Multiple lines of evidence indicate that spontaneous brain activity plays an essential role in brain function (Raichle and Mintun, 2006; Zhang and Raichle, 2010). For instance, intrinsic neuronal signaling consumes the vast majority of brain energy (Raichle, 2006, 2010). Investigation of spontaneous brain activity, predominantly conducted using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) (Biswal et al., 1995; Fox and Raichle, 2007), has provided critical insight into the intrinsic organization of the brain network. Using spontaneously fluctuating blood-oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) signal measured by rsfMRI, resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) between brain regions can be gauged by statistical interdependence of their rsfMRI signals over the period of data acquisition (Fox and Raichle, 2007). Based on this quantity, multiple brain networks of functionally-related regions have been identified in both humans and animals, which convey the information of stable functional connectivity organization of the brain (Beckmann et al., 2005; Fox et al., 2005; Damoiseaux et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2009; Allen et al., 2011; Liang et al., 2011).

Conventional rsfMRI studies generally focus on steady features of RSFC by assuming that RSFC is stationary during the acquisition period. However, meaningful temporal variability of RSFC at shorter time scales has also been discovered (Chang and Glover, 2010). This initial research and its follow-up studies revealed dynamic properties of RSFC, indicating that the stationarity assumption of RSFC would be overly simplistic for understanding spontaneous brain activity (Hutchison et al., 2013a; Preti et al., 2017; Chang et al., 2016a). Indeed, using sliding window analysis and clustering methods, temporally alternating but spatially repeatable RSFC patterns have been identified (Allen et al., 2014). In addition, Liu and Duyn (2013) developed a method that examined instantaneous co-activations of BOLD signal at single rsfMRI frames and found that BOLD co-activation patterns well corresponded brain connectivity configurations (Liu and Duyn, 2013). With this method, the default mode network, which is a single network under the assumption of stationary RSFC, can be decomposed into multiple sub-networks with distinct spatiotemporal characteristics and functional relevance (Liu and Duyn, 2013). Notably, the neurophysiologic relevance of dynamic RSFC has been validated in multiple studies using simultaneous electrophysiology and rsfMRI acquisitions (Tagliazucchi et al., 2012; Chang et al., 2013; Keilholz, 2014; Liu et al., 2015b).

In parallel with blossoming dynamic RSFC studies in humans, dynamic RSFC studies in animal models have also been conducted. Animals’ brain preserves fundamental organizational properties as the human brain (Liang et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2016), and can serve as a translational model for studying complicated brain dynamics. Using either the sliding window or co-activation pattern approach, dynamic RSFC patterns have been found in both awake and anesthetized rats, as well as in anesthetized monkeys (Majeed et al., 2011; Hutchison et al., 2013b; Keilholz et al., 2013; Mohajerani et al., 2013; Liang et al., 2015; Grandjean et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2017). These results suggest that dynamics in RSFC might be a general feature in the mammalian brain.

Despite the critical advancement, aforementioned dynamic rsfMRI studies have mainly focused on revealing the spatial characteristics of RSFC patterns that were non-stationary, while the temporal relationship between these RSFC patterns is still unclear. Particularly, although the existence of temporal transitions between characteristic RSFC patterns has been established, it remains elusive whether these transitions are random or organized in an orderly manner (Majeed et al., 2011; Zalesky et al., 2014; Mitra et al., 2015; Preti et al., 2017). Lack of such information highlights a gap in elucidating the temporal relationship of separate brain connectivity configurations, and thus hinders the comprehensive characterization of spatiotemporal dynamics of spontaneous brain activity.

To address this issue, in the present study we studied the temporal transitions of intrinsic brain activity in both awake rats and humans. The reproducibility of the RSFC pattern transitions was examined. In addition, the organization of RSFC pattern transitions in rats and humans were respectively studied using graph theory analysis. RSFC patterns that were pivotal in temporal transitions were further identified.

In this study, we investigated the temporal transitions between spontaneous brain activity patterns in awake rats and humans. In rat data, we first obtained a library of 40 characteristic RSFC patterns, using seed-based correlational analysis with seeds defined by parcels in a whole-brain RSFC-based parcellation (Ma et al., 2016). These characteristic RSFC patterns were used as the reference patterns. Subsequently, based on the notion that the BOLD co-activation patterns of single rsfMRI frames represent their RSFC patterns (Liu et al., 2013; Liu and Duyn, 2013), each rsfMRI frame was matched to one of the 40 reference RSFC patterns that had the highest spatial similarity to the BOLD co-activation pattern of the frame. This step generated a time sequence of characteristic RSFC patterns for each rsfMRI run. Temporal transitions between every pair of RSFC patterns were then counted, which created a RSFC pattern transition matrix. A weighted directed transition network was constructed by thresholding this transition matrix, and was analyzed using graph theory. The same approach was also applied to human rsfMRI data to examine the translational value of the findings in rats. A schematic illustration of these procedures is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Characteristic RSFC patterns in the awake rat brain

