Architecture of TAF11/TAF13/TBP complex suggests novel regulation properties of general transcription factor TFIID

  1. Kapil Gupta
  2. Aleksandra A Watson
  3. Tiago Baptista
  4. Elisabeth Scheer
  5. Anna L Chambers
  6. Christine Koehler
  7. Juan Zou
  8. Ima Obong-Ebong
  9. Eaazhisai Kandiah
  10. Arturo Temblador
  11. Adam Round
  12. Eric Forest
  13. Petr Man
  14. Christoph Bieniossek
  15. Ernest D Laue
  16. Edward A Lemke
  17. Juri Rappsilber
  18. Carol V Robinson
  19. Didier Devys
  20. Làszlò Tora  Is a corresponding author
  21. Imre Berger  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Bristol, United Kingdom
  2. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, IGBMC, France
  4. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany
  5. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  6. Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, United Kingdom
  7. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, France
  8. Institut de Biologie Structurale, France
  9. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic

Abstract

General transcription factor TFIID is a key component of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation. Human TFIID is a megadalton-sized complex comprising TATA-binding protein (TBP) and 13 TBP-associated factors (TAFs). TBP binds to core promoter DNA, recognizing the TATA-box. We identified a ternary complex formed by TBP and the histone fold (HF) domain-containing TFIID subunits TAF11 and TAF13. We demonstrate that TAF11/TAF13 competes for TBP binding with TATA-box DNA, and also with the N-terminal domain of TAF1 previously implicated in TATA-box mimicry. In an integrative approach combining crystal coordinates, biochemical analyses and data from cross-linking mass-spectrometry (CLMS), we determine the architecture of the TAF11/TAF13/TBP complex, revealing TAF11/TAF13 interaction with the DNA binding surface of TBP. We identify a highly conserved C-terminal TBP-interaction domain (CTID) in TAF13 which is essential for supporting cell growth. Our results thus have implications for cellular TFIID assembly and suggest a novel regulatory state for TFIID function.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kapil Gupta

    School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Aleksandra A Watson

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tiago Baptista

    Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, IGBMC, Illkirch, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elisabeth Scheer

    Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, IGBMC, Illkirch, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anna L Chambers

    School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8133-6240
  6. Christine Koehler

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Juan Zou

    Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ima Obong-Ebong

    Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Eaazhisai Kandiah

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Arturo Temblador

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3076-6317
  11. Adam Round

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Eric Forest

    Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Petr Man

    BioCeV - Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Christoph Bieniossek

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Ernest D Laue

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7476-4148
  16. Edward A Lemke

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Juri Rappsilber

    Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Carol V Robinson

    Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Didier Devys

    Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, IGBMC, Illkirch, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9655-3512
  20. Làszlò Tora

    Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, IGBMC, Illkirch, France
    For correspondence
    laszlo@igbmc.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7398-2250
  21. Imre Berger

    School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    imre.berger@bristol.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7518-9045

Funding

Wellcome

  • Imre Berger

H2020 European Research Council (ERC-2013-340551)

  • Làszlò Tora

Research Councils UK

  • Imre Berger

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-BSV8-0021-03)

  • Imre Berger

Baden-Württemberg Stiftung

  • Imre Berger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Gupta et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,637
    views
  • 565
    downloads
  • 31
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kapil Gupta
  2. Aleksandra A Watson
  3. Tiago Baptista
  4. Elisabeth Scheer
  5. Anna L Chambers
  6. Christine Koehler
  7. Juan Zou
  8. Ima Obong-Ebong
  9. Eaazhisai Kandiah
  10. Arturo Temblador
  11. Adam Round
  12. Eric Forest
  13. Petr Man
  14. Christoph Bieniossek
  15. Ernest D Laue
  16. Edward A Lemke
  17. Juri Rappsilber
  18. Carol V Robinson
  19. Didier Devys
  20. Làszlò Tora
  21. Imre Berger
(2017)
Architecture of TAF11/TAF13/TBP complex suggests novel regulation properties of general transcription factor TFIID
eLife 6:e30395.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30395

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30395

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Angel D'Oliviera, Xuhang Dai ... Jeffrey S Mugridge
    Research Article

    The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro or Nsp5) is critical for production of viral proteins during infection and, like many viral proteases, also targets host proteins to subvert their cellular functions. Here, we show that the human tRNA methyltransferase TRMT1 is recognized and cleaved by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. TRMT1 installs the N2,N2-dimethylguanosine (m2,2G) modification on mammalian tRNAs, which promotes cellular protein synthesis and redox homeostasis. We find that Mpro can cleave endogenous TRMT1 in human cell lysate, resulting in removal of the TRMT1 zinc finger domain. Evolutionary analysis shows the TRMT1 cleavage site is highly conserved in mammals, except in Muroidea, where TRMT1 is likely resistant to cleavage. TRMT1 proteolysis results in reduced tRNA binding and elimination of tRNA methyltransferase activity. We also determined the structure of an Mpro-TRMT1 peptide complex that shows how TRMT1 engages the Mpro active site in an uncommon substrate binding conformation. Finally, enzymology and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that kinetic discrimination occurs during a later step of Mpro-mediated proteolysis following substrate binding. Together, these data provide new insights into substrate recognition by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro that could help guide future antiviral therapeutic development and show how proteolysis of TRMT1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs both TRMT1 tRNA binding and tRNA modification activity to disrupt host translation and potentially impact COVID-19 pathogenesis or phenotypes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Qian Wang, Jinxin Liu ... Qian Liu
    Research Article

    Paramyxovirus membrane fusion requires an attachment protein for receptor binding and a fusion protein for membrane fusion triggering. Nipah virus (NiV) attachment protein (G) binds to ephrinB2 or -B3 receptors, and fusion protein (F) mediates membrane fusion. NiV-F is a class I fusion protein and is activated by endosomal cleavage. The crystal structure of a soluble GCN4-decorated NiV-F shows a hexamer-of-trimer assembly. Here, we used single-molecule localization microscopy to quantify the NiV-F distribution and organization on cell and virus-like particle membranes at a nanometer precision. We found that NiV-F on biological membranes forms distinctive clusters that are independent of endosomal cleavage or expression levels. The sequestration of NiV-F into dense clusters favors membrane fusion triggering. The nano-distribution and organization of NiV-F are susceptible to mutations at the hexamer-of-trimer interface, and the putative oligomerization motif on the transmembrane domain. We also show that NiV-F nanoclusters are maintained by NiV-F–AP-2 interactions and the clathrin coat assembly. We propose that the organization of NiV-F into nanoclusters facilitates membrane fusion triggering by a mixed population of NiV-F molecules with varied degrees of cleavage and opportunities for interacting with the NiV-G/receptor complex. These observations provide insights into the in situ organization and activation mechanisms of the NiV fusion machinery.