Pausing guides RNA folding to populate transiently stable RNA structures for riboswitch-based transcription regulation

  1. Hannah Steinert
  2. Florian Sochor
  3. Anna Wacker
  4. Janina Buck
  5. Christina Helmling
  6. Fabian Hiller
  7. Sara Keyhani
  8. Jonas Noeske
  9. Steffen Kaspar Grimm
  10. Martin M Rudolph
  11. Heiko Keller
  12. Rachel Anne Mooney
  13. Robert Landick
  14. Beatrix Suess
  15. Boris Fürtig  Is a corresponding author
  16. Jens Wöhnert  Is a corresponding author
  17. Harald Schwalbe  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  2. Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
  3. Technical University Darmstadt, Germany
  4. University of Wisconsin - Madison, United States

Abstract

In bacteria, the regulation of gene expression by cis-acting transcriptional riboswitches located in the 5'-untranslated regions of messenger RNA requires the temporal synchronization of RNA synthesis and ligand binding-dependent conformational refolding. Ligand binding to the aptamer domain of the riboswitch induces premature termination of the mRNA synthesis of ligand-associated genes due to the coupled formation of 3'-structural elements acting as terminators. To date, there has been no high resolution structural description of the concerted process of synthesis and ligand-induced restructuring of the regulatory RNA element. Here, we show that for the guanine-sensing xpt-pbuX riboswitch from Bacillus subtilis, the conformation of the full-length transcripts is static: it exclusively populates the functional off-state but cannot switch to the on-state, regardless of the presence or absence of ligand. We show that only the combined matching of transcription rates and ligand binding enables transcription intermediates to undergo ligand-dependent conformational refolding.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hannah Steinert

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Florian Sochor

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Anna Wacker

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Janina Buck

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christina Helmling

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fabian Hiller

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sara Keyhani

    Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jonas Noeske

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Steffen Kaspar Grimm

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Martin M Rudolph

    Department of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Heiko Keller

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rachel Anne Mooney

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Robert Landick

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Beatrix Suess

    Department of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Boris Fürtig

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    fuertig@nmr.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6443-7656
  16. Jens Wöhnert

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
    For correspondence
    woehnert@bio.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Harald Schwalbe

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    schwalbe@nmr.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB902)

  • Harald Schwalbe

State of Hesse (BMRZ)

  • Harald Schwalbe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Steinert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hannah Steinert
  2. Florian Sochor
  3. Anna Wacker
  4. Janina Buck
  5. Christina Helmling
  6. Fabian Hiller
  7. Sara Keyhani
  8. Jonas Noeske
  9. Steffen Kaspar Grimm
  10. Martin M Rudolph
  11. Heiko Keller
  12. Rachel Anne Mooney
  13. Robert Landick
  14. Beatrix Suess
  15. Boris Fürtig
  16. Jens Wöhnert
  17. Harald Schwalbe
(2017)
Pausing guides RNA folding to populate transiently stable RNA structures for riboswitch-based transcription regulation
eLife 6:e21297.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21297

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21297

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Joar Esteban Pinto Torres, Mathieu Claes ... Yann G-J Sterckx
    Research Article

    African trypanosomes are the causative agents of neglected tropical diseases affecting both humans and livestock. Disease control is highly challenging due to an increasing number of drug treatment failures. African trypanosomes are extracellular, blood-borne parasites that mainly rely on glycolysis for their energy metabolism within the mammalian host. Trypanosomal glycolytic enzymes are therefore of interest for the development of trypanocidal drugs. Here, we report the serendipitous discovery of a camelid single-domain antibody (sdAb aka Nanobody) that selectively inhibits the enzymatic activity of trypanosomatid (but not host) pyruvate kinases through an allosteric mechanism. By combining enzyme kinetics, biophysics, structural biology, and transgenic parasite survival assays, we provide a proof-of-principle that the sdAb-mediated enzyme inhibition negatively impacts parasite fitness and growth.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Eva Herdering, Tristan Reif-Trauttmansdorff ... Ruth Anne Schmitz
    Research Article

    Glutamine synthetases (GS) are central enzymes essential for the nitrogen metabolism across all domains of life. Consequently, they have been extensively studied for more than half a century. Based on the ATP-dependent ammonium assimilation generating glutamine, GS expression and activity are strictly regulated in all organisms. In the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina mazei, it has been shown that the metabolite 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG) directly induces the GS activity. Besides, modulation of the activity by interaction with small proteins (GlnK1 and sP26) has been reported. Here, we show that the strong activation of M. mazei GS (GlnA1) by 2-OG is based on the 2-OG dependent dodecamer assembly of GlnA1 by using mass photometry (MP) and single particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis of purified strep-tagged GlnA1. The dodecamer assembly from dimers occurred without any detectable intermediate oligomeric state and was not affected in the presence of GlnK1. The 2.39 Å cryo-EM structure of the dodecameric complex in the presence of 12.5 mM 2-OG demonstrated that 2-OG is binding between two monomers. Thereby, 2-OG appears to induce the dodecameric assembly in a cooperative way. Furthermore, the active site is primed by an allosteric interaction cascade caused by 2-OG-binding towards an adaption of an open active state conformation. In the presence of additional glutamine, strong feedback inhibition of GS activity was observed. Since glutamine dependent disassembly of the dodecamer was excluded by MP, feedback inhibition most likely relies on the binding of glutamine to the catalytic site. Based on our findings, we propose that under nitrogen limitation the induction of M. mazei GS into a catalytically active dodecamer is not affected by GlnK1 and crucially depends on the presence of 2-OG.