An example of a characteristic RSFC pattern is shown in Figure 2, and the other 39 characteristic RSFC patterns are shown in Figure 2—figure supplements 1–5. As the whole-brain parcellation scheme we adopted maximized within-parcel and minimized cross-parcel RSFC profile similarity, these 40 group-level seed-based RSFC maps represented a set of characteristic RSFC patterns in the awake rat brain, and were used as the reference patterns. Notably, the number 40 was arbitrarily selected as an example of low-dimensionality parcellation of the rat brain. Similar analysis can be applied using other parcel numbers.

Figure 2 with 5 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2 (right panel) also shows the averaged pattern of rsfMRI frames that were matched to the reference RSFC pattern, which demonstrated high reminiscence between the BOLD co-activation pattern of single rsfMRI frames and the RSFC pattern it corresponded to (correlation coefficient = 0.91).

Reproducible temporal transitions between RSFC patterns

We first demonstrated that temporal transitions between RSFC patterns were highly reproducible at the group level. We randomly split all rats into two subgroups and obtained the transition matrix for each subgroup. Both matrices exhibited high similarity (Figure 3a), reflected by a significant correlation (r = 0.86, p ≈ 0) between the corresponding off-diagonal entries. To control for the possible bias that transitions between similar RSFC patterns may have a higher chance to occur in both subgroups, which can inflate the reproducibility, we regressed out the spatial similarities between reference RSFC patterns from both transition matrices. The reproducibility remained high after regression, with a significant correlation value of 0.77 (p ≈ 0, Figure 3b). Taken together, these results suggest that transitions between RSFC patterns are not random but follow specific temporal sequences in awake rats, and these transition sequences are not dictated by the similarity between RSFC patterns.

Figure 3 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

To further examine whether reproducible RSFC pattern transitions were dominated by a small portion of rats, we assessed the reproducibility of RSFC pattern transitions for each individual animal by computing Pearson correlation between each individual-level transition matrix and the group-level transition matrix. Fisher Z-transformed correlation values were then averaged across rats. Our data showed a significant individual-level reproducibility (mean (±SD)=0.57 (±0.14), p ≈ 0). These results collectively indicate that nonrandom RSFC pattern transitions are a characteristic feature in awake rats.

To rule out the possibility that RSFC pattern transitions were caused by head motion (Laumann et al., 2016), we conducted several additional analyses. First, we re-evaluated the reproducibility of RSFC transitions between two subgroups of rats with relatively high and low motion, respectively. Rats in the first subgroup all had the motion level below the median, quantified by framewise displacement (FD). Rats in the second subgroup all had the motion level above the median. The mean (±SD) FD of the below- and above-median subgroups were 0.037 (±0.024) mm and 0.054 (±0.033) mm, respectively. Transition matrices were obtained in these two subgroups, respectively. Comparing these two transition matrices yielded a reproducibility of 0.786 with regression of RSFC pattern similarities, and 0.872 without regression of RSFC pattern similarities (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), which is similar to the reproducibility assessed based on a random division to subgroups (0.77 and 0.86 with and without regression of RSFC pattern similarities, respectively, Figure 3). In addition, the transition matrices from both subgroups were highly consistent with those in subgroups randomly divided (Figure 3). To statistically test whether the reproducibility using motion-based division to subgroups was different from that based on random divisions, we repeated random subgroup divisions 10000 times. Mean reproducibility (±SD) across all 10000 trials was 0.876 (±0.010) and 0.791 (±0.017) without and with regression of RSFC pattern similarities, respectively. Figure 3—figure supplement 2 shows the distributions of the reproducibility between randomly divided subgroups across all trials. This data demonstrated that the reproducibility using motion-based division to subgroups was not statistically different from the reproducibility based on random division regardless whether RSFC pattern similarities were regressed out (p=0.75) or not (p=0.67). These results indicate that high reproducibility in RSFC pattern transitions was not attributed to head motion.

