting its potential role involving CRC progression.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Bruno Bockorny, Lakshmi Muthuswamy ... Senthil K Muthuswamy
    Tools and Resources

    Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all common tumors. Earlier cancer diagnosis could increase survival rates and better assessment of metastatic disease could improve patient care. As such, there is an urgent need to develop biomarkers to diagnose this deadly malignancy. Analyzing circulating extracellular vesicles (cEVs) using ‘liquid biopsies’ offers an attractive approach to diagnose and monitor disease status. However, it is important to differentiate EV-associated proteins enriched in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from those with benign pancreatic diseases such as chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). To meet this need, we combined the novel EVtrap method for highly efficient isolation of EVs from plasma and conducted proteomics analysis of samples from 124 individuals, including patients with PDAC, benign pancreatic diseases and controls. On average, 912 EV proteins were identified per 100 µL of plasma. EVs containing high levels of PDCD6IP, SERPINA12, and RUVBL2 were associated with PDAC compared to the benign diseases in both discovery and validation cohorts. EVs with PSMB4, RUVBL2, and ANKAR were associated with metastasis, and those with CRP, RALB, and CD55 correlated with poor clinical prognosis. Finally, we validated a seven EV protein PDAC signature against a background of benign pancreatic diseases that yielded an 89% prediction accuracy for the diagnosis of PDAC. To our knowledge, our study represents the largest proteomics profiling of circulating EVs ever conducted in pancreatic cancer and provides a valuable open-source atlas to the scientific community with a comprehensive catalogue of novel cEVs that may assist in the development of biomarkers and improve the outcomes of patients with PDAC.