Abstract

The biological properties of pancreatic cancer stem cells (PCSCs) remain incompletely defined and the central regulators are unknown. By bioinformatic analysis of a human PCSC-enriched gene signature, we identified the transcription factor HNF1A as a putative central regulator of PCSC function. Levels of HNF1A and its target genes were found to be elevated in PCSCs and tumorspheres, and depletion of HNF1A resulted in growth inhibition, apoptosis, impaired tumorsphere formation, decreased PCSC marker expression, and downregulation of POU5F1/OCT4 expression. Conversely, HNF1A overexpression increased PCSC marker expression and tumorsphere formation in pancreatic cancer cells and drove PDA cell growth. Importantly, depletion of HNF1A in xenografts impaired tumor growth and depleted PCSC marker-positive cells in vivo. Finally, we established an HNF1A-dependent gene signature in PDA cells that significantly correlated with reduced survivability in patients. These findings identify HNF1A as a central transcriptional regulator of PCSC properties and novel oncogene in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Data availability

All data from this study is available without limitations (GSE108151).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas
    (2017) Cancer Genome Atlas
    No restrictions; all data available without limitations.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ethan V Abel

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2922-617X
  2. Masashi Goto

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Brian Magnuson

    Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Saji Abraham

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nikita Ramanathan

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Emily Hotaling

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Anthony A Alaniz

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Chandan Kumar-Sinha

    Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michele L Dziubinski

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sumithra Urs

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Lidong Wang

    Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jiaqi Shi

    Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Meghna Waghray

    Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Mats Ljungman

    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Howard C Crawford

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Diane M Simeone

    Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    diane.simeone@nyumc.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5142-3087

Funding

Gershenson Pancreatic Cancer Fund

  • Diane M Simeone

SKY Foundation

  • Howard C Crawford
  • Diane M Simeone

American Cancer Society (127662-PF-15-033-01-DDC)

  • Ethan V Abel

Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (16-70-25-ABEL)

  • Ethan V Abel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard M White, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal protocols were approved by University Committee for the Use and Care of Animals (UCUCA) at The University of Michigan. The animal welfare assurance number for this study is A3114-01. Every effort was made throughout this study to minimize stress to and suffering of animal subjects.

Human subjects: Patient samples were collected under a protocol approved by the IRB at the The University of Michigan. All patients gave informed consent. The human assurance number for this study is FWA00004969.

Version history

  1. Received: November 29, 2017
  2. Accepted: August 1, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 3, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 4, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Abel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,392
    views
  • 650
    downloads
  • 54
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ethan V Abel
  2. Masashi Goto
  3. Brian Magnuson
  4. Saji Abraham
  5. Nikita Ramanathan
  6. Emily Hotaling
  7. Anthony A Alaniz
  8. Chandan Kumar-Sinha
  9. Michele L Dziubinski
  10. Sumithra Urs
  11. Lidong Wang
  12. Jiaqi Shi
  13. Meghna Waghray
  14. Mats Ljungman
  15. Howard C Crawford
  16. Diane M Simeone
(2018)
HNF1A is a novel oncogene that regulates human pancreatic cancer stem cell properties
eLife 7:e33947.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33947

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33947

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Camille Dantzer, Justine Vaché ... Violaine Moreau
    Research Article

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Fang Huang, Zhenwei Dai ... Yang Wang
    Research Article

    Aberrant alternative splicing is well-known to be closely associated with tumorigenesis of various cancers. However, the intricate mechanisms underlying breast cancer metastasis driven by deregulated splicing events remain largely unexplored. Here, we unveiled that RBM7 is decreased in lymph node and distant organ metastases of breast cancer as compared to primary lesions and low expression of RBM7 is correlated with the reduced disease-free survival of breast cancer patients. Breast cancer cells with RBM7 depletion exhibited an increased potential for lung metastasis compared to scramble control cells. The absence of RBM7 stimulated breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and angiogenesis. Mechanistically, RBM7 controlled the splicing switch of MFGE8, favoring the production of the predominant isoform of MFGE8, MFGE8-L. This resulted in the attenuation of STAT1 phosphorylation and alterations in cell adhesion molecules. MFGE8-L exerted an inhibitory effect on the migratory and invasive capability of breast cancer cells, while the truncated isoform MFGE8-S, which lack the second F5/8 type C domain had the opposite effect. In addition, RBM7 negatively regulates the NF-κB cascade and an NF-κB inhibitor could obstruct the increase in HUVEC tube formation caused by RBM7 silencing. Clinically, we noticed a positive correlation between RBM7 expression and MFGE8 exon7 inclusion in breast cancer tissues, providing new mechanistic insights for molecular-targeted therapy in combating breast cancer.