Host-selected mutations converging on a global regulator drive an adaptive leap by bacteria to symbiosis

  1. Molly Sabrina Pankey
  2. Randi L Foxall
  3. Ian M Ster
  4. Lauren A Perry
  5. Brian M Schuster
  6. Rachel A Donner
  7. Matthew Coyle
  8. Vaughn S Cooper
  9. Cheryl A Whistler  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of New Hampshire, United States
  2. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Host immune and physical barriers protect against pathogens but also impede the establishment of essential symbiotic partnerships. To reveal mechanisms by which beneficial organisms adapt to circumvent host defenses, we experimentally evolved ecologically distinct bioluminescent Vibrio fischeri through Euprymna scolopes squid light organs. Serial squid passaging of bacteria produced eight distinct mutations in the binK sensor kinase gene that conferred an exceptional selective advantage demonstrated through both empirical and theoretical analysis. Squid-adaptive binK alleles promoted colonization and immune evasion that was mediated by cell-associated matrices including symbiotic polysaccharide (Syp) and cellulose. binK variation also altered quorum sensing, raising the threshold for luminescence induction. Preexisting coordinate regulation of symbiosis traits by BinK presented an efficient solution where altered BinK function was the key to unlock multiple colonization barriers. These results identify a genetic basis for microbial adaptability and underscore the importance of hosts as selective agents that shape emergent symbiont populations.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Molly Sabrina Pankey

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7061-9613
  2. Randi L Foxall

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ian M Ster

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lauren A Perry

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Brian M Schuster

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rachel A Donner

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Matthew Coyle

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Vaughn S Cooper

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Cheryl A Whistler

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States
    For correspondence
    cheryl.whistler@unh.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2301-2069

Funding

National Science Foundation (IOS-1258099)

  • Vaughn S Cooper
  • Cheryl A Whistler

U.S. Department of Agriculture (216015)

  • Cheryl A Whistler

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Edward G Ruby, University of Hawaii, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 19, 2016
  2. Accepted: April 23, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 27, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 9, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Pankey et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,486
    Page views
  • 553
    Downloads
  • 31
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, PubMed Central, Crossref.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Molly Sabrina Pankey
  2. Randi L Foxall
  3. Ian M Ster
  4. Lauren A Perry
  5. Brian M Schuster
  6. Rachel A Donner
  7. Matthew Coyle
  8. Vaughn S Cooper
  9. Cheryl A Whistler
(2017)
Host-selected mutations converging on a global regulator drive an adaptive leap by bacteria to symbiosis
eLife 6:e24414.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24414

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24414

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Reese Richardson, Heliodoro Tejedor Navarro ... Thomas Stoeger
    Research Article

    Present-day publications on human genes primarily feature genes that already appeared in many publications prior to completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003. These patterns persist despite the subsequent adoption of high-throughput technologies, which routinely identify novel genes associated with biological processes and disease. Although several hypotheses for bias in the selection of genes as research targets have been proposed, their explanatory powers have not yet been compared. Our analysis suggests that understudied genes are systematically abandoned in favor of better-studied genes between the completion of -omics experiments and the reporting of results. Understudied genes remain abandoned by studies that cite these -omics experiments. Conversely, we find that publications on understudied genes may even accrue a greater number of citations. Among 45 biological and experimental factors previously proposed to affect which genes are being studied, we find that 33 are significantly associated with the choice of hit genes presented in titles and abstracts of -omics studies. To promote the investigation of understudied genes, we condense our insights into a tool, find my understudied genes (FMUG), that allows scientists to engage with potential bias during the selection of hits. We demonstrate the utility of FMUG through the identification of genes that remain understudied in vertebrate aging. FMUG is developed in Flutter and is available for download at fmug.amaral.northwestern.edu as a MacOS/Windows app.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erandi Velazquez-Miranda, Ming He
    Insight

    Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.