In the second analysis, we directly compared the motion level between rsfMRI frames involved in RSFC pattern transitions versus those that were not in transitions. All rsfMRI frames analyzed were categorized into two groups. The first group included frames whose preceding and/or successive frame corresponded to a different RSFC pattern (i.e. in transitions). The second group included frames whose preceding and successive frames were the same RSFC pattern (i.e. not in transition). These two groups of rsfMRI frames showed consistent motion levels, quantified by their FD values (p=0.44, two-sample t-test), again indicating that RSFC pattern transitions were not triggered by head motion. To further test whether some RSFC pattern transitions were induced by head motion, we measured the head motion during each transition and compared the mean head motion level for each transition sequence and the occurrence count of this transition sequence. Specifically, we calculated the mean FD for transitions between every two RSFC patterns. This calculation yielded a 40 × 40 matrix, in which each element quantified the mean FD for each transition sequence (e.g. element (i,j) of this matrix measured the mean FD for the transition from RSFC pattern i to RSFC pattern j). Our data showed that the correlation between this transition FD matrix and the RSFC pattern transition matrix was minimal (r = −0.034), suggesting that the mean head motion level during each transition sequence did not predict the occurrence count of this transition sequence. This result further supported that RSFC pattern transitions were independent of head motion, and RSFC transitions did not follow head motion.

To examine whether our results were dependent on the motion censoring threshold selected (FD <0.2 mm), we reanalyzed our data using a more stringent censoring threshold (FC <0.1 mm). At this threshold and also keeping all other motion control criteria identical, very similar RSFC pattern transition matrices were obtained (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). The correlations between the RSFC pattern transition matrices at FD <0.1 mm and those at FD <0.2 mm were 0.83 and 0.88 with and without regression of RSFC pattern similarities, respectively, suggesting that our results were robust and insensitive to the motion censoring threshold applied.

Within- and between-brain system transitions

Figure 4 shows the group-level transition matrix thresholded using a permutation test (p<0.05, FDR corrected). Rows/columns in the transition matrix were arranged based on the brain system that the seed region of the reference RSFC pattern belonged to. Transitions between RSFC patterns tended to occur within the same brain system, as shown by a relatively denser distribution of near-diagonal nonzero elements in the matrix. However, cross-system transitions such as striatal-thalamic, striatal-somatosensory, striatal-prefrontal, striatal-hippocampal, hippocampal-amygdala, amygdala-motor transitions were observed.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Organization of RSFC pattern transitions

A directed weighted graph of the RSFC pattern transition network was constructed based on the group-level thresholded transition matrix (Figure 4), as shown in Figure 5. The number of edges was 242, yielding a connection density of 15.5%. The transition network exhibited a prominent community structure with nine modules identified using the Louvain community detection algorithm (Vincent et al., 2008), suggesting that RSFC patterns belonging to the same modules had a higher probability to transit between each other than RSFC patterns across modules. The corresponding seed regions of RSFC patterns were color coded based on the community affiliations (Figure 5 inlet). Module one primarily covered hippocampal and retrohippocampal networks as well as caudal visual networks. Module two included caudal midbrain networks. Module three was comprised of brainstem and rostral midbrain networks. Module four covered rostral visual, amygdala, hypothalamic as well as motor and olfactory networks. Module five was dominated by auditory and somatosensory networks. Module six captured posterior ventral thalamic networks. Module seven included anterior thalamic networks. Module eight covered striatal and prefrontal networks. Module nine mainly included anterior cingulate cortex network. Networks from the same system usually fell into the same community, again indicating transitions between RSFC patterns frequently occurred within the same brain system. However, networks from different systems were also observed in the same modules, which highlights the importance of cross-system transitions.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

By quantifying the node-specific graph measures of node strength, betweenness centrality, characteristic path length and local clustering coefficient, hub nodes (i.e. pivotal RSFC patterns) in the graph were identified. Six RSFC patterns were identified as hubs in rats (hub score ≥3) including the networks of retrosplenial cortex, dorsal superior and inferior colliculi, hippocampus, anterior ventral thalamus, striatum and motor cortex. Figure 6 shows the seed regions of RSFC patterns with hub score ≥1, color coded based on the hub score. No color was given to seed regions of RSFC patterns with hub score = 0.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Figure 7 shows RSFC pattern transitions of four representative hubs (red nodes), demonstrating the pivotal role of these patterns in RSFC temporal transitions. The majority of transitions between hubs and other RSFC patterns were bidirectional. Figure 7a shows transitions of the hub network of the superior and inferior colliculi with the networks of the periaqueductal gray, hippocampus, dorsal thalamus, hypothalamus, caudal visual cortex and motor areas. Figure 7b demonstrates the transitions between the hippocampus network (hub) and the RSFC networks of the superior and inferior colliculi, hippocampus/retrohippocampus, caudal visual cortex, as well as prefrontal and orbital cortices. Figure 7c displays transitions between the hub network of the anterior ventral thalamus and the RSFC networks of the brainstem, midbrain, dorsal CA1, dorsal thalamus, posterior ventral thalamus, dorsal caudate-putamen (CPu), olfactory tubercle, and orbital cortex. Figure 7d illustrates the transitions between the hub network of the ventral CPu, and the RSFC networks of the brainstem and olfactory tubercle, as well as infralimbic, prelimbic, and orbital cortices. Taken together, these results indicate that hub RSFC patterns were centralized patterns that play a pivotal role in transitions with other RSFC patterns involving multiple brain systems.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

