Signalling: A new trick for an old lipid
Cholesterol is a lipid molecule that is a vital component of all animal cell membranes. It provides structural integrity, which is needed for the membrane to be an effective barrier, and is also required for the production of hormones and vitamin D. These roles mean the production and transport of cholesterol in cells is strictly regulated. This, combined with its poor solubility, has hindered efforts to study its specific molecular roles. Despite this, cholesterol has long been connected to the Hedgehog signalling pathway, which helps to regulate how tissues form in animals and is mutated in several types of cancer.
Now, in eLife, Rajat Rohatgi from Stanford University, Christian Siebold from the University of Oxford and colleagues – including Giovanni Luchetti and Ria Sircar as joint first authors – report a new role for cholesterol in activating the Hedgehog pathway through the receptor protein Smoothened (Luchetti et al., 2016). Similar results have also been recently reported by Adrian Salic and colleagues (Huang et al., 2016).
There are three main components in the Hedgehog pathway that allow cells to send and receive signals: the signalling protein Hedgehog, a transmembrane protein called Patched, and a transmembrane receptor protein called Smoothened. In the absence of Hedgehog, Patched inhibits Smoothened. However, when Hedgehog binds to Patched, this inhibition is blocked and Smoothened is able to activate other Hedgehog pathway components inside the cell. It is thought that Patched and Smoothened communicate using a small molecule rather than by direct contact (Taipale et al., 2002), but it is not clear exactly how this works.
Smoothened possesses two sites at which small molecules are able to bind: one is in its transmembrane domain region and the other is in its cysteine-rich domain on the external surface of the cell. A similar cysteine-rich domain is found in several other proteins, where it is known to be able to bind to lipids (Bazan et al., 2009). Earlier this year, Rohatgi, Siebold and colleagues presented the first complete crystal structure of the transmembrane domain region and cysteine-rich domain of Smoothened (Byrne et al., 2016). Unexpectedly, they found a cholesterol molecule occupied a hydrophobic (water-fearing) pocket in the cysteine-rich domain. Since disrupting cholesterol production in humans and mice affects Smoothened activity (Blassberg et al., 2016; Cooper et al., 2003), this raised the possibility that cholesterol might directly bind to and regulate Smoothened.
Cholesterol is a challenging molecule to work with because it is hydrophobic and can randomly integrate into membranes and modify the activities of many proteins. To overcome this problem both Luchetti et al. and Huang et al. used a chemical called methyl-β-cyclodextrin to deliver cholesterol to cells and show that it directly activates Smoothened through its cysteine-rich domain.
There are many common findings between the two studies. Firstly, both teams demonstrate that cholesterol stimulates Hedgehog signalling via Smoothened with a high degree of specificity. For example, cholestenol and other molecules that are similar to cholesterol were unable to do the same. Both teams were able to rule out the transmembrane domain region as the site of cholesterol binding by showing that cholesterol could activate Smoothened even in the presence of mutations that block the binding of small molecules to this region. By contrast, mutating or completely removing the cysteine-rich domain of Smoothened blocked both the cholesterol and Hedgehog responses. Furthermore, the presence of cholesterol and Hedgehog protein together led to higher levels of Hedgehog signalling activity than the presence of just Hedgehog protein, indicating a possible role for Patched in the regulation of Smoothened by cholesterol (Figure 1).
How does cholesterol binding outside the cell translate to signalling within the cell? Luchetti et al. predict, based on previous structures (Byrne et al., 2016), that cholesterol binding to the cysteine-rich domain of Smoothened induces a clockwise rotation with respect to the transmembrane domain region. This change in shape could be sufficient to promote signalling inside the cell.
Together the findings of Luchetti et al. and Huang et al. strongly support a role for cholesterol in activating Smoothened in cells. However, it is worth noting that recent findings from other research groups favour an inhibitory role for sterol molecules instead (Roberts et al., 2016; Sever et al., 2016). Therefore, several critical questions remain. Does cholesterol binding itself alter Smoothened activity, or is cholesterol merely a cofactor that is needed for Smoothened to be activated by another molecule? Does Hedgehog protein affect cholesterol levels and is this mediated through the activity of Patched (Figure 1)? Since most cholesterol is trapped within the cell membrane, it will also be important to understand how cholesterol is able to access the cysteine-rich domain of Smoothened.
Nonetheless, this work reveals a new signalling role for cholesterol in controlling the Smoothened receptor and reiterates the possibility that Hedgehog signalling may have evolved from an ancient lipid-sensing pathway (Hausmann et al., 2009).
References
-
Reduced cholesterol levels impair Smoothened activation in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndromeHuman Molecular Genetics 25:693–705.https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddv507
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2016, Sharpe
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,336
- views
-
- 176
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
The biosynthesis of cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) by mammalian membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases (mACs) is predominantly regulated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Up to now the two hexahelical transmembrane domains of mACs were considered to fix the enzyme to membranes. Here, we show that the transmembrane domains serve in addition as signal receptors and transmitters of lipid signals that control Gsα-stimulated mAC activities. We identify aliphatic fatty acids and anandamide as receptor ligands of mAC isoforms 1–7 and 9. The ligands enhance (mAC isoforms 2, 3, 7, and 9) or attenuate (isoforms 1, 4, 5, and 6) Gsα-stimulated mAC activities in vitro and in vivo. Substitution of the stimulatory membrane receptor of mAC3 by the inhibitory receptor of mAC5 results in a ligand inhibited mAC5–mAC3 chimera. Thus, we discovered a new class of membrane receptors in which two signaling modalities are at a crossing, direct tonic lipid and indirect phasic GPCR–Gsα signaling regulating the biosynthesis of cAMP.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.