Global reorganisation of cis-regulatory units upon lineage commitment of human embryonic stem cells

  1. Paula Freire-Pritchett
  2. Stefan Schoenfelder
  3. Csilla Várnai
  4. Steven W Wingett
  5. Jonathan Cairns
  6. Amanda J Collier
  7. Raquel García-Vílchez
  8. Mayra Furlan-Magaril
  9. Cameron S Osborne
  10. Peter J Fraser
  11. Peter J Rugg-Gunn  Is a corresponding author
  12. Mikhail Spivakov  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Babraham Institute, United Kingdom
  2. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
  3. King's College London School of Medicine, United Kingdom

Abstract

Long-range cis-regulatory elements such as enhancers coordinate cell-specific transcriptional programmes by engaging in DNA looping interactions with target promoters. Deciphering the interplay between the promoter connectivity and activity of cis-regulatory elements during lineage commitment is crucial for understanding developmental transcriptional control. Here, we use Promoter Capture Hi-C to generate a high-resolution atlas of chromosomal interactions involving ~22,000 gene promoters in human pluripotent and lineage-committed cells, identifying putative target genes for known and predicted enhancer elements. We reveal extensive dynamics of cis-regulatory contacts upon lineage commitment, including the acquisition and loss of promoter interactions. This spatial rewiring occurs preferentially with predicted changes in the activity of cis-regulatory elements, and is associated with changes in target gene expression. Our results provide a global and integrated view of promoter interactome dynamics during lineage commitment of human pluripotent cells.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Paula Freire-Pritchett

    Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Stefan Schoenfelder

    Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Csilla Várnai

    Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Steven W Wingett

    Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jonathan Cairns

    Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Amanda J Collier

    Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Raquel García-Vílchez

    Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mayra Furlan-Magaril

    Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Cameron S Osborne

    Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, King's College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Peter J Fraser

    Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Peter J Rugg-Gunn

    Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    peter.rugg-gunn@babraham.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Mikhail Spivakov

    Nuclear Dynamics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    mikhail.spivakov@babraham.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0383-3943

Funding

Wellcome (WT093736)

  • Peter J Rugg-Gunn

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J004480/1)

  • Paula Freire-Pritchett
  • Stefan Schoenfelder
  • Csilla Várnai
  • Steven W Wingett
  • Jonathan Cairns
  • Mayra Furlan-Magaril
  • Peter J Fraser
  • Mikhail Spivakov

Medical Research Council (MR/J003808/1)

  • Amanda J Collier

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Job Dekker, University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: September 28, 2016
  2. Accepted: March 22, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 27, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Freire-Pritchett et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,736
    Page views
  • 1,394
    Downloads
  • 79
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Paula Freire-Pritchett
  2. Stefan Schoenfelder
  3. Csilla Várnai
  4. Steven W Wingett
  5. Jonathan Cairns
  6. Amanda J Collier
  7. Raquel García-Vílchez
  8. Mayra Furlan-Magaril
  9. Cameron S Osborne
  10. Peter J Fraser
  11. Peter J Rugg-Gunn
  12. Mikhail Spivakov
(2017)
Global reorganisation of cis-regulatory units upon lineage commitment of human embryonic stem cells
eLife 6:e21926.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21926

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Fu-Qing Jiang, Kun Liu ... Xu-Feng Qi
    Research Article

    Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide due to the inability of adult heart to regenerate after injury. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation catalyzed by the enzyme methyltransferase-like 3 (Mettl3) plays an important role in various physiological and pathological bioprocesses. However, the role of m6A in heart regeneration remains largely unclear. To study m6A function in heart regeneration, we modulated Mettl3 expression in vitro and in vivo. Knockdown of Mettl3 significantly increased the proliferation of cardiomyocytes and accelerated heart regeneration following heart injury in neonatal and adult mice. However, Mettl3 overexpression decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation and suppressed heart regeneration in postnatal mice. Conjoint analysis of methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq) and RNA-seq identified Fgf16 as a downstream target of Mettl3-mediated m6A modification during postnatal heart regeneration. RIP-qPCR and luciferase reporter assays revealed that Mettl3 negatively regulates Fgf16 mRNA expression in an m6A-Ythdf2-dependent manner. The silencing of Fgf16 suppressed the proliferation of cardiomyocytes. However, the overexpression of ΔFgf16, in which the m6A consensus sequence was mutated, significantly increased cardiomyocyte proliferation and accelerated heart regeneration in postnatal mice compared with wild-type Fgf16. Our data demonstrate that Mettl3 post-transcriptionally reduces Fgf16 mRNA levels through an m6A-Ythdf2-dependen pathway, thereby controlling cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Wenbo Liu, Xukun Lu ... Jianqiao Liu
    Research Article

    Alternative splicing expands the transcriptome and proteome complexity and plays essential roles in tissue development and human diseases. However, how alternative splicing regulates spermatogenesis remains largely unknown. Here, using a germ cell-specific knockout mouse model, we demonstrated that the splicing factor Srsf10 is essential for spermatogenesis and male fertility. In the absence of SRSF10, spermatogonial stem cells can be formed, but the expansion of Promyelocytic Leukemia Zinc Finger (PLZF)-positive undifferentiated progenitors was impaired, followed by the failure of spermatogonia differentiation (marked by KIT expression) and meiosis initiation. This was further evidenced by the decreased expression of progenitor cell markers in bulk RNA-seq, and much less progenitor and differentiating spermatogonia in single-cell RNA-seq data. Notably, SRSF10 directly binds thousands of genes in isolated THY+ spermatogonia, and Srsf10 depletion disturbed the alternative splicing of genes that are preferentially associated with germ cell development, cell cycle, and chromosome segregation, including Nasp, Bclaf1, Rif1, Dazl, Kit, Ret, and Sycp1. These data suggest that SRSF10 is critical for the expansion of undifferentiated progenitors by regulating alternative splicing, expanding our understanding of the mechanism underlying spermatogenesis.