In order to isolate the effect of pathogenic VWMD mutations on eIF2B GEF activity, we first developed an assay using purified recombinant human complexes. A minimal defined system requires substrate (heterotrimeric eIF2 complex), enzyme (heteropentameric eIF2B complex) and a method of monitoring reaction kinetics. We expressed and purified recombinant human eIF2 from human cells (Figure 1A and B), and loaded it with a fluorescent GDP analog, Bodipy-FL-GDP. The fluorescence quantum yield of this analog is increased upon protein binding and quenched in solution; release of Bodipy-FL-GDP from eIF2 is thus measured as a time-dependent decrease in fluorescence (Sekine et al., 2015). In the presence of excess unlabeled GDP, the fluorescence signal of Bodipy-FL-GDP follows a pattern of single-exponential decay. As previously reported, eIF2 alone exhibits a slow intrinsic rate of GDP exchange (t_1/2 > 70 mins; Figure 1C; Panniers and Henshaw, 1983).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Based on crystallographic and mass spectrometric data (Kashiwagi et al., 2016; Kuhle et al., 2015; Wortham et al., 2014), the βδγε subunits of eIF2B form a stable heterotetrameric subcomplex in vitro, which can be further ‘dimerized’ by association with an α₂ subcomplex to form the decameric holoenzyme. We co-expressed and affinity-purified either all five wild-type eIF2B subunits together from human cells, or the βδγε and α subunits separately (Figure 1D). We reasoned that the first approach would allow us to selectively obtain pre-formed eIF2B decameric complexes, whereas the second approach would allow us to reconstitute the process of holoenzyme assembly in vitro.

Co-expression of five eIF2B subunits yielded a purified complex with a size corresponding to the predicted (αβδγε)₂ decamer, as determined by multi-angle light scattering (Figure 1E). Expression of the α subunit by itself produced a homodimer, whereas a heterotetramer was formed by βδγε in the absence of α (Figure 1E). Thus, the purification process yielded intact subcomplexes containing equimolar quantities of each eIF2B subunit. Addition of purified eIF2B decamer to eIF2 stimulated GDP release and increased the rate of fluorescence decay (t_1/2 = 20 mins; Figure 1C). Consistent with prior results, the stimulatory effect of eIF2B on eIF2 GDP release was further enhanced by addition of ISRIB in a dose-dependent manner (Sekine et al., 2015; Sidrauski et al., 2015). The combination of βγδε and α₂ behaved similarly to the pre-formed decameric complex (see below).

The eIF2B δ subunit exhibits alternative splicing, producing two isoforms, δ1 and δ2, which differ only at their N-terminal region (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A; Kuhn et al., 2009). Prior work in cells suggested that the longer and less-studied δ1 isoform may render eIF2B insensitive to inhibition by eIF2α phosphorylation by weakening the eIF2-eIF2B interaction (Martin et al., 2010). As a first step, we used our reconstituted system as a platform to compare the two different δ isoforms. We purified decamers of both isoforms (Figure 1D) to compare their effectiveness at stimulating GDP release. Additionally, we stoichiometrically phosphorylated trimeric eIF2 at serine 51 of its α subunit using recombinant PERK kinase, to serve as an eIF2B inhibitor in the GEF assay.

We found that the δ1 and δ2 isoforms had similar basal GEF activity and responded similarly to ISRIB stimulation (EC₅₀ = 0.8 nM and 1.2 nM, respectively; Figure 1F). Next, while keeping the total eIF2 concentration constant, we titrated phospho-eIF2 into the system to a maximum of two-fold excess over unphosphorylated eIF2. As expected, the GDP release t_1/2 increased asymptotically with addition of phospho-eIF2 (Figure 1G), approaching the intrinsic rate of eIF2 GDP release without eIF2B. In contrast to previous reports, we observed no difference between the two δ isoforms in their response to phospho-eIF2. Notably, we showed that ISRIB equally reduced the inhibitory effect of phospho-eIF2 on both isoforms, such that even a 2:1 ratio of inhibitor:substrate was insufficient to block eIF2B activity. We conclude that there is no difference between the two δ isoforms under our experimental conditions.

The results above validated our assay as a sensitive and reproducible method to monitor the GEF activity of recombinant eIF2B complexes. Based on these measurements, we generated VWMD mutants in the background of eIF2B with the δ2 isoform, which is the predominant isoform in vivo (Martin et al., 2010). All subsequent experiments also included a small fraction of unlabeled phospho-eIF2 (5 nM added to 25 nM eIF2:Bodipy-FL-GDP) in the assays to increase the dynamic range of the response to ISRIB stimulation.

With an in vitro measurement system in place, we next examined the effects of pathogenic VWMD mutations on the GEF activity of eIF2B. Using the structure of S. pombe eIF2B as a guide, we selected five VWMD mutations that vary in their location within the eIF2B complex and the severity of the resulting disease (Figure 2A and Table 1). Two of the mutations reside in the αβδ regulatory subcomplex. αV183F, located at the interface of the α-α homodimer, has been shown to abolish dimer formation (Wortham et al., 2014). Similarly, δR483W is predicted to disrupt a key β-δ heterodimer interaction that is important for tetramerization of the (βδ)₂ subcomplex. R113 in the catalytic ε subunit contacts the β subunit and the mutation of Arg to His likely destabilizes the interaction between the catalytic and regulatory subcomplexes (Kashiwagi et al., 2016). εR113H is one of the most prevalent VWMD mutations (Table 1). We also generated εR136H and εR195H mutations, which are surface-exposed and buried residues, respectively. Patients with the εR136H mutation exhibit classical disease progression (Kantor et al., 2005), whereas the εR195H mutation results in a severe, early-onset form of VWMD known as Cree leukoencephalopathy (Black et al., 1988; Fogli et al., 2002). Notably, animal models have been generated for the δR483W, εR136H and εR195H mutations, and they recapitulate important aspects of the human disease (Dooves et al., 2016; Geva et al., 2010).

