Bladder cancer associated mutations in RXRA activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors to drive urothelial Proliferation

Abstract

RXRA regulates transcription as part of a heterodimer with 14 other nuclear receptors, including the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Analysis from the TCGA raised the possibility that hyperactive PPAR signaling, either due to PPAR gamma gene amplification or RXRA hot-spot mutation (S427F/Y) drives 20-25% of human bladder cancers. Here we characterize mutant RXRA, demonstrating it induces enhancer/promoter activity in the context of RXRA/PPAR heterodimers in human bladder cancer cells. Structure-function studies indicate that the RXRA substitution allosterically regulates the PPAR AF2 domain via an aromatic interaction with the terminal tyrosine found in PPARs. In mouse urothelial organoids, PPAR agonism is sufficient to drive growth-factor independent growth in the context of concurrent tumor suppressor loss. Similarly, mutant RXRA stimulates growth-factor independent growth of Trp53/Kdm6a null bladder organoids. Mutant RXRA driven growth of urothelium is reversible by PPAR inhibition, supporting PPARs as targetable drivers of bladder cancer.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Angela M Halstead

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chiraag D Kapadia

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jennifer Bolzenius

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Clarence E Chu

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Andrew Schriefer

    Genome Technology Access Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lukas D Wartman

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5499-8465
  7. Gregory R Bowman

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Vivek K Arora

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    arorav@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1694-9109

Funding

Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (Clinical Investigator)

  • Vivek K Arora

Cancer Research Foundation (Young Investigator)

  • Vivek K Arora

National Cancer Institute (T32 CA113275)

  • Angela M Halstead

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000448)

  • Vivek K Arora

National Cancer Institute (P30 CA91842)

  • Andrew Schriefer

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK104279)

  • Chiraag D Kapadia

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse experiments were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines and current NIH policies and were approved by the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol #20140186.

Copyright

© 2017, Halstead et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,723
    views
  • 450
    downloads
  • 56
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Angela M Halstead
  2. Chiraag D Kapadia
  3. Jennifer Bolzenius
  4. Clarence E Chu
  5. Andrew Schriefer
  6. Lukas D Wartman
  7. Gregory R Bowman
  8. Vivek K Arora
(2017)
Bladder cancer associated mutations in RXRA activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors to drive urothelial Proliferation
eLife 6:e30862.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30862

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30862

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Arman Angaji, Michel Owusu ... Johannes Berg
    Research Article

    In growing cell populations such as tumours, mutations can serve as markers that allow tracking the past evolution from current samples. The genomic analyses of bulk samples and samples from multiple regions have shed light on the evolutionary forces acting on tumours. However, little is known empirically on the spatio-temporal dynamics of tumour evolution. Here, we leverage published data from resected hepatocellular carcinomas, each with several hundred samples taken in two and three dimensions. Using spatial metrics of evolution, we find that tumour cells grow predominantly uniformly within the tumour volume instead of at the surface. We determine how mutations and cells are dispersed throughout the tumour and how cell death contributes to the overall tumour growth. Our methods shed light on the early evolution of tumours in vivo and can be applied to high-resolution data in the emerging field of spatial biology.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Susanne Tilk, Judith Frydman ... Dmitri A Petrov
    Research Article

    In asexual populations that don’t undergo recombination, such as cancer, deleterious mutations are expected to accrue readily due to genome-wide linkage between mutations. Despite this mutational load of often thousands of deleterious mutations, many tumors thrive. How tumors survive the damaging consequences of this mutational load is not well understood. Here, we investigate the functional consequences of mutational load in 10,295 human tumors by quantifying their phenotypic response through changes in gene expression. Using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), we find that high mutational load tumors up-regulate proteostasis machinery related to the mitigation and prevention of protein misfolding. We replicate these expression responses in cancer cell lines and show that the viability in high mutational load cancer cells is strongly dependent on complexes that degrade and refold proteins. This indicates that the upregulation of proteostasis machinery is causally important for high mutational burden tumors and uncovers new therapeutic vulnerabilities.