1. Developmental Biology
Download icon

Evolutionary Developmental Biology: Sensing oxygen inside and out

  1. Maria R Stupnikov
  2. Wellington V Cardoso  Is a corresponding author
  1. Columbia University Medical Center, United States
Insight
  • Cited 2
  • Views 1,829
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2017;6:e27467 doi: 10.7554/eLife.27467

Abstract

Neuroendocrine cells act as oxygen sensors in animals from fish to humans, but the evolutionary origins of these cells are only just becoming clear.

Main text

For single-celled organisms like bacteria, every cell can detect changes in the level of oxygen in its environment and respond accordingly. Things, however, can be rather more complicated in multicellular organisms (Jonz et al., 2016). For example, animals must have a respiratory system to deliver enough oxygen to millions of cells to meet with their metabolic demands. An animal’s survival also depends on it monitoring oxygen levels both internally (for example, in its blood) and externally (in the environment). Multicellular organisms have oxygen sensors that consist largely of cells called neuroendocrine cells. When oxygen levels drop, these sensors release neurotransmitters, chemicals that excite nearby neurons to signal to a control center in the brain. The control center then triggers reflexes that increase the frequency of breathing.

These oxygen sensors have evolved at strategic places in the body. In land animals like mammals and birds (collectively referred to as amniotes), these sensors are found in two distinct locations: next to the carotid arteries, and in the airways of the lungs. The carotid arteries are the major blood vessels that deliver oxygenated blood to the head and neck, and the neuroendocrine cells are packed closely together to form a structure called the carotid body located where these arteries branch. In the airways of the lungs, the oxygen sensors are distributed as single cells or in small groups known as neuroendocrine bodies, present mostly at the branch-points. Primarily aquatic species, like fish and amphibians (collectively referred to as non-amniotes), have oxygen-sensing neuroendocrine cells in their gills to detect oxygen in the water. At least one fish, the jawless lamprey, also has oxygen-sensitive cells that are rich in neurotransmitters near its major blood vessels, reminiscent of the carotid body found in the land animals (Jonz et al., 2016).

The multiple similarities of neuroendocrine cells in these different structures have led to a long-lasting debate as to how they are related in terms of evolution, particularly whether the neuroendocrine cells in the carotid body and the lungs of land animals evolved from the neuroendocrine cells in the gills of their aquatic ancestors. Now, in eLife, Clare Baker at the University of Cambridge and colleagues – including Dorit Hockman as first author – address this controversy and report that these different oxygen sensors diverged long before animals transitioned onto land (Hockman et al., 2017).

Previous studies in mice and birds had already shown that lung neuroendocrine cells have a different embryonic origin than those found in the carotid body. Most animal embryos form three distinct layers during the early stages of development: endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm. These layers later contribute to different parts of the body. The neuroendocrine cells in the lung develop from the endoderm, while those in the carotid body develop from the neural crest, which arises from the ectoderm (Pearse et al., 1973; Hoyt et al., 1990; Song et al., 2012; Kuo and Krasnow, 2015).

To decipher the evolutionary relationships between the oxygen sensors, Hockman et al. – who are based at institutions in Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, the US and the UK – set out to determine the origin of the gill neuroendocrine cells. To do this, they traced how neuroendocrine cells develop in the embryos of three non-amniotes: namely two species of fish (lamprey and zebrafish) and one species of frog (Xenopus). First, they engineered zebrafish so that all cells derived from the neural crest would fluoresce red. However, no red cells were seen in the gills, which indicated that gill neuroendocrine cells are not neural crest-derived. The finding that zebrafish mutants which lack neural crest cells still developed neuroendocrine cells in their gills further supported this conclusion. Importantly, Hockman et al. went on to confirm that the neuroendocrine cells in the zebrafish gills develop from endodermal cells, just like those in the lungs of mice. Similar results were seen with lamprey and Xenopus.

The finding that during development neuroendocrine cells in gills arise from the endoderm and not the neural crest effectively ruled out the possibility that they could have evolved from the same precursor cell as carotid body cells. Hockman et al. then identified neural crest-derived cells rich in neurotransmitters near major blood vessels in young lamprey and zebrafish. Specifically, these cells were found near large blood vessels of the fish’s pharyngeal arches, an association that closely resembles that seen in the carotid bodies of land animals. This led Hockman et al. to propose a new model for the evolution of oxygen sensors (Figure 1). According to this model, the carotid body seen in amniotes evolved from the grouping together of the neural crest-derived cells that were present near the pharyngeal arches of non-amniotes (which eventually develop into the gill arches). Later, these cells altered the neurotransmitters that they produced, and became wired into the nervous system. By contrast, the neuroendocrine cells in the gills and lungs continued to develop in situ from endodermal cells when animals transitioned from an aquatic to a terrestrial life.