RSFC pattern transitions in humans

To assess whether temporal transitions between RSFC patterns were also nonrandom in humans, we applied the same analysis to rsfMRI data from 812 human subjects in the HCP. Each frame was matched to one of 333 characteristic RSFC patterns defined by a well-established RSFC-based parcellation in humans (Gordon et al., 2016), and the number of transitions between every two RSFC patterns was counted for each subject. All subjects were then randomly split into two subgroups (406 subjects in each subgroup). The reproducibility between two subgroups was 0.9955 (without regression of seed map similarities, Figure 8a), and 0.9954 (with the regression of seed map similarities, Figure 8b). To assess the reproducibility at the individual level, the correlation between the transition matrix of each individual subject versus the group-level transition matrix was calculated. The mean correlation (±SD) across all subjects was 0.60 (±0.05). All these results were highly consistent with our findings in awake rats, suggesting that nonrandom transitions between RSFC patterns are conserved across species and might represent a characteristic feature of the mammalian brain.

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

The group-level transition matrix obtained from all 812 human subjects was thresholded using the same permutation test (p<0.05, FDR corrected), as shown in Figure 9. Rows/columns of the RSFC transition matrix were grouped based on the brain system of the seed region. Similar to RSFC pattern transitions in rats, transitions between RSFC patterns in humans tended to occur within the same brain system, indicated by a denser distribution of near-diagonal nonzero elements in the matrix. However, considerable across-system RSFC pattern transitions were also evident.

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

The hub score of each RSFC pattern was calculated in the same way as the rat data. Figure 10 showed seed regions of RSFC patterns with hub score ≥1, color coded based on the hub score. Seed regions of RSFC patterns with hub score = 0 were not given any color. Our results demonstrated that the human RSFC pattern transitions contain multiple hubs (hub score ≥3) in separate brain systems including default-mode (five nodes), cingulo-opercular (eight nodes), dorsal attention (two nodes), ventral attention (four nodes), fronto-parietal (four nodes), parietal memory (one node) and visual (five nodes) networks. Interestingly, these hub patterns were predominantly integrative networks.

Figure 10

Download asset Open asset

In the present study, we investigated temporal sequential transitions between intrinsic brain activity patterns in the awake rat and human brain. We showed that transitions between RSFC patterns exhibited high reproducibility across animals and were significantly above chance (Figures 3 and 4). In addition, the RSFC pattern transition network was constructed using the thresholded transition matrix (Figure 4), and its topological organization including the community structure (Figure 5) and hubness (Figure 6) was evaluated. Moreover, the transitions of four representative hub RSFC patterns in rats were demonstrated (Figure 7). Importantly, non-random RSFC pattern transitions were also observed in humans (Figure 8), and the organization of the human transition network was further analyzed using the same graph analysis approach (Figures 9 and 10). Taken together, the present study for the first time characterized the temporal organization between successive brain connectivity configurations. It demonstrates that spontaneous brain activity was not only far from random spatially, but also far from random temporally. Similar results in rats and humans indicate that this feature might be well conserved across species. These data collectively have provided new insight into understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of spontaneous activity in the mammalian brain.

1. 1. Van Essen DC
   2. Smith SM
   3. Barch DM
   4. Behrens TE
   5. Yacoub E
   6. Ugurbil K

   (2013) The Human Connectome Project S1200 Data Release

   Open access dataset available from ConnectomeDB (https://db.humanconnectome.org/app/template/Login.vm). Account registration is required and access to certain data elements such as family structure is subject to restricted use terms (please see http://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/data-use-terms).

   https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/document/1200-subjects-data-release

1. 1. Allen EA
   2. Damaraju E
   3. Plis SM
   4. Erhardt EB
   5. Eichele T
   6. Calhoun VD

   (2014) Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state

   Cerebral Cortex 24:663–676.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs352

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Allen EA
   2. Erhardt EB
   3. Damaraju E
   4. Gruner W
   5. Segall JM
   6. Silva RF
   7. Havlicek M
   8. Rachakonda S
   9. Fries J
   10. Kalyanam R
   11. Michael AM
   12. Caprihan A
   13. Turner JA
   14. Eichele T
   15. Adelsheim S
   16. Bryan AD
   17. Bustillo J
   18. Clark VP
   19. Feldstein Ewing SW
   20. Filbey F
   21. Ford CC
   22. Hutchison K
   23. Jung RE
   24. Kiehl KA
   25. Kodituwakku P
   26. Komesu YM
   27. Mayer AR
   28. Pearlson GD
   29. Phillips JP
   30. Sadek JR
   31. Stevens M
   32. Teuscher U
   33. Thoma RJ
   34. Calhoun VD

   (2011) A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting-state networks

   Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 5:2.

