Bladder cancer associated mutations in RXRA activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors to drive urothelial proliferation

Abstract

RXRA regulates transcription as part of a heterodimer with 14 other nuclear receptors, including the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Analysis from the TCGA raised the possibility that hyperactive PPAR signaling, either due to PPAR gamma gene amplification or RXRA hot-spot mutation (S427F/Y) drives 20-25% of human bladder cancers. Here we characterize mutant RXRA, demonstrating it induces enhancer/promoter activity in the context of RXRA/PPAR heterodimers in human bladder cancer cells. Structure-function studies indicate that the RXRA substitution allosterically regulates the PPAR AF2 domain via an aromatic interaction with the terminal tyrosine found in PPARs. In mouse urothelial organoids, PPAR agonism is sufficient to drive growth-factor independent growth in the context of concurrent tumor suppressor loss. Similarly, mutant RXRA stimulates growth-factor independent growth of Trp53/Kdm6a null bladder organoids. Mutant RXRA driven growth of urothelium is reversible by PPAR inhibition, supporting PPARs as targetable drivers of bladder cancer.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Angela M Halstead

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chiraag D Kapadia

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jennifer Bolzenius

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Clarence E Chu

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Andrew Schriefer

    Genome Technology Access Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lukas D Wartman

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5499-8465
  7. Gregory R Bowman

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Vivek K Arora

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    arorav@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1694-9109

Funding

Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (Clinical Investigator)

  • Vivek K Arora

Cancer Research Foundation (Young Investigator)

  • Vivek K Arora

National Cancer Institute (T32 CA113275)

  • Angela M Halstead

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000448)

  • Vivek K Arora

National Cancer Institute (P30 CA91842)

  • Andrew Schriefer

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK104279)

  • Chiraag D Kapadia

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ross L Levine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse experiments were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines and current NIH policies and were approved by the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol #20140186.

Version history

  1. Received: July 28, 2017
  2. Accepted: November 10, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 16, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: November 17, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: December 7, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Halstead et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,677
    views
  • 448
    downloads
  • 51
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Angela M Halstead
  2. Chiraag D Kapadia
  3. Jennifer Bolzenius
  4. Clarence E Chu
  5. Andrew Schriefer
  6. Lukas D Wartman
  7. Gregory R Bowman
  8. Vivek K Arora
(2017)
Bladder cancer associated mutations in RXRA activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors to drive urothelial proliferation
eLife 6:e30862.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30862

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30862

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Savvas Nikolaou, Amelie Juin ... Laura M Machesky
    Research Article Updated

    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis, with high rates of metastasis and few treatment options. Hyperactivation of KRAS in almost all tumours drives RAC1 activation, conferring enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity as well as macropinocytosis. Macropinocytosis is well understood as a nutrient scavenging mechanism, but little is known about its functions in trafficking of signalling receptors. We find that CYRI-B is highly expressed in pancreatic tumours in a mouse model of KRAS and p53-driven pancreatic cancer. Deletion of Cyrib (the gene encoding CYRI-B protein) accelerates tumourigenesis, leading to enhanced ERK and JNK-induced proliferation in precancerous lesions, indicating a potential role as a buffer of RAC1 hyperactivation in early stages. However, as disease progresses, loss of CYRI-B inhibits metastasis. CYRI-B depleted tumour cells show reduced chemotactic responses to lysophosphatidic acid, a major driver of tumour spread, due to impaired macropinocytic uptake of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1. Overall, we implicate CYRI-B as a mediator of growth and signalling in pancreatic cancer, providing new insights into pathways controlling metastasis.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Chenxi Gao, Huaibin Ge ... Jing Hu
    Research Article

    BRAFV600E mutation is a driver mutation in the serrated pathway to colorectal cancers. BRAFV600E drives tumorigenesis through constitutive downstream extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, but high-intensity ERK activation can also trigger tumor suppression. Whether and how oncogenic ERK signaling can be intrinsically adjusted to a ‘just-right’ level optimal for tumorigenesis remains undetermined. In this study, we found that FAK (Focal adhesion kinase) expression was reduced in BRAFV600E-mutant adenomas/polyps in mice and patients. In Vil1-Cre;BRAFLSL-V600E/+;Ptk2fl/fl mice, Fak deletion maximized BRAFV600E’s oncogenic activity and increased cecal tumor incidence to 100%. Mechanistically, our results showed that Fak loss, without jeopardizing BRAFV600E-induced ERK pathway transcriptional output, reduced EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-dependent ERK phosphorylation. Reduction in ERK phosphorylation increased the level of Lgr4, promoting intestinal stemness and cecal tumor formation. Our findings show that a ‘just-right’ ERK signaling optimal for BRAFV600E-induced cecal tumor formation can be achieved via Fak loss-mediated downregulation of ERK phosphorylation.