Microscopy: Imaging far and wide
The idea of a microscope typically conjures up thoughts of a highly magnified image of a tiny sample captured in unprecedented detail. In principle, however, the physical mechanisms that allow us to see such microscopic details do not actually require the observed region or the specimen itself to be particularly small. Rather, the performance of a microscope is primarily limited by the diffraction of light as it passes through the various optical elements in the instrument.
The resolution of a microscope, , is defined as the shortest distance between two points on a specimen that can still be seen as two distinct points in the image. In 1873 Ernst Abbe showed that diffraction limited the resolution of a microscope to , where is the wavelength of the light, is the refractive index of the medium the light travels through, and is the half-angle at which the objective captures light from the sample: is also known as the "numerical aperture" of the objective.
As Abbe's equation makes clear, the resolution is independent of the magnification. Rather, it is the design of the objective that determines both the resolution of the microscope and its "field-of-view" (that is, the overall size of the sample that can be imaged). And although a variety of microscope objectives are available from commercial manufacturers, they are designed to either capture a fairly large field-of-view (typically a millimeter or so across) at low resolution, or a small field-of-view (typically a few hundred micrometers or less across) at high resolution. By contrast, to obtain a high-resolution image of a large specimen we need a combination of a large field-of-view, a long working distance (that is, the distance between the objective and the focal plane of the microscope), and a high numerical aperture: however, there are no commercial microscopes that offer this combination at present.
Now, in eLife, Gail McConnell of Strathclyde University and colleagues – Johanna Trägårdh, Rumelo Amor, John Dempster, Es Reid and Brad Amos (who is also at the MRC Laboratory for Molecular Biology) – report that they have developed an objective called the Mesolens that offers both a relatively large field-of-view and a relatively high resolution (Figure 1; McConnell et al., 2016). Using a custom-built confocal microscope equipped with the Mesolens, McConnell et al. were able to capture beautiful single-shot images of whole mouse embryos with cellular resolution, and also capture images of explants from the brains of rat embryos, again with cellular resolution.
The Mesolens was made possible by a combination of sophisticated optical design and skillful engineering, including excellent correction for the various optical aberrations that would otherwise compromise high-resolution imaging over a large field-of-view. Moreover, the Mesolens is an immersion lens, which means that the gap between the objective and the sample is filled with a medium such as oil, water or glycerol: McConnell et al. designed their lens to provide high-quality images in a variety of immersion media with different optical properties.
A confocal microscope is able to image a sample in all three dimensions by taking two-dimensional images at a range of different depths: the Mesolens allowed McConnell et al. to image volumes of up to 6 x 6 x 3 mm3 with a lateral resolution of 0.7–0.8 micrometers and an axial resolution of 7–8 micrometers (with a numerical aperture of 0.47). These figures are factors of at least two and three higher than the resolutions that can be achieved with currently available large field-of-view commercial objectives.
In addition to applications in developmental biology and embryology, including whole-embryo phenotyping and screening applications that require rapid imaging of large specimens, the ability to image samples measuring several millimeters across with near-cellular resolution will be useful in many other areas of the life sciences. In neuroscience, for example, researchers are trying to combine techniques such as tissue clearing and tissue expansion (Höckendorf et al., 2014; Marx, 2016) with large-volume light microscopy (Ji et al., 2016) to image entire mammalian brains at high resolution; the Mesolens could prove useful in these efforts. And extending beyond its application in confocal microscopy, the Mesolens could have applications in light-sheet microscopy (Keller and Ahrens, 2015), which excels in the rapid imaging of large volumes. In particular, combining the Mesolens with other techniques could reduce the need to use "optical tiling" when imaging large specimens, or to subject large specimens to sectioning and other destructive sample-preparation techniques.
The Mesolens highlights the increasingly important role of custom optical designs in improving the performance of light-based microscopes. Recent, complementary efforts in mesoscale imaging with two-photon microscopy also rely heavily on custom-built objectives. For example, the two-photon random access microscope developed by Karel Svoboda of the HHMI Janelia Research Campus and co-workers features a custom objective with a numerical aperture of 0.6 and a field-of-view of 5 millimeters, and enables imaging up to a depth of 1 millimeter (Sofroniew et al., 2016). The twin-region, panoramic two-photon microscope (Trepan2p) developed by Spencer Smith of the University of North Carolina and co-workers features a custom objective with a numerical aperture of 0.43 and a field of view of 3.5 millimeters, and has been used to image multiple cortical areas in mice (Stirman et al., 2016). Other examples of this emerging trend to develop new microscopes with custom-built optics include lattice light-sheet microscopy (Chen et al., 2014) and IsoView light-sheet microscopy (Chhetri et al., 2015).