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2011.00002

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Beckmann CF
   2. DeLuca M
   3. Devlin JT
   4. Smith SM

   (2005) Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis

   Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360:1001–1013.

   https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1634

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bergmann E
   2. Zur G
   3. Bershadsky G
   4. Kahn I

   (2016) The organization of mouse and human cortico-hippocampal networks estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity

   Cerebral Cortex 26:4497–4512.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw327

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Biswal B
   2. Yetkin FZ
   3. Haughton VM
   4. Hyde JS

   (1995) Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI

   Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 34:537–541.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910340409

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bullmore E
   2. Sporns O

   (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems

   Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10:186–198.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2575

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Chan RW
   2. Leong ATL
   3. Ho LC
   4. Gao PP
   5. Wong EC
   6. Dong CM
   7. Wang X
   8. He J
   9. Chan YS
   10. Lim LW
   11. Wu EX
   12. Lc H
   13. Ex W

   (2017) Low-frequency hippocampal-cortical activity drives brain-wide resting-state functional MRI connectivity

   PNAS 114:E6972–E6981.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703309114

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Chang C
   2. Glover GH

   (2010) Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI

   NeuroImage 50:81–98.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.011

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Chang C
   2. Leopold DA
   3. Schölvinck ML
   4. Mandelkow H
   5. Picchioni D
   6. Liu X
   7. Ye FQ
   8. Turchi JN
   9. Duyn JH

   (2016a) Tracking brain arousal fluctuations with fMRI

   PNAS 113:4518–4523.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520613113

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Chang C
    2. Liu Z
    3. Chen MC
    4. Liu X
    5. Duyn JH

    (2013) EEG correlates of time-varying BOLD functional connectivity

    NeuroImage 72:227–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Chang PC
    2. Procissi D
    3. Bao Q
    4. Centeno MV
    5. Baria A
    6. Apkarian AV

    (2016b) Novel method for functional brain imaging in awake minimally restrained rats

    Journal of Neurophysiology 116:61–80.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01078.2015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Damoiseaux JS
    2. Rombouts SA
    3. Barkhof F
    4. Scheltens P
    5. Stam CJ
    6. Smith SM
    7. Beckmann CF

    (2006) Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects

    PNAS 103:13848–13853.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601417103

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Feinberg DA
    2. Moeller S
    3. Smith SM
    4. Auerbach E
    5. Ramanna S
    6. Gunther M
    7. Glasser MF
    8. Miller KL
    9. Ugurbil K
    10. Yacoub E

    (2010) Multiplexed echo planar imaging for sub-second whole brain FMRI and fast diffusion imaging

    PLoS One 5:e15710.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015710

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Ferenczi EA
    2. Zalocusky KA
    3. Liston C
    4. Grosenick L
    5. Warden MR
    6. Amatya D
    7. Katovich K
    8. Mehta H
    9. Patenaude B
    10. Ramakrishnan C
    11. Kalanithi P
    12. Etkin A
    13. Knutson B
    14. Glover GH
    15. Deisseroth K

    (2016) Prefrontal cortical regulation of brainwide circuit dynamics and reward-related behavior

    Science 351:aac9698.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9698

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Fox MD
    2. Raichle ME

    (2007) Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8:700–711.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2201

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Fox MD
    2. Snyder AZ
    3. Vincent JL
    4. Corbetta M
    5. Van Essen DC
    6. Raichle ME

    (2005) The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks

    PNAS 102:9673–9678.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504136102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Gao YR
    2. Ma Y
    3. Zhang Q
    4. Winder AT
    5. Liang Z
    6. Antinori L
    7. Drew PJ
    8. Zhang N

    (2017) Time to wake up: Studying neurovascular coupling and brain-wide circuit function in the un-anesthetized animal

    NeuroImage 153:382–398.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.069

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Genovese CR
    2. Lazar NA
    3. Nichols T

    (2002) Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate

    NeuroImage 15:870–878.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1037

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Glasser MF
    2. Sotiropoulos SN
    3. Wilson JA
    4. Coalson TS
    5. Fischl B
    6. Andersson JL
    7. Xu J
    8. Jbabdi S
    9. Webster M
    10. Polimeni JR
    11. Van Essen DC
    12. Jenkinson M
    13. Consortium WU-MH
    14. WU-Minn HCP Consortium