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

To better control for the effects of these mutations on eIF2B holoenzyme formation, we expressed them as separate βγδε and α₂ subcomplexes and combined equimolar amounts of each subcomplex for the GEF assay. Similar to wild-type proteins, all the mutant subcomplexes purified to homogeneity with similar yield (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Wild-type eIF2B promoted GDP release from eIF2 with t_1/2 = 12.2 mins (Figure 2B and Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Under identical conditions, every VWMD mutant except εR136H had significantly slowed GDP release. αV183F had 33% of wild-type basal activity, whereas δR483W, εR113H and εR195H had 28%, 61% and 56% activity, respectively. Thus, 4 out of 5 VWMD mutations tested in this fully reconstituted system exhibited compromised GEF activity. The wild-type GEF activity of the εR136H mutant complex is intriguing. It is possible that the mutation destabilizes the endogenous ε subunit in cells. However, no reduction in the affected subunit was observed in cerebellar lysates from mice carrying this mutation and a 23% reduction in GEF activity was reported (Geva et al., 2010).

In our assay, ISRIB stimulated the activity of wild-type eIF2B ~ 2X in a dose-dependent manner (EC₅₀ = 0.9 nM; Figure 2B and C; Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). 50 nM ISRIB successfully rescued the activity of the VWMD mutants, with stimulation ranging from 1.8X for αV183F up to 7.4X for δR483W (Figure 2B). Indeed, the ISRIB-rescued GEF activity of every mutant except αV183F exceeded the level of basal wild-type activity. The similar ISRIB EC₅₀ values across wild-type and VWMD mutant complexes (Figure 2C) indicate that the mutations do not affect the ability of ISRIB to bind to eIF2B and stimulate its GEF activity. In the case of the δR483W mutant, the ISRIB EC₅₀ was lower than wild-type, indicating that ISRIB was actually more effective at enhancing the activity of this mutant.

αV183F is unique among the mutations tested in this study because it is the only one that affects the α₂ homodimer instead of the βδγε subcomplex. Unlike the other mutations, ISRIB was unable to normalize its activity to wild-type levels even though the EC₅₀ was unchanged (Figure 2B and C). To further characterize this mutation, we performed a GEF assay with wild-type βδγε and titrated α^WT or α^V183F. It has been shown that the heterotetramer containing the catalytic eIF2Bε subunit retains a low level of GEF activity that is enhanced by supplementation of eIF2Bα (Williams et al., 2001). Consistent with this, we observed that the activity of βδγε was <30% of decamer (Figure 2D, compare left-most point of black curve against points with >2.5 nM eIF2Bα). βδγε activity was stimulated 2.3X in the presence of 50 nM ISRIB (Figure 2D, compare left-most points of black and gray curves), concomitant with stabilization of a more-active octameric form (Figure 2D and Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). Addition of α subunit increased GEF activity in a concentration-dependent manner, with K_m = 6 nM for α^WT and 246 nM for α^V183F; 40X more mutant subunit was required to achieve the same level of GEF activity compared to wild-type (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C). Thus, dimerization of the α subunit, which is abolished by the V183F mutation, provides a critical avidity effect that promotes eIF2B complex formation and activity. ISRIB shifted the K_m of α^WT and α^V183F to 4 nM and 88 nM, respectively. The assays in Figure 2C were performed with 3 nM eIF2B, which explains the incomplete rescue of αV183F mutant activity by ISRIB; under those conditions, α concentration was still 30X below the αV183F K_m. We show that using sufficiently high concentrations of α^V183F, wild-type levels of GEF activity are achievable, both in the absence and presence of ISRIB (Figure 2D).

In conclusion, we show that four different VWMD mutant eIF2B complexes display deficient GEF activity in a fully reconstituted system. ISRIB enhanced the activity of all generated mutants, even in a case where the biochemical consequence of the disease-causing mutation (εR136H) could not be readily assessed.

Having established that VWMD mutant complexes show compromised GEF activity, we wondered how this impairment was elicited by the various mutations that affect different subunits. A clue came from comparing the activity of tetrameric (-α₂ dimer) and decameric (+α₂ dimer) eIF2B; the former is significantly poorer at stimulating GDP release (Figure 2D; compare activity of tetramer before and after addition of α subunit). We postulated that some VWMD mutations might destabilize the eIF2B holoenzyme, thus leading to reduced activity. To examine the ability of eIF2B complexes to form decamers, we combined the purified βδγε and α₂ subcomplexes, and subjected the mixtures to size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). We used an elevated salt concentration (300 mM) to destabilize the eIF2B complex slightly and increase the dynamic range of the assay, allowing us to interrogate the effect of the pathogenic mutations as well as the ability of ISRIB to enhance decamer formation. A similar approach was previously used to demonstrate the stabilizing effect of ISRIB on eIF2B-containing lysates by sucrose gradient (Sidrauski et al., 2015).

Wild-type eIF2B readily formed a decamer as the major species, eluting at 12.7 mL on the SEC column (Figure 2E and Figure 2—figure supplement 2A). A minor peak corresponding to the βδγε tetramer was observed at 14.1 mL, whereas the α₂ homodimer eluted at 16.7 mL. By calculating the ratio of peak areas for decamer:tetramer (R_10/4), we obtained a simple metric for complex stability (Figure 2F). The wild-type complex had a R_10/4 of 5.2 under these assay conditions. Remarkably, αV183F, δR483W, εR113H and εR195H had decreased R_10/4s of 0.6, 2.0, 4.6 and 4.0, respectively, demonstrating that these pathogenic mutations destabilize the decameric eIF2B complex (Figure 2E–F and Figure 2—figure supplement 2A). The εR136H mutant had a R_10/4 of 8.5, indicating decamer stability as good as, if not better than wild-type.

