Pausing guides RNA folding to populate transiently stable RNA structures for riboswitch-based transcription regulation

  1. Hannah Steinert
  2. Florian Sochor
  3. Anna Wacker
  4. Janina Buck
  5. Christina Helmling
  6. Fabian Hiller
  7. Sara Keyhani
  8. Jonas Noeske
  9. Steffen Kaspar Grimm
  10. Martin M Rudolph
  11. Heiko Keller
  12. Rachel Anne Mooney
  13. Robert Landick
  14. Beatrix Suess
  15. Boris Fürtig  Is a corresponding author
  16. Jens Wöhnert  Is a corresponding author
  17. Harald Schwalbe  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  2. Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
  3. Technical University Darmstadt, Germany
  4. University of Wisconsin - Madison, United States

Abstract

In bacteria, the regulation of gene expression by cis-acting transcriptional riboswitches located in the 5'-untranslated regions of messenger RNA requires the temporal synchronization of RNA synthesis and ligand binding-dependent conformational refolding. Ligand binding to the aptamer domain of the riboswitch induces premature termination of the mRNA synthesis of ligand-associated genes due to the coupled formation of 3'-structural elements acting as terminators. To date, there has been no high resolution structural description of the concerted process of synthesis and ligand-induced restructuring of the regulatory RNA element. Here, we show that for the guanine-sensing xpt-pbuX riboswitch from Bacillus subtilis, the conformation of the full-length transcripts is static: it exclusively populates the functional off-state but cannot switch to the on-state, regardless of the presence or absence of ligand. We show that only the combined matching of transcription rates and ligand binding enables transcription intermediates to undergo ligand-dependent conformational refolding.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hannah Steinert

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Florian Sochor

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Anna Wacker

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Janina Buck

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christina Helmling

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fabian Hiller

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sara Keyhani

    Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jonas Noeske

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Steffen Kaspar Grimm

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Martin M Rudolph

    Department of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Heiko Keller

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rachel Anne Mooney

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Robert Landick

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Beatrix Suess

    Department of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Boris Fürtig

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    fuertig@nmr.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6443-7656
  16. Jens Wöhnert

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
    For correspondence
    woehnert@bio.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Harald Schwalbe

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    schwalbe@nmr.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB902)

  • Harald Schwalbe

State of Hesse (BMRZ)

  • Harald Schwalbe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Lewis E Kay, University of Toronto, Canada

Version history

  1. Received: September 6, 2016
  2. Accepted: May 24, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 25, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 5, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Steinert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,581
    views
  • 518
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hannah Steinert
  2. Florian Sochor
  3. Anna Wacker
  4. Janina Buck
  5. Christina Helmling
  6. Fabian Hiller
  7. Sara Keyhani
  8. Jonas Noeske
  9. Steffen Kaspar Grimm
  10. Martin M Rudolph
  11. Heiko Keller
  12. Rachel Anne Mooney
  13. Robert Landick
  14. Beatrix Suess
  15. Boris Fürtig
  16. Jens Wöhnert
  17. Harald Schwalbe
(2017)
Pausing guides RNA folding to populate transiently stable RNA structures for riboswitch-based transcription regulation
eLife 6:e21297.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21297

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21297

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Boglarka Zambo, Evelina Edelweiss ... Gergo Gogl
    Research Article

    Truncation of the protein-protein interaction SH3 domain of the membrane remodeling Bridging Integrator 1 (BIN1, Amphiphysin 2) protein leads to centronuclear myopathy. Here, we assessed the impact of a set of naturally observed, previously uncharacterized BIN1 SH3 domain variants using conventional in vitro and cell-based assays monitoring the BIN1 interaction with dynamin 2 (DNM2) and identified potentially harmful ones that can be also tentatively connected to neuromuscular disorders. However, SH3 domains are typically promiscuous and it is expected that other, so far unknown partners of BIN1 exist besides DNM2, that also participate in the development of centronuclear myopathy. In order to shed light on these other relevant interaction partners and to get a holistic picture of the pathomechanism behind BIN1 SH3 domain variants, we used affinity interactomics. We identified hundreds of new BIN1 interaction partners proteome-wide, among which many appear to participate in cell division, suggesting a critical role of BIN1 in the regulation of mitosis. Finally, we show that the identified BIN1 mutations indeed cause proteome-wide affinity perturbation, signifying the importance of employing unbiased affinity interactomic approaches.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ramona Weber, Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    Recent findings indicate that the translation elongation rate influences mRNA stability. One of the factors that has been implicated in this link between mRNA decay and translation speed is the yeast DEAD-box helicase Dhh1p. Here, we demonstrated that the human ortholog of Dhh1p, DDX6, triggers the deadenylation-dependent decay of inefficiently translated mRNAs in human cells. DDX6 interacts with the ribosome through the Phe-Asp-Phe (FDF) motif in its RecA2 domain. Furthermore, RecA2-mediated interactions and ATPase activity are both required for DDX6 to destabilize inefficiently translated mRNAs. Using ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing, we identified two classes of endogenous mRNAs that are regulated in a DDX6-dependent manner. The identified targets are either translationally regulated or regulated at the steady-state-level and either exhibit signatures of poor overall translation or of locally reduced ribosome translocation rates. Transferring the identified sequence stretches into a reporter mRNA caused translation- and DDX6-dependent degradation of the reporter mRNA. In summary, these results identify DDX6 as a crucial regulator of mRNA translation and decay triggered by slow ribosome movement and provide insights into the mechanism by which DDX6 destabilizes inefficiently translated mRNAs.