    (2013) The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project

    NeuroImage 80:105–124.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Gordon EM
    2. Laumann TO
    3. Adeyemo B
    4. Huckins JF
    5. Kelley WM
    6. Petersen SE

    (2016) Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations

    Cerebral Cortex 26:288–303.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu239

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Grandjean J
    2. Preti MG
    3. Bolton TAW
    4. Buerge M
    5. Seifritz E
    6. Pryce CR
    7. Van De Ville D
    8. Rudin M

    (2017) Dynamic reorganization of intrinsic functional networks in the mouse brain

    NeuroImage 152:497–508.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Griffanti L
    2. Salimi-Khorshidi G
    3. Beckmann CF
    4. Auerbach EJ
    5. Douaud G
    6. Sexton CE
    7. Zsoldos E
    8. Ebmeier KP
    9. Filippini N
    10. Mackay CE
    11. Moeller S
    12. Xu J
    13. Yacoub E
    14. Baselli G
    15. Ugurbil K
    16. Miller KL
    17. Smith SM

    (2014) ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging

    NeuroImage 95:232–247.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.034

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Gurney KN
    2. Humphries MD
    3. Redgrave P

    (2015) A new framework for cortico-striatal plasticity: behavioural theory meets in vitro data at the reinforcement-action interface

    PLoS Biology 13:e1002034.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002034

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Hahn TT
    2. McFarland JM
    3. Berberich S
    4. Sakmann B
    5. Mehta MR

    (2012) Spontaneous persistent activity in entorhinal cortex modulates cortico-hippocampal interaction in vivo

    Nature Neuroscience 15:1531–1538.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3236

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Hutchison RM
    2. Womelsdorf T
    3. Allen EA
    4. Bandettini PA
    5. Calhoun VD
    6. Corbetta M
    7. Della Penna S
    8. Duyn JH
    9. Glover GH
    10. Gonzalez-Castillo J
    11. Handwerker DA
    12. Keilholz S
    13. Kiviniemi V
    14. Leopold DA
    15. de Pasquale F
    16. Sporns O
    17. Walter M
    18. Chang C

    (2013a) Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations

    NeuroImage 80:360–378.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Hutchison RM
    2. Womelsdorf T
    3. Gati JS
    4. Everling S
    5. Menon RS

    (2013b) Resting-state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques

    Human Brain Mapping 34:2154–2177.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22058

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Jacomy M
    2. Venturini T
    3. Heymann S
    4. Bastian M

    (2014) ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software

    PLoS One 9:e98679.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Keilholz SD
    2. Magnuson ME
    3. Pan WJ
    4. Willis M
    5. Thompson GJ

    (2013) Dynamic properties of functional connectivity in the rodent

    Brain Connectivity 3:31–40.

    https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2012.0115

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Keilholz SD

    (2014) The neural basis of time-varying resting-state functional connectivity

    Brain Connectivity 4:769–779.

    https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2014.0250

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. King JA
    2. Garelick TS
    3. Brevard ME
    4. Chen W
    5. Messenger TL
    6. Duong TQ
    7. Ferris CF

    (2005) Procedure for minimizing stress for fMRI studies in conscious rats

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 148:154–160.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.04.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Laumann TO
    2. Snyder AZ
    3. Mitra A
    4. Gordon EM
    5. Gratton C
    6. Adeyemo B
    7. Gilmore AW
    8. Nelson SM
    9. Berg JJ
    10. Greene DJ
    11. McCarthy JE
    12. Tagliazucchi E
    13. Laufs H
    14. Schlaggar BL
    15. Dosenbach NUF
    16. Petersen SE

    (2016) On the stability of BOLD fMRI correlations

    Cerebral Cortex 103:.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw265

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Lee K
    2. Holley SM
    3. Shobe JL
    4. Chong NC
    5. Cepeda C
    6. Levine MS
    7. Masmanidis SC

    (2017) Parvalbumin interneurons modulate striatal output and enhance performance during associative learning

    Neuron 93:1451–1463.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.033

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Leong AT
    2. Chan RW
    3. Gao PP
    4. Chan YS
    5. Tsia KK
    6. Yung WH
    7. Wu EX
    8. Ex W

    (2016) Long-range projections coordinate distributed brain-wide neural activity with a specific spatiotemporal profile

    PNAS 113:E8306–E8315.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616361113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Liang Z
    2. King J
    3. Zhang N

    (2011) Uncovering intrinsic connectional architecture of functional networks in awake rat brain

    Journal of Neuroscience 31:3776–3783.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4557-10.2011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Liang Z
    2. King J
    3. Zhang N