We repeated the SEC experiment, but with the mobile phase supplemented with 200 nM ISRIB. In agreement with our hypothesis, we observed a collapse of the tetramer peak and an increase in the decameric species for all eIF2B constructs (Figure 2E and Figure 2—figure supplement 2A). This change was particularly large for the αV183F mutant, which underwent an 8.2X increase in R_10/4 to 4.9 after ISRIB addition, which is comparable to that of wild-type complex in the absence of drug (Figure 2F).

Our data show that decamer formation is presumably correlated with eIF2B function (GEF activity of wild-type ~ εR136H > εR113H ~ εR195H > αV183F > δR483W). The αV183F mutation produced a particularly severe effect on complex stability, but the GEF activity of the mutant is better than expected because its βδγε subcomplex is wild-type. By contrast, the other mutants fall into a distinct class wherein defects affect the heterotetrameric subcomplex directly. Our results suggest that VWMD mutations that impair GEF activity may do so via a common mechanism of destabilizing the decameric eIF2B holoenzyme. This could explain why compound heterozygote alleles lead to VWMD; there are many non-targeted ways to push a complex away from optimal stability. The existence of over 170 eIF2B mutations in human VWMD likely reflects the ease with which the multi-subunit eIF2B assembly can be disrupted. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that ISRIB can engage with mutant eIF2B complexes, stabilize formation of the highly active decamer, and rescue GEF activity in vitro.

As a further test of our hypothesis that eIF2B decamer formation drives enhanced GEF activity, we wondered whether we could generate a synthetic VWMD-like mutation that would also be resistant to ISRIB stimulation by mutating residues in the vicinity of the ISRIB binding pocket. eIF2Bδ is a key mediator of ISRIB binding, based on unbiased activity-based screening (Sekine et al., 2015) and biochemical stabilization assays (Sidrauski et al., 2015). Modeling of the ISRIB-resistant mutations from the activity-based screen onto the S. pombe eIF2B structure placed them near the pseudo-twofold rotational axis of eIF2B (Kashiwagi et al., 2016), consistent with the proposed mechanism of stabilization. Examination of the eIF2B crystal structure revealed a cavity at its core that could potentially accommodate ISRIB; the ISRIB-resistant mutants form part of the surface of this space (Kashiwagi et al., 2016). To date, no VWMD mutations have been identified in this immediate region. We identified another cavity-facing residue in the δ subunit, L487, which also packs against the adjacent β subunit (Figure 3A). We reasoned that introducing a bulky residue at the L487 position might simultaneously disrupt both eIF2B complex stability and ISRIB binding.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

We generated the δL487W mutation in the background of the eIF2B (αβδγε)₂ decamer, as we were unable to purify it in a tetrameric form. As a control, we also generated δL179F, which was identified in an unbiased screen as an ISRIB-resistant mutant with wild-type activity (Sekine et al., 2015). First, we compared decamer stability of the wild-type and mutants by SEC on the purified αβδγε complexes. ISRIB supplementation increased the R_10/4 of wild-type eIF2B from 8.6 to 15.5 (Figure 3B–C and Figure 2—figure supplement 2B). The δL487W mutation had a markedly reduced R_10/4 of 1.6 (6X lower than wild-type) that did not change significantly in the presence of ISRIB, confirming that we had generated an ISRIB-resistant mutant. As expected, the δL179F also did not respond to ISRIB, although its R_10/4 of 5.6 was closer to wild-type eIF2B (Figure 3B–C and Figure 2—figure supplement 2B).

Like bona-fide VWMD mutations that destabilize the decameric complex, we expected δL487W to have impaired GEF activity. Consistent with the SEC data, the GEF activity of the δL487W mutant was severely compromised (25% of wild-type activity), whereas the activity of the δL179F mutant was similar to wild-type (Figure 3D) and both mutants were unresponsive to the addition of up to 500 nM ISRIB (550X wild-type EC₅₀). Finally, we took advantage of a purified δL179F βδγε ISRIB-resistant tetramer, and combined it with the αV183F VWMD mutation. As expected, the combination of both mutations displayed not only compromised GEF activity which is driven by the αV183F mutation, but an inability to be rescued by ISRIB (Figure 3E). Thus, our examination of existing structural knowledge allowed us to generate a novel ISRIB-resistant mutant with VWMD-like complex stability and activity, which we contrasted against another ISRIB-resistant mutant with wild-type properties.

The positive effects of ISRIB in vitro motivated us to generate a cellular model of VWMD, which would allow us to test its ability to rescue functional outputs of the ISR. We aimed to introduce mutations into an isogenic mammalian cell background in order to make direct comparisons between cell lines. We first isolated a monoclonal cell line from a previously described polyclonal HEK293T population containing an ISR reporter stably integrated at multiple genomic sites (Sidrauski et al., 2013). The ISR reporter drives firefly luciferase expression under control of the ATF4 5’ untranslated region (containing two uORFs). Like endogenous ATF4, translation of this reporter is driven by stress-induced eIF2α phosphorylation, which reduces ternary complex formation and results in translation initiation in the luciferase open reading frame (Sidrauski et al., 2013). We reasoned that this reporter would enable us to quantitatively measure ISR induction in cells carrying the various eIF2B VWMD mutations.

Using the monoclonal parental ISR reporter cells, we generated daughter cell lines individually harboring the αV183F, δR483W, εR113H and εR195H mutations at their endogenous loci by CRISPR-Cas9 editing and homology-directed repair (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). Despite repeated attempts, we were unable to produce cells with the εR136H mutation. As a substitute, we generated a ‘classical VWMD’ I346T mutation in the γ subunit, the second subunit of the catalytic subcomplex. For each VWMD mutation, we isolated and validated two independent clones. Due to the low efficiency of homology-directed repair and the hypotriploid nature of HEK293T cells (three copies of each eIF2B gene), we only obtained true homozygous VWMD mutations for αV183F (2 clones), δR483W (1 clone) and εR195H (1 clone). The remaining clones carried one or two VWMD alleles, with the remaining allele(s) disrupted by an out-of-frame indel leading to a premature stop codon (Supplementary file 1). Nevertheless, the VWMD allele is the only source of the affected subunit for all clones analyzed in this study. Thus, these cell lines do not suffer from the complication of residual wild-type eIF2B activity.