A new model for the evolution of oxygen sensors.

Oxygen-sensitive neuroendocrine (NE) cells (yellow) associated with blood vessels (red) serve as sensors for internal oxygen levels (top). These include catecholaminergic cells in an ancestral structure in non-amniotes like fish (left), and the glomus cells in the carotid body of amniotes like humans (right). Other neuroendocrine cells act as sensors for external oxygen (bottom). These include cells in the gills of fish (left) and the airways of amniotes (right). Hockman et al. propose that the clusters of catecholaminergic cells near the blood vessels in non-amniotes evolved into the carotid bodies of amniotes. The neuroendocrine cells in these internal sensors are all derived from the neural crest. By contrast, the external oxygen sensors in gills and airways are derived from the endoderm in both non-amniotes and amniotes. Neurons are shown in blue; accessory cells are shown in gray. NEB: neuroendocrine body.

The challenge ahead is to elucidate the network of genes that led oxygen-sensing structures to diversify as animals evolved. Some of the signals needed for neuroendocrine cells to develop are already known (Borges et al., 1997; Ito et al., 2000; Kameda, 2005; Tsao et al., 2009Branchfield et al., 2016). However, there is evidence that each type of sensor requires slightly different cues and produces a different combination of molecules (Dauger et al., 2003). Additional knowledge of these differences will help us to understand how these sensors acquired their specialized functions to fulfill new roles during evolution.

References

    1. Ito T
    2. Udaka N
    3. Yazawa T
    4. Okudela K
    5. Hayashi H
    6. Sudo T
    7. Guillemot F
    8. Kageyama R
    9. Kitamura H
    (2000)
    Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors regulate the neuroendocrine differentiation of fetal mouse pulmonary epithelium
    Development 127:3913–3921.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maria R Stupnikov

    Columbia Center for Human Development, Department of Medicine, the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, and the Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5349-5233
  2. Wellington V Cardoso

    Columbia Center for Human Development, Department of Medicine, the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, and the Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    wvc2104@columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8868-9716

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: May 19, 2017 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2017, Stupnikov et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,829
    Page views
  • 261
    Downloads
  • 2
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Meisam Zaferani et al.
    Research Article

    Mammalian sperm rolling around their longitudinal axes is a long-observed component of motility, but its function in the fertilization process, and more specifically in sperm migration within the female reproductive tract, remains elusive. While investigating bovine sperm motion under simple shear flow and in a quiescent microfluidic reservoir and developing theoretical and computational models, we found that rolling regulates sperm navigation in response to the rheological properties of the sperm environment. In other words, rolling enables a sperm to swim progressively even if the flagellum beats asymmetrically. Therefore, a rolling sperm swims stably along the nearby walls (wall-dependent navigation) and efficiently upstream under an external fluid flow (rheotaxis). By contrast, an increase in ambient viscosity and viscoelasticity suppresses rolling, consequently, non-rolling sperm are less susceptible to nearby walls and external fluid flow and swim in two-dimensional diffusive circular paths (surface exploration). This surface exploration mode of swimming is caused by the intrinsic asymmetry in flagellar beating such that the curvature of a sperm’s circular path is proportional to the level of asymmetry. We found that the suppression of rolling is reversible and occurs in sperm with lower asymmetry in their beating pattern at higher ambient viscosity and viscoelasticity. Consequently, the rolling component of motility may function as a regulatory tool allowing sperm to navigate according to the rheological properties of the functional region within the female reproductive tract.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sun-Hee Hwang et al.
    Research Article

    The role of compartmentalized signaling in primary cilia during tissue morphogenesis is not well understood. The cilia-localized G-protein-coupled receptor—Gpr161 represses hedgehog pathway via cAMP signaling. We engineered a knock-in at Gpr161 locus in mice to generate a variant (Gpr161mut1), which was ciliary localization defective but cAMP signaling competent. Tissue phenotypes from hedgehog signaling depend on downstream bifunctional Gli transcriptional factors functioning as activators/repressors. Compared to knockout (ko), Gpr161mut1/ko had delayed embryonic lethality, moderately increased hedgehog targets and partially down-regulated Gli3-repressor. Unlike ko, the Gpr161mut1/ko neural tube did not show Gli2-activator-dependent expansion of ventral-most progenitors. Instead, the intermediate neural tube showed progenitor expansion that depends on loss of Gli3-repressor. Increased extraciliary receptor (Gpr161mut1/mut1) prevented ventralization. Morphogenesis in limb buds and midface requires Gli-repressor; these tissues in Gpr161mut1/mut1 manifested hedgehog hyperactivation phenotypes—polydactyly and midfacial widening. Thus, ciliary and extraciliary Gpr161 pools likely establish tissue-specific Gli-repressor thresholds in determining morpho-phenotypic outcomes.