Total biosynthesis of the cyclic AMP booster forskolin from Coleus forskohlii

  1. Irini Pateraki  Is a corresponding author
  2. Johan Andersen-Ranberg
  3. Niels Bjerg Jensen
  4. Sileshi Gizachew Wubshet
  5. Allison Maree Heskes
  6. Victor Forman
  7. Björn Hallström
  8. Britta Hamberger
  9. Mohammed Saddik Motawia
  10. Carl Erik Olsen
  11. Dan Staerk
  12. Jørgen Hansen
  13. Birger Lindberg Møller
  14. Bjoern Hamberger
  1. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  3. Evolva, Denmark
  4. Nofima, Norway
  5. KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
  6. Michigan State University, United States

Abstract

Forskolin is a unique structurally complex labdane type diterpenoid used in the treatment of glaucoma and heart failure based on its activity as a cyclic AMP booster. Commercial production of forskolin relies exclusively on extraction from its only known natural source, the plant Coleus forskohlii, in which forskolin accumulates in the root cork. Here we report the discovery of five cytochrome P450s and two acetyltransferases which catalyze a cascade of reactions converting the forskolin precursor 13R-manoyl oxide into forskolin and a diverse array of additional labdane-type diterpenoids. A minimal set of three P450s in combination with a single acetyl transferase was identified that catalyzes the conversion of 13R-manoyl oxide into forskolin as demonstrated by transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. The entire pathway for forskolin production from glucose encompassing expression of nine genes was stably integrated into Saccharomyces cerevisiae and afforded forskolin titers of 40 mg/L.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Irini Pateraki

    Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    For correspondence
    eipa@plen.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    Irini Pateraki, Filed international patent600 applications (PCT/DK2015/050020) covering 'Biosynthesis of forskolin and related compounds.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7526-2334
  2. Johan Andersen-Ranberg

    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    Johan Andersen-Ranberg, Filed international patent600 applications (PCT/DK2015/050020) covering 'Biosynthesis of forskolin and related compounds.
  3. Niels Bjerg Jensen

    Evolva, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    Niels Bjerg Jensen, Filed international patent600 applications (PCT/DK2015/050020) covering 'Biosynthesis of forskolin and related compoundsEmployee of Evolva SA.
  4. Sileshi Gizachew Wubshet

    Nofima, Osloveien, Norway
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Allison Maree Heskes

    Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2732-5185
  6. Victor Forman

    Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Björn Hallström

    Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Britta Hamberger

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Mohammed Saddik Motawia

    Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Carl Erik Olsen

    Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Dan Staerk

    Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jørgen Hansen

    Evolva, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    Jørgen Hansen, Employee of Evolva SA.
  13. Birger Lindberg Møller

    Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    Birger Lindberg Møller, Filed international patent600 applications (PCT/DK2015/050020) covering 'Biosynthesis of forskolin and related compounds.
  14. Bjoern Hamberger

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    Bjoern Hamberger, Filed international patent600 applications (PCT/DK2015/050020) covering 'Biosynthesis of forskolin and related compounds'.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1249-1807

Funding

Villum Fonden

  • Birger Lindberg Møller

Novo Nordisk

  • Birger Lindberg Møller

European Commission

  • Irini Pateraki

DOE Office of Science (BER DE-FC02-07ER64494)

  • Bjoern Hamberger

Strategic Partnership Grant (15-SPG-Full-3101)

  • Bjoern Hamberger

MSU Foundation

  • Bjoern Hamberger

Michigan State University (startup funding from the Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry)

  • Bjoern Hamberger

Michigan State University (AgBioResearch - MICL02454)

  • Bjoern Hamberger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Pateraki et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,134
    views
  • 818
    downloads
  • 99
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Irini Pateraki
  2. Johan Andersen-Ranberg
  3. Niels Bjerg Jensen
  4. Sileshi Gizachew Wubshet
  5. Allison Maree Heskes
  6. Victor Forman
  7. Björn Hallström
  8. Britta Hamberger
  9. Mohammed Saddik Motawia
  10. Carl Erik Olsen
  11. Dan Staerk
  12. Jørgen Hansen
  13. Birger Lindberg Møller
  14. Bjoern Hamberger
(2017)
Total biosynthesis of the cyclic AMP booster forskolin from Coleus forskohlii
eLife 6:e23001.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23001

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23001

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Bernd K Gilsbach, Franz Y Ho ... Christian Johannes Gloeckner
    Research Article

    The Parkinson’s disease (PD)-linked protein Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) consists of seven domains, including a kinase and a Roc G domain. Despite the availability of several high-resolution structures, the dynamic regulation of its unique intramolecular domain stack is nevertheless still not well understood. By in-depth biochemical analysis, assessing the Michaelis–Menten kinetics of the Roc G domain, we have confirmed that LRRK2 has, similar to other Roco protein family members, a KM value of LRRK2 that lies within the range of the physiological GTP concentrations within the cell. Furthermore, the R1441G PD variant located within a mutational hotspot in the Roc domain showed an increased catalytic efficiency. In contrast, the most common PD variant G2019S, located in the kinase domain, showed an increased KM and reduced catalytic efficiency, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism from the kinase domain to the G domain. Autophosphorylation of the G1+2 residue (T1343) in the Roc P-loop motif is critical for this phosphoregulation of both the KM and the kcat values of the Roc-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis, most likely by changing the monomer–dimer equilibrium. The LRRK2 T1343A variant has a similar increased kinase activity in cells compared to G2019S and the double mutant T1343A/G2019S has no further increased activity, suggesting that T1343 is crucial for the negative feedback in the LRRK2 signaling cascade. Together, our data reveal a novel intramolecular feedback regulation of the LRRK2 Roc G domain by a LRRK2 kinase-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, PD mutants differently change the kinetics of the GTPase cycle, which might in part explain the difference in penetrance of these mutations in PD patients.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Katherine A Senn, Karli A Lipinski ... Aaron A Hoskins
    Research Article

    Pre-mRNA splicing is catalyzed in two steps: 5ʹ splice site (SS) cleavage and exon ligation. A number of proteins transiently associate with spliceosomes to specifically impact these steps (first and second step factors). We recently identified Fyv6 (FAM192A in humans) as a second step factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; however, we did not determine how widespread Fyv6’s impact is on the transcriptome. To answer this question, we have used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to analyze changes in splicing. These results show that loss of Fyv6 results in activation of non-consensus, branch point (BP) proximal 3ʹ SS transcriptome-wide. To identify the molecular basis of these observations, we determined a high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of a yeast product complex spliceosome containing Fyv6 at 2.3 Å. The structure reveals that Fyv6 is the only second step factor that contacts the Prp22 ATPase and that Fyv6 binding is mutually exclusive with that of the first step factor Yju2. We then use this structure to dissect Fyv6 functional domains and interpret results of a genetic screen for fyv6Δ suppressor mutations. The combined transcriptomic, structural, and genetic studies allow us to propose a model in which Yju2/Fyv6 exchange facilitates exon ligation and Fyv6 promotes usage of consensus, BP distal 3ʹ SS.