Previous studies in both yeast and mammalian cells noted that a subset of VWMD mutations reduced levels of the affected subunit, and in some instances also destabilized associated subunits of the mutant complex (Richardson et al., 2004; Sekine et al., 2015; Wortham et al., 2016). We anticipated that decreasing subunit levels might further cripple the activity of VWMD mutant eIF2B, above and beyond the effects on decamer stability established above. To determine whether the generated VWMD mutations decrease the level of the various subunits, we performed immunoblotting of each eIF2B polypeptide in wild-type and VWMD mutant cells. The αV183F mutation caused a consistent 50% reduction in the level of the α subunit in both clones generated, whereas the γ subunit showed a 50% reduction in only one clone (Figure 4A; Figure 4—figure supplement 1B–C). The γI346T mutation caused a 20% reduction (that did not reach statistical significance) in γ subunit in one clone, and a significant 90% reduction in the second clone. Both the εR113H and εR195H mutations produced significant 20–40% reductions in ε subunit levels. One clone of εR195H also showed a 40% reduction in the α, β and δ regulatory subcomplex (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). As noted in previous studies, VWMD mutations negatively affected the abundance of the mutated subunit, and in a subset of clones, the level of additional subunits was also reduced. Because both αV183F clones and one of the εR195H clones are homozygous mutants, the effect on protein levels cannot be explained solely by reduced gene dosage. The observed differences between clones carrying the same mutation could possibly be due to the intrinsic genomic instability of HEK293T cancer cells. In the subsequent experiments, we analyzed both clones of each VWMD mutation.

Figure 4 with 4 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Loss of eIF2B function is expected to produce a chronic ISR signal, and both VWMD patient-derived fibroblasts and post-mortem brain samples have markers of ISR induction (Kantor et al., 2005) (van der Voorn et al., 2005). Thus, we assumed that our cell lines with introduced VWMD mutations would exhibit a basal signature of ISR induction. To test this, we measured the two proximal outputs of the ISR: increased levels of ATF4 protein and attenuation of global protein synthesis (Figure 4B).

First, we compared the level of endogenous ATF4 under steady-state, unstressed conditions. We did not detect significant basal ATF4 expression in any of the VWMD mutants (Figure 4C and Figure 4—figure supplement 2A, first lane in each panel), even in the mutants with reduced eIF2B subunit levels; two clones, δR483W clone #2 and εR113H clone #2, showed weak expression that was not reproducible. ATF4 induction is a highly sensitive readout of ISR activation, thus the lack of upregulation in the mutants was unexpected. Next, we measured ³⁵S-methionine incorporation to determine the relative rates of protein synthesis in the various lines. Consistent with a lack of ATF4 upregulation, the basal rate of protein synthesis was similar in both VWMD and wild-type cell lines (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B–C). These data are consistent with prior reports showing that in two other systems, VWMD patient-derived lymphoblasts and engineered VWMD mutant CHO cells, the rate of protein synthesis was not reduced (Sekine et al., 2015; van Kollenburg et al., 2006a). We conclude that HEK293T VWMD mutants do not show significant ISR activation under basal conditions, suggesting that eIF2B activity is not limiting in this context. This is likely due to the high level of eIF2B expression in transformed cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 4A–B; Balachandran and Barber, 2004; Kim et al., 2000), which would mask the effects of VWMD mutations. Increased levels of eIF2B ensure that transformed cells can maintain high rates of protein synthesis for rapid proliferation.

We wondered whether challenging cells with an exogenous stressor might reveal differences in ISR induction between wild-type and VWMD cells. To this end, we treated cells with tunicamycin (Tm), an inhibitor of protein N-glycosylation that triggers the ISR through activation of the PERK kinase. The level of endogenous ATF4 in wild-type and VWMD cells was significantly increased after 3 hr of Tm treatment (Figure 4C and Figure 4—figure supplement 2A, second lane in each panel). Importantly, co-treatment with 500 nM ISRIB fully suppressed the upregulation of ATF4 protein in wild-type as well as VWMD cell lines (Figure 4C and Figure 4—figure supplement 2A, third lane in each panel). This result demonstrates that even though we did not observe basal ISR induction under our growth conditions, ISRIB can suppress exogenous stress-induced ATF4 upregulation in cells expressing various eIF2B mutant subunits.

In order to quantitatively compare the response of the different cell lines to ER stress, we took advantage of the genetically encoded ATF4-luciferase reporter. Cells were treated with varying concentrations of thapsigargin (Tg), an inhibitor of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ ATPase, which disrupts ER calcium homeostasis and activates PERK kinase (Lytton et al., 1991). After 7 hr of treatment, wild-type cells showed a dose-dependent increase in ATF4-luciferase activity (EC₅₀ = 14 nM; Figure 4—figure supplement 3). Surprisingly, all VWMD mutant cell lines showed a similar dose response, with no significant differences in Tg EC₅₀. This implies that under our assay conditions, VWMD mutations that reduce eIF2B levels (and impair GEF activity in vitro) do not sensitize the cellular response to ER stress. As was the case for Tm, ISRIB prevented activation of the ATF4-luciferase reporter in cells treated with a saturating concentration of Tg, a severe ER stressor (Figure 4D).

