Abstract

The biological properties of pancreatic cancer stem cells (PCSCs) remain incompletely defined and the central regulators are unknown. By bioinformatic analysis of a human PCSC-enriched gene signature, we identified the transcription factor HNF1A as a putative central regulator of PCSC function. Levels of HNF1A and its target genes were found to be elevated in PCSCs and tumorspheres, and depletion of HNF1A resulted in growth inhibition, apoptosis, impaired tumorsphere formation, decreased PCSC marker expression, and downregulation of POU5F1/OCT4 expression. Conversely, HNF1A overexpression increased PCSC marker expression and tumorsphere formation in pancreatic cancer cells and drove PDA cell growth. Importantly, depletion of HNF1A in xenografts impaired tumor growth and depleted PCSC marker-positive cells in vivo. Finally, we established an HNF1A-dependent gene signature in PDA cells that significantly correlated with reduced survivability in patients. These findings identify HNF1A as a central transcriptional regulator of PCSC properties and novel oncogene in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Data availability

All data from this study is available without limitations (GSE108151).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas
    (2017) Cancer Genome Atlas
    No restrictions; all data available without limitations.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ethan V Abel

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2922-617X
  2. Masashi Goto

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Brian Magnuson

    Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Saji Abraham

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nikita Ramanathan

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Emily Hotaling

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Anthony A Alaniz

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Chandan Kumar-Sinha

    Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michele L Dziubinski

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sumithra Urs

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Lidong Wang

    Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jiaqi Shi

    Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Meghna Waghray

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Mats Ljungman

    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Howard C Crawford

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Diane M Simeone

    Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    diane.simeone@nyumc.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5142-3087

Funding

Gershenson Pancreatic Cancer Fund

  • Diane M Simeone

SKY Foundation

  • Howard C Crawford
  • Diane M Simeone

American Cancer Society (127662-PF-15-033-01-DDC)

  • Ethan V Abel

Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (16-70-25-ABEL)

  • Ethan V Abel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard M White, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal protocols were approved by University Committee for the Use and Care of Animals (UCUCA) at The University of Michigan. The animal welfare assurance number for this study is A3114-01. Every effort was made throughout this study to minimize stress to and suffering of animal subjects.

Human subjects: Patient samples were collected under a protocol approved by the IRB at the The University of Michigan. All patients gave informed consent. The human assurance number for this study is FWA00004969.

Version history

  1. Received: November 29, 2017
  2. Accepted: August 1, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 3, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 4, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Abel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,297
    Page views
  • 641
    Downloads
  • 46
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ethan V Abel
  2. Masashi Goto
  3. Brian Magnuson
  4. Saji Abraham
  5. Nikita Ramanathan
  6. Emily Hotaling
  7. Anthony A Alaniz
  8. Chandan Kumar-Sinha
  9. Michele L Dziubinski
  10. Sumithra Urs
  11. Lidong Wang
  12. Jiaqi Shi
  13. Meghna Waghray
  14. Mats Ljungman
  15. Howard C Crawford
  16. Diane M Simeone
(2018)
HNF1A is a novel oncogene that regulates human pancreatic cancer stem cell properties
eLife 7:e33947.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33947

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33947

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Julian J A Hoving, Elizabeth Harford-Wright ... Alison C Lloyd
    Research Article

    Collective cell migration is fundamental for the development of organisms and in the adult, for tissue regeneration and in pathological conditions such as cancer. Migration as a coherent group requires the maintenance of cell-cell interactions, while contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL), a local repulsive force, can propel the group forward. Here we show that the cell-cell interaction molecule, N-cadherin, regulates both adhesion and repulsion processes during rat Schwann cell (SC) collective migration, which is required for peripheral nerve regeneration. However, distinct from its role in cell-cell adhesion, the repulsion process is independent of N-cadherin trans-homodimerisation and the associated adherens junction complex. Rather, the extracellular domain of N-cadherin is required to present the repulsive Slit2/Slit3 signal at the cell-surface. Inhibiting Slit2/Slit3 signalling inhibits CIL and subsequently collective Schwann cell migration, resulting in adherent, nonmigratory cell clusters. Moreover, analysis of ex vivo explants from mice following sciatic nerve injury showed that inhibition of Slit2 decreased Schwann cell collective migration and increased clustering of Schwann cells within the nerve bridge. These findings provide insight into how opposing signals can mediate collective cell migration and how CIL pathways are promising targets for inhibiting pathological cell migration.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Johannes Paladini, Annalena Maier ... Stephan Grzesiek
    Research Article

    Abelson tyrosine kinase (Abl) is regulated by the arrangement of its regulatory core, consisting sequentially of the SH3, SH2, and kinase (KD) domains, where an assembled or disassembled core corresponds to low or high kinase activity, respectively. It was recently established that binding of type II ATP site inhibitors, such as imatinib, generates a force from the KD N-lobe onto the SH3 domain and in consequence disassembles the core. Here, we demonstrate that the C-terminal αI-helix exerts an additional force toward the SH2 domain, which correlates both with kinase activity and type II inhibitor-induced disassembly. The αI-helix mutation E528K, which is responsible for the ABL1 malformation syndrome, strongly activates Abl by breaking a salt bridge with the KD C-lobe and thereby increasing the force onto the SH2 domain. In contrast, the allosteric inhibitor asciminib strongly reduces Abl’s activity by fixating the αI-helix and reducing the force onto the SH2 domain. These observations are explained by a simple mechanical model of Abl activation involving forces from the KD N-lobe and the αI-helix onto the KD/SH2SH3 interface.