    (2012a) Anticorrelated resting-state functional connectivity in awake rat brain

    NeuroImage 59:1190–1199.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Liang Z
    2. King J
    3. Zhang N

    (2012b) Intrinsic organization of the anesthetized brain

    Journal of Neuroscience 32:10183–10191.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1020-12.2012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Liang Z
    2. King J
    3. Zhang N

    (2014) Neuroplasticity to a single-episode traumatic stress revealed by resting-state fMRI in awake rats

    NeuroImage 103:485–491.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.050

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Liang Z
    2. Li T
    3. King J
    4. Zhang N

    (2013) Mapping thalamocortical networks in rat brain using resting-state functional connectivity

    NeuroImage 83:237–244.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Liang Z
    2. Liu X
    3. Zhang N

    (2015) Dynamic resting state functional connectivity in awake and anesthetized rodents

    NeuroImage 104:89–99.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Liu J
    2. Lee HJ
    3. Weitz AJ
    4. Fang Z
    5. Lin P
    6. Choy M
    7. Fisher R
    8. Pinskiy V
    9. Tolpygo A
    10. Mitra P
    11. Schiff N
    12. Lee JH

    (2015) Frequency-selective control of cortical and subcortical networks by central thalamus

    eLife 4:e09215.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09215

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Liu X
    2. Chang C
    3. Duyn JH

    (2013) Decomposition of spontaneous brain activity into distinct fMRI co-activation patterns

    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7:101.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Liu X
    2. Duyn JH

    (2013) Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity

    PNAS 110:4392–4397.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216856110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Liu X
    2. Yanagawa T
    3. Leopold DA
    4. Chang C
    5. Ishida H
    6. Fujii N
    7. Duyn JH

    (2015b) Arousal transitions in sleep, wakefulness, and anesthesia are characterized by an orderly sequence of cortical events

    NeuroImage 116:222–231.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Logothetis NK
    2. Eschenko O
    3. Murayama Y
    4. Augath M
    5. Steudel T
    6. Evrard HC
    7. Besserve M
    8. Oeltermann A

    (2012) Hippocampal-cortical interaction during periods of subcortical silence

    Nature 491:547–553.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11618

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Ma Y
    2. Hamilton C
    3. Zhang N

    (2017) Dynamic connectivity patterns in conscious and unconscious brain

    Brain Connectivity 7:1–12.

    https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2016.0464

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Ma Z
    2. Perez P
    3. Ma Z
    4. Liu Y
    5. Hamilton C
    6. Liang Z
    7. Zhang N

    (2016) Functional atlas of the awake rat brain: A neuroimaging study of rat brain specialization and integration

    NeuroImage.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.007

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Majeed W
    2. Magnuson M
    3. Hasenkamp W
    4. Schwarb H
    5. Schumacher EH
    6. Barsalou L
    7. Keilholz SD

    (2011) Spatiotemporal dynamics of low frequency BOLD fluctuations in rats and humans

    NeuroImage 54:1140–1150.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.030

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Mazzucato L
    2. Fontanini A
    3. La Camera G

    (2015) Dynamics of multistable states during ongoing and evoked cortical activity

    Journal of Neuroscience 35:8214–8231.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4819-14.2015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Mitra A
    2. Snyder AZ
    3. Blazey T
    4. Raichle ME

    (2015) Lag threads organize the brain's intrinsic activity

    PNAS 112:E2235–E2244.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503960112

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Moeller S
    2. Yacoub E
    3. Olman CA
    4. Auerbach E
    5. Strupp J
    6. Harel N
    7. Uğurbil K

    (2010) Multiband multislice GE-EPI at 7 tesla, with 16-fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal whole-brain fMRI

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 63:1144–1153.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22361

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Mohajerani MH
    2. Chan AW
    3. Mohsenvand M
    4. LeDue J
    5. Liu R
    6. McVea DA
    7. Boyd JD
    8. Wang YT
    9. Reimers M
    10. Murphy TH

    (2013) Spontaneous cortical activity alternates between motifs defined by regional axonal projections

    Nature Neuroscience 16:1426–1435.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3499

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Mölle M
    2. Yeshenko O
    3. Marshall L
    4. Sara SJ
    5. Born J

    (2006) Hippocampal sharp wave-ripples linked to slow oscillations in rat slow-wave sleep

    Journal of Neurophysiology 96:62–70.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00014.2006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. Book

    1. Paxinos G

    (2015)

    The Rat Nervous System

    Amsterdam: Academic Press.

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Piray P
    2. Toni I
    3. Cools R

    (2016) Human choice strategy varies with anatomical projections from ventromedial prefrontal cortex to medial striatum

    Journal of Neuroscience 36:2857–2867.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2033-15.2016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Power JD
    2. Barnes KA
    3. Snyder AZ
    4. Schlaggar BL
    5. Petersen SE

    (2012) Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion

    NeuroImage 59:2142–2154.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Preti MG
    2. Bolton TA
    3. Van De Ville D

    (2017) The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives

    NeuroImage 160:41–54.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.061

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Raichle ME
    2. Mintun MA

    (2006) Brain work and brain imaging

    Annual Review of Neuroscience 29:449–476.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112819

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Raichle ME

    (2006) Neuroscience. The brain's dark energy

    Science 314:1249–1250.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134405

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Raichle ME

    (2010) The brain's dark energy

    Scientific American 302:44–49.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0310-44

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Robinson EC
    2. Jbabdi S
    3. Glasser MF
    4. Andersson J
    5. Burgess GC
    6. Harms MP
    7. Smith SM
    8. Van Essen DC
    9. Jenkinson M

    (2014) MSM: a new flexible framework for Multimodal Surface Matching

    NeuroImage 100:414–426.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.069

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Roumis DK
    2. Frank LM

    (2015) Hippocampal sharp-wave ripples in waking and sleeping states

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 35:6–12.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.05.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Salimi-Khorshidi G
    2. Douaud G
    3. Beckmann CF
    4. Glasser MF
    5. Griffanti L
    6. Smith SM

    (2014) Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers

    NeuroImage 90:449–468.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.046

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Setsompop K
    2. Gagoski BA
    3. Polimeni JR
    4. Witzel T
    5. Wedeen VJ
    6. Wald LL

    (2012) Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 67:1210–1224.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23097

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Smith SM
    2. Fox PT
    3. Miller KL
    4. Glahn DC
    5. Fox PM
    6. Mackay CE
    7. Filippini N
    8. Watkins KE
    9. Toro R
    10. Laird AR
    11. Beckmann CF

    (2009) Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest

    PNAS 106:13040–13045.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905267106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Tagliazucchi E
    2. von Wegner F
    3. Morzelewski A
    4. Brodbeck V
    5. Laufs H

    (2012) Dynamic BOLD functional connectivity in humans and its electrophysiological correlates

    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:339.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00339

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. van den Heuvel MP
    2. Mandl RC
    3. Stam CJ
    4. Kahn RS
    5. Hulshoff Pol HE

    (2010) Aberrant frontal and temporal complex network structure in schizophrenia: a graph theoretical analysis

    Journal of Neuroscience 30:15915–15926.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2874-10.2010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Van Essen DC
    2. Smith SM
    3. Barch DM
    4. Behrens TE
    5. Yacoub E
    6. Ugurbil K
    7. WU-Minn HCP Consortium

    (2013) The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview

    NeuroImage 80:62–79.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Vidaurre D
    2. Smith SM
    3. Woolrich MW

    (2017) Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time

    PNAS 114:12827–12832.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705120114

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Vincent DB
    2. Jean-Loup G
    3. Renaud L
    4. Etienne L

    (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008:P10008.

    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Xiao D
    2. Vanni MP
    3. Mitelut CC
    4. Chan AW
    5. LeDue JM
    6. Xie Y
    7. Chen AC
    8. Swindale NV
    9. Murphy TH

    (2017) Mapping cortical mesoscopic networks of single spiking cortical or sub-cortical neurons

    eLife 6:e19976.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19976

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Yoshida K
    2. Mimura Y
    3. Ishihara R
    4. Nishida H
    5. Komaki Y
    6. Minakuchi T
    7. Tsurugizawa T
    8. Mimura M
    9. Okano H
    10. Tanaka KF
    11. Takata N

    (2016) Physiological effects of a habituation procedure for functional MRI in awake mice using a cryogenic radiofrequency probe

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 274:38–48.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.09.013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Zalesky A
    2. Fornito A
    3. Cocchi L
    4. Gollo LL
    5. Breakspear M

    (2014) Time-resolved resting-state brain networks

    PNAS 111:10341–10346.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400181111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Zhang D
    2. Raichle ME

    (2010) Disease and the brain's dark energy

    Nature Reviews Neurology 6:15–28.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2009.198

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Zhang N
    2. Rane P
    3. Huang W
    4. Liang Z
    5. Kennedy D
    6. Frazier JA
    7. King J

    (2010) Mapping resting-state brain networks in conscious animals

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 189:186–196.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Zhiwei Ma

   Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, United States

   Present address

   Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Nanyin Zhang

   Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   nuz2@psu.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5824-9058

• 2,106

  views

• 293

  downloads

• 24

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.