Finally, we tested whether ISRIB could rescue the reduction in protein synthesis in mutant cells after a stress challenge. We measured ³⁵S-methionine incorporation following treatment with the ER stressor dithiothreitol (DTT), a reducing agent that causes rapid accumulation of unfolded proteins. After 1 hr of DTT treatment, we observed a reduction in ³⁵S-methionine incorporation, with similar responses (~75% decrease) in wild-type and VWMD mutant cells (Figure 4E and Figure 4—figure supplement 2D). Co-treatment with ISRIB significantly restored ³⁵S-methionine incorporation to a similar extent in both wild-type and VWMD mutant cells. Taken together, our results demonstrate that ISRIB engages VWMD mutant eIF2B in all tested cell lines and attenuates both cellular outputs of the ISR.

VWMD mutant HEK293T cells did not exhibit basal ISR activation or increased sensitivity to exogenous ER stress. Given that three of the generated mutations (αV183F, δR483W and εR195H) had a detrimental effect on complex stability and GEF activity of recombinant eIF2B, we speculated that the lack of impairment of VWMD mutant cancer cells was due to high levels of eIF2B expression. Indeed, when we assessed the levels of each eIF2B subunit in a panel of five cell lines (HEK293T, HeLa, B-lymphocytes, WI-38 and hIPSCs), we discovered that HEK293T cells had the highest expression of every eIF2B subunit (Figure 4—figure supplement 4A–B). Our data are consistent with previous reports demonstrating overexpression of eIF2B subunits in transformed mammary epithelial cell lines (Balachandran and Barber, 2004; Kim et al., 2000), and is likely due to the selective advantage conferred by increased protein synthesis. Given this result, we postulated that conditions wherein the effective concentration of eIF2B is greatly reduced may reveal deficiencies in these mutants.

We produced lysates from wild-type and VWMD mutant cell lines and compared their activities using the GEF assay (Figure 4F and Figure 4—figure supplement 4C). The >100X dilution of lysates relative to native cytosol placed the system in a regime wherein eIF2B activity became rate-limiting, finally revealing the deleterious nature of each VWMD mutation that was buffered by the high eIF2B levels found in cancer cells. αV183F lysates retained only 32–43% of wild-type activity. Lysates from both γI346T clones possessed 55% of wild-type activity. The observation that one clone had 80% of eIF2Bγ protein compared to wild-type whereas the second had only 10% (Figure 4A and Figure 4—figure supplement 1C), suggests that the quantity of eIF2Bγ is not limiting for eIF2B complex formation here. The severe disease mutation δR483W retained only 28–35% of wild-type activity. The two mutations in the catalytic subunit, εR113H and εR195H, had 44–51% and 48–63% of wild-type activity, respectively. Importantly, the reductions in activity for the mutants are consistent with data obtained from our fully reconstituted system. Our results represent the first comparison of the effects of VWMD mutations on GEF activity in an isogenic mammalian cell background.

Finally, we tested the ability of ISRIB to rescue the deficiencies of the VWMD lysates in this assay. At 50 nM ISRIB, the t_1/2 of GDP release with wild-type lysate was 3.6 mins, a 5.5X stimulation of activity (Figure 4F). Addition of ISRIB enhanced GEF activity to the point that all reactions containing VWMD lysates attained t_1/2 < 9 mins. In the case of one of the δR483W clones, this translated to a dramatic 14X improvement in activity. Dose-response analysis showed that ISRIB had an in vitro EC₅₀ = 0.38 nM in wild-type lysate (Figure 4G and Figure 4—figure supplement 4C). Moreover, the EC₅₀ values for the VWMD lysates were similar to wild-type, with the notable exception of one αV183F clone (EC₅₀ = 0.99 nM). As we observed in our reconstituted system, the two δR483W clones had lower ISRIB EC₅₀ than wild-type (0.21 nM and 0.05 nM; see Discussion). This suggests that under the dilute protein concentrations used in this assay, the imbalance in the relative concentrations of the different eIF2B subunits did not dictate ISRIB sensitivity. Taken together, our results demonstrate that VWMD mutant cancer cell lines have impaired GEF activity that is revealed by dilution of the cellular lysate. Moreover, lysate GEF activity can be enhanced significantly, beyond basal wild-type levels, by the small molecule eIF2B activator ISRIB.

Previous work demonstrated that many VWMD mutations lead to a partial reduction in GEF activity. Although the majority of these experiments measured the enzymatic activity of lysates derived from patient cells, a few were performed in yeast cells in which analogous mutations were generated in the highly conserved eIF2B complex (Richardson et al., 2004). Intriguingly, some pathogenic mutations have been reported not to affect the enzymatic activity of eIF2B. Liu et al. performed a comprehensive analysis of VWMD mutations using affinity-purified eIF2B derived from HEK293T cells overexpressing all the subunits of the complex, and concluded that GEF activity was not predictive of VWMD severity (Liu et al., 2011). Moreover, they reported that some severe mutations affected eIF2B function without obviously impairing recombinant complex integrity or enzymatic activity. By contrast, Fogli et al. measured the GEF activity of transformed lymphocyte lysates derived from 30 VWMD patients and reported a 20–70% decrease in activity in all mutated cells that correlated with age of disease onset (Fogli et al., 2004b).

These contrasting conclusions underscore the need for further evaluation of the effect of VWMD mutations on eIF2B function. To this end, we interrogated the effect of pathogenic VWMD mutations in recombinant eIF2B complexes as well as in an isogenic cell model. The two complementary systems also served as the foundation to evaluate the ability of the eIF2B activator ISRIB to interact with the various VWMD mutant complexes and enhance their residual GEF activity.