By extending the scale of optical microscopy to several millimeters, this new generation of custom-built objectives also emphasizes the need for new wide-field detection systems that can take full advantage of the capabilities of these new lenses. To optimally sample the large field-of-view captured by the Mesolens in a wide-field microscope, gigapixel cameras will be needed: for comparison, a state-of-the-art scientific camera will typically have 4–6 megapixels. Various gigapixel designs are already under development (Brady et al., 2012; Zheng et al., 2014), and further advances in this domain will help exploit the full potential of the Mesolens in imaging large volumes at high resolution.
References
-
Technologies for imaging neural activity in large volumesNature Neuroscience 19:1154–1164.https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4358
-
Optimizing probes to image cleared tissueNature Methods 13:205–209.https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3774
-
0.5 gigapixel microscopy using a flatbed scannerBiomedical Optics Express 5:1–8.https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.000001
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2016, Chhetri et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,505
- views
-
- 309
- downloads
-
- 3
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
- Developmental Biology
Differentiation of female germline stem cells into a mature oocyte includes the expression of RNAs and proteins that drive early embryonic development in Drosophila. We have little insight into what activates the expression of these maternal factors. One candidate is the zinc-finger protein OVO. OVO is required for female germline viability and has been shown to positively regulate its own expression, as well as a downstream target, ovarian tumor, by binding to the transcriptional start site (TSS). To find additional OVO targets in the female germline and further elucidate OVO’s role in oocyte development, we performed ChIP-seq to determine genome-wide OVO occupancy, as well as RNA-seq comparing hypomorphic and wild type rescue ovo alleles. OVO preferentially binds in close proximity to target TSSs genome-wide, is associated with open chromatin, transcriptionally active histone marks, and OVO-dependent expression. Motif enrichment analysis on OVO ChIP peaks identified a 5’-TAACNGT-3’ OVO DNA binding motif spatially enriched near TSSs. However, the OVO DNA binding motif does not exhibit precise motif spacing relative to the TSS characteristic of RNA polymerase II complex binding core promoter elements. Integrated genomics analysis showed that 525 genes that are bound and increase in expression downstream of OVO are known to be essential maternally expressed genes. These include genes involved in anterior/posterior/germ plasm specification (bcd, exu, swa, osk, nos, aub, pgc, gcl), egg activation (png, plu, gnu, wisp, C(3)g, mtrm), translational regulation (cup, orb, bru1, me31B), and vitelline membrane formation (fs(1)N, fs(1)M3, clos). This suggests that OVO is a master transcriptional regulator of oocyte development and is responsible for the expression of structural components of the egg as well as maternally provided RNAs that are required for early embryonic development.
-
- Developmental Biology
Over the past several decades, a trend toward delayed childbirth has led to increases in parental age at the time of conception. Sperm epigenome undergoes age-dependent changes increasing risks of adverse conditions in offspring conceived by fathers of advanced age. The mechanism(s) linking paternal age with epigenetic changes in sperm remain unknown. The sperm epigenome is shaped in a compartment protected by the blood-testes barrier (BTB) known to deteriorate with age. Permeability of the BTB is regulated by the balance of two mTOR complexes in Sertoli cells where mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) promotes the opening of the BTB and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) promotes its integrity. We hypothesized that this balance is also responsible for age-dependent changes in the sperm epigenome. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed reproductive outcomes, including sperm DNA methylation in transgenic mice with Sertoli cell-specific suppression of mTORC1 (Rptor KO) or mTORC2 (Rictor KO). mTORC2 suppression accelerated aging of the sperm DNA methylome and resulted in a reproductive phenotype concordant with older age, including decreased testes weight and sperm counts, and increased percent of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa and mitochondrial DNA copy number. Suppression of mTORC1 resulted in the shift of DNA methylome in sperm opposite to the shift associated with physiological aging – sperm DNA methylome rejuvenation and mild changes in sperm parameters. These results demonstrate for the first time that the balance of mTOR complexes in Sertoli cells regulates the rate of sperm epigenetic aging. Thus, mTOR pathway in Sertoli cells may be used as a novel target of therapeutic interventions to rejuvenate the sperm epigenome in advanced-age fathers.