In enzymatic assays with both VWMD HEK293T cell lysates and purified recombinant eIF2B complexes, we observed compromised GEF activity in all generated mutants with the exception of εR136H. Importantly, we saw a correlation in GEF activity impairment for each specific mutant using eIF2B from the two different sources. δR483W and αV183F were the most crippling mutations in both assays. γI346T, εR113H and εR195H had similar but milder deleterious effects on GEF activity in cell lysates. In line with lysate measurements, recombinant εR195H eIF2B complexes also showed a milder defect in enzymatic activity than αV183F and δR483W. The EC₅₀ of ISRIB for stimulating GEF activity was similar between wild-type and mutant complexes, except for δR483W (in both recombinant protein and cell lysates). Combined with our knowledge that no existing pathogenic mutations map to the putative ISRIB binding site within eIF2B, our data suggest that a broad range of VWMD mutations may be amenable to ISRIB-mediated rescue.

Among our tested mutations, δR483W was the only one within the (βδ)₂ regulatory core, and its position suggests that it could have potential effects on the stability of the βδγε subcomplex itself (Figure 2A). Although this is not apparent in the μM concentration range of our SEC experiments, they could manifest in the dilute nM regime of the GEF assay. We speculate that the ISRIB EC₅₀ for this mutant is lowered because the compound is acting synergistically with eIF2Bα to rescue not just decamer formation but the stability of the tetramer itself. Future experiments using more sensitive methods to assay stability of the βδγε subcomplex at ultra-low concentrations could address this particular question.

The degree of impairment of GEF activity in our in vitro assays and the reported severity of the disease allele in humans did not correlate. In particular, the two catalytic subunit mutants, εR113H (which has a classical disease presentation) and εR195H (which presents with a severe early phenotype), had similar lysate GEF activity. Thus, our reconstituted system can detect defects in eIF2B enzymatic function but does not capture true cellular complexity, such as factors that may modulate the activity of eIF2B in astrocytes or oligodendrocytes – the cell types most severely affected in the disease.

Recombinant eIF2B complexes of the εR136H mutant had wild-type levels of activity and complex stability. We were unable to generate HEK293T cells carrying this mutation and thus could not measure the enzymatic activity of cell lysates. The GEF activity of cerebellar lysates prepared from mice carrying the analogous mutation showed a 23% reduction in activity, and no significant decrease in the level of the mutated subunit was observed (Geva et al., 2010). In this case, the purified mutant complex did not reveal the enzymatic defect that is observed in the relevant cell types. eIF2B has been reported to possess non-GEF activities, functioning as a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) displacement factor (Jennings et al., 2013), as well as directly regulating ternary complex formation (Jennings et al., 2017). Mutations that affect these functions will not be revealed in the standard GEF assay that measures release of GDP from pre-loaded recombinant eIF2. It is worth noting that the αβδ regulatory subcomplex is evolutionarily descended from an archaeal sugar-binding metabolic enzyme complex, ribose 1,5-biphosphate isomerase, and has been shown to retain its capacity to bind metabolites (Dholakia et al., 1986; Gross et al., 1988; Kuhle et al., 2015). This suggests that the absence or presence of metabolites could act as another layer of regulation on eIF2B function. VWMD mutations affecting any of these activities/regulators would not be detected in the minimal system represented by our GEF assay. We note that this class of mutations provide an ideal opportunity to further dissect eIF2B function in future experiments, without the complication of intrinsically impaired GEF activity.

Mutations that destabilize the eIF2B decamer compromise GEF activity and may potentiate the disease phenotype. ISRIB binds at the eIF2B two-fold symmetric axis formed by (βδ)₂, stabilizing and activating the complex. As eIF2B is essential for life, VWMD mutations can only partially cripple its activity. We hypothesized that regardless of the VWMD mutations introduced, ISRIB would be able to interact with the mutant complexes and enhance the residual GEF activity. Our data demonstrate that ISRIB can indeed interact with eIF2B complexes harboring pathogenic VWMD mutations. In cells, the activator can fully restore GEF activity and suppress induction of the ISR following ER stress and restore protein synthesis in five different mutant cell lines. Notably, ISRIB rescued decamer formation of all recombinant VWMD mutant eIF2B complexes that displayed a significant reduction in their decamer:tetramer ratio. This stabilization of mutant eIF2B by ISRIB resulted in restoration of GEF activity against its substrate eIF2 to wild-type levels. As predicted, incorporation of an ISRIB-resistant mutation, δL179F, prevented activation of a complex that contains the destabilizing αV183F mutation.

The observation that ISRIB enhanced the activity of wild-type eIF2B in our cell-based assays suggests that even the wild-type complex can benefit from additional stabilization. We do not rule out the intriguing possibility that ISRIB may also have an allosteric stimulatory effect on the eIF2B complex, which is implied by our finding that ISRIB reduces the sensitivity of eIF2B to inhibition by phospho-eIF2 (Figure 1G). This result diverges from our previous observation that ISRIB does not alter the response of eIF2B to phospho-eIF2 (Sidrauski et al., 2015). However, our previous results were obtained using a high phospho-eIF2 concentration (~175 nM compared to 0–50 nM here) and lower eIF2B concentration (~0.5 nM compared to 1 nM here), conditions under which ISRIB is unlikely to have a rescuing effect.

The effect of ISRIB on white matter astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, the most susceptible cell types in VWMD, must be investigated. Further experiments are also needed to understand the differential sensitivity of different cell types to VWMD mutations. Post-translational modifications and metabolites may modify eIF2B stability and activity in cells and these could vary significantly depending on cellular context. The intracellular concentration of eIF2B subcomplexes as well as the ratio of eIF2:eIF2B are likely also important, particularly since eIF2 can convert from a substrate to an inhibitor of eIF2B upon stress-induced phosphorylation.

In conclusion, the ability of ISRIB to restore the GEF activity of eIF2B complexes containing VWMD mutations suggests that it may have beneficial effects in this neurodevelopmental leukodystrophy. More broadly, the finding that ISRIB can attenuate ISR activation in cells opens up avenues for use of this compound to ameliorate conditions wherein this crucial signaling pathway is inappropriately engaged.

The HEK293T ATF4-luciferase reporter cell line was previously described (Sidrauski et al., 2013). A monoclonal population (isolated by single cell dilution) was used as the parental cell line for generating the VWMD knock-in mutations. Cells were maintained in DMEM High Glucose (Corning CellGro) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1X antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Gibco).

eIF2B mutations were introduced into the HEK293T ATF4-luciferase reporter cell line using the GeneArt CRISPR Nuclease Vector with OFP Reporter Kit (Thermo Fisher). gRNA sequences (see Key Resources Table) were designed with MIT’s online CRISPR design tool (crispr.mit.edu), synthesized by IDT and inserted into the GeneArt plasmid according to manufacturer’s instructions. 150-base oligonucleotides were synthesized and used as DNA donor templates for homology-directed repair (HDR) after Cas9 cutting. The oligonucleotides were designed to include the point mutation of interest, as well as silent mutations to the gRNA PAM sequence to prevent Cas9 re-cutting.

1 μg of the guide-containing GeneArt plasmid and 10 μL of 50 μM HDR donor template were delivered into cells with a Lonza 4D-Nucleofector, using the SF reagent kit and program SF-130, according to vendor’s instructions. In some cases, cells were temporarily arrested at the G2/M transition by treatment with 20 ng/mL nocozadole for 16 hr before nucleofection to improve HDR efficiency. After 48–72 hr, OFP-positive cells were single-sorted into 96-well plates using a BD BioSciences FACSAria Fusion. Single clones were expanded and genomic DNA was extracted with a Quick-gDNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research). The eIF2B locus of interest was amplified by PCR and the purified PCR product was subjected to Sanger sequencing. Due to the low efficiency of HDR, this step typically yielded mixed sequences due to differential editing of the three eIF2B alleles in each clone. To disambiguate the editing events, PCR products were cloned into TOPO vectors using the TOPO-TA cloning kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). TOPO clones were sequenced to ensure that we determined the identity of each of the three alleles (Supplementary file 1).

Cell line identities were verified by ATCC STR profiling and have been tested to be free of mycoplasma contamination.

One day prior to treatment, cells were seeded into 96-well white opaque plates (Falcon) at a density of 4 × 10⁴ cells/well in 100 μL medium/well. Thapsigargin (1 mM stock concentration in DMSO) was dispensed into wells using a Tecan D300e digital dispenser, and incubated at 37°C for the specified time. ONE-Glo luciferase assay reagent (Promega) was added to each well following manufacturer’s instructions and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Luminescence was measured on a Molecular Devices SpectraMax i3x plate reader.

One day prior to the assay, cells were seeded into 12-well tissue culture plates coated with 10 mg/mL poly-D-lysine (Sigma) at a density of 5 × 10⁶ cells/mL. On the day of the assay, cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of DTT and ISRIB, and incubated for 40 min. 20 μCi of EasyTag L-[³⁵S]-methionine (Perkin Elmer) was added to each well and the plate was incubated for an additional 20 min. Cells were washed with PBS and lysed by addition of 0.2 mL RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Pierce).

For measurement of ³⁵S-methionine incorporation by gel quantitation, 20 μL of each lysate was run on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel (Bio-Rad). Gels were fixed in 40% methanol/10% acetic acid, stained with Bio-Rad QC Colloidal Coomassie solution, rinsed and dried. Dried gels were exposed to a storage phosphor screen (GE Healthcare) for 1–2 days. The phosphor screen was imaged on a Typhoon FLA scanner (GE Healthcare). For each lane of the phosphor and Coomassie images, areas and mean pixel intensities were quantified using ImageJ (NIH.gov).

Sequences of full-length human eIF2B subunits (UniProt accession numbers: eIF2Bα, Q14232; eIF2Bβ, P49770; eIF2Bγ, Q9UI10; eIF2Bδ, Q9NR50; eIF2Bε, Q13144) and human eIF2 subunits (UniProt accession numbers: eIF2S1, P05198; eIF2S2, P20042; eIF2S3, P41091) were synthesized by GenScript with or without an N-terminal FLAG-TEV tag, and cloned into a modified pHybE vector for expression (Hsieh, 2012). Point mutations were introduced into subunits by site-directed mutagenesis.

Proteins were expressed in HEK293-6E cells (NRC-Canada) using a Wave Bioreactor System 20/50EHT (GE Healthcare). Cells were grown to a density of 1.2 × 10⁶ cells/mL in Freestyle 293 expression media (Thermo Fisher) supplemented with 0.05% Pluronic-F68 (Thermo Fisher) and 0.5% Penicillin-Streptomycin (Thermo Fisher). Cells were transfected with expression plasmid DNA at 0.5 mg/L mixed with 1 mg/mL polyethylenimine (PolySciences Inc.) in a 1:4 ratio for 10 min, and grown at 37°C with 8% CO₂ for 3 days.

All purification steps were performed at 4°C. Cell pellets were resuspended in buffer A (20 mM HEPES, 300 mM KCl, pH 7.4) and lysed in a French Press (Aminco). Post-lysis, 1 mM EDTA and a standard protease inhibitor cocktail that omitted AEBSF but included PMSF were added to the supernatant. Protein complexes were purified by FLAG affinity chromatography (Domanski et al., 2012) using buffer A + 1 mM EDTA. Pooled fractions were dialyzed overnight against buffer A + 1 mM EDTA and 0.5 mM TCEP. eIF2 was further purified on a TSKgel SuperQ-5PW anion-exchange column (50 mL bed volume; Tosoh Biosciences) using 50 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl₂, 50–500 mM KCl salt gradient, 8.0–7.2 pH gradient. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assay.

For verification of protein complex sizes by multi-angle light scattering, 100 μL of each undiluted purified sample (concentrations ranged from 0.55 to 0.75 mg/mL) was loaded onto a WTC-030S5 column (Wyatt Technology) by auto-injection from a 1260 Infinity II HPLC system (Agilent Technologies). The column was connected in-line to a Dawn HELIOS II system (Wyatt Technology). The system was run at 0.3 mL/min for 1 hr using 20 mM HEPES, 200 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.4 as the mobile phase. Protein concentrations for molecular weight calculations were determined by UV₂₈₀ absorbance.

For loading of eIF2 with fluorescent nucleotide, 500 μL of eIF2 at 4.9 mg/mL (38 μM) was adjusted to a final concentration of 5 mM EDTA. Bodipy-FL-GDP (Thermo Fisher #G22360) was added to a 5-fold molar excess over eIF2 and the mixture was incubated for 1 hr at room temperature. MgCl₂ was added to a final concentration of 10 mM to quench the loading reaction. The mixture was buffer-exchanged by loading onto an Illustra NAP-5 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 20 mM HEPES, 120 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.4. Loaded eIF2 was eluted with 1 mL buffer, aliquoted and stored at −80°C until use.

For phosphorylation of eIF2, 150 μL of eIF2 at 1.5 μM was incubated with 500 μM ATP and 100 nM PERK kinase (Thermo Fisher #PV5106) for 2 hr at room temperature. The mixture was buffer-exchanged by loading onto a PD Spintrap G-25 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 20 mM HEPES, 120 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.4. Phosphorylated eIF2 was eluted with 0.6 mL buffer, aliquoted and stored at −80°C until use.

Wild-type and VWMD HEK293T cells were grown to approximately 80% confluence in 4 × 15 cm tissue culture dishes per cell line. Cells were harvested in PBS by pipetting and centrifuged to pellet. Each cell pellet was resuspended in 0.8 mL 20 mM HEPES, 150 mM KCl, 2 mM TCEP, pH 7.4 + cOmplete^TM EDTA-Free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Cells were lysed by manually passing them through a tungsten carbide ball-bearing homogenizer (isobiotec) with an 8 μm clearance. Lysed samples were cleared by centrifugation at 48,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. Cleared lysates were aliquoted and stored at −80°C until use.

Wild-type and VWMD HEK293T lysates were normalized to a protein concentration of 0.2 mg/mL by BCA assay. Samples were run on a ProteinSimple Wes capillary system using a 12–230 kDa separation module and the following instrument parameters: run conditions = 375V, 25 min; antibody diluent time = 5 min; primary and secondary antibody incubation time = 30 min. All antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:50 except for eIF2Bγ (1:25 dilution) and eIF2α (1:100 dilution).

Bodipy-FL-GDP-loaded eIF2 was adjusted to 1 μM using assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 120 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.4). A mixture of 50 nM eIF2 +1 mg/mL BSA was prepared in assay buffer and loaded into the injection module of a Molecular Devices SpectraMax i3x plate reader.

2X mixtures were prepared in assay buffer for the following experiments: HEK293T lysate assay = 0.2 mM GDP, 1 mg/mL BSA, 10 nM phospho-eIF2, 0.6 mg/mL lysate; recombinant eIF2B assay = 0.2 mM GDP, 1 mg/mL BSA, 10 nM phospho-eIF2, 6 nM eIF2B 4mer + α subunit (or 2 nM eIF2B 5mer); α titration assay = 0.2 mM GDP, 1 mg/mL BSA, 10 nM phospho-eIF2, 10 nM eIF2B 4mer, 0–1 μM α subunit; phospho-eIF2 titration assay = 0.2 mM GDP, 1 mg/mL BSA, 2 nM eIF2B 5mer, phospho-eIF2 and ‘cold’ eIF2 in varying ratios with a total concentration of 100 nM. In all experiments, 5 μL of each mixture was pipetted into the wells of a 384-well black low-volume plate (Greiner Bio-One #784076).

For ISRIB dose-response studies, ISRIB was dispensed from a 25 μM or 250 μM stock using a Tecan D300e digital dispenser into wells containing the mixtures above. DMSO was used for normalization in order to maintain a concentration of 0.2% in all wells in the final assay volume. For each run, triplicate measurements were made for each concentration of ISRIB.

Reactions were read on the Spectramax plate reader using the following instrument parameters: plate temperature = 25°C; eIF2 injection = 5 μL per well; shake before read = 2 s low intensity; PMT sensitivity = high; flashes/read = 6; excitation wavelength = 485 nm (15 nm width); emission wavelength = 535 nm (25 nm width); read duration = 30 min at 45 s intervals.

In a final assay volume of 10 μL/well, the following conditions were kept constant: 25 nM Bodipy-FL-GDP-loaded eIF2, 0.1 mM GDP, 1 mg/mL BSA. Phospho-eIF2, ISRIB and eIF2B varied depending on the experiment. To calculate GDP release half-lives, single-exponential decays were fit to the raw fluorescence intensity data using Prism (GraphPad Software).

Purified proteins were thawed and centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C to remove any potential aggregates. For 5mer runs, proteins were normalized to 1 μM prior to column loading. For 4mer + α runs, the 4mer was normalized to 1 μM and the α subunit was normalized to 1.2 μM. 100 μL of each sample was injected onto a Superose 6 10/300 column connected to an AKTA Pure 25 FPLC system (both from GE Healthcare). The system was run at 0.4 mL/min for 1 hr using 20 mM HEPES, 300 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.4 as the mobile phase. For conditions with ISRIB, the protein samples and mobile phase were supplemented with 200 nM ISRIB.

Data was processed in Prism (GraphPad Software). One- or two-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD was used for significance testing between different samples.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

The authors thank John Wang and Dan Eaton for assistance with multi-angle light scattering measurements. We also thank Swathi Krishnan, Calvin Jan, Voytek Okreglak, Jeff Settleman, David Stokoe and David Botstein for critical reading of the manuscript.

© 2